Patient-Reported Outcomes After Switching to a 2-Drug Regimen of Fixed-Dose Combination Dolutegravir/Lamivudine: 48-Week Results from the SALSA Study.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) facilitate communication between patients and providers, enhancing patient-centered care. We report PROs for virologically suppressed people living with HIV-1 who switched to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) or continued their 3- or 4-drug current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) in the phase 3 SALSA study. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (status version; HIVTSQs) and HIV Symptom Distress Module (HIV-SDM) at Weeks 4, 24, and 48. A post hoc analysis assessed change in HIVTSQs and HIV-SDM by age (≥ 50 and < 50 years). Higher HIVTSQs scores represent greater treatment satisfaction (range, 0-60); lower HIV-SDM scores indicate less symptom bother (range, 0-80). Participants in the DTG/3TC (n = 246) and CAR (n = 247) groups reported comparable baseline HIVTSQs total scores (mean [SD], 55.2 [6.5] and 55.8 [5.5], respectively). Beginning at Week 4, mean HIVTSQs scores in the DTG/3TC group further increased vs. CAR and were sustained through Week 48. Baseline mean (SD) HIV-SDM symptom bother scores were comparable between the DTG/3TC (9.0 [9.9]) and CAR (7.9 [9.3]) groups. Small improvements in HIV-SDM scores favoring DTG/3TC were observed at Weeks 4 and 24 and sustained through Week 48 (though not significant between groups). Participants aged ≥ 50 and < 50 years who switched to DTG/3TC reported higher satisfaction and less symptom distress vs. CAR; these results were generally comparable between age groups. Participants who switched to DTG/3TC reported rapid and sustained improvements in treatment satisfaction compared with those who continued CAR, reinforcing the benefits of DTG/3TC beyond virologic suppression (NCT04021290; registration date, 7/11/2019).

Real-World Effectiveness of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in People With HIV-1 in Test-and-Treat Settings or With High Baseline Viral Loads: TANDEM Study Subgroup Analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the treatment of antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive people with HIV-1 based on results from the pivotal GEMINI-1/GEMINI-2 trials. Around that time, immediate initiation of treatment upon diagnosis was recommended in the US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines. Here we report results from 126 treatment-naive people with HIV-1 who initiated DTG/3TC as part of a test-and-treat strategy (n = 61) or with high baseline viral loads (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/ml; n = 16) from the TANDEM study. METHODS: TANDEM was a US-based, retrospective chart review study that included a cohort of 126 individuals aged ≥ 18 years with no prior history of ART who initiated DTG/3TC before September 30, 2020, and had ≥ 6 months of follow-up. Test-and-treat was defined as ART initiation shortly after diagnosis without available viral load, CD4 + cell count, or HIV-1 resistance data. Outcomes included virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml; overall and by baseline viral load) and discontinuations. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Among 61 individuals who initiated DTG/3TC in a test-and-treat setting (median [interquartile range (IQR)] treatment duration, 1.3 [0.9-1.7] years), 57 (93%) achieved virologic suppression, and 51 (84%) remained suppressed; 1 (< 1%) individual discontinued DTG/3TC due to persistent low-level viremia. The most common healthcare provider (HCP)-reported reason for initiating DTG/3TC was avoidance of long-term toxicities among individuals in the test-and-treat subgroup. Of 16 treatment-naive individuals with high baseline viral loads (median [IQR] treatment duration, 100,000-250,000 copies/ml: 1.2 [0.8-1.8] years; > 250,000 copies/ml: 1.0 [0.7-1.1] years), 14 (88%) achieved virologic suppression, 13 (81%) remained suppressed, and none discontinued DTG/3TC. Patient preference was the most common HCP-reported reason for initiating DTG/3TC in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate real-world effectiveness of DTG/3TC, with few discontinuations, in people with HIV-1 in test-and-treat settings or with high baseline viral loads.

Two-Drug Regimens Dolutegravir/Lamivudine and Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Are Effective with Few Discontinuations in US Real-World Settings: Results from the TANDEM Study.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) and dolutegravir/rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) are fixed-dose, complete, single-tablet, two-drug regimens (2DRs) indicated for HIV-1. DTG/3TC is approved for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive people with HIV-1 and virologically suppressed individuals to replace current ART; DTG/RPV is indicated for virologically suppressed individuals as a switch option. Virologic efficacy and effectiveness of these DTG-based 2DRs have been demonstrated in phase 3 clinical trials and real-world cohorts, primarily from Europe. This study characterized real-world use of DTG-based 2DRs for HIV-1 treatment in the USA. METHODS: TANDEM was a retrospective medical chart review across 24 US sites. Individuals aged ≥ 18 years who initiated DTG/3TC or DTG/RPV before September 30, 2020, with ≥ 6 months of follow-up were included. One cohort included ART-naive people who initiated DTG/3TC (n = 126), and two other cohorts included virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) people on stable ART regimens for ≥ 3 months before switch to either DTG/3TC (n = 192) or DTG/RPV (n = 151). Clinical characteristics, treatment history, and outcomes are described. RESULTS: Virologically suppressed individuals were older than those who were ART-naive, and the ART-naive cohort had higher proportions of individuals assigned male at birth and of Hispanic ethnicity. The most common healthcare provider-reported reason for choosing a DTG-based 2DR was avoidance of long-term toxicities (25-33% across cohorts), followed by simplification/streamlining of treatment. Among ART-naive people on DTG/3TC, 94% achieved virologic suppression after initiation, and 83% maintained suppression at last follow-up; discontinuation rate was < 1%. Among cohorts who switched to DTG-based 2DRs, 96% maintained virologic suppression on DTG/3TC and 93% on DTG/RPV; 2% on DTG/3TC and 3% on DTG/RPV discontinued. CONCLUSION: Motivation for selecting DTG-based 2DRs was primarily driven by a desire to avoid or manage toxicities and simplify treatment. Results demonstrate that DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV are effective in real-world settings, with few discontinuations, reflecting data from clinical trials.

Cost-effectiveness of Cabotegravir Long-Acting for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Cabotegravir long-acting (CAB-LA) administered every 2 months was approved in the USA as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for individuals at risk of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection based on the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 083 and HPTN 084 clinical trials, which demonstrated superior reduction in HIV-1 acquisition compared with daily oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) in men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender women (TGW), and cisgender women. A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the lifetime cost-effectiveness of initiating CAB-LA versus generic oral FTC/TDF for HIV PrEP in the USA from a healthcare sector perspective. METHODS: PrEP-eligible adults entered the Markov model receiving CAB-LA or FTC/TDF and could continue initial PrEP, transition to a second PrEP option, or discontinue PrEP over time. Efficacy was taken from the HPTN 083 and HPTN 084 clinical trials. Individuals who acquired HIV-1 infection incurred lifetime HIV-related costs, could transmit HIV onwards, and could develop PrEP-related resistance mutations. Input parameter values were obtained from public and published sources. Model outcomes were discounted at 3%. RESULTS: The model estimated that the CAB-LA pathway prevented 4.5 more primary and secondary HIV-1 infections per 100 PrEP users than the oral PrEP pathway, which yielded 0.2 fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost per person. Additional per-person lifetime costs were $9476 (2022 US dollars), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $46,843 per QALY gained. Results remained consistent in sensitivity and scenario analyses, including in underserved populations with low oral PrEP usage. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that initiating CAB-LA for PrEP is cost-effective versus generic daily oral FTC/TDF for individuals at risk of acquiring HIV-1 infection.

Comparing Real-World Healthcare Costs Associated with Single-Tablet Regimens for HIV-1: The 2-Drug Regimen Dolutegravir/Lamivudine vs. Standard 3- or 4-Drug Regimens.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) is a 2-drug regimen for HIV-1 treatment with long-term efficacy and good tolerability comparable to 3- or 4-drug regimens. This study evaluated DTG/3TC cost versus other standard single-tablet regimens during its first year of approval. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed US claims data from adults with HIV-1. Eligibility criteria included ≥ 1 dispensing of DTG/3TC, DTG/abacavir (ABC)/3TC, bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF), elvitegravir (EVG)/cobicistat (COBI)/FTC/TAF, and darunavir (DRV)/COBI/FTC/TAF (index date was first dispensing) and ≥ 6 months of continuous eligibility before index date (baseline period). All-cause and HIV-related healthcare costs were evaluated during the observation period (index date until earliest of end of continuous eligibility or data availability). Adjusted cost differences and adjusted cost ratios were estimated using multivariable regression models controlling for differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 22,061 individuals with HIV-1 and dispensed treatment with DTG/3TC (n = 590), DTG/ABC/3TC (n = 4355), BIC/FTC/TAF (n = 9068), EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF (n = 7081), or DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF (n = 967) were included. Most claims data were from men (mean age ~ 46 years). Mean unadjusted all-cause total healthcare costs per patient per month were significantly lower for DTG/3TC versus BIC/FTC/TAF and DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF, and mean unadjusted HIV-related healthcare costs per patient per month were significantly lower for DTG/3TC versus DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF. Cost differences were primarily driven by significantly lower pharmacy costs for DTG/3TC versus other regimens (P < 0.001), while medical costs were similar across cohorts. Results were similar among treatment-naive and treatment-experienced individuals. After adjusting for baseline covariates, significant adjusted cost differences were generally consistent with unadjusted findings. Adjusted cost ratios generally favored DTG/3TC for all-cause healthcare and HIV-related costs, with all pharmacy cost ratios favoring DTG/3TC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dolutegravir/lamivudine had the lowest healthcare costs of BIC/FTC/TAF, EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF, and DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF, and the lowest pharmacy costs of all regimens, in unadjusted and adjusted analyses and by treatment experience, supporting the economic benefits of DTG/3TC as an initial or switch regimen for HIV-1.

