Joint position sense testing at the wrist and its correlations with kinesiophobia and pain intensity in individuals who have sustained a distal radius fracture: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor impairment following distal radius fracture (DRF) has been associated with a significant decline in function. Joint position sense (JPS) testing is a meaningful and responsive way to assess sensorimotor impairment for individuals who have sustained a DRF; however, there are factors that may influence the results of JPS testing, including kinesiophobia and pain intensity. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence kinesiophobia may have on wrist JPS testing and if pain intensity impacts kinesiophobia and JPS in individuals with a DRF. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Participants referred from two medical centers with a diagnosis of DRF treated with at least 3 weeks of immobilization were enrolled in the study. Data were collected at 1 week and 6 weeks postimmobilization period. Demographics were summarized with descriptive statistics, and linear relationships between kinesiophobia, pain intensity, and wrist JPS were examined using Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants were included in this study (mean age 42.9 years). Significant positive correlations were found between the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; r = 0.951, p < 0.001), TSK and JPS error (r = 0.942, p < 0.001), as well as NRS and JPS error (r = 0.898, p < 0.001). These correlations indicate that higher levels of kinesiophobia are associated with increased pain intensity and greater JPS error. T-tests reveal no significant difference between male and female for the TSK, NRS, or JPS scores. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association for individuals with high levels of kinesiophobia and both greater pain and errors with JPS testing.

Hand therapist use of patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The use of standardized outcome measures is essential for best clinical practice by hand therapists to determine patient status, progress, and the outcome of interventions. A better understanding of current patient-reported outcome (PRO) use in hand and upper extremity practice is warranted. PURPOSE: This study sought to understand what outcome measures are being used in clinical practice, how they are being used, and the perceived usefulness of PROs by active members of the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT). STUDY DESIGN: This study employed a cross-sectional design. METHODS: The web-based survey was distributed through Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Salt Lake City, Utah) to active members of ASHT with an email address on file. The survey consisted of multiple choice and open-ended questions. RESULTS: A total of 348 members responded to the survey. Seven hundred thirty-two different outcome measures were reported to be used by the hand therapist respondents. The most used outcome measure was QuickDASH by 38% of the respondents. Two hundred seventy-five (88%) indicated that their workplace advocated the use of PROs. Most respondents indicated that there were not constraints preventing the use of a PRO. Few therapists respondents use a psychosocial PRO in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the hand therapist respondents to our survey use a PRO and discuss the results with their clients. The QuickDASH was the PRO used most often by hand therapists. Only a few hand therapists use a psychosocial tool to measure patient status in clinical practice.

Assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: A modified Delphi-based consensus paper of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

BACKGROUND: While the literature is abundant on hand therapy assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA), clarity and uniformity are meager, making it a desirable diagnosis to establish expert consensus. PURPOSE: This study aimed to ascertain if consensus exists for the assessment and treatment of nonsurgical management of thumb CMC OA in the hand therapy clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: This was a consensus paper via the modified Delphi approach. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to determine consensus among an expert panel, including hand therapists and hand surgeons, via two online surveys. A consensus paper steering committee (from the American Society of Hand Therapist's research division) designed the surveys and analyzed responses. Consensus was established as 75% agreement among the expert panel. Demographic information was collected from the expert panel. RESULTS: The expert panel included 34 hand therapists and seven hand surgeons. The survey response rates were 93.6% for the first survey and 90.2% for the second survey. Consensus recommendations were classified according to the World Health Organization categorization. These included evaluating the body structures for clinical signs/clinical testing and body functions for pain, range of motion for palmar abduction, radial abduction, opposition, and thumb metacarpal phalangeal flexion/extension, and grip and tripod pinch strength. Further consensus recommendations were for the assessment of function using a region-specific, upper extremity patient-reported outcome measure (activity and participation), environmental factors, outcome expectation, and illness perception within the patient's unique environmental and social contexts. Treatment recommendations included the use of an orthosis during painful activities, a dynamic stability program (stable C posture, release of tight adductors, and strengthening of stabilizers), patient education, joint protection techniques, adaptive equipment, and functional-based intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The findings describe the consensus of a group of experts and provide a clinical reference tool on the hand therapy assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb CMC joint OA.

