Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
2.
Z Rheumatol ; 75(4): 372-80, 2016 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26820723

ABSTRACT

Testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by the indirect immunofluorescence test (IFT) is regarded as a fundamental serological screening method for diagnosing connective tissue diseases (CTD). In the case of a negative result exclusion of certain CTDs is indicated, especially systemic lupus erythematosus, and a positive ANA result is the starting point for further tests aimed at finding disease-specific autoantibodies. The recently discovered antibodies against lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF/DSF70) deviate from the normal interpretation pattern in ANA diagnostics. These antibodies give rise to a characteristic dense fine speckled (DSF) immunofluorescence pattern in IFT and target the ubiquitously expressed nuclear stress protector protein LEDGFp75. They can be detected, sometimes in high titers, not only in patients with diverse disorders of the skin or eyes and with neoplasms but also in persons with relatively mild or unspecific complaints and even in apparently healthy individuals; however, they are less frequent in CTD. These anti-LEDGF antibodies can be found in all age groups with a tendency to a higher prevalence in younger people and the frequency does not increase in advanced age. The vast majority of anti-LEDGF carriers are female. The CTDs with isolated anti-LEDGF antibodies, i. e. unaccompanied by autoantibodies typical for the respective CTD, are extremely rare. Detection of ANA exclusively with a DSF immunofluorescence pattern and confirmed by a specific anti-LEDGF binding assay, does not therefore indicate the presence of CTD but is indicative of exclusion of systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis and an ANA-associated overlap syndrome, similar to a completely negative ANA result.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/immunology , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Antibodies, Antinuclear/immunology , Immunoassay/methods , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Transcription Factors/immunology , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/blood , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Rheumatic Diseases/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity , Transcription Factors/blood
5.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 134(24): 1278-82, 2009 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19499499

ABSTRACT

Systemic autoimmune diseases are characterized by the presence of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA). Diluted patient sera are typically used to screen for the presence of ANA by immunfluorescence microscopy with fixed HEp-2 cells. Despite high-quality test kits, reports of different laboratories frequently present controversial results. This article recommends unified processing and interpretation of HEp-2 based screening for autoantibodies. Suggestions are made for the selection of high-quality test kits, optimized processing and diagnostic procedures. In addition to a relevant clinical diagnosis and an experienced laboratory specialist, the following procedure is highly recommended to achieve good laboratory practice: Initial HEp-2 based screening by indirect immunofluorescence, starting with a 1:80 serum dilution, and evaluation in a bright fluorescence microscope, pathological values from a titer of 1:160 upwards, internal quality checks and unified interpretation. We aim to improve diagnosis and care of patients with autoimmune diseases as a central focus of the European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI).


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/analysis , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Cell Line , Humans , Microscopy, Fluorescence
6.
Z Rheumatol ; 66(3): 206, 208-11, 2007 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17354003

ABSTRACT

For systemic sclerosis, laboratory tests can play a supplementary role to clinical investigations, imaging techniques and functional tests. Typical autoantibodies support early diagnosis and help in assigning patients to subgroups of the disease; negative results for antinuclear antibodies suggest exclusion of the diagnosis. To detect organ involvement and comorbidity, the laboratory contributes by clinical chemistry, in certain cases by histopathological findings and by the cytological assessment of broncho-alveolar lavage fluid. Inflammatory parameters are of minor importance. Multiple autoantibody determinations in the course of the disease are not yet helpful. Numerous additional laboratory parameters are of value for investigating pathogenesis, but have not yet been generally introduced into the routine diagnostics of systemic sclerosis.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/trends , Scleroderma, Systemic/diagnosis , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Germany , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends
7.
Z Rheumatol ; 65(4): 279-84, 2006 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16788839

ABSTRACT

In systemic sclerosis (SSc) and its variants, autoantibodies are the best known immunological aberration. In more than 95% of the patients, antinuclear antibodies or other autoantibodies can be detected. In about 90% of SSc patients with antinuclear antibodies, scleroderma associated autoantibodies highly specific for systemic sclerosis are found. These autoantibodies usually exclude each other in individual patients, and they are detectable early, persisting during the course of the disease. SSc patients characterized by scleroderma associated autoantibodies belong to disease subsets which are relatively homogeneous in clinical, genetic and prognostic terms. Besides these diagnostically relevant autoantibodies, numerous additional ones have also been described. These are neither SSc specific nor mutually exclusive, and their antigens have only been partially characterized. Some, however, are thought to be relevant to the as yet unanswered question of whether autoantibodies are directly involved in SSc pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Antibody Specificity/immunology , DNA Topoisomerases, Type I/immunology , DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases/immunology , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Progression , Humans , Prognosis , Scleroderma, Systemic/diagnosis
9.
Z Rheumatol ; 61(4): 355-66, 2002 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12426841