Retrospective analysis of adherence to HIV treatment and healthcare utilization in a commercially insured population.

AIMS: Single-tablet regimens (STRs) can improve antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence; however, the relationship between long-term adherence and patient healthcare resource utilization (HRU) is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess long-term ART adherence among people living with HIV (PLHIV) using STRs and multi-tablet regimens (MTRs) and compare HRU over time by adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed medical and pharmacy claims (Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Database). Included PLHIV were aged ≥18 years, had ≥1 medical claim with an HIV diagnosis, and had pharmacy claims for a complete STR or MTR. Adherence was analyzed as the proportion of days covered (PDC), stratified as ≥95%, very high; 90-95%, high; 80-90%, moderate; <80%, low. Cumulative all-cause and HIV-related HRU were calculated across 4 years. Among PLHIV with ≥4-year follow-up, HRU was assessed by adherence. RESULTS: Among 15,153 PLHIV included, 63% achieved PDC ≥90% during Year 1. Among the subgroup of PLHIV with ≥4-year follow-up (N = 3,818), the proportion maintaining PDC ≥90% fell from 67% in Year 1 to 54% by Year 4. The difference from Years 1 to 4 in the proportion of PLHIV with PDC ≥90% was 13% and 17% in the STR and MTR groups, respectively. Cumulative HRU across the 4-year follow-up was higher in PLHIV with low vs high adherence (27% with low adherence had ≥1 emergency room visit vs 17% for very high, p < .0001; 15% with low adherence had ≥1 inpatient stay vs 7% for very high, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: ART adherence showed room for improvement, particularly over the long term. PLHIV receiving STRs exhibited higher adherence vs those receiving MTRs; this difference increased over time. The proportion of PLHIV with higher HRU was significantly higher among those with lower adherence and became greater over time. Interventions and alternative therapies to improve adherence among PLHIV should be explored.

Virologic Outcomes Among People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus With High Pretherapy Viral Load Burden Initiating on Common Core Agents.

BACKGROUND: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) with viral loads (VLs) ≥100 000 copies/mL are less likely to achieve virologic success, but few studies have characterized real-world treatment outcomes. METHODS: ART-naive PLWH with VLs ≥100 000 copies/mL initiating dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir (EVG), raltegravir (RAL), or darunavir (DRV) between 12 August 2013 and 31 July 2017 were identified from the OPERA database. Virologic failure was defined as (i) 2 consecutive VLs ≥200 copies/mL after 36 weeks of ART; (ii) 1 VL ≥200 copies/mL with core agent discontinuation after 36 weeks; (iii) 2 consecutive VLs ≥200 copies/mL after suppression (≤50 copies/mL) before 36 weeks; or (iv) 1 VL ≥200 copies/mL with discontinuation after suppression before 36 weeks. Cox modeling estimated the association between regimen and virologic failure. RESULTS: There were 2038 ART-naive patients with high VL who initiated DTG (36%), EVG (46%), DRV (16%), or RAL (2%). Median follow-up was 18.1 (interquartile range, 12.4-28.9) months. EVG and DTG initiators were similar at baseline, but RAL initiators were older and more likely to be female with low CD4 cell counts while DRV initiators differed notably on factors associated with treatment failure. Virologic failure was experienced by 9.2% DTG, 13.2% EVG, 18.4% RAL, and 18.8% DRV initiators. Compared to DTG, the adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.46 (1.05-2.03) for EVG, 2.24 (1.50-3.34) for DRV, and 4.13 (1.85-9.24) for RAL. CONCLUSIONS: ART-naive PLWH with high VLs initiating on DTG were significantly less likely to experience virologic failure compared to EVG, RAL, and DRV initiators.Antiretroviral therapy-naïve people living with HIV (PLWH) initiating therapy with viral loads ≥100,000 copies/mL varied markedly at baseline. In adjusted models, PLWH initiating dolutegravir-based regimens were less likely to experience virologic failure as compared to elvitegravir, raltegravir and darunavir initiators.

