LYVE-1 is not restricted to the lymph vessels: expression in normal liver blood sinusoids and down-regulation in human liver cancer and cirrhosis.

Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE)-1 is thought to be restricted to lymph vessels and has been used as such to show that tumor lymphangiogenesis occurs on overexpression of lymphangiogenic factors in mouse tumor models. However, these studies have not yet been corroborated in human tumors. Here we show, first, that LYVE-1 is not exclusive to the lymph vessels. Indeed, LYVE-1 is also present in normal hepatic blood sinusoidal endothelial cells in mice and humans. Surprisingly, LYVE-1 is absent from the angiogenic blood vessels of human liver tumors and only weakly present in the microcirculation of regenerative hepatic nodules in cirrhosis, though both vessels are largely derived from the liver sinusoids. Second, we propose a novel approach to identify lymphatics in human and murine liver. By combining LYVE-1 and Prox 1 (a transcription factor) immunohistochemistry, we demonstrate that lymphatics are abundant in cirrhosis. In contrast, in human hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases, they are restricted to the tumor margin and surrounding liver. The absence of intratumor lymphatics in hepatocellular carcinomas and liver metastases may impair molecular and cellular transport in these tumors. Finally, the presence of LYVE-1 in liver sinusoidal endothelia suggests that LYVE-1 has functions beyond the lymph vascular system.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C differentially affects tumor vascular function and leukocyte recruitment: role of VEGF-receptor 2 and host VEGF-A.

Unlike vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, the effect of VEGF-C on tumor angiogenesis, vascular permeability, and leukocyte recruitment is not known. To this end, we quantified in vivo growth and vascular function in tumors derived from two VEGF-C-overexpressing (VC+) and mock-transfected cell lines (T241 fibrosarcoma and VEGF-A-/- embryonic stem cells) grown in murine dorsal skinfold chambers. VC+ tumors grew more rapidly than mock-transfected tumors and exhibited parallel increases in tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, VEGF-C overexpression elevated vascular permeability in T241 tumors, but not in VEGF-A-/- tumors. Surprisingly, unlike VEGF-A, VEGF-C did not increase leukocyte rolling or adhesion in tumor vessels. Administration of VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-2 neutralizing antibody DC101 reduced vascular density and permeability of both VC+ and mock-transduced T241 tumors. These data suggest that VEGFR-2 signaling is critical for tumor angiogenesis and vascular permeability and that VEGFR-3 signaling does not compensate for VEGFR-2 blockade. An alternate VEGFR, VEGFR-1 or neuropilin-1, may modulate adhesion of leukocytes to tumor vessels.

Tumor oxygenation in hormone-dependent tumors during vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 blockade, hormone ablation, and chemotherapy.

Tumor oxygenation is critical for tumor survival as well as for response to therapy, e.g., radiation therapy. Hormone ablation therapy in certain hormone-dependent tumors and antiangiogenic therapy lead to vessel regression and have also shown beneficial effects when combined with radiation therapy. These findings are counterintuitive because vessel regression should reduce oxygen tension (pO2) in tumors, decreasing the effectiveness of radiotherapy. Here we report on the dynamics of pO2 and oxygen consumption in a hormone-dependent tumor following hormone ablation and during treatment with an anti-VEGFR-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) or a combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; the latter combination is not known to cause vessel regression at doses used clinically. Androgen-dependent male mouse mammary carcinoma (Shionogi) was implanted into transparent dorsal skin-fold chambers in male severe combined immunodeficient mice. Thirteen days after the tumors were implanted, mice were treated with antiangiogenic therapy (anti-VEGFR-2 mAb, 1.4 mg/30 g body weight), hormone ablation by castration, or doxorubicin (6.5 mg/kg every 7 days) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg every 7 days). A non-invasive in vivo method was used to measure pO2 profiles and to calculate oxygen consumption rates (Q(O2)) in tumors. Tumors treated with anti-VEGFR-2 mAb exhibited vessel regression and became hypoxic. Initial vessel regression was followed by a "second wave" of angiogenesis and increases in both pO2 and Q(O2). Hormone ablation led to tumor regression followed by an increase in pO2 coincident with regrowth. Chemotherapy led to tumor growth arrest characterized by constant Q(O2) and elevated pO2. The increased pO2 during anti-VEGFR-2 mAb and hormone ablation therapy may explain the observed beneficial effects of combining antiangiogenic or hormone therapies with radiation treatment. Thus, understanding the microenvironmental dynamics is critical for optimal scheduling of these treatment modalities.

Local imbalance of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors: a potential mechanism of focal necrosis and dormancy in tumors.

Solid tumors produce both stimulators and inhibitors of angiogenesis. The suppression of metastases by some primary tumors has been attributed to the longer circulatory half-lives of the inhibitors. We propose that intrinsic differences in the physicochemical properties of these regulators may also explain focal suppression of angiogenesis within the primary tumor. We present a mathematical framework that describes production, diffusion, and degradation of these factors in tumor and host tissue and their effect on angiogenesis at local and distal sites. Results show focal suppression of angiogenesis, provide an explanation for tumor dormancy and focal necrosis, and predict a suppressive influence of primary tumors on angiogenesis at metastatic sites. They suggest generally that diffusible factors produced by tumors can stimulate responses in adjacent host tissue, preparing it for further tumor invasion. This study presents a new paradigm for the development of tumor necrosis and offers new insight into angiogenesis regulation and therapy. The framework established for modeling the competing effects of diffusible stimulators and inhibitors can be applied more generally to growth factors/inhibitors and other opposing factors produced in the tumor environment.