A follow up survey on the impact of COVID-19 on hand therapy practice.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus-19 pandemic continues to influence on the hand therapy community. It is important to understand how therapists are currently affected and how things have changed since the onset of the pandemic. PURPOSE: Follow-up on a previous survey and investigate the current status of hand therapy practice 10 months into the pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Web-based survey. METHODS: A 38-item survey was electronically delivered to American Society of Hand Therapists members between December 9, 2020 and January 6, 2021. Stress, safety measures, changes in practice patterns and telehealth were focus areas in the survey. Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient was used to analyze nonparametric correlations, Chi-Square analysis examined relationships between categorical values and unpaired t-tests were utilized for the comparison of means. RESULTS: Of the 378 respondents, 85% reported higher stress levels compared to pre-pandemic times. Younger therapists expressed more stress over childcare concerns (rs = 0.38;P = .000) and job security (rs = 0.21; P = .000), while older therapists expressed more stress over eldercare concerns (rs= -.13;P = .018). Descriptively, hours spent on direct clinical care were near prepandemic levels. Telehealth is currently used by 29% of respondents and did not correlate to age or years of practice. Postoperative cases (t(423) = 4.18;P = .0001) and people age 50-64-years (t(423) = 3.01;P = .002) were most frequently seen for in person visits. Nontraumatic, nonoperative cases (t(423) = 4.52;P = .0001) as well as those 65 years and older (t(423) = 3.71; P = .0002) were more likely to be seen via telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Hand therapists are adapting as reflected by the return to near normal work hours and less utilization of telehealth. Respondents still report higher levels of stress compared to prior to the pandemic, and this stress appears to be multifactorial in nature. Weariness with the precautionary measures such as mask wearing, social distancing and sanitizing was expressed through open-ended responses.

The use of occupation-based interventions and assessments in hand therapy: A cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to gather information on how hand therapists incorporate occupation-based interventions in their clinical practice and what outcome measures hand therapists use to measure the occupational performance of their clients STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Survey Design. METHODS: The 16-item Survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Hand Therapists on two occasions. RESULTS: Three hundred eleven hand therapists responded to the survey. Hand therapists use a variety of occupation-based interventions (OBI) in clinical practice and most believe they are important. Findings from this study reveal that incorporating an occupation-based assessment along with or in place of an assessment of body functions and structures is not performed routinely. One hundred twenty-six (41%) respondents indicated that they use occupation-based activities 26-50% of the time with their clients. DISCUSSION: The top three OBI interventions used by hand therapists included dressing tasks, cooking and meal preparation, and in hand manipulation of coins and medication. The lack of understanding of the theoretical models regarding occupation-based interventions may be a barrier toward implementation of occupation-based interventions and assessments as many hand therapists may have trained under a medical model. CONCLUSION: Most respondents to this survey indicated that they believe OBI should be performed by hand therapists and use them routinely in practice. The most frequently used type of assessment was the DASH (Disabilities of the Shoulder Arm & Hand). The least frequently used assessment was the Short Form 36 and patient specific occupation-based assessment.

Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Protocol for Thumb Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint often presents with joint instability and proprioceptive deficits. Proprioception has been found to play an important role in the rehabilitative process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a proprioceptive training program on pain and function in individuals with early-stage thumb Carpometacarpal joint OA. METHODS: A double-blind experimental trial using a 2-group pretest/posttest design was used in this pilot study. Participants had a diagnosis of grade I and II thumb CMC joint OA in their dominant hand and a pain rating of >4/10 on Visual Analogue Scale. Participants received either standard treatment (control group) or standard treatment plus a proprioceptive training program (experimental group). Outcome measures were lateral pinch strength, pain intensity during activities, and proprioceptive response via joint position sense (JPS) testing. RESULTS: Twelve individuals (average age of 66.25 years) participated. Both groups had a statistically significant decrease in pain and increase in lateral pinch strength, all occurring with a large effect size but no statistically significant difference between groups. The experimental group experienced a large effect size for JPS testing, whereas the control group experienced a trivial effect size, and there was a statistically significant difference between groups for JPS testing. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who completed the proprioceptive training program in this study had an improvement in proprioceptive functioning. This program shows potential for routine inclusion in hand therapy for thumb CMC joint OA; however, additional high-level studies with larger sample sizes are required.