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of dolutegravir/lamivudine for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir(DTG)/lamivudine(3TC) is the first 2-drug regimen recommended as an initial treatment for people living with HIV (PLHIV). OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness and potential budget impact of DTG/3TC in the US healthcare setting. METHODS: A previously published hybrid decision-tree and Markov cohort state transition model was adapted to estimate the incremental costs and health outcome benefits over a patients' lifetime. DTG/3TC was compared with current standard of care in treatment naive and treatment experienced virologically suppressed PLHIV. Health states included in the model were based upon virologic response and CD4 cell count, with death as an absorbing state. Clinical data was informed by the Phase III GEMINI 1 and 2 clinical trials, a published network meta-analysis (NMA) in treatment-naive patients and the Phase III TANGO clinical trial in treatment experienced patients. Costs and utilities were informed by published data and discounted annually at a rate of 3%. A separate 5-year budget impact analysis was conducted assuming 5%-15% uptake in eligible treatment naive and 10%-30% uptake in eligible treatment experienced patients. RESULTS: In the treatment naive analyses based on GEMINI 1 and 2, DTG/3TC dominated, i.e., was less costly and more effective, than all comparators. DTG/3TC resulted in 0.083 incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a cost saving of $199,166 compared with the DTG + tenofovir disoproxil(TDF)/emtricitabine(FTC) comparator arm. The incremental QALY and cost savings for DTG/3TC compared with DTG/abacavir(ABC)/3TC, cobicistat-boosted darunavir(DRV/c)/tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)/FTC, and bictegravir (BIC)/TAF/FTC, based on NMA results were 0.465, 0.142, and 0.698, and $42,948, $122,846, and $44,962, respectively. In the analyses of treatment-experienced virologically suppressed patients based on TANGO, DTG/3TC offered slightly lower QALYs (-0.037) with an estimated savings of $78,730 when compared with continuation of TAF-based regimen (TBR). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that these conclusions were relatively insensitive to alternative parameter estimates. The budget impact analysis estimated that by 5th year a total of 70,240 treatment naive patients and 1,340,480 treatment experienced patients could be eligible to be prescribed DTG/3TC. The estimated budget savings over 5 years ranged from $1.12b to $3.35b (corresponding to 27,512 to 82,536 on DTG/3TC by year 5) in the lowest and highest uptake scenarios, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, DTG/3TC with its comparable efficacy and lower drug acquisition costs, has the potential to offer significant cost savings to US healthcare payers for the initial treatment of treatment naive patients and as a treatment switching option for virologically suppressed patients. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded in full by ViiV healthcare, Brentford, UK. Medical writing to support this study was also funded in full by ViiV Healthcare, Brentford, UK. Butler, Hayward, and Jacob are employees of HEOR Ltd, the company performing this study funded by ViiV Healthcare. Anderson is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline and owns shares in the company. Punekar, Evitt, and Oglesby are employees of ViiV Healthcare and own stocks in GlaxoSmithKline.

Real-World Experience with Dolutegravir-Based Two-Drug Regimens.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir-based 2-drug regimens (DTG 2DRs) are now accepted as alternatives to 3-drug regimens for HIV antiretroviral treatment (ART); however, literature on physician drivers for prescribing DTG 2DR is sparse. This study evaluated treatment patterns of DTG 2DR components in clinical practice in the US. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review in adult patients in care in the US with HIV-1 who received DTG 2DR prior to July 31, 2017, with follow-up until January 30, 2018. Primary objectives of the study were to determine reasons for patients initiating DTG 2DR and to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics. All analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Overall, 278 patients received DTG 2DR (male: 70%; mean age: 56 years). Most patients were treatment experienced (98%), with a mean 13.5 years of prior ART. DTG was most commonly paired with darunavir (55%) or rilpivirine (27%). The most common physician-reported reasons for initiating DTG 2DR were treatment simplification/streamlining (30%) and avoidance of potential long-term toxicities (20%). Before starting DTG 2DR, 42% of patients were virologically suppressed; of those, 95% maintained suppression while on DTG 2DR. Of the 50% of patients with detectable viral load before DTG 2DR, 79% achieved and maintained virologic suppression on DTG 2DR during follow-up. There were no virologic data for 8% of patients prior to starting DTG 2DR. Only 15 patients discontinued DTG 2DR, of whom 4 (27%) discontinued due to virologic failure. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to commercial availability of the single-tablet 2DRs, DTG 2DR components were primarily used in treatment-experienced patients for treatment simplification and avoidance of long-term toxicities. Many of these patients achieved and maintained virologic suppression, with low discontinuation rates.

Estimating HIV Management and Comorbidity Costs Among Aging HIV Patients in the United States: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: As life expectancy of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) approaches that of the general population, the composition of HIV management costs is likely to change. OBJECTIVES: To (a) review treatment and disease management costs in HIV, including costs of adverse events (AEs) related to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and long-term toxicities, and (b) explore the evolving cost drivers. METHODS: A targeted literature review between January 2012 and November 2017 was conducted using PubMed and major conferences. Articles reporting U.S. costs of HIV management, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining events, end of life care, and ART-associated comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and osteoporosis were included. All costs were inflated to 2017 U.S. dollars. A Markov model-based analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of increased life expectancy on costs associated with HIV treatment and management. RESULTS: 22 studies describing HIV costs in the United States were identified, comprising 16 cost-effectiveness analysis studies, 5 retrospective analyses of health care utilization, and 1 cost analysis in a resource-limited setting. Management costs per patient per month, including routine care costs (on/off ART), non-HIV medication, opportunistic infection prophylaxis, inpatient utilization, outpatient utilization, and emergency department utilization were reported as CD4+ cell-based health state costs ranging from $1,192 for patients with CD4 > 500 cells/mm3 to $2,873 for patients with CD4 < 50 cells/mm3. Event costs for AEs ranged from $0 for headache, pain, vomiting, and lipodystrophy to $31,545 for myocardial infarction. The mean monthly per-patient costs for CVD management, CKD management, and osteoporosis were $5,898, $6,108, and $4,365, respectively. Improvements in life expectancy, approaching that of the general population in 2018, are projected to increase ART-related and AE costs by 35.4% and comorbidity costs by 175.8% compared with estimated costs with HIV life expectancy observed in 1996. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified and summarized holistic cost estimates appropriate for use within U.S. HIV cost-effectiveness analyses and demonstrates an increasing contribution of comorbidity outcomes, primarily associated with aging in addition to long-term treatment with ART, not typically evaluated in contemporary HIV cost-effectiveness analyses. DISCLOSURES: This analysis was sponsored by ViiV Healthcare, which had no role in the analyses and interpretation of study results. Ward, Sugrue, Hayward, and McEwan are employees of HEOR Ltd, which received funding from ViiV Healthcare to conduct this study. Anderson is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline and holds shares in the company. Punekar and Oglesby are employees of ViiV Healthcare and hold shares in GlaxoSmithKline. Lopes was employed by ViiV Healthcare at the time of the study and holds shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

Retrospective analysis of comorbidities and treatment burden among patients with HIV infection in a US Medicaid population.

Objective: Comorbidities and comedications are important factors influencing optimal therapy because people are living longer with HIV infection. This study describes the long-term comorbidity profile and treatment burden among people with HIV-1 infection.Methods: This retrospective study included Medicaid claims data from patients with ≥1 antiretroviral (ARV) claim between 2016 and 2017 (most recent claim defined the index date), ≥1 HIV diagnosis within 1 year before index, age ≥18 years at first HIV diagnosis and <65 years at index, ≥12 months of continuous eligibility before index, and no history of HIV-2 infection. Comorbidities, concomitant medication use, and pill burden were assessed in the 4 years before index. Analyses were stratified by patient age and treatment experience.Results: Among 3456 patients, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 47.1 (10.4) years; the majority were black (55%) and men (63%). In general, the prevalence of comorbidities increased from the fourth year to the first year before index and included cardiovascular disease (28-40%), hypertension (24-37%), hyperlipidemia (12-17%), and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (13-19%). Concomitant medication use corresponding to these comorbidities slightly increased over time. In the year before index, mean (SD) daily pill burden was 2.1 (1.4) for ARVs and 5.9 (5.9) for non-ARVs. Older age and prior treatment experience were associated with higher rates of comorbidities and greater pill burden.Conclusions: In people with HIV infection, comorbidities and concomitant medication use increased with age, supporting considerations for streamlined ARV regimens highlighted in treatment guidelines.

Virologic Outcomes Among ART-Naïve Individuals Initiating Dolutegravir, Elvitegravir, Raltegravir or Darunavir: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir (DTG), Elvitegravir (EVG), Raltegravir (RAL) and Darunavir (DRV) are commonly prescribed core agents for antiretroviral therapy (ART), and a need exists to compare their clinical effectiveness, as defined by virologic failure risks in real-world settings. METHODS: This observational analysis of a US clinical cohort consisted of ART-naïve people living with HIV (PLWH) in the OPERA database initiating DTG-, EVG-, RAL- or DRV-based regimens between August 2013 and July 2016, with follow-up to July 2017. PLWH were observed from first core agent initiation until core agent discontinuation, clinical activity cessation, death, or study end. Key outcomes included viral suppression (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL) and confirmed virologic failure (two consecutive viral loads > 200 copies/mL or a viral load > 200 copies/mL followed by discontinuation). Association between core agent and time to virologic failure was assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Overall, 4049 ART-naïve PLWH initiated EVG (47.4%), DTG (34.7%), DRV (14.6%), or RAL (3.2%). DTG and EVG initiators had generally similar baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, including race, risk of infection, baseline viral load, and baseline CD4 levels. RAL and DRV initiators were older and generally sicker than DTG initiators. During follow-up, more DTG initiators achieved virologic suppression (78.7%) compared with EVG (73.6%; p < 0.05), RAL (51.9%; p < 0.0001) and DRV (48.6%; p < 0.0001) initiators. Compared to DTG, both RAL and DRV were associated with higher rates of virologic failure, with adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of 4.70 (3.03, 7.30) and 2.38 (1.72, 3.29), respectively. No difference was observed between EVG and DTG with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.24 (0.94, 1.64). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort representative of PLWH in care in the US, ART-naïve PLWH prescribed DTG had better virologic outcomes than RAL and DRV, but had virologic failure risks comparable to EVG, although RAL and DRV were preferentially prescribed to sicker individuals. FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare.

Benchmarking HIV Quality Measures Across US Payer Types.

