ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The standard method for scoring polysomnographic (PSG) sleep is insufficient in the intensive care unit (ICU). A modified classification has been proposed, but has not been tested in specific groups of ICU patients. We aimed firstly to (1) use the modified classification to describe sleep in two groups of ICU patients: a severe sepsis group and a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) group, and (2) to compare sleep stage distribution in the groups; secondly to compare the PSG findings with nurses' sleep evaluation. METHODS: Non-sedated mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis or COPD completed up to 20-hours PSG recording in each patient. A modified classification for scoring sleep in ICU was used for scoring the PSGs. Sleep assessment by nurses was done at 15 minutes intervals. RESULTS: We included 16 patients with severe sepsis and 17 patients with COPD. Half of the patients in the severe sepsis group and 59% in the COPD group had atypical sleep. We found significantly different sleep stage distribution in the two groups, with the COPD group having a higher proportion of atypical sleep (54.4% vs 48.7%, P < .0001). No correlation between nurse sleep assessment and PSG was found in cases of atypical sleep (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Normal PSG sleep characteristics as defined by standard classification are absent in many conscious, non-sedated critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation. Nurse sleep evaluation does not correlate with PSG if atypical sleep is present in the PSG, which limits the reliability of subjective sleep assessment in this patient population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Day surgery is expanding in several countries, and it is important to collect information about quality. The aim of this study was to assess morbidity and unanticipated hospital visits 0-30 days post-operatively in a large cohort. METHODS: We prospectively recorded data from 57,709 day surgery procedures performed in eight day surgery centres over a 3-year period. We cross-checked with the National Patient Registry to identify complications 0-30 days post-operatively, and registrations from The Danish Register of Cause of Death were requested. We retrieved the records of 1174 patients to assign a relation between secondary contact and day surgery. RESULTS: The overall rate of return hospital visits was 1.21% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.30%] caused by a wide range of diagnoses. No deaths were definitely related to day surgery. The return hospital visits were due to haemorrhage/haematoma 0.50% (95% CI: 0.44-0.56%), infection 0.44% (95% CI: 0.38-0 49%) and thromboembolic events 0.03%. Major morbidity was rare. The surgical procedures with the highest rate of complication were tonsillectomies 11.4%, surgically induced abortions 3.13% and inguinal hernia repairs 1.23%. CONCLUSION: This large-scale Danish national study confirmed that day surgery is associated with a very low rate of return hospital visits. Despite the rapid expansion of day surgery, safety has been maintained, major morbidity being very rare, and no deaths being definitely related to day surgery.