Incorporation of occupational based intervention into joint protection education for individuals with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A case series.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, the use of occupational performance in education on joint protection techniques has not been studied for individuals with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. PURPOSE: This case series was designed to investigate if occupation-based instruction inside the clinic was useful and found satisfactory as an educational tool for individuals with thumb CMC joint arthritis. METHODS: Three participants with thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis performed washing, rinsing, and drying a dish, moving a pot and pan, maneuvering a laundry basket, and pouring from a pitcher during joint protection education in the therapy clinic with a skilled hand therapist in addition to routine treatment. Satisfaction with this intervention was assessed via a 3-question satisfaction survey. Pain with activity and function via the Thumb Disability Examination were assessed at baseline and a 4week follow up. RESULTS: Patients in this study expressed satisfaction with the inclusion of the performance of occupations in their joint protection education in the clinic. Pain with activity improved by an average of 1.7/10 on a 10-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale and function improved by an average of 10.04 on the Thumb Disability Examination. CONCLUSIONS: Although no causal relationships can be assumed in this study, hand therapists should consider adding occupation-based intervention as a component of patient education on joint protection for individuals with thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis.

Clinical effects of proprioceptive thumb exercise for individuals with carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized Control Trial. INTRODUCTION: Thumb CMC joint OA is a common diagnosis. Currently there is no evidence available to under if proprioceptive neuromuscular training is an effective intervention for this population. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To establish the effectiveness of a proprioceptive training program as a complementary therapy for patients with thumb CMC joint OA. METHODS: Standard conservative thumb CMC joint OA treatments were received by both the control (n = 26) and experimental groups (n = 26) for a period of 12 weeks. The experimental group received a proprioceptive training program during the same intervention period. Outcome measures included severity of pain with activity according to the numerical rating scale (NRS), QuickDASH, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and proprioception via joint position sense (JPS). RESULTS: Fifty-two females participated in the study. Both the experimental and control group made both clinically and statistically significant changes in the mean VAS and COPM scores over time. Only the experimental group achieved a statistically and clinically significant change in JPS error score over time. DISCUSSION: Experimental group achieved a statistically significant change in JPS over time in concordance with previous investigations. Changes in pain scores differed from prior investigations and the between-group comparison was not statistically significant. Changes in the Quick DASH was similar to previous findings. CONCLUSION: Proprioceptive training in addition to a traditional rehabilitation program decreased error scores on the joint position sense test.

The Effect of Proprioception Training on Pain Intensity in Thumb Basal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

A randomized controlled trial of forty-five females over 18 years of age with diagnosis of thumb basal osteoarthritis in their dominant hand and with a minimum pain rating of 4/10 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during activities of daily living (ADLs) were recruited from March to June 2021. The group receiving proprioception training was compared to routine conservative physiotherapy treatment. The main purpose of this clinical trial is to test the effect of proprioception training on pain intensity in subjects with thumb osteoarthritis. Primary outcome was joint position sense (JPS) for the assessment of CMC proprioception and secondary outcomes were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) for the assessment of patient satisfaction and the Quick-DASH which assessed upper limb function. A block randomization was carried out for the control group (n = 22) and experimental group (n = 23). Participants and evaluator were blinded to the group assignment. Proprioception training produced a statistically significant reduction in pain post intervention, but this reduction was small (d = 0.1) at the 3-month follow-up. JPS accuracy demonstrated statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.001) post-intervention and at the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.003). Statistically significant differences between means were found in both the Quick-Dash and COPM post intervention (both, p < 0.001), as well as at the 3-month follow-up (both, p < 0.001). There was a significant time factor for the reduction of pain intensity over time but effect sizes between groups was small at the 3-month follow-up period. Proprioceptive training improves thumb JPS accuracy; however, it does not contribute to a reduction in pain intensity in the long term. The inclusion of a proprioceptive program may be beneficial for improving individuals with thumb CMC OA sensorimotor performance. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04738201. No funding was provided for this study.

The impact of COVID-19 on hand therapy practice.

BACKGROUND: Hand therapists and health care providers across the spectrum have been profoundly impacted by COVID-19. Greater insight and information regarding how practitioners have been affected by this unparalleled pandemic is important. PURPOSE: Survey research was performed to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hand therapy practice. STUDY DESIGN: Online survey research. METHODS: Four constructs guided the development of the survey: psychosocial and financial impact; safety practice patterns; changes in current practice patterns; use of telehealth. The survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Hand Therapists from April 14, 2020 through May 4, 2020. Descriptive demographic data were obtained. Frequencies were examined using ChiSquare, correlations were examined using Spearman Correlation Coefficient, and means were compared via independent t-test. RESULTS: A total of 719 members responded to the survey. Eighty-six percent of therapists reported feeling more stress than they did prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. This level of stress was similar across ages, practice settings, financial stability or instability, and geographical settings. Older therapists (rs = 0.04) and those that practiced longer (rs = 0.009) felt more comfortable with in-person treatment. Ninety-eight percent of therapists reported a decrease in caseload. Postoperative cases (P= .0001) and patients ages 19-49 were more likely to receive in-person treatment (P= .002). 46% of therapists reported providing telehealth services. Nontraumatic, nonoperative cases (P= .0001) and patients aged 65 or older were more likely to receive telehealth services (P= .0001). Younger therapists (rs = 0.03) and therapists working in outpatient therapist owned, outpatient corporate owned, and outpatient academic medical centers (X2 [4, N = 637] = 15.9463, P= .003) were more likely to utilize telehealth. CONCLUSION: Stress was felt globally among hand therapy clinicians regardless of financial security or insecurity, age, practice area, or geographical setting. Therapists saw a drastic decrease in caseloads. In-person caseloads shifted primarily to postoperative cases. STUDY DESIGN: Web based survey.

Usefulness of a hand therapy application.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort design that collected data by means of a survey. INTRODUCTION: Performance and adherence to a home exercise program (HEP) has been identified as an integral component of hand therapy rehabilitation. Understanding how patients learn along with offering creative options to improve engagement is important. Advancements in technology including the use of smart phone apps should be considered. PURPOSE OF STUDY: To determine if a hand therapy app is a useful method for patient education and home exercises for patients receiving hand therapy for an orthopedic injury distal to the shoulder. METHOD: Individuals receiving hand therapy at an outpatient hand therapy clinic via a convenience sample (n = 41) were asked to download use The Hand Therapy Application for an individualized exercise program. The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) questionnaire was used to assess the smart phone app. RESULTS: The overall MARS score for the hand therapy app was 3.5 out of 5. The MARS also gathered information on the app's engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and subjective quality of the app with mean scores of 3.6, 3.8, and 3.7, respectively. Data was also collected on the app's description accuracy, goals, quality and quantity of information, visual information, credibility, and evidence base. DISCUSSION: Participants receiving skilled hand therapy gave an overall rating of The Hand Therapy Application as above average for providing information about the participants condition and for HEP instruction. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggests that The Hand Therapy Application should be a consideration as a HEP tool in clinical practice.

Patient satisfaction with the CMC controller: A cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. INTRODUCTION: The evidence specific to understanding patient satisfaction, preference and the effects on occupational performance using a CMC orthosis is sparse. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The main purpose of this study was to determine patient satisfaction, aspects of the orthotic preference, and the effect on pain and function of the CMC Controller Plus neoprene orthotic device. METHODS: This research was conducted at two outpatient clinics located in Pennsylvania and Florida during 2019. The subjects of this study included any individuals referred to one of two participating hand therapy facilities with either a primary or secondary diagnosis of thumb CMC joint arthritis or present with this diagnosis as a comorbidity. The CMC Controller Plus orthosis (Hely & Weber) was provided to each patient by the treating therapist at no cost to the patient after the patient agreed to take part in the study. None of the patients received hand therapy treatment for the CMC pain; the only intervention provided was the CMC Controller Plus. RESULTS: The CMC Controller Plus orthosis improved the patients' functional status and reduced their pain. The effect size for the change in function was large (1.29) compared to the effect size for the reduction in pain which approached moderate at 0.49. DISCUSSION: The CMC Controller Plus orthosis improved the patient's functional status by 52% and reduced their pain by 29%. CONCLUSION: The results were both statistically and clinically significant.

Outcome measurement of hand function following mirror therapy for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. INTRODUCTION: Mirror therapy is a treatment used to address hand function following a stroke. Measurement of outcomes using appropriate assessment tools is crucial; however, many assessment options exist. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study is to systematically review outcome measures that are used to assess hand function following mirror therapy after stroke and, in addition, to identify the psychometric and descriptive properties of the included measures and through the linking process determine if the outcome measures are representative of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). METHODS: Following a comprehensive literature search, outcome measures used in the included studies were linked to the ICF and analyzed based on descriptive information and psychometric properties. RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria and included 24 different assessment tools to measure hand or upper limb function. Most outcome measures used in the selected studies (63%) were rated by the evaluating therapist. Thirteen outcome measures (54%) linked to the ICF body function category and 10 measures (42%) linked to activities and participation. One outcome measure was linked to not defined, and all other ICF categories were not represented. A majority of outcome measures have been assessed for validity, reliability, and responsiveness, but responsiveness was the least investigated psychometric property. DISCUSSION: Current studies on mirror therapy after stroke are not consistent in the assessment tools used to determine hand function. Understanding of study outcomes requires analysis of the assessment tools. The outcome measures used in the included studies are not representative of personal and environmental factors, but tools linking to body functions and activities and participations provide important information on functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating a combination of measures that are psychometrically sound and reflective of the ICF should be considered for assessment of hand function after mirror therapy after stroke.

Linking commonly used hand therapy outcome measures to individual areas of the International Classification of Functioning: A systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. INTRODUCTION: Identifying outcome measures that correspond to the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) provides insight into selecting appropriate outcome tools in hand therapy practice. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The objective of this study is to systematically review patient-reported outcome measures commonly used in hand therapy to determine the extent to which the content represents the biopsychosocial view of the ICF. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Studies that met inclusion criteria were identified, and outcome measures were extracted. The meaningful concept was determined for each item on the measure and linked to the most specific ICF category. Summary linkage calculations were completed. RESULTS: Eleven patient-reported outcomes were identified from 43 included studies. Activity and participation had the highest content coverage followed by body functions. There was linking to personal factors and not defined-disability and mental health. Environmental factors were not represented in any of the included outcome measures. The core set representation of unique codes ranged from 8.55% to 18.80% (mean: 11.97%) for the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions and from 30.43% to 47.83% (mean: 31.40%) for the Brief ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions. The percent representation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions for unique disability ranged from 21.62% to 43.24% (mean: 20.33%) and from 62.50% to 87.50% (mean: 72.22%) for the Brief ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions. DISCUSSION: None of the included measures represent all categories of the ICF Core Sets for Hand Conditions. CONCLUSION: Utilizing the most recent refinement rules for the linking process, this study provides comparisons of measures along with clarity of content coverage for the most commonly used tools in the practice of hand therapy.