Despite advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a significant issue in the United States. Early diagnosis, continuous treatment access/adherence, and long-term care engagement help patients benefit fully from ART; however, a shortfall in care engagement remains, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes. This analysis benchmarks rates of health care quality and process measures to identify areas for improvement. This retrospective, claims-based, real-world cohort study assessed the percentage of prevalent (existing) and incident (newly diagnosed) patients with HIV with commercial or public health insurance meeting 4 National Quality Forum (NQF)-endorsed, 1 Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA), and 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) measures over a 4-year period. Most prevalent patients consistently met the NQF-endorsed prescribed ART and gaps in visits measures. Longer-term visit frequency measure rates were well below the 90% Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS target. Proportion of prevalent patients meeting each NQF-endorsed measure was maintained/increased with increasing age in 2015-2016. Substantially fewer incident patients than prevalent patients met NQF-endorsed measures across all measurement periods, particularly for visit frequency (32%-51%). PQA ART adherence was low (36%-73%). CDC receipt of care rates were high (83%-92%), whereas retention in care rates were low (67%-72%) among prevalent patients. For incident patients, linkage to care rates were consistently low (21%-44%). This study benchmarks current US HIV care engagement and highlights the need for improvement in early care engagement, ART adherence and long-term retention of care among patients with HIV.

Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns among US patients with HIV.

OBJECTIVES: Describe the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with HIV-1 who have commercial or Medicare health insurance in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Administrative claims for adult commercial and Medicare health plan enrollees with evidence of HIV-1 and antiretroviral therapy (ART) between January 1, 2007, and March 31, 2017, were assessed. Current and previous complete ART regimens were identified using a claims-based algorithm. Results were stratified by treatment status and insurance type. RESULTS: Of 18,699 eligible patients, 5027 (27%) had no previous ART regimens; 15,275 (82%) had commercial insurance. Mean age was 47.5 years. Common comorbidities included hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, depression, and anxiety. The mean number of ART regimens was 1.43, with 31% of patients having 2 or more regimens. Mean (SD) daily pill burden was higher in patients with more than 1 ART regimen over time (5.7 [6.0] pills) or with Medicare insurance (9.2 [8.0] pills) than in patients with no previous ART (1.9 [4.4] pills) or with commercial insurance (3.7 [4.7] pills). Overall, 60% of patients achieved 90% or greater adherence to their ART regimen and 16% had a prescription filled for any contraindicated medication to an ART during their regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive study demonstrated that people living with HIV enrolled in Medicare have a significant amount of comorbidities and total pill burden. Although advancements in ART have significantly improved life expectancy and quality of life for people living with HIV, it is important to take into account individual complexities such as comorbidities and pill burden when selecting ART regimens.

Real-World Health Plan Data Analysis: Key Trends in Medication Adherence and Overall Costs in Patients with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential to achieve long-term viral suppression in patients with HIV-1. Single-tablet regimens (STRs) have improved adherence and decreased health care costs and hospitalizations, but previous study results suggest that the relationship between ART adherence and health care costs and utilization is complex. OBJECTIVE: To assess ART adherence trends in patients with HIV-1 to determine if differences in utilization, demographics, and overall costs exist among patients with varying levels of medication adherence. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed medical and pharmacy claims data from an administrative claims database between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2016, for Medicaid or commercially insured patients continuously enrolled for ≥ 6 months before and ≥ 15 months after the index date (date of first medical claim with an HIV diagnosis or pharmacy claim for HIV ART medication between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2014). Qualifying patients were aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of HIV-1 infection or at least 1 pharmacy claim for HIV ART at index and at least 2 pharmacy claims during the follow-up period. Patients were categorized on the basis of adherence as measured by proportion of days covered (PDC; ≥ 95%, highly adherent; < 95%, less adherent) and treatment with an STR or multiple-tablet regimen (MTR). Commercially insured patients were stratified by duration of follow-up data (< 3 or ≥ 3 years). There were not enough Medicaid patients for follow-up analysis. Outcomes of interest were ART adherence and annual medical and pharmacy utilization and costs. Descriptive statistics were generated, and health care resource utilization and costs were reported as annual averages. Chi-square and t-tests were used to examine differences between the cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 332 Medicaid patients and 1,698 patients insured commercially met inclusion criteria. Adherence to ART medication (mean PDC) during the first 15 months was lower in Medicaid patients (65%) versus commercial patients (79%; P < 0.0001). Patients treated with STRs comprised 47% and 37% of patients in the < 3-year and ≥ 3-year follow-up cohorts, respectively. More STR patients achieved ≥95% adherence than MTR patients (< 3-year follow-up, 53% vs. 39%; ≥ 3-year follow-up, 61% vs. 45%; P < 0.001). In both follow-up cohorts, less adherent patients had higher mean annual medical costs, and results were significant for patients with ≥ 3-year follow-up ($8,224 vs. $3,097; P = 0.0007). These results were largely driven by savings in mean annual inpatient costs among the highly adherent patients in both cohorts (< 3-year follow-up, -$2,525 [P = 0.0003]; ≥ 3-year follow-up, -$815 [P < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on STRs were more adherent than patients on MTRs regardless of length of follow-up. Better adherence was associated with significant inpatient cost savings. The relationship between adherence and total medical costs is nuanced depending on the duration of follow-up. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by ViiV Healthcare, which participated in protocol development, the analysis plan, and interpretation of results but did not have final approval on the decision to publish. Kangethe, Polson, Lord, and Evangelatos are employees of Magellan Rx Management, which was contracted by ViiV Healthcare to conduct the research for this study. Oglesby is an employee of ViiV Healthcare and owns stock in GlaxoSmithKline. Data from this study were previously presented at AMCP Nexus; October 16-19, 2017; Dallas, TX.