ABSTRACT

Distinct, especially non-organ specific autoantibodies are closely associated with connective tissue diseases and in many cases are vital elements of the laboratory diagnostics of these disorders. Their inclusion into the common classification criteria is quite heterogeneous. None of the autoantibodies is 100% specific for a certain disease, and diagnostic specificity is usually reduced when application of the test is broadened and when more sensitive methods are used. In individual patients with scleroderma and/or myositis related diseases, typical autoantibodies usually exclude each other; however, there are characteristical exceptions from that rule. Evidence is accumulating that autoantibodies are detectable early during disease course and often even in preclinical stages. Variations of antibody levels during disease course are different in different systems and in some cases have been shown to correlate with disease activity. Negative results in sensitive screening assays are often essential to exclude a connective tissue disease. Although it has certain drawbacks and is being disputed, the indirect immunofluorescence assay with HEp-2 cells still serves as a standard first step in connective tissue disease-related antibody detection. In case of positive results in this assay, further steps should be performed carefully, considering the signs and symptoms of the suspected disease as well as the immunofluorescence pattern, and being aware of the peculiarities and limitations of the assay methods used.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Collagen Diseases/diagnosis , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Collagen Diseases/immunology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests
11.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 61(2): 121-7, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11796397

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antibodies targeting DNA topoisomerase I (ATA) or centromere proteins (ACA) are associated with clinical subsets of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The occurrence of those autoantibodies is considered to be mutually exclusive. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and immunogenetic data of three patients who are co-expressing both antibodies, and then review previous publications. METHODS: Both antibodies were detected by different methods, including indirect immunofluorescence technique, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, immunodiffusion, and immunoblot. Patients were HLA typed by serological and molecular genetic methods. Data were extracted from published reports for comparison. The search for published studies was through Medline and other database research programmes. RESULTS: During routine laboratory diagnostics over several years three patients with scleroderma and coincidence of ATA and ACA were identified: patient 1 with diffuse SSc, Raynaud's phenomenon, puffy fingers and fingertip necrosis, contractures, and calcinosis; patient 2 with diffuse SSc, Raynaud's phenomenon, oedema of the hands, and interstitial calcinosis of hands, knees, and shoulders, and pulmonary fibrosis; patient 3 with scleroderma of hands, forearms, and face, Raynaud's phenomenon, puffy fingers, finger contractures, fingertip necrosis, and calcinosis. All three patients studied were carriers of HLA alleles known to be associated with these autoantibodies. In serial measurements the concentrations of the two antibodies showed independent or even reverse fluctuations. Screening of 100 patients with ACA for ATA and vice versa disclosed no further patients with coincidence of these antibodies. Twenty eight cases of ACA/ATA coexistence in 5423 patients (0.52%) with SSc or SSc associated symptoms were found in an analysis of published studies. CONCLUSION: The expression of ATA and ACA is not totally mutually exclusive, but coincidence is rare (<1% of patients with SSc). Patients with both autoantibodies often have diffuse scleroderma and show immunogenetic features of both antibody defined subsets of SSc.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Centromere/immunology , DNA Topoisomerases, Type I/immunology , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Adult , Humans , Immunologic Tests , Middle Aged
13.
J Mol Med (Berl) ; 79(12): 722-31, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11862315

ABSTRACT

Autoimmune diseases arise from a host's immune response against self-antigens. The triggering events ultimately resulting in such a break of tolerance are largely unknown. It is also not known why certain molecular structures become autoantigenic. The hypothesis has long been proposed that autoimmune diseases arise from molecular mimicry followed by an epitope spreading mechanism. Recently we have shown that the anti-centromere-associated protein A (CENP-A) immune response is directed against an autoantigenic motif, G/A-P-R/S-R-R, that occurs three times in the N-terminal amino acids of CENP-A. In the present study we used mutational analyses with immobilized oligopeptide arrays to identify the amino acids in this motif that are responsible for antibody binding. In particular, we found that surprisingly mimotopes of this motif are present in a vast number of autoantigens and in the Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1. With affinity-purified antibodies we show that the antibodies against this motif are polyclonal and cross-react with several autoantigens. However, in these autoantigens this motif often represents a cryptic epitope explaining the obvious conflict between our results and the known high specificity of autoantibodies. The presence of such an ubiquitous structure on autoantigens suggests a novel peptide-driven mechanism for the evolution of autoantibodies.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoantigens/immunology , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/immunology , Epitopes/immunology , Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens/immunology , Amino Acid Motifs/genetics , Amino Acid Motifs/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Centromere Protein A , Cross Reactions , DNA Mutational Analysis , Epitopes/genetics , Humans , Peptides/chemistry , Peptides/immunology , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
14.
J Mol Med (Berl) ; 78(8): 460-7, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11097115

ABSTRACT

The major targets recognized by anti-centromere autoantibodies are the three centromere-associated proteins (CENPs) A, B, and C, with apparent molecular masses of 19, 80, and 140 kDa, respectively. Previously a major epitope region on the 19-kDa CENP-A antigen was identified by synthesis of a soluble synthetic 15-mer peptide (amino acids 3-17) to be used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blot competition assays. However, no systematic experimental scanning for epitope regions on the CENP-A autoantigen has yet been performed. In this study we scanned the complete CENP-A amino acid sequence for epitopes using 19 previously characterized autoimmune-sera. Overlapping peptides 15 amino acids in length and offset by three amino acids were synthesized on activated membranes, covering the whole CENP-A autoantigen. Probing of the membranes with various anti-centromere sera showed that all epitopes are clustered in the N-terminal 45 amino acids. For fine-mapping of this autoreactive region the N-terminus of CENP-A (amino acids 1-45) was scanned again by probing overlapping 15-mer, 12-mer, 10-mer, 8-mer, 7-mer, 6-mer, and 5-mer peptides, all offset by one amino acid, with anti-centromere sera. In this way we localized two epitope core regions within the N-terminal 45 amino acids, one covering amino acids 2-17, recognized by 17 sera, and the other covering amino acids 22-38, recognized by 18 sera. One serum did not react with CENP-A at all. Several sera seem to recognize overlapping individual epitopes within these two epitope core regions. All sera, however, recognize a sequence motif G/A-P-R/S-R-R.


Subject(s)
Autoantigens/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/immunology , Adult , Amino Acid Sequence , Antibody Formation , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Autoantigens/blood , Autoantigens/chemistry , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Centromere/immunology , Centromere Protein A , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/blood , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/chemistry , Connective Tissue Diseases/immunology , Epitopes/chemistry , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Humans , Liver Neoplasms , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Molecular Weight , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Tumor Cells, Cultured
15.
Clin Rheumatol ; 19(5): 371-7, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11055826