Linking hand therapy outcome measures used after carpal tunnel release to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of hand therapy after carpal tunnel release (CTR) is restoration of function. Outcome assessment tools that cover the concepts contained in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), a framework for describing functioning and disability, are appropriate for hand therapy treatment of this diagnosis. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To identify and review outcome measures used in studies on rehabilitation after CTR and link these to the concepts contained in the ICF. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Outcome measures in the included studies were linked to the ICF. For data calculation purposes, outcome measures were linked to the specific ICF category, which matched the majority of assessment items if there were components that fit into more than 1 category. The quality of the studies was evaluated, and effect sizes for the treatment interventions were calculated for a comprehensive systematic review. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven outcomes (68.75%) were linked to body function, 1 (6.25%) to body structure, 3 (18.75%) to activity and participation, and 1 (6.25%) to environmental factors. No outcomes were associated with environmental factors or personal factors. Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study scores of the included studies ranged from 23 to 43/48. DISCUSSION: The predominant outcome tools in the current research on rehabilitation after CTR are impairment measures and are linked to the category of body structures and body functions. CONCLUSIONS: Functional measures, associated with the activity and participation category, are only modestly represented, and there is a lack of representation of environmental and personal factors for outcome measures used following CTR.

The assessment of psychological factors on upper extremity disability: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: The primary purpose of this scoping review was to describe the nature and extent of the published research that assesses the relationship between psychological features and patient-reported outcome following surgery or rehabilitation of upper extremity disease or injury. METHODS: Twenty-two included studies were examined for quantitative study design, outcome measure, inclusion/exclusion criteria, follow-up and recruitment strategy. Patient population and psychological assessment tools were examined for validity. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. Only 7 of the 22 studies were longitudinal and the rest were cross sectional studies. Depression was the most common psychological status of interest and was included in 17 studies. Pain catastrophizing was the psychological status of interest in 5 of the studies. Four studies considered anxiety, 3 considered pain anxiety, 3 considered distress, 2 considered coping, 2 considered catastrophic thinking, and 2 considered fear avoidance beliefs. DISCUSSION: The majority of studies in this review were cross-sectional studies. Cross-sectional studies may not provide conclusive information about cause-and-effect relationships. This review encourages clinicians to be mindful of the psychological implications found in rehabilitation of individuals with upper extremity disease or injury along with being cognizant of choosing appropriate measurement tools that best represent each patient's characteristics and diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of the research addressing psychological factors affecting outcomes after hand injury focus on negative traits and have limited strength to suggest causation as most have used cross-sectional designs. Stronger longitudinal designs and consideration of positive traits are needed in future studies.

ICF components of outcome measures for mallet finger: A systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review outcome measures used for the assessment of the conservative management of mallet finger to determine if they characterize the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health components of activity, participation, environmental factors, or quality of life. METHODS/RESULTS: Five studies published within the last 10 years were included in the systematic review. A majority, 19 of the outcomes used by the authors, fell within the body functions and structures category. Six were related to activity, and 1 was related to participation. One was linked to environmental factors. Five were found to be not definable and related to quality of life. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that many outcome measures focus on body structures and functions in the current research on the conservative treatment of mallet finger injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a.

Linking ICF components to outcome measures for orthotic intervention for CMC OA: A systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review outcome measures used for assessment of orthotic intervention in the conservative management of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis to determine if they characterize International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) components. The determinants of patient satisfaction regarding the orthotic intervention were also extracted from the studies. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Outcome measures in the included studies were linked to the ICF. Determinants of patient satisfaction regarding the orthotic intervention were also extracted. RESULTS: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Eight (47.1%) outcomes were linked to body structures and functions, 8 (47.1%) to activity limitations and participation restrictions, and 1 (5.9%) outcome fell into the nondefinable quality of life category. Four studies assessed patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review on orthotic intervention for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis found opportunities related to assessment and outcome measures when present studies are linked to the ICF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a.

Conservative treatment of mallet finger: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To determine if there is a superior orthosis and wearing regimen for the conservative treatment of mallet finger injuries. The secondary purpose is to examine the current evidence to evaluate if a night orthosis is necessary following the initial immobilization phase. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the search terms mallet finger, splint, orthosis, and conservative treatment. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review. In all 4 RCTs mallet fingers were immobilized continuously for 6 weeks in acute injuries and 8 weeks for chronic injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Two of the three studies found a large effect size for orthotic intervention ranging from 2.17 to 12.12. Increased edema and age and decreased patient adherence seem to negatively influence DIP extension gains. Recommended immobilization duration is between 6 to 8 weeks and with additional weeks of immobilization in cases of persistent lags. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1a.