A Systematic Literature Review of Adverse Events Associated with Systemic Treatments Used in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

This systematic literature review describes adverse events (AEs) among patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who received second-line or later anticancer therapies. Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of adults with advanced or metastatic STS who received systemic anticancer therapy before enrollment in a randomized-controlled trial of pazopanib, another targeted cancer agent, or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Of 204 publications identified, seven articles representing six unique studies met inclusion criteria. Additional safety results for pazopanib were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Hematologic toxicities were common with all therapies evaluated (pazopanib, trabectedin, dacarbazine ± gemcitabine, gemcitabine ± docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and ifosfamide). Studies differed in AE type, timing of assessment, and outcomes reported, although patient populations and AE assessment timing were relatively similar for pazopanib and trabectedin. AEs that were more common with trabectedin than pazopanib were anemia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, and elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase. An AE that was more common with pazopanib than trabectedin was anorexia. Only the pazopanib study reported AE frequencies versus placebo. A planned meta-analysis was not feasible, as there was no common comparator. More well-designed studies that include common comparators are needed for comparison of safety effects among treatments for STS.

Prospective Validation of the Lupus Impact Tracker: A Patient-Completed Tool for Clinical Practice to Evaluate the Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and utility of the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT). METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal study with 20 North American sites participating. Consenting patients completed the LIT, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (version 2), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), LupusQoL, and patient LIT feedback questionnaire. Rheumatologists completed the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index, and physician LIT feedback questionnaire. The reliability, convergent validity, construct validity, and responsiveness of the LIT were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 325 SLE patients enrolled, 90% were female, 53% were white, and 33% were African American. Their mean age was 42 years. The mean ± SD baseline physician's global assessment and total SELENA-SLEDAI scores were 1.04 ± 0.8 and 4.28 ± 3.8, respectively, while 3-month scores were 0.94 ± 0.73 and 4.09 ± 3.79, respectively. Internal consistency reliability was high (>0.9) at both visits. LIT scores correlated highly with other measures of patient-reported outcomes, and construct validity was established against clinical measures. The LIT was highly responsive to patient-reported changes in SLE health status; however, LIT scores were not as responsive to changes in the SELENA-SLEDAI score. The majority of patients and physicians found LIT to be acceptable and feasible to administer in a clinical setting. CONCLUSION: The LIT is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the impact of SLE on patients and captures unique and important information not included in physician assessments of disease. It may be useful in clinical practice to facilitate communication between the physician and the patient and enable efficient incorporation of the patient's perspective in disease management.

A Retrospective Administrative Claims Database Evaluation of the Utilization of Belimumab in US Managed Care Settings.

PURPOSE: Belimumab is an approved therapy for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study examined the real-world utilization patterns of belimumab and standard SLE therapies in patients after regulatory approval of belimumab in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of belimumab users in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database was conducted using administrative claims data (GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Study Register Study ID: 114955). The overall population for analysis was composed of patients who were prescribed belimumab, had ≥6 months pre- and ≥6 months post-index medical and pharmacy eligibility, and at least 1 medical claim for SLE. Patients' clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment history, treatment patterns of belimumab, utilization of other medications, all-cause resource utilization, and costs were assessed. No hypotheses were tested. FINDINGS: All patients who were prescribed belimumab had an SLE claim. Patients who met all eligibility criteria (n = 155) were primarily female (94.2%; mean [SD] age, 44 [12] years) and 94.2% had used standard SLE therapies during the pre- and post-index periods. The majority had moderate SLE disease severity pre-index, and there was a small shift (approximately 8%) from moderate to mild SLE after initiation of belimumab. Two thirds of patients remained on belimumab therapy at 6 months post-index. The percentage of patients with any claim for oral corticosteroids remained stable; however, the point estimate for mean daily dose decreased slightly in months 3 to 6 post-index. Inpatient hospital admissions decreased slightly in the post-index period. The point estimate for total costs (excluding belimumab) decreased after initiation of belimumab, although overall total health care costs (including belimumab) increased. IMPLICATIONS: All patients with a belimumab prescription had an SLE diagnosis on at least 1 medical claim, and the vast majority of those meeting all eligibility criteria had previously used a standard SLE therapy. Disease severity improved for a number of patients while on belimumab treatment and modest corticosteroid dose reductions were observed in later months. After initiating belimumab, health care costs (excluding belimumab) decreased. GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Study Register Study ID: 114955.

