Skin metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.

Skin metastasis associated with lung cancer is an uncommon manifestation and usually portends an aggressive clinical course. It can be either synchronous with the underlying malignancy or be the sign of recurrence. Solitary metastases can be treated with surgical resection or radiation therapy, but multiple lesions are usually treated with palliative chemotherapy. With standard platinum-based doublet regimens, treatment results are usually poor. With the advent of newer agents like pemetrexed, bevacizumab and erlotinib, perhaps results may improve with ongoing clinical trials.

Plasma microRNAs as novel biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer.

A diagnosis of lung cancer at its early stages is vital for improving the survival rate of patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a family of 19- to 25-nucleotide non-coding small RNAs, are frequently dysregulated in lung cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of circulating miRNAs for early detection of lung cancer. We searched the published literature for the miRNA microarray data of primary lung cancer and selected 15 miRNAs that were most frequently up-regulated in lung cancer tissues. Total plasma RNA including miRNAs was isolated, polyadenylated and reverse-transcribed into cDNAs. The levels of miRNAs were determined by real-time RT-PCR in 74 lung cancer patients and 68 age-matched cancer-free controls. We found that the levels of miR-155, miR-197, and miR-182 in the plasma of lung cancer including stage I patients were significantly elevated compared with controls (P<0.001). The combination of these 3 miRNAs yielded 81.33% sensitivity and 86.76% specificity in discriminating lung cancer patients from controls. The levels of miR-155 and miR-197 were higher in the plasma from lung cancer patients with metastasis than in those without metastasis (P<0.05) and were significantly decreased in responsive patients during chemotherapy (P<0.001). These results indicate that miR-155, miR-197, and miR-182 can be potential non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer.

Documenting the natural history of patients with resected stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon after random assignment to adjuvant treatment with edrecolomab or observation: results from CALGB 9581.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial comparing adjuvant treatment with edrecolomab versus observation in patients with resected, low-risk, stage II colon cancer. This study also prospectively studied patient- and tumor-specific markers of treatment outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After surgical resection, patients with stage II colon cancer were randomly assigned to either five infusions of edrecolomab at 28-day intervals or observation without adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Final accrual included 1,738 patients; 865 patients received edrecolomab, and 873 patients were observed without adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up time was 7.9 years. There were no significant outcome differences between study arms (overall survival [OS], P = .71; disease-free survival, P = .64). The combined 5-year all-cause OS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.88), and the combined 5-year disease-specific OS was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.94). The relationships between demographic and histopathologic factors and survival differed for all-cause and disease-specific survival outcomes, but no combined prognostic factor model was found to adequately classify patients at higher risk of recurrence or death as a result of colon cancer. CONCLUSION: Edrecolomab did not prolong survival. Consequently, this large study with a long duration of follow-up provided unique data concerning the natural history of resected stage II colon cancer. Prognostic factors identified in previous retrospective and pooled analyses were associated with survival outcomes in this stage II patient cohort. Results from ongoing molecular marker studies may enhance our ability to determine the risk profile of these patients.

Scar carcinoma of the lung: a historical perspective.

Lung scar carcinoma (SC) was first described by Friedrich in 1939 as a type of lung cancer that originates around peripheral scars in the lung. Scarring in the lung can result from a variety of infections, injuries, and lung diseases. Scars can also be due to repeated episodes of tumor necrosis and healing. SCs are typically found as subpleural adenocarcinomas with retraction or puckering of the overlying pleura. They were considered a histologic curiosity that was promoted for decades until doubts about their existence were raised in the 1980s. Finding type III collagen, type V collagen, and myofibroblasts characteristic of fibrosis in the scars, finally reversed the original SC concept. The presence of type III collagen and extracellular matrix suggested an ongoing fibrosing process secondary to host response to the neoplasm. The high concentration of type III collagen in SC indicates that the fibrous tissue is in an active immature state compared with noneuplastic fibrous tissue, which is mature and contains type I and type V collagen. A recent cohort analysis of data from the PLCO (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian) cancer screening trial demonstrated a correlation between the presence of scar and the development of carcinoma, but the causation of this association has to be determined by future studies. The role of inflammation, infections, and smoking in the development of cancer is discussed in this article. Additional research is necessary to determine if lung scarring detected by imaging requires clinical monitoring in the context of the development of lung cancer when a defined set of risk factors is identified.

History of small-cell lung cancer.

The history of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the more fascinating stories of medicine, a story of hope and disappointment that characterizes it as 1 of the most elusive cancers. Its history can be divided into 3 intervals. The first interval encompassed the 30 years after the initial reports from Bernard in 1926 during which SCLC was characterized. The second interval, from the 1960s-1980s, introduced advances in staging and treatment of SCLC and the advent of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) as the primary forms of therapy. The final interval covers the past 25 years, which is considered a dormant period, although there are some shimmers of hope from the emergence of several new active drugs that are currently undergoing clinical trials.

Sex differences in outcome with bevacizumab therapy: analysis of patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with or without bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599.

INTRODUCTION: E4599 compared carboplatin and paclitaxel with (PCB) or without (PC) bevacizumab in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Bevacizumab improved overall survival. However, an unplanned subset analysis did not show a survival benefit for females treated with bevacizumab. METHODS: Known prognostic factors and toxicities were compared by sex. Proportional hazards models of survival with multiple factor combinations were used to adjust for treatment effect. RESULTS: The analysis includes 850 patients. The median survival was 8.7 months (PC) versus 11.7 months (PCB) for males (p = 0.001) and 13.1 months (PC) versus 13.3 months (PCB) for females (p = 0.87). Progression-free survival and response rate on the PCB arm were 6.3 months and 29% for males and 6.2 months and 41% for females (p > 0.05). Progression-free survival and response rate on the PC arm were 4.3 months and 16% for males and 5.3 months and 14% for females (p > 0.05). No significant demographic differences were seen between the two arms for males, whereas fewer females on the PCB arm had liver metastasis (PCB 11.7% versus PC 23.2%, p = 0.003). Adverse events with a sex difference on the PCB arm included severe hypertension (males: 4.2%, females: 9.9%, p = 0.02), constipation (males: 1.4%, females: 4.7%, p = 0.05), and abdominal pain (males: 0.9%, females: 5.2%, p = 0.01). In the proportional hazards model adjusting for the other factors, the test for a sex by treatment interaction was not significant (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors may contribute to the apparent sex-specific differences in efficacy of bevacizumab noted in this study.

Neuropsychological functioning and quality of life during the first year after completing chemotherapy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Research has documented modest cognitive difficulties among women treated for breast cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of these subtle cognitive changes on quality of life after treatment. METHODS: Data are presented from women breast cancer patients who completed neuropsychological tests and questionnaires regarding quality of life 6 and 12 months post-chemotherapy (n's=39 and 33). Neuropsychological test scores were examined for evidence of cognitive difficulties at each time point; repeated measures ANOVAs were used to identify changes over time. Regression analyses assessed relationships of quality of life outcomes with cognitive functioning, social support seeking, and fatigue. RESULTS: Small percentages of participants (<20% across tests) evidenced deficits in delayed memory, processing speed, response inhibition, and verbal fluency (VF) at each time point. Reliable change index analyses suggested statistically reliable improvements in each cognitive domain for a modest portion of participants. Regressions revealed hesitation to seek social support and fatigue as the most consistent predictors of quality of life at 6 and 12 months post-chemotherapy. Cognitive complaints and VF difficulties were also significantly related to quality of life at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to confirming the importance of fatigue and social support in quality of life, these data offer preliminary indications that weaker VF skills and self-reported cognitive complaints may be associated with poorer functional outcomes among cancer survivors. Further research is needed to validate these potential relationships, which suggest that cognitive difficulties among cancer survivors may warrant monitoring and possible intervention.

Fludarabine followed by alemtuzumab consolidation for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: final report of Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 19901.

The humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab is an effective therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We examined the impact of alemtuzumab treatment after initial fludarabine treatment for feasibility and safety. Patients (N = 85) with previously untreated symptomatic CLL received fludarabine (25 mg/m(2)/day) for 5 days every 4 weeks for four cycles followed by 2 months of observation. Patients with stable disease or better response then received alemtuzumab 30 mg three times weekly for 6 weeks either intravenously (IV; cohort 1; N = 39) or subcutaneously (SC; cohort 2; N = 20). Of the 85 evaluable patients enrolled on our study, four (5%) attained a complete response (CR) and 43 (51%) attained a partial response after fludarabine induction for an overall response rate (ORR) of 55%. Thirty-nine patients received IV alemtuzumab for consolidation with improvement in CR to 27% and ORR to 73%. Twenty patients received SC alemtuzumab consolidation with improvement in CR to 17% and ORR to 69%. Toxicity from IV alemtuzumab included infusion-related reactions and infection. Mild local inflammation was common from SC alemtuzumab but there were virtually no systemic side effects. Nine of 59 (15%) patients had cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections; one patient died. The administration of alemtuzumab as consolidation therapy following an abbreviated fludarabine induction is feasible but requires close monitoring for CMV infection and other infectious events.

Cognitive and psychological factors associated with early posttreatment functional outcomes in breast cancer survivors.

Breast cancer survivors experience cognitive difficulties following chemotherapy, yet the effects of these deficits on functional outcomes have not been systematically evaluated. This study assessed the relationships between postchemotherapy cognitive difficulties and functional outcomes. Forty-six women with breast cancer were seen at 1-month postchemotherapy; data were collected on cognitive functioning, psychological variables, and physical symptoms. Wilcoxon signed-rank analyses revealed cognitive deficits in executive functioning and verbal fluency. Subsequent regression analyses demonstrated that poorer executive functioning was associated with decreased productivity, community involvement, and social role functioning. Poorer quality of life was predicted by depression and reluctance to seek social support, but not cognitive functioning. These findings indicate that executive functioning deficits are associated with important functional outcomes among breast cancer survivors 1-month postchemotherapy. Thus, treatment efforts should focus on addressing cognitive, as well as psychological and physical, issues among cancer survivors.

Trends in the outcomes for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to examine the outcomes of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) over time and to determine if any trends were present with respect to the publication of significant clinical trials. We assembled a cohort of 6271 patients aged 21 years and older with LS-SCLC diagnosed from 1983 to 1998 and followed through 2005. Potential covariates included patient age at diagnosis, sex, race, year of diagnosis, laterality, tumor size, and location (upper lobe, middle lobe, lower lobe, or main bronchus). In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, African American race, and main bronchus location were all associated with a statistically significant increase in the mortality hazard. When compared to patients diagnosed in 1983-1987 who did not receive radiotherapy, the hazard for mortality was significantly reduced for patients diagnosed in 1988-1992 regardless of whether they received radiotherapy (HR=0.59; CI 0.52-0.65; p<0.0001) or not (HR=0.67; CI 0.60-0.75; p<0.0001). Patients who were diagnosed in 1993-1998 and received radiotherapy had similarly improved survival (HR=0.53; CI 0.47-0.58; p<0.0001), which was better than patients from the same time era who did not receive radiotherapy (HR=0.77; CI 0.69-0.85; p<0.0001). In conclusion, the survival for patients with LS-SCLC has improved over time. Many factors are likely involved, however we believe that part of this improvement was the result of clinical trials which investigated and subsequently defined chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care. In order to continue to improve clinical outcomes, clinical trials investigating new treatment paradigms are needed.

