ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Several techniques can be proposed as fertility sparing surgery in young patients treated for cervical cancer but uncertaincies remain concerning their outcomes. Analysis of oncological issues is then the first aim of this review in order to evaluate the best strategy. RESULTS: Data were identified from searches of MEDLINE, Current Contents, PubMed and from references in relevant articles from January 1987 to 15th of September 2021. We carry out an updated systematic review involving 5862 patients initially selected for fertility-sparing surgery in 275 series. FINDINGS: In patients having a stage IB1 disease, recurrence rate/RR in patients undergoing simple conisation/trachelectomy, radical trachelectomy/RT by laparoscopico-vaginal approach, laparotomic or laparoscopic approaches are respectively: 4.1%, 4.7%, 2.4% and 5.2%. In patients having a stage IB2 disease, RR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or RT by laparotomy are respectively 13.2% and 4.8% (p = .0035). After neoadjuvant treatment a simple cone/trachelectomy was carried out in 91 (30%) patients and a radical one in 210 (70%) cases. But the lowest pregnancy rate is observed in patients undergoing RT by laparotomy (36%). CONCLUSIONS: The choice between these treatments should be based above all, on objective oncological data that strike a balance for each procedure between the best chances for cure and the fertility results. In patients having a stage IB1 disease, oncological results are quite similar according to the procedure used. In patients having a stage IB2 disease, RT by open approach has the lowest RR. Anyway the lowest pregnancy rate is observed in patients undergoing RT by laparotomy.

Increasing global accessibility to high-level treatments for cervical cancers.

Human papillomaviruses (HPV)-related gynecological cancers are a major health care issue, and a leading cause of cancer death in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In 2020, the World Health Organization launched a program aimed at cervical cancer elimination, by screening and vaccination strategies. Offering the best possible care to women diagnosed with invasive cancer is a complementary objective. Treatment of cervical cancer as per modern standards is complex and multimodal, mainly relying on surgery, external-beam radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) and brachytherapy. In parallel with the pivotal role of multidisciplinary discussion, international societies provide guidance to define the most effective and least toxic anti-cancer strategy, homogenize treatment protocols and provide benchmark quality indicators as a basis for accreditation processes. The challenge is to offer the appropriate diagnostic workup and treatment upfront and to avoid non- evidence-based treatment that consumes resources, impairs quality of life (QoL), and compromises oncological outcome. Various strategies may be applied for improving treatment quality: development of surgical mentorship, companion-training programs and international cooperation. The lack of radiotherapy/brachytherapy facilities is a major concern in LMIC. Reinforcing international support in terms of education, training, research and development and technical cooperation with national projects is required to increase access to minimum requirements but also introduce modern techniques, upgrade radiotherapy/brachytherapy services, and expand access to modern systemic treatments. In countries with robust economies, compliance to standards should also be increased. Integrative cancer care and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to tackle the dual challenge of increasing cure rates while minimizing QoL impairment. Appropriate dimensioning of the resources to avoid harmful treatment delays and access to expert referral centers is also a priority.

[Fertility preservation in cervical cancer, analysis of 30 years of practice and immersion in future developments]. / La préservation de fertilité en cas de cancer du col, analyse de 30 ans de pratique et immersion dans les évolutions à venir.

OBJECTIVES: The strategy of fertility preservation (FP) in cervical cancer has been challenged for several years and a therapeutic de-escalation seems to be necessary. In this context, we evaluated the oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes of surgical techniques performed in our centre for FP. METHODS: This retrospective uni centric trial included 75 patients, managed at the Gustave Roussy Institute between 1995 and 2020, for cervical cancer (stage IB1 FIGO 2018) and having conducted a fertility preservation project after a complete pre-therapy work-up. The objective of this study was to understand our results on fertility and obstetrical outcomes and to correlate them with oncological data and finally to evaluate the evolution of our surgical practices. RESULTS: 54 patients benefited from an extended trachelectomy and no lymph node involvement was found. 1 patient received a complementary treatment postoperatively which did not allow to preserve her fertility. The recurrence rate was 4.8% (4/75) with one death described. 31 pregnancies were obtained, representing a pregnancy rate of 50%. 74% of pregnancies were obtained spontaneously and 60% of pregnancies were carried to term. CONCLUSION: Our results are similar to those in the literature. Despite a fertility preservation project, only half of the patients were able to achieve a pregnancy.

ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.

[Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study on 34 complete cytoreductive surgeries]. / Carcinome séreux de bas grade ovarien à un stade avancé : étude rétrospective sur 34 patientes en résection complète.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is a distinct, slow-growing entity that affects mainly young women. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characterisitics and survival outcomes of a population of patients suffering from advanced stage CSBG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in patients with advanced stage ovarian CSBG (FIGO IIIb-IV) who had complete macroscopic cytoreductive surgery, at Gustave Roussy Institut, Villejuif, between 2004 and 2017. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included, who were mainly young women (mean age 41.3 years), diagnosed at FIGO stage IIIC (91 %). The median follow-up was 41 months. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 16 patients (47.1 %), and complete response never occurred. Upper abdominal surgical procedures were necessary in 90 % of cases and a bowel resection was performed in more than 80 % of cases. Over 90 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by maintenance treatment with bevacizumab in over 40 % of cases. During follow-up, 9 (26 %) deaths occurred. Five-year overall survival was 70 % and disease-free survival was 20 %. CONCLUSION: CSBG of the ovary has a low chemosensitivity and requires maximum surgical management, which should be performed in expert centers.

ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.

Declaración de consenso de ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE sobre el diagnóstico preoperatorio de los tumores de ovario La Sociedad Europea de Oncología Ginecológica (ESGO), la Sociedad Internacional de Ecografía en Obstetricia y Ginecología (ISUOG), el Grupo Internacional de Análisis de Tumores de Ovario (IOTA) y la Sociedad Europea de Endoscopia Ginecológica (ESGE) elaboraron conjuntamente declaraciones de importancia para la práctica clínica y con base empírica sobre el diagnóstico preoperatorio de los tumores de ovario, a partir de imágenes, biomarcadores y modelos de predicción, entre otras técnicas. La ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE designó a un grupo internacional multidisciplinar, que incluye a personas expertas de la práctica clínica y la investigación que han demostrado liderazgo y experiencia en el diagnóstico preoperatorio de los tumores de ovario y en el tratamiento de las pacientes con cáncer de ovario (19 personas expertas de toda Europa). También se incluyó en el grupo a una representante de las pacientes. Para garantizar que las declaraciones tenían una base empírica, se revisó la literatura actual y se valoró de forma crítica. Se redactaron declaraciones preliminares basadas en la revisión de la literatura pertinente. La totalidad del grupo debatió durante una teleconferencia cada declaración preliminar y se llevó a cabo una primera ronda de votaciones. Las declaraciones se eliminaron cuando no se obtuvo el consenso entre los miembros del grupo. Los votantes tuvieron la oportunidad de aportar comentarios/sugerencias a la par que sus votos. Las declaraciones se revisaron en consecuencia. Se llevó a cabo otra ronda de votaciones según las mismas reglas para que todo el grupo pudiera evaluar la versión revisada de las declaraciones. El grupo logró un consenso sobre 18 declaraciones. Esta Declaración de Consenso presenta estas declaraciones de la ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE sobre el diagnóstico preoperatorio de los tumores de ovario y la evaluación de la carcinomatosis, junto con un resumen de la evidencia que apoya cada declaración.

Glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: 20-year experience from a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: Glassy cell carcinoma (GCC) of the uterine cervix is a rare entity. This study aims at describing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cervical GCC patients treated in a comprehensive cancer center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reported patients and tumors characteristics, therapeutic management, overall survival (OS), progression-free progression (PFS), relapse rates, and toxicities. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2014, 55 patients were treated with curative intent. The median age at diagnosis was 41 years (range, 20-68). Among 22 patients with early stage tumors (IA2-IB1-IIA1), 17 had preoperative brachytherapy, followed by radical hysterectomy. Among 33 patients with locally advanced disease (≥IB2), 32 underwent chemoradiation±brachytherapy boost. After a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 0.15-21.7 years), 18/55 (33%) patients experienced tumor relapse. Local recurrence occurred in 2/22 (9%) patients with early disease (treated with upfront surgery) and in 3/32 (9%) patients with locally advanced disease. Most frequent relapses were distant, occurring in a total of 11/55 patients (20%). PFS rates at 5-year were 86.4% (95% CI: 63.4-95.4) for early stage versus 75.9% (95% CI: 55.2-89.2) for locally advanced stages, respectively (P=0.18). CONCLUSION: Large cohort data are warranted to guide the optimal management of GCC. From this retrospective analysis, a multimodal approach yielded to good disease control in early stages tumors. Given the high-risk of distant failure, consideration should be given to adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced disease.

