Primary prevention of food allergy in 2021: Update and proposals of French-speaking pediatric allergists.

During the past years, there has been an alarming increase in cases of food allergy and anaphylaxis in ever-younger children. Often, these children have multiple food allergies and food sensitizations, involving allergens with high anaphylactic potential, such as peanuts and nuts, which have a major influence on their quality of life and future. After reviewing the current epidemiological data, we discuss the main causes of the increase in food allergies. We analyze data from studies on the skin barrier and its fundamental role in the development of sensitization and food allergies, data on the tolerogenic digestive tract applied in particular to hen eggs and peanuts, as well as data on the prevention of allergy to cow milk proteins. In light of these studies, we propose a practical guide of recommendations focused on infants and the introduction of cow milk, the management of eczema, and early and broad dietary diversification including high-risk food allergens, such as peanut and nuts while taking into account the food consumption habits of the family.

Oral immunotherapy in food allergies: A practical update for pediatricians.

Food oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising treatment for persistent and severe food allergies (FAs) in children, but also for accelerating tolerance to cow's milk and cooked egg in young children. In the near future, pediatricians will increasingly encounter severely allergic children undergoing FA-OIT. FA-OIT consists in daily ingestion of increasing doses of the allergen during the up-dosing phase, and ingestion of a constant dose during the maintenance phase. The global aim is to increase the reactive threshold of allergic patients, and finally enable them to ingest a target quantity of allergen without any reaction throughout the treatment (desensitization). Many studies showed the efficacy of FA-OIT in desensitization, and some of them in sustained unresponsiveness. This corresponds to tolerance after FA-OIT discontinuation, especially for cow's milk and hen's egg allergy. However, there is an ongoing debate about the safety of the treatment. Side effects are frequent, notably aversion to the allergen and oral syndromes as well as systemic allergic symptoms. These reactions occur mainly during the up-dosing phase and become less frequent with time, but they are common causes of FA-OIT discontinuation. Patients and their families must be trained to manage these reactions at home. Long-term side effects can also occur, such as eosinophilic esophagitis. Pediatricians play an important role in maintaining patient motivation; they also provide knowledge on possible allergic reactions and the reactogenic cofactors (mainly fever and viral infection, anti-inflammatory intake, physical activity), and refer the patient to the relevant specialists in the case of long-term care. Other routes of administration for food immunotherapy (epicutaneous and sublingual) and different adjuvant treatments (probiotics, anti-IgE molecule) are currently under study. This will allow us to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy and reduce the risk of any side effects, in order to provide a more favorable risk-benefit ratio.

Practical interest of both skin prick test and specific IgE in the evaluation of tolerance acquisition in IgE mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA). A clinical retrospective study in a cohort of 184 children.

BACKGROUND: Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) represents one of the leading causes of food allergy in infants and young children. The immune reaction may be IgE mediated, non-IgE mediated, or mixed. IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy is revealed by immediate and acute symptoms which can be severe. The aim of this study is to report a one centre experience in the real life of testing children with IgE-mediated CMPA and try to identify predictive factor for follow-up challenges. METHOD: Retrospective and monocentric study between September 1997 and February 2008. 178 infants diagnosed with IgE-mediated CMPA during breastfeeding weaning were included. Initial factors such as age, sex, skin prick tests (SPTs), specific IgE (sIgE), atopic dermatitis and types of reaction were noted. Between 12 and 24 months all infants have undergone at least one evaluation including SPT. RESULTS: At the food challenge, 138 (75.8%) infants were found tolerant. Results of the skin prick test (SPT) were statistically different according to the food challenge result (2.2mm vs. 5.1mm, p<0.0001). It was the same result for sIgE for CM 2.0ku/l vs. 11.5ku/l - p<0.0001 and for casein 1.0ku/l vs. 16.0ku/l - p=0.0014. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the practical interest of both SPT and sIgE in the evaluation of tolerance induction in IgE-mediated CMPA, but with no corresponding results. Sensitivity, specificity and probability curves of success for cow's milk challenge can be determined and have clinical utility.

[Respiratory sensitization to molds in children: myth or reality?]. / La sensibilisation respiratoire aux moisissures chez l'enfant: mythe ou réalité?

The authors have made a systematic study by PRICK-test and RAST, sometimes followed by a rhino-manometric provocation, of the frequency of sensitization to the two moulds Alternaria and Cladosporium in 200 "all comers" children in a paediatric consultation. The frequency was low, only 10% for those consulting in the groups of asthma, rhinitis, pollinosis, repeated respiratory infections and syndromes of obstructed expiration taken together, and 13% for allergic asthma only. This sensitivity is rarely isolated, but is most often accompanied, or complicated by, other pneumoallergens, such as dust, mites, pollens and sometimes cockroaches. It imposes certain particular clinical traits on asthma (summer asthma or recurring asthma) and in others appears to be strongly influenced by the habitat. The skin tests seem to be very weak and RAST insufficient to be sure of real sensitization. Diagnosis, always difficult, is probably best done by a provocation test (preferably rhino-manometry) and this jumps over the bundle of clinical and biological arguments, as well as being, at least in our country, the most useful mimic of atmospheric moulds. The authors insist on the importance of the interrogation which should be concerned with the chronological and environmental circumstances and all respiratory infections that are suspected of having an allergic factor.