Comparison of outcomes for elderly patients treated with weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus the standard 3-weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes between elderly (aged > or = 70 years) patients treated with paclitaxel on a weekly basis and with carboplatin (every 4 weeks) versus the standard 3-weekly regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel for first-line therapy of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. METHODS: Of the 444 patients enrolled, 136 (31%) were aged > or = 70 years. Seventy-two patients were randomized to the weekly schedule (paclitaxel, 100 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; carboplatin, area under the curve [AUC] = 6 mg/mL.min on Day 1 every 4 weeks), and 64 patients were randomized to the standard schedule (paclitaxel, 225 mg/m(2); carboplatin, AUC = 6 mg/mL.min on Day 1 every 21 days). Patients with stable disease or objective response after 4 cycles of therapy were eligible for maintenance therapy with weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2), 3 of 4 weeks). RESULTS: The response rate for elderly patients was 26% on the weekly regimen and 19% on the standard schedule. The median survival duration for the weekly and the standard schedules was 37 weeks and 31 weeks, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were similar at 31% and 33%. Grade 3 to 4 anemia was more common on the weekly schedule (16% vs 6%), whereas grade 3 neuropathy was less common (5.5% vs 9.5%). Nausea and emesis were also less frequent on the weekly schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy was similar between the weekly regimen and the standard regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and may be advantageous based on its favorable tolerability profile.

Randomized, phase III study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus standard every-3-weeks administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin administered every 4 weeks to the standard regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred forty-four patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to either arm 1 (n = 223), paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 6 mg/mL x min on day 1 of each 4 week cycle, or arm 2 (n = 221), paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 6 on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. After four cycles of therapy, patients in both treatment arms were eligible to continue weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2), 3 of 4 weeks) as maintenance therapy until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 27.6% for arm 1 and 19.2% for arm 2. Median time to progression (TTP) was 18.4 and median survival (MS) was 38.6 weeks for arm 1. For arm 2, the median TTP and MS were 16.7 weeks and 42.9 weeks respectively. Grade 3/4 anemia was more common with arm 1, although grade 2/3 neuropathy and arthralgia were less common. The remainder of the toxicities were similar between the two arms. CONCLUSION: All efficacy parameters were similar between the two treatment arms. The favorable nonhematologic toxicity profile of arm 1 makes this an alternative treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Lung Cancer Symptom Scale outcomes in relation to standard efficacy measures: an analysis of the phase III study of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require care that emphasizes symptom palliation in addition to extending survival. The low response rates and minimal survival gains observed in second-line studies underscore the need to assess treatment efficacy with symptomatic end points. METHODS: To characterize the relationship between patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes and efficacy end points (tumor response, overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS]), retrospective analyses were performed on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) data (n = 488) from the phase III study of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) versus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in advanced NSCLC. The LCSS data consisted of patient ratings of six symptoms and three summary items using 100-mm visual analogue scales. The mean maximum improvement for each item was categorized according to best tumor response, with statistical analyses based on a two-factor interaction model (with treatment arm and response group as fixed factors). Additional analyses pooled data between treatment arms and examined correlation (nonparametric and Pearson's) of time to first worsening of symptoms (TWS) with PFS and OS. RESULTS: All LCSS items, except hemoptysis, showed mean maximum improvement over baseline for responders and patients with stable disease (p < 0.01), with greater improvement associated with response. Median TWS for each LCSS item ranged between 2.3 months (fatigue) and 7.0 months (cough), with correlation between TWS and PFS and OS (all p values

Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Clinical and experimental work supports the view that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a relevant target for cancer therapy. Expression of EGFR is exaggerated in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and activation of EGFR appears to have an important role in the growth and differentiation of this and other types of cancers. EGFR-targeted therapeutic approaches have shown clinical activity in advanced human cancers for which chemotherapy over the last 30 years has sustained a mere palliative role at best. Therefore, the need remains for novel anti-cancer therapies that effectively and specifically target epithelial tumor cells while minimizing the toxic side-effects commonly associated with cytotoxic conventional therapies. Agents capable of inhibiting EGFR activity with resultant inhibition of cell proliferation and angiogenesis have significant potential as chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinomas as well as multiple other malignancies.

Small cell lung cancer: have we made any progress over the last 25 years?

Twenty-five years ago, small cell lung cancer was widely considered to be the next cancer added to the list of "curable cancers." This article attempts to summarize the progress made toward that goal since then. Clinical trials have provided landmarks in the therapy of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). These are: (a) the proof that thoracic radiation therapy adds to systemic chemotherapy, (b) the superiority of twice-daily radiation therapy over daily fractionation, and (c) the need for prophylactic central nervous system radiation (prophylactic cranial irradiation). Each of these innovations adds about 5%-10% to the overall survival rate. In extensive-stage disease, irinotecan plus cisplatin may be a possible alternative to the "standard" etoposide-cisplatin chemotherapy doublet, but there has been little progress otherwise. It is imperative that, whenever possible, patients be given the opportunity to participate in future clinical trials so that the survival for these patients can continue to improve.

A randomized trial comparing immediate versus delayed treatment of anemia with once-weekly epoetin alfa in patients with non-small cell lung cancer scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the safety/efficacy of once-weekly (QW) epoetin alfa measured by quality of life (QOL), hemoglobin (Hb), transfusion incidence, tumor response, and survival in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients with Hb > or = 11 to < 15 g/dl scheduled for at least 8 weeks of first-line chemotherapy were randomized to subcutaneously receive 40,000 U of epoetin alfa QW at chemotherapy initiation (immediate) or no epoetin alfa unless Hb decreased to < or = 10 g/dl (delayed). The primary efficacy variable was change in QOL for immediate versus delayed intervention. Target accrual was 320 patients. RESULTS: The study was terminated early because of slow accrual; of 216 patients enrolled, 211 were evaluable for efficacy. Hb was maintained in the immediate group, but it decreased in the delayed group (12.9 versus 11.6 g/dl final values, respectively). Numerically, fewer immediate patients required transfusions versus delayed patients. Mean QOL scores, modestly declining in both groups from baseline to final measurement, were not significantly different between groups. Tumor response and median overall survival were similar between groups. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated, with a similar thrombovascular event rate between groups. CONCLUSION: Epoetin alfa in subcutaneous doses of 40,000 U QW, given immediately at chemotherapy initiation for advanced NSCLC, was well tolerated, and it effectively maintained Hb, leading to a reduced transfusion incidence versus delayed epoetin alfa. Overall QOL scores were higher than typical in this population, decreasing slightly during treatment in both groups. Overall survival was similar between groups, with no evidence of a negative effect by early epoetin alfa intervention.

A phase III study of surgical resection and paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy with or without adjuvant radiation therapy for resected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9734.

PURPOSE: Patients with completely resected stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are at substantial risk for locoregional and systemic recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy has recently improved overall control for these patients. We added adjuvant chemotherapy to control presumed micrometastatic disease and then randomized patients to receive radiation therapy (RT) or observation to determine the benefit of local radiation consolidation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient eligibility required histologically documented stage IIIA (radiographically occult N2) NSCLC that was completely resected, with no known residual disease, surgical staging per protocol requirements, Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0/1, no previous chemotherapy or RT, and minimal laboratory values. All eligible patients received 4 cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours with carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6 on days 1, 22, 43, and 64 beginning 4-8 weeks after surgery. Two to 4 weeks after chemotherapy, patients were randomized to receive RT as 5000 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks or observation. RESULTS: The study closed after 2 years because of slow accrual. Forty-four patients entered the study; 2 were ineligible, and 5 were not randomized because of progression, adverse reaction, or patient withdrawal. Thirty-seven patients were the basis of this analysis. Median failure-free survival was 16.8 months on the observation arm and 33.7 months on the RT arm, with a 1-year survival rate of 72% on the observation arm and 74% on the RT arm. There were no statistical differences between the observation and RT arms for failure-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this small study, consolidation RT after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIA NSCLC did not significantly improve outcome for this high-risk population.