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare ELISA, immunodiffusion and immunoblot for the detection of anti-Jo-1 antibodies, and to investigate the association of the results with clinical manifestations. In two medical centres for rheumatology and one for pulmonology, all patients with suspected connective tissue disease were screened over a 5-year period for anti-Jo-1 antibodies by ELISA. Positive sera were controlled in another laboratory by immunodiffusion. If immunodiffusion was negative, sera were controlled again by ELISA. ELISA-positive immunodiffusion-negative sera were tested by immunoblotting. The patients were characterised clinically, and their clinical signs and symptoms were compared with those of 257 patients with anti-Jo-1 antibodies published in 15 case series and 30 case reports. Twenty-five patients had a positive ELISA test. Fifteen sera were positive by ELISA and immunodiffusion (group 1). Three sera showed high titres in both ELISA tests with negative immunodiffusion and immunoblot (group 2). Seven sera showed low titres in both ELISA tests. The results were negative in the other tests (group 3). Patients in groups 1 and 2 could be classified as Jo-1 syndrome patients. Of these 18 patients, 15 had arthritis, 14 had myositis and 14 had interstitial lung disease. Only four patients had myositis at disease onset. We describe four unusual patients with Jo-1 syndrome in detail: 1. Long history of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis; 2. Sjögren's syndrome with Ro- and La-antibodies; 3. Scleroderma and bronchial carcinoma with centromere antibodies; 4. Corticoid-sensitive psychosis. Patients with suspected connective tissue disease may be screened for anti-Jo-1 antibodies by ELISA. It detects some patients that are missed by immunodiffusion. Especially lower ELISA titres should be controlled by another method because of the low specificity of the test. The clinical picture is variable. Most patients have features other than myositis at disease onset.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/analysis , Connective Tissue Diseases/immunology , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/analysis , Connective Tissue Diseases/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Immunoblotting , Immunodiffusion , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Arthritis Rheum ; 39(5): 868-76, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8639185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical and immunogenetic features of patients with Mi-2 autoantibodies. METHODS: Eighteen adult white patients with Mi-2 antibodies were clinically characterized and compared with 41 Mi-2-negative dermatomyositis (DM) patients. HLA class I and class II typing for DRB alleles was done by microcytotoxicity assay and for DQA and DQB alleles by polymerase chain reaction-based oligotyping. RESULTS: Seventeen of the 18 Mi-2-positive patients had DM. Symptoms of scleroderma, lung involvement, and arthritis were less common in this group than in the Mi-2-negative DM patients; the V-sign rash and nailfold involvement were found more frequently. Mi-2 antibodies were strongly associated with HLA-DR7 (88% versus 24% in healthy controls), HLA-DQA1*0201 (86% versus 23%), and DR7 "homozygosity" (31% versus 0%). A tryptophan residue at position 9 of the HLA-DR beta chain was present in all Mi-2-positive patients (100% versus 62%; homozygous in 81% versus 15%). CONCLUSION: Our results reemphasize the specificity of Mi-2 antibodies for DM, and extend previous reports that Mi-2 antibody production is associated with certain HLA class II antigens. We propose beta 9-Trp as a candidate epitope on the HLA-DR beta chain as a prerequisite for this type of autoimmune response.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases , Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoantigens/immunology , DNA Helicases , Dermatomyositis/immunology , HLA-DR Antigens/chemistry , Tryptophan/chemistry , Tryptophan/immunology , Adult , Amino Acid Sequence , Antibody Specificity , Base Sequence , Dermatomyositis/physiopathology , Epitopes/immunology , Female , HLA-DR Antigens/genetics , HLA-DR Antigens/immunology , Humans , Male , Mi-2 Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase Complex , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Oligonucleotide Probes/genetics , Tryptophan/genetics
19.
J Rheumatol ; 22(1): 67-72, 1995 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7699685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: NOR-90 autoantibodies directed against the nucleolus organizer region (NOR) have been described as rare scleroderma associated antibodies. We studied the clinical features of patients with NOR-90 antibodies as well as their HLA phenotype. METHODS: NOR-90 antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay using HEp-2 cells, by chromosome spreads as a substrate and in addition by Western blot analysis with HeLa-S3 nucleolar extract. HLA antigens of the NOR-90 antibody positive patients were typed with the standard NIH complement dependent microcytotoxicity test. RESULTS: Nine sera selected by means of the indirect immunofluorescence revealed a typical double band pattern of about 90 kDa identical with the pattern of 2 NOR-90 reference sera by Western blot analysis. Only one patient positive for NOR-90 antibodies suffered from systemic sclerosis (limited cutaneous scleroderma). The other patients with NOR-90 antibodies showed no signs of systemic sclerosis. All patients with NOR-90 antibodies were women and 8 of 9 patients (89 versus 13% of healthy controls, Pcorr < 0.001) were positive for the HLA-DR1 allele. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the first report on NOR-90 antibodies we demonstrated no association of these antibodies with systemic sclerosis; however, we found strong evidence for an immunogenetic background of NOR-90 antibody formation.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , DNA-Binding Proteins/immunology , Nucleolus Organizer Region/immunology , Pol1 Transcription Initiation Complex Proteins , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Transcription Factors/immunology , Adult , Aged , Antibody Specificity , Blotting, Western , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Middle Aged , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Scleroderma, Systemic/blood
20.
Z Rheumatol ; 54(1): 39-49, 1995.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7725809

ABSTRACT

In more than 95% of patients with systemic sclerosis and in about 60% of patients suffering from idiopathic inflammatory myopathies autoantibodies directed at different nuclear or cytoplasmic antigens can be detected with different methods. Scleroderma-associated autoantibodies can be visualized as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by immunofluorescence assays using cultured monolayer cells. In case of a negative ANA result the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis is unlikely. In individual patients the different autoantibodies (against DNA topoisomerase I (Scl-70), centromeric antigens, fibrillarin, To (Th), RNA polymerases, NOR-90, U1-nRNP, PM-Scl, Ku) are mutually exclusive. They can be detected early in the course of diseases, most often are persistent, and are closely associated with immunogenetic markers. They are characteristic for distinct subsets of patients homogeneous in clinical manifestations as well as in disease outcome. Myositis-associated autoantibodies are directed to nuclear (about 60% of myositis patients; PM-Scl, Mi-2) or cytoplasmic antigens (about 35-40%; Jo-1 and other aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases, signal recognition particle (SRP), KJ and others) and likewise are related to distinct clinical, prognostic, and immunogenetic traits leading to the description of characteristic antibody-based syndromes. Based on published results and on our own investigations, the diagnostic potential of scleroderma- and myositis-associated antibodies is evaluated and a new classification of systematic myositic and sclerodermatous disease is proposed.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Myositis/diagnosis , Scleroderma, Systemic/diagnosis , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Immunoblotting , Myositis/immunology , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL