IgG4 anti-infliximab in treated patients: Clinical impact and temporal evolution.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) carries potential risk of immunogenicity with the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). ADA may belong to different isotypes and are usually measured by ELISA bridging assay. This test is not designed to detect IgG4 antibodies. The aim was to measure IgG4 anti-IFX antibodies in a cohort of IFX-treated patients and to evaluate their relationship with ADA and their clinical impact. METHODS: Anti-drug antibodies were detected using a bridging ELISA in the serum of 222 treated patients with different clinical outcomes to IFX. The same samples were analyzed for IgG4 anti-IFX antibodies using an experimental ImmunoCAP assay with reduced serum IgG4 background levels. A longitudinal evaluation was performed in a subgroup of 38 patients to define the temporal evolution of IgG4 anti-IFX. RESULTS: IgG4 anti-IFX was found in 26.6% of patients. Eighty of 222 patients were ADA+ (36%) and the majority (57/80, 71.3%) had IgG4 anti-IFX. Two IgG4-positive but ADA-negative patients were identified. IgG4 anti-IFX levels correlated with the serum levels of ADA. IgG4 anti-IFX was more common in both reactive and nonresponder patients than in tolerant/responder patients. Patients who had experienced IgE-mediated reactions displayed significantly higher IgG4 anti-IFX than IgE-negative reactive patients. The majority of patients tested positive for IgG4 anti-IFX after the first seven infusions. CONCLUSIONS: IgG4 anti-IFX is common in treated patients and a large part of ADA producing patients produce IgG4 antibodies. The IgG4 anti-IFX response does not prevent hypersensitivity reactions to IFX and correlates with the IgE anti-IFX response.

Circulating T cells to infliximab are detectable mainly in treated patients developing anti-drug antibodies and hypersensitivity reactions.

Antibodies recognizing infliximab (IFX) may develop in a proportion of treated patients, leading to loss of response or hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). T cell response to IFX has been poorly investigated. This paper was addressed to detect IFX-specific T cells in treated patients with inflammatory diseases developing, or not, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and to correlate the presence of specific T cells with the clinical outcomes of the treatment. A co-culture system of IFX-loaded dendritic cells and purified autologous CD4+ T cells was used to detect memory T cells in 32 ADA+ and 39 ADA- IFX-treated patients and control groups. The cytokine profile of IFX-specific T cells was also studied in culture supernatants. IFX-specific cell proliferation was detected mainly in cells from ADA+ patients, irrespective of their different diseases. HR patients displayed higher T cell proliferation than non-responder and tolerant patients. A mixed [interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-13, IL-10] cytokine profile was shown in cells from ADA+ patients, while IL-10 was the most frequently detected cytokine in the supernatants of cultures from ADA- patients. Immunoglobulin (Ig)E+ ADA+ patients with previous HRs exhibited a more pronounced type 2 profile than IgE- ADA+ patients. This work provides evidence that IFX-specific circulating T cells are detectable mainly in ADA+ patients with HRs, regardless of their disease. The IFX-induced cytokine pattern partially correlates with the ADA isotype.

Allergological in vitro and in vivo evaluation of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab.

BACKGROUND: The administration of biological agents is potentially affected by IgE-mediated infusion reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the utility of skin testing in patients who have experienced infliximab (IFX)-related reactions. METHODS: Thirty patients with previous immediate hypersensitivity reaction to IFX, 20 disease-matched non exposed subjects, 15 IFX-treated disease-matched tolerant patients and 15 IFX non-responder patients were enrolled. Non-isotype-specific and IgE anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were measured by a double-capture ELISA kit and ImmunoCAP assay, respectively. Prick and intra-dermal tests were carried out with the commercial IFX preparation serially diluted. RESULTS: Skin testing, performed in 23 of 30 reactive patients, resulted positive in 7 of them (30.4%), whereas no positivity was found in other groups of patients. The majority of reactive patients displayed non-isotype-specific ADAs (23/30, 76.6%) and the presence of anti-IFX IgE antibodies was detected in 6 of them (26%). All 6 IgE-positive reactive patients showed skin testing positivity. One reactive ADAs-positive patient who resulted skin test positive, with no detectable serum IFX-specific IgE ADAs, was also found. Skin testing positivity was associated with severe and early reactions (within the 3rd dose). No unexpected adverse reactions to skin testing were recorded. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study shows that about 30% of reactive patients display skin testing positivity. They usually develop severe reactions, mainly during the first administrations of IFX. The specificity and the safety of skin testing procedure for this biological agent are also confirmed.

Poly(I:C) promotes the production of IL-17A by murine CD1d-driven invariant NKT cells in airway inflammation.

BACKGROUND: IL-17A is associated with different asthma phenotypes as virus-associated or steroid-resistant asthma. Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid [poly(I:C)] on IL-17A production by CD1d-activated iNKT cells. METHODS: We analysed the in vitro effect of poly(I:C) on the release of IL-17A by spleen and lung CD1d-activated iNKT cells with α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer). Its activity was also investigated in an α-GalCer-induced murine models, including lung inflammation. The inhibition of IL-17A by Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 agonists in the same in vitro and in vivo models has been analysed. RESULTS: Poly(I:C) upregulated the in vitro IL-17A production by CD1d-activated NK1.1- CD4- iNKT subset, without modifying type 1 and type 2 cytokines. The two stimuli selectively upregulated IL-17A serum levels in vivo. Their intratracheal administration resulted in increased airway hyper-reactivity (AHR), neutrophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage and airway inflammation, which were inhibited by anti-IL-17A antibody. Poly(I:C) effects were attributable to IL1ß and IL-23 release from dendritic cells, as showed by inhibition with neutralizing antibodies. TLR7 agonists inhibited the IL-17A production by poly(I:C) plus α-GalCer in the same models. Such effect was associated with the increased production by DC of IL-17A-inhibiting cytokines and the dampening of IL-1ß and IL-23. CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic dsRNA selectively expand a CD1d-driven IL-17A-producing iNKT cell subset, thus explaining the worsening of airway inflammation by some viral infections. TLR3- and TLR7-triggering viral sequences can exert variable and opposite effects on adaptive immune response.

Anti-infliximab IgE and non-IgE antibodies and induction of infusion-related severe anaphylactic reactions.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha useful in the treatment of many chronic inflammatory diseases. Severe anaphylaxis has been reported during therapy, although the exact mechanism has not been fully defined. The reactions have been related to the infliximab immunogenicity and development of specific antibodies. AIMS OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of the development of IgE and non-IgE antibodies to infliximab and their relationship with infusion reaction. METHODS: Seventy-one patients (11 reactives, 11 therapeutically nonresponders, and 49 unreactive therapeutically responders) and 20 non-infliximab-exposed control subjects (ten rheumatoid arthritis, five spondyloarthropathies, five vasculitis) were evaluated for the presence of IgE (ImmunoCAP assay), IgM, and non-isotype-specific (ELISA assays) anti-infliximab antibodies. Sera were obtained at baseline and during the course of treatment, before each infliximab infusion. RESULTS: Eleven out of 71 patients had a hypersensitivity reaction to infliximab. Non-isotype-specific anti-infliximab antibodies were detected in eight reactive and two nonresponder patients. Three patients with severe reactions displayed anti-infliximab IgE antibodies and positive skin testing. Detectable levels of anti-infliximab IgM antibodies were shown in three additional IgE- and skin testing-negative patients. IgE and IgM antibodies to infliximab were not detectable in the two nonresponder patients. Antibodies developed before the 2nd and the 3rd infusion, and their appearance was strictly related to the timing of the reaction. CONCLUSIONS: This report indicates that in some patients with infliximab-related severe reactions, IgE or IgM antibodies against infliximab were detectable. The majority of reactions could be predicted by the appearance of anti-infliximab antibodies.