Costs, resource utilization, and treatment patterns for patients with metastatic melanoma in a commercially insured setting.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate real-world healthcare costs, resource utilization, and treatment patterns among metastatic melanoma (MM) patients who received a therapy recommended in current treatment guidelines during 2011 and 2012, following approval in the US of novel therapies (ipilimumab and vemurafenib). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Administrative claims data were used in a retrospective, longitudinal, open cohort study. Adult MM patients were identified using ICD-9 codes. Therapy-based patient cohorts and index dates were defined by the first receipt of a therapy of interest: ipilimumab, vemurafenib, paclitaxel (alone and in combination), interleukin-2, dacarbazine (alone and in combination), or temozolomide. The follow-up period extended until the end of eligibility or data availability. A multivariate regression model was used to compare outcomes of the ipilimumab and vemurafenib cohorts, controlling for baseline and demographic characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct healthcare costs (2013 US dollars) and utilization (incidence rates) were measured on a per-patient-per-month (PPPM) basis for each treatment cohort. Treatment patterns were assessed, including the frequency of patients receiving a second therapy of interest. RESULTS: The study population included 834 patients (265 ipilimumab, 234 vemurafenib, 174 paclitaxel, 104 interleukin-2, 46 dacarbazine, and 11 temozolomide). Costs ranged from $10,879 PPPM (temozolomide) to $35,472 PPPM (ipilimumab). Adjusted total costs were $18,337 PPPM higher for the ipilimumab vs. the vemurafenib cohort (p < 0.001), primarily due to higher outpatient costs. Multivariate analysis did not find significant differences in resource utilization between ipilimumab and vemurafenib, except that ipilimumab patients had fewer outpatient visits (excluding treatment visits). Ipilimumab and vemurafenib patients received a second therapy of interest (12% and 11%, respectively) less frequently than interleukin-2 and dacarbazine patients. CONCLUSIONS: The cost and resource utilization burden of MM is high and varies substantially across treatment cohorts. The two novel therapies, ipilimumab and vemurafenib, have quickly been adopted and are the most frequently used therapies. The results observed during the approximately 6 month follow-up period may not be representative of the full clinical experience of patients with MM.

Economic burden associated with adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: There are currently many approved agents for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM), the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Treatments may include systemic therapies such as ipilimumab, dacarbazine, temozolomide, high-dose interleukin 2, interferon α, dacarbazine- or temozolomide-based combination chemotherapy/biochemotherapy, paclitaxel, paclitaxel/cisplatin, and paclitaxel/carboplatin, as well as the targeted therapies vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and trametinib for patients with BRAF V600 mutation. However, all treatment options are associated with different adverse events (AEs) and, in some instances, considerable toxicity. The occurrence of such treatment-related AEs can lead to higher health care resource utilization and increasing treatment and patient management costs. An understanding of the economic burden of these AEs will therefore enable better management of health care expenditures, not just for existing therapies, but also for new and novel treatments in development. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental health care costs of specific AEs among patients with MM treated with paclitaxel, vemurafenib, ipilimumab, dacarbazine, temozolomide, high-dose interleukin 2, or interferon α, along with AEs known to be associated with dabrafenib and trametinib. METHODS: This cohort study employed a retrospective administrative claims-based analysis of MarketScan commercial and Medicare supplemental databases from July 1, 2004, to April 30, 2012. Patients included those aged ≥ 18 years who had diagnosed melanoma (ICD-9-CM code 172.xx)with ≥ 1 diagnosis of metastasis and ≥ 1 claim for any of the 7 study treatments. Health care encounters for AEs of interest were based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis/procedure codes. Incremental cost per AE was determined by comparing the 30-day expenditures in patients with the event to patients without the event based on a shadow event date. Multivariate generalized linear models (GLMs) with a log-link function and gamma distribution were utilized to control for baseline differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 2,621 patients with MM were included. Mean age was 56.0 years (SD ± 13.0); 64% were male; and 24% had a diagnosis of primary or secondary brain cancer at the time of MM diagnosis. GLM-based estimate of 30-day incremental costs by AE category were metabolic, $9,135 (95% CI = $6,404-$12,392); hematologic/lymphatic, $8,450 (95% CI = $6,528-$10,633); cardiovascular, $6,476 (95% CI = $4,667-$8,541); gastrointestinal, $6,338 (95% CI = $4,740-$8,122); skin/subcutaneous, -$900 (95% CI = -$1,899-$237); central nervous system/psychiatric, $5,903 (95% CI = $3,842-$8,313); and pain, $5,078 (95% CI = $3,392-$7,012). CONCLUSIONS: Incremental costs associated with many MM treatment-related AEs are substantial. New approaches to prevent and/or better manage these events may reduce overall health care costs.