Evaluation of adjuvant vaginal vault brachytherapy in early stage cervical cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was shown to decrease pelvic relapses in patients with an early stage cervical cancer and intermediate-risk histopathological prognostic factors, at the cost of increased bowel morbidity. We examined the feasibility and results of adjuvant brachytherapy alone as an alternative to EBRT in this situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients receiving adjuvant brachytherapy between 1991 and 2018 for an early stage cervical cancer were examined. Patients were included if they presented a pT1a2N0 or pT1b1N0 disease following radical colpohysterectomy. Adjuvant vaginal wall brachytherapy (without EBRT) was indicated because of a tumor size≥2cm and/or presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Patients received 60Gy to 5mm of the vaginal wall, through low-dose or pulse-dose rate technique. Patients' outcome was examined for disease control, toxicities and prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included. Eight patients (20%) had LVSI, 26 patients (65%) had a tumor size≥2cm. With median follow-up time of 42.0 months, 90% of patients were in complete remission and four patients (10%) experienced tumor relapse, all in the peritoneal cavity, and associated with synchronous pelvic lymph node failure in 2/4 patients. No vaginal or isolated pelvic nodal failure was reported. At 5 year, overall survival was 83.6% (CI95%: 67.8-100%) and disease-free survival was 85.1% (CI95%: 72.6-99.9%). In univariate analysis, probability of relapse correlated with tumor size≥3cm (P=0.004). No acute or late toxicity grade more than 2 was reported. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy alone was a well-tolerated adjuvant treatment for selected patients with intermediate risk factors. The risk of relapse in patients with tumor size≥3cm was however high, suggesting that EBRT is more appropriate in this situation.

Implementation of image-guided brachytherapy as part of non-surgical treatment in inoperable endometrial cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed outcomes of inoperable endometrial cancer (IEC) patients treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a 3D image-guided brachytherapy boost. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with EBRT followed by 3D image-guided brachytherapy for IEC were retrospectively included. EBRT delivered a dose of 45Gy. Then, patients had an uterovaginal brachytherapy guided by 3D imaging. Clinical target volume (CTVBT) included the whole uterus and the initial disease extent. Gross tumour volume (GTVres) included the residual disease at time of brachytherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified. Causes of inoperability were comorbidities (37%) or tumour loco regional extent (63%). Including EBRT and brachytherapy, the median D90 (minimal dose delivered to 90% of the volume) was 60.7 GyEQD2 (IQR = 56.4-64.2) for the CTVBT, and was 73.6 GyEQD2 (IQR = 64.1-83.7) for the GTVres. The median overall treatment time was 50 days (IQR = 46-54). The mean follow-up was 36.5 months (SD = 30.2). The cumulative incidence of local, pelvic and distant failures was 19% (n = 5), 7% (n = 2) and 26% (n = 7), respectively. Five-year overall survival was 63% (95% CI = 43-91). Late urinary and gastro intestinal toxicities ≥ grade 2 were reported in four (15%) and two patients (7%) respectively. No vaginal toxicity ≥ grade 2 was reported. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy seems to be an effective option for IEC. The implementation of 3D concepts at time of brachytherapy may contribute to high local control probability and low toxicity profile. Large scale retrospective or prospective data are needed to confirm these early data.

Comprehensive analysis of patient outcome after local recurrence of locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Since dose escalation allowed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), local relapses have become a rare event. Only scarce data are available on the outcome of patients experiencing a local relapse after IGABT. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2016, all consecutive patients treated at Gustave Roussy Institute for LACC and receiving concomitant chemoradiation and IGABT were analysed. Clinical and treatment-related prognostic factors for survival after local relapse were searched, in order to potentially identify patients requiring salvage treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were treated during this period. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 10.8% (n = 28) had a local relapse. Among these patients, 53.6% had synchronous lymph nodes or distant metastatic relapse and only 13 patients (5% of all patients) had isolated local relapse. After local relapse, median survival was 47 months and three patients were alive at last follow-up. Only three patients with local relapse could receive salvage surgery (10.7%). Metastases occurrence and pelvic wall involvement were the main contraindications (67.9%) for salvage surgery. Among the three patients treated with surgery, two are still alive at last follow-up without significant complication. Improved survival was observed among the two patients who could have surgery (p = .02). Local progression led to serious symptoms in 75% of patients. Only the time interval between brachytherapy and relapse (<1 year) was prognostic for 2-year overall survival (p = .005). CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery is feasible in a very low number of highly selected patients with local relapse following IGABT. Local failure is a major cause of severe local symptoms, confirming that every effort should be done to achieve long-term local control through dose escalation.

Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines based on a third international consensus meeting.

We aimed to provide comprehensive protocols and promote effective management of pregnant women with gynecological cancers. New insights and more experience have been gained since the previous guidelines were published in 2014. Members of the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP), in collaboration with other international experts, reviewed existing literature on their respective areas of expertise. Summaries were subsequently merged into a manuscript that served as a basis for discussion during the consensus meeting. Treatment of gynecological cancers during pregnancy is attainable if management is achieved by collaboration of a multidisciplinary team of health care providers. This allows further optimization of maternal treatment, while considering fetal development and providing psychological support and long-term follow-up of the infants. Nonionizing imaging procedures are preferred diagnostic procedures, but limited ionizing imaging methods can be allowed if indispensable for treatment plans. In contrast to other cancers, standard surgery for gynecological cancers often needs to be adapted according to cancer type and gestational age. Most standard regimens of chemotherapy can be administered after 14 weeks gestational age but are not recommended beyond 35 weeks. C-section is recommended for most cervical and vulvar cancers, whereas vaginal delivery is allowed in most ovarian cancers. Breast-feeding should be avoided with ongoing chemotherapeutic, endocrine or targeted treatment. More studies that focus on the long-term toxic effects of gynecologic cancer treatments are needed to provide a full understanding of their fetal impact. In particular, data on targeted therapies that are becoming standard of care in certain gynecological malignancies is still limited. Furthermore, more studies aimed at the definition of the exact prognosis of patients after antenatal cancer treatment are warranted. Participation in existing registries (www.cancerinpregnancy.org) and the creation of national tumor boards with multidisciplinary teams of care providers (supplementary Box S1, available at Annals of Oncology online) is encouraged.

[Place of radiotherapy and surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer patients]. / Places respectives de la radiothérapie et de la chirurgie dans les cancers du col utérin.

The treatment of cervical cancer patients relies on surgery and radiotherapy (according to the stage) and requires a multimodal discussion before any treatment to avoid adding the morbidities of each individual intervention and to optimize functional and oncological outcomes. The places of surgery and radiotherapy have been highlighted in recent international guidelines. For early stage tumors, an exclusive surgery with or without fertility sparing (according to well defined criteria) is the therapeutic standard. For tumors with risk factors (measuring more than 2cm in size and/or presence of lymphovascular invasion) a preoperative brachytherapy can be proposed to minimize the need for postoperative external beam radiotherapy and optimize local control. For locally advanced disease, the standard treatment relies on chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost. A primary paraaortic lymph node dissection may guide radiotherapy volumes and is useful to identify patients requiring a para-aortic radiotherapy. The technical evolutions of surgical approaches and technological improvement of radiotherapy and brachytherapy should be analyzed in the context of prospective studies. We review the literature on the respective places of radiotherapy and surgery for the treatment of cervical cancer.

ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease.

The development of guidelines is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO-ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on April 12-14, 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO-ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†.

The development of guidelines recommendations is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO-ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on 12-14 April 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO-ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Impact of cancer chemotherapy before ovarian cortex cryopreservation on ovarian tissue transplantation.

STUDY QUESTION: How efficacious is transplantation of ovarian cortex previously exposed to chemotherapy? SUMMARY ANSWER: Prior exposure to chemotherapy did not disrupt the function of cryopreserved ovarian tissue after transplantation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) followed by ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is an efficacious technique for restoration of female fertility. At least 130 children have been born following this procedure. To date, little is known about the efficacy of OTT in patients exposed to cancer chemotherapy prior to OTC. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study evaluates the recovery of ovarian function and fertility in 31 consecutive patients who had received OTT, between 2005 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Thirty one patients, wanting children, were transplanted with autologous ovarian cortex, among which 22 patients (71%) had been exposed to chemotherapy before OTC. Recovery of ovarian function was considered total once menstruation occurred. Ovarian function recovery (OFR), ovarian graft survival, and incidence of pregnancy were related to previous chemotherapy exposure, type of chemotherapy and graft characteristics (number of grafted fragments and follicular density). MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: The amount of ovarian tissue collected was the only parameter to show any significant change between patients with versus without previous chemotherapy. At 1 year after OTT, the cumulative incidence of OFR was 83% (93% in patients exposed to chemotherapy and 67% in others (P = 0.14)). A low follicular density (<0.3 foll/mm2) in the transplant and a low number of grafted fragments (<16) were significantly associated with a delayed OFR. Graft survival at 2 years after OTT was 77%. It was significantly lower in patients exposed to bifunctional alkylating agents before ovarian cryopreservation and in patients with a low follicular density. The proportion of women who succeeded in having at least one live birth was 23% in the total population, 0% (0/9) in the group 'no previous chemotherapy', and 32% (7/22) in the group 'previous chemotherapy'. The cumulative incidence of pregnancy (Kaplan-Meier) at 3 years after OTT was 36% overall and 49% in case of previous chemotherapy, with no difference related to previous chemotherapy exposure. In total there were 13 pregnancies and 8 births in 7 patients. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The pathology in the two groups of patients was not comparable. In the group of patients who had chemotherapy before OTC, there were 95% of hematological malignancies. In the group of patients who did not have chemotherapy before OTC only 1 out of 9 patients had a malignant hematological disease while 44% had some pathology affecting the ovaries. Few women are available for study and only large changes are likely to have statistical significance. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These results suggest that prior cancer chemotherapy should no longer be considered a limitation to cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and current recommendations in this regard should be revised. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the Agence de la Biomédecine (France's biomedical office). There are no competing interests to report. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02184806.

Gynaecologic cancer surgery and preservation of fertility.

For gynecological cancers, even at an early stage, the standard treatment is "radical excision" involving hysterectomy (radical or not) with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. But for young patients with early stage disease, many recent studies have focused on preservation of subsequent fertility by keeping at least one ovary and the uterus. The main objective of this fertility-sparing surgery is to preserve fertility, if this can be accomplished without increasing the oncological risks. Whether the initial site of the cancer is the cervix, uterine fundus or ovary, the oncologic validation of fertility-sparing treatment requires several evaluation criteria: a rigorous clinical, radiological and surgical staging to verify that the pathology is truly at an early initial stage; expert pathologic interpretation of biopsy specimens to validate the histological criteria of "good prognosis"; provision of complete and understandable patient education verifying the true objectives for this fertility-sparing treatment (whose intent is to retain a potential for subsequent fertility without guaranteeing it) and provision of an explanation of the oncological constraints and implications of fertility-sparing surgery in the event of a possible pregnancy. As always in oncology, this strategy demands teamwork requiring successive discussions with the patient and spouse and thorough discussion of the oncological safety of this fertility-sparing strategy in multidisciplinary consultation meetings before "giving a green light".

Prospective Assessment of First-Year Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancy: A French Multicentric Study.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration remains one of the most mutilating procedures, with important postoperative morbidity, an altered body image, and long-term physical and psychosocial concerns. This study aimed to assess quality of life (QOL) during the first year after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy performed with curative intent. METHODS: A French multicentric prospective study was performed by including patients who underwent pelvic exenteration. Quality of life by measurement of functional and symptom scales was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires before surgery, at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: The study enrolled 97 patients. Quality of life including physical, personal, fatigue, and anorexia reported in the QLQ-C30 was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively and improved at least to baseline level 1 year after the procedure. Body image also was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively. Global health, emotional, dyspnea, and anorexia items were significantly improved 1 year after surgery compared with baseline values. Unlike younger patients, elderly patients did not regain physical and social activities after pelvic exenteration. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic decision on performing a pelvic exenteration can have a severe and permanent impact on all aspects of patients' QOL. Deterioration of QOL was most significant during the first 3 months after surgery. Elderly patients were the only group of patients with permanent decreased physical and social function. Preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up evaluation should include health-related QOL instruments, counseling by a multidisciplinary team to cover all aspects concerning stoma care, sexual function, and long-term concerns after surgery.