Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 34(5): 424-30, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24395195

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The 22q11.2 deletion (del22q11.2) is one of the most common microdeletions. We performed a collaborative, retrospective analysis in France of prenatal diagnoses and outcomes of fetuses carrying the del22q11.2. METHODS: A total of 272 fetuses were included. Data on prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound findings, pathological features, outcomes and inheritance were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean time of prenatal diagnosis was 25.6 ± 6 weeks of gestation. Most of the diagnoses (86.8%) were prompted by abnormal ultrasound findings [heart defects (HDs), in 83.8% of cases]. On fetal autopsy, HDs were again the most common disease feature, but thymus, kidney abnormalities and facial dysmorphism were also described. The deletion was inherited in 27% of cases. Termination of pregnancy (TOP) occurred in 68.9% of cases and did not appear to depend on the inheritance status. However, early diagnosis was associated with a higher TOP rate. CONCLUSION: This is the largest cohort of prenatal del22q11.2 diagnoses. As in postnatally diagnosed cases, HDs were the most frequently observed abnormalities. However, thymus and kidney abnormalities and polyhydramnios should also be screened for in the prenatal diagnosis of del22q11.2. Only the time of diagnosis appeared to be strongly associated with the pregnancy outcome: the earlier the diagnosis, the higher the TOP rate.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/diagnostic imaging , DiGeorge Syndrome/diagnosis , Pregnancy Outcome , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adolescent , Adult , Autopsy , DiGeorge Syndrome/epidemiology , Female , Fetus , France , Health Surveys , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 43(9): 698-703, 2014 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24332742

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aberrant right subclavian artery is a malformation of the aortic arch present at less than 2 % of the individuals in the general population. This incidence is higher in trisomy 21, making it possible use the aberrant right subclavian artery as a prenatal marker of trisomy 21. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This work, which relates to a series of 11,479 consecutive fetal autopsies aims to measure the force of association between the aberrant right subclavian artery and trisomy 21, to confront our results with the sonographic series previously published and to contribute to assess the place that can have this sign in the echographic screening and the fetopathologic diagnosis of trisomy 21. RESULTS: The isolated presence of an aberrant right subclavian artery does not represent an argument sufficient for the indication of a karyotype. But the detection of this anomaly must make pay a special attention in search of other associated signs. CONCLUSION: On the results of this study, the aberrant right subclavian artery has to be considered as a part of the spectrum not only of trisomy 21, but also of many other congenital syndromes.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm/complications , Cardiovascular Abnormalities/complications , Deglutition Disorders/complications , Down Syndrome/complications , Subclavian Artery/abnormalities , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm/genetics , Cardiovascular Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging , Cardiovascular Abnormalities/genetics , Deglutition Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Deglutition Disorders/genetics , Down Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Subclavian Artery/diagnostic imaging
4.
Arch Pediatr ; 12(3): 254-7, 2005 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15734119

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The deletion of chromosome 22q11.2 is involved in the majority of DiGeorge or velo-cardiofacial syndrome. The phenotypic variability was noted in the "CATCH 22" acronym. This acronym doesn't recapitulate the full spectrum of the symptoms. The diagnosis of this syndrome can be done with the prenatal diagnosis, with fetal pathology or with a child alive. METHODS: Review of 52 cases with the microdeletion 22q11. Six cases were diagnosed during the prenatal period, 12 cases at fetal pathology examination, and 34 cases during infancy. RESULTS: Cardiac malformations were the major indications (75%) to search for the microdeletion. The facial dysmorphy was difficult to diagnose during the antenatal period or in dead foetus, thereby it was not often recognized. The renal anomalies usually present in 35% of cases, were diagnosed in only 6 to 16% of the cases in our study. CONCLUSION: Phenotypic diversity of the DiGeorge syndrome is important. Its knowledge allows to better determine the indications of the research of the microdeletion. 22q11.2.


Subject(s)
DiGeorge Syndrome , Child , Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22/genetics , DiGeorge Syndrome/diagnosis , DiGeorge Syndrome/genetics , Female , Fetal Death/etiology , Fetal Death/genetics , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Infant, Newborn , Male , Phenotype , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis , Research , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL