Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Nucl Cardiol ; : 102042, 2024 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39293709

ABSTRACT

Myocardial perfusion abnormalities and altered myocardial blood flow have been described in cardiac amyloidosis. Transient ischemic dilatation (TID) on perfusion imaging has been seen in the presence of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, significant LV systolic dysfunction and hypertensive cardiomyopathy. But to our knowledge this phenomenon has not been described in cardiac amyloidosis. We present a case of cardiac amyloidosis presenting with transient ischemic dilatation on myocardial perfusion imaging.

2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 113(1): 125-134, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085715

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Myocardial perfusion defects after breast radiation therapy (RT) correlate with volume of irradiated left ventricle (LV). We aimed to determine the relationship between myocardial perfusion, LV dosimetry, and grade ≥2 late cardiac events in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A randomized study evaluated the benefit of inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy over forward-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy for radiation toxicity in breast cancer. A secondary endpoint was evaluating cardiac perfusion by single-photon emission computed tomography done at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years post-RT. We used receiver operating curve and regression analysis to identify association between perfusion, radiation dose-volumes, and the risk of late cardiac events. RESULTS: Of 181 patients who received adjuvant RT, 102 were patients with cancer in the left breast (called in this study the left-sided group) and 79 were patients with cancer in the right breast (called in this study the right-sided group). Median follow-up was 127 months (range, 19-160 months). A significant worsening of perfusion defects occurred after RT in the left-sided group, which improved by 1 year. Late cardiac events were found among 16 patients (17.2%) in the left-sided group and 4 patients (5.5%) in the right-sided group. Perfusion changes did not correlate with late cardiac events, but LV dose-volumes correlated with late cardiac events. Maintaining the LV volume receiving 5 Gy and 10 Gy to <42 cc and <38cc, respectively, can reduce the risk of radiation-related late cardiac events at 10 years to <5% over baseline. CONCLUSIONS: RT was associated with short-term perfusion defects that improved within 1 year and was not correlated with late cardiac events. The ventricular volumes receiving 5 Gy and 10 Gy were correlated with late cardiac events.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Radiation Injuries , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cardiotoxicity , Female , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Prospective Studies , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control
3.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 73(3): 149-154, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30540684

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the dosing and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696; Entresto, Quebec, Canada) in a nonclinical trial population. This study was conducted to evaluate the use and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in patients followed at a multidisciplinary heart failure (HF) clinic. We performed a retrospective chart review of 126 patients with HF, initiated on sacubitril/valsartan, and seen at a specialty HF clinic between August 1, 2015, and August 1, 2017. We defined the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan as 200 mg twice a day. At baseline, median age was 67 years, 77% were men, median ejection fraction was 29%, and 86.5% of patients had symptoms of New York Heart Association class ≥II. Within 6 months of being transitioned onto sacubitril/valsartan therapy, 27.2% achieved the target dose of 200 mg twice a day, 40.8% achieved the target dose of 100 mg twice a day, and 32.0% achieved the target dose of 50 mg twice a day. The main reasons for not achieving target dose within 6 months included slower uptitration of therapy than in the trial (n = 41, 54.7%), a decrease in systolic blood pressure (n = 19, 25.3%), not completing blood work (n = 3, 4%), and patient noncompliance (n = 3, 4%). Overall, achievement of sacubitril/valsartan target doses was modest in a tertiary HF clinic, limited by various factors such as side effects and patients' medication noncompliance. Implementation of patient and clinician support pathways may improve uptake, uptitration, and maintenance of evidence-based doses in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Aminobutyrates/administration & dosage , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Protease Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Tetrazoles/administration & dosage , Aged , Aminobutyrates/adverse effects , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Biphenyl Compounds , Drug Combinations , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neprilysin/antagonists & inhibitors , Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Tetrazoles/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Valsartan
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL