Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Publication year range
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; : 107157, 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the dominance of different SARS-CoV-2 variants, the severity of COVID-19 has evolved. We aimed to investigate the difference in symptom prevalence and the association between symptoms and adverse pregnancy outcomes during the dominance of Wild-type/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. METHODS: COVID-19 related symptom prevalence, maternal and specific neonatal outcomes of 5431 pregnant women registered in this prospective study were compared considering the dominant virus variant. Logistic regression models analyzed the association between specific symptoms and intensive care unit (ICU) admission or preterm birth. RESULTS: Infection with the Delta variant led to an increase in the symptom burden compared to the Wild-type/Alpha variant and the highest risk for respiratory tract symptoms, feeling of sickness, headache, and dizziness/drowsiness. An infection with the Omicron variant was associated with the lowest risk of dyspnea and changes in smell/taste but the highest risk for nasal obstruction, expectoration, headaches, myalgia, and fatigue compared to the Wild-type/Alpha and Delta variant dominant periods. With the progression of the Wild-type/Alpha to the Delta variant neonatal outcomes worsened. Dyspnea and fever were strong predictors for maternal ICU admission and preterm birth independent of vaccination status or trimester of infection onset. CONCLUSION: The symptom burden increased during the Delta period and was associated with worse pregnancy outcomes than in the Wild-type/Alpha area. During the Omicron dominance there still was a high prevalence of less severe symptoms. Dyspnea and fever can predict a severe maternal illness.

2.
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol ; 227(6): 466-473, 2023 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490932

ABSTRACT

With a prevalence of 0,01-0,03%, acute fatty liver in pregnancy (AFLP) is a rare and dangerous complication of pregnancy and is difficult to distinguish from other, sometimes more common, pregnancy diseases such as HELLP syndrome, aHUS and TTP because of its mostly non-specific symptoms. Due to its rarity, AFLP is often not obvious to the obstetrician as a possible differential diagnosis. Yet early diagnosis and the fastest possible delivery is the only causal therapy and is important for the mortality rate. In the present manuscript, the pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy of acute fatty liver in pregnancy are highlighted for the clinical routine based on case descriptions from three university hospitals, and reference is made to possible findings that are helpful in establishing the diagnosis. The angiogenic preeclampsia marker sFlt-1 plays a role and provides new opportunities to consider pathophysiological approaches.


Subject(s)
Fatty Liver , HELLP Syndrome , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Fatty Liver/diagnosis , Fatty Liver/therapy , Fatty Liver/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , HELLP Syndrome/diagnosis , HELLP Syndrome/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL