Normal hearing and verbal discrimination in real sounds environments.

INTRODUCTION: Human beings are constantly exposed to complex acoustic environments every day, which even pose challenges for individuals with normal hearing. Speech perception relies not only on fixed elements within the acoustic wave but is also influenced by various factors. These factors include speech intensity, environmental noise, the presence of other speakers, individual specific characteristics, spatial separatios of sound sources, ambient reverberation, and audiovisual cues. The objective of this study is twofold: to determine the auditory capacity of normal hearing individuals to discriminate spoken words in real-life acoustic conditions and perform a phonetic analysis of misunderstood spoken words. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive observational cross-sectional study involving 20 normal hearing individuals. Verbal audiometry was conducted in an open-field environment, with sounds masked by simulated real-word acoustic environment at various sound intensity levels. To enhance sound emission, 2D visual images related to the sounds were displayed on a television. We analyzed the percentage of correct answers and performed a phonetic analysis of misunderstood Spanish bisyllabic words in each environment. RESULTS: 14 women (70%) and 6 men (30%), with an average age of 26 ±â€¯5,4 years and a mean airway hearing threshold in the right ear of 10,56 ±â€¯3,52 dB SPL and in the left ear of 10,12 ±â€¯2,49 dB SPL. The percentage of verbal discrimination in the "Ocean" sound environment was 97,2 ±â€¯5,04%, "Restaurant" was 94 ±â€¯4,58%, and "Traffic" was 86,2 ±â€¯9,94% (p = 0,000). Regarding the phonetic analysis, the allophones that exhibited statistically significant differences were as follows: [o] (p = 0,002) within the group of vocalic phonemes, [n] (p = 0,000) of voiced nasal consonants, [r] (p = 0,0016) of voiced fricatives, [b] (p = 0,000) and [g] (p = 0,045) of voiced stops. CONCLUSION: The dynamic properties of the acoustic environment can impact the ability of a normal hearing individual to extract information from a voice signal. Our study demonstrates that this ability decreases when the voice signal is masked by one or more simultaneous interfering voices, as observed in a "Restaurant" environment, and when it is masked by a continuous and intense noise environment such as "Traffic". Regarding the phonetic analysis, when the sound environment was composed of continuous-low frequency noise, we found that nasal consonants were particularly challenging to identify. Furthermore in situations with distracting verbal signals, vowels and vibrating consonants exhibited the worst intelligibility.

Variation of electrical impedance over 5 years post-implantation and relationship with the maximum comfort level (MCL) in adults with cochlear implants.

INTRODUCTION: The maximum comfort level (MCL), threshold level (THR) and electrical impedance change in the postoperative period of the cochlear implant for months until they stabilize. The objective of this article is to establish the variation during 5 post-surgical years of impedance, and its relationship with MCL in unilaterally implanted adults. METHODS: Retrospective study over 5 years, with 78 adult patients implanted with MED-EL in a tertiary hospital from the year 2000 to 2015. The variation in impedance, MCL and the relationship between them were analyzed in basal (9-12), medial (5-8) and apical electrodes (1-4), performing an inferential ANOVA analysis of repeated measures with comparisons between consecutive times, corrected with Bonferroni criteria. RESULTS: 33 men (42.3%) and 45 women (57.7%), with a mean age of 52.7±14.6 years. "Stability" was considered the time of follow-up without statistically significant differences between one visit and the next. Changes in impedance in medial electrodes ceased to be statistically significant at 3 months, and in apicals at 6 months, with mean values of 5.84 and 6.43kΩ. MCL stabilized at 2 years in basal and apical electrodes, and at 3 years in medial, with mean values of 24.9, 22.7, and 25.6qu. There was a correlation between MCL and impedance in medium electrodes up to 3 months and in apical ones up to one year. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical impedance drops significantly in medial and apical electrodes up to 3 and 6 months. MCL increases significantly up to two years. Impedance is related to MCL up to 6 months.

Power output and hearing performance in osseointegrated auditory devices.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Osseointegrated auditory devices are hearing gadgets that use the bone conduction of sound to produce hearing improvement. The mechanisms and factors that contribute to this sound transmission have been widely studied, however, there are other aspects that remain unknown, for instance, the influence of the processor power output. The aim of this study was to know if there is any relationship between the power output created by the devices and the hearing improvement that they achieve. MATERIALS Y METHODS: 44 patients were implanted with a percutaneous Baha® 5 model. Hearing thresholds in pure tone audiometry, free-field audiometry, and speech recognition (in quiet and in noise) were measured pre and postoperatively in each patient. The direct bone conduction thresholds and the power output values from the processors were also obtained. RESULTS: The pure tone average threshold in free field was 39.29 dB (SD = 9.15), so that the mean gain was 29.18 dB (SD = 10.13) with the device. This involved an air-bone gap closure in 63.64% of patients. The pure tone average threshold in direct bone conduction was 27.6 dB (SD = 10.91), which was 8.4 dB better than the pure tone average threshold via bone conduction. The mean gain in speech recognition was 39.15% (SD = 23.98) at 40 dB and 36.66% (SD = 26.76) at 60 dB. The mean gain in the signal-to-noise ratio was -5.9 dB (SD = 4.32). On the other hand, the mean power output values were 27.95 dB µN (SD = 6.51) in G40 and 26.22 dB µN (SD = 6.49) in G60. When analysing the relationship between bone conduction thresholds and G40 and G60 values, a correlation from the frequency of 1000 Hz was observed. However, no statistically significant association between power output, functional gain or speech recognition gain was found. CONCLUSIONS: The osseointegrated auditory devices generate hearing improvement in tonal thresholds and speech recognition, even in noise. Most patients closed the air-bone gap with the device. There is a direct relationship between the bone conduction threshold and the power output values from the processor, but only in mid and high frequencies. However, the relationship between power output and gain in speech recognition is weaker. Further investigation of contributing factors is necessary.

Power output and hearing performance in osseointegrated auditory devices. / Análisis de la potencia de salida y del rendimiento auditivo de los dispositivos auditivos osteointegrados.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Osseointegrated auditory devices are hearing gadgets that use the bone conduction of sound to produce hearing improvement. The mechanisms and factors that contribute to this sound transmission have been widely studied, however, there are other aspects that remain unknown, for instance, the influence of the processor power output. The aim of this study was to know if there is any relationship between the power output created by the devices and the hearing improvement that they achieve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients were implanted with a percutaneous Baha® 5 model. Hearing thresholds in pure tone audiometry, free-field audiometry, and speech recognition (in quiet and in noise) were measured pre and postoperatively in each patient .The direct bone conduction thresholds and the power output values from the processors were also obtained. RESULTS: The pure tone average threshold in free field was 39.29dB (SD 9.15), so that the mean gain was 29.18dB (SD 10.13) with the device. This involved an air-bone gap closure in 63.64% of patients. The pure tone average threshold in direct bone conduction was 27.6dB (SD 10.91), which was 8.4dB better than the pure tone average threshold via bone conduction. The mean gain in speech recognition was 39.15% (SD 23.98) at 40dB and 36.66% (SD 26.76) at 60dB. The mean gain in the signal-to-noise ratio was -5.9dB (SD 4.32). On the other hand, the mean power output values were 27.95dB µN (SD 6.51) in G40 and 26.22dB µN (SD 6.49) in G60. When analysing the relationship between bone conduction thresholds and G40 and G60 values, a correlation from the frequency of 1,000Hz was observed. However, no statistically significant association between power output, functional gain or speech recognition gain was found. CONCLUSIONS: The osseointegrated auditory devices generate hearing improvement in tonal thresholds and speech recognition, even in noise. Most patients closed the air-bone gap with the device. There is a direct relationship between the bone conduction threshold and the power output values from the processor, but only in mid and high frequencies. However, the relationship between power output and gain in speech recognition is weaker. Further investigation of contributing factors is necessary.

Clinical Performance Assessment of a New Active Osseointegrated Implant System in Mixed Hearing Loss: Results From a Prospective Clinical Investigation.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of a new active osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implant in moderate to severe mixed-hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study of a series of cases. SETTING: Tertial referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with moderate mixed-hearing loss were evaluated (10 Cochlear Osia group and 10 Baha 5 Power Connect -control group). INTERVENTION: Rehabilitative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing performance in quiet and in noise and quality-of-life were evaluated. RESULTS: Improvements in audibility, speech-understanding, speech-recognition, and quality-of-sound in noise and quiet were found for the Osia System compared with preoperative unaided hearing and performance was similar to that obtained with Baha 5 Power Connect. CONCLUSIONS: The new active transcutaneous bone conduction system provided a tonal improvement in free-field at middle and high frequencies. The performance in speech recognition in quiet and in noise was similar to control group outcomes.

First experiences with the Ponto™ SuperPower osseointegrated device. / Primeras experiencias con el dispositivo osteointegrado Ponto™ SuperPower.

Osseointegrated hearing devices Power and SuperPower present indications for bone thresholds of 55 and 65 dB respectively. We conducted a prospective observational study of a series of six cases with mixed hearing loss for whom implantation of the DAO Ponto™ Super-Power was performed. Tonal and verbal evaluations without and with background noise (HINTS) were performed prior to implantation and six months after adaptation. All the participants showed improvement in tonal and verbal results, varying according to the degree of contralateral hearing loss. The verbal results with background noise were noteworthy, where most of the patients obtained a signal-to-noise ratio between 2 and 4 dB. The results in the APHAB and GBI questionnaires showed a reduction in the perception of the problem and an improvement in quality of life respectively. The results presented reflect the possibility of treatment of mixed hearing loss with the Ponto™ SuperPower device.

Audiologic and subjective evaluation of Baha® Attract device. / Valoración audiológica y subjetiva del dispositivo Baha® Attract.

We included 9 patients implanted with Baha® Attract. All our patients were evaluated by free field tonal audiometry, free field verbal audiometry and free field verbal audiometry with background noise, all the tests were performed with and without the device. To evaluate the subjective component of the implantation, we used the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). The auditive assessment with the device showed average auditive thresholds of 35.8dB with improvements of 25.8dB over the previous situation. Speech reception thresholds were 37dB with Baha® Attract, showing improvements of 23dB. Maximum discrimination thresholds showed an average gain of 60dB with the device. Baha® Attract achieves auditive improvements in patients for whom it is correctly indicated, with a consequent positive subjective evaluation. This study shows the attenuation effect in transcutaneous transmission, that prevents the device achieving greater improvements.

Pathologic erythrocyte deformability in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if viscoelastic properties of blood influence suffering sudden sensorineural hearing loss and the capacity to respond after a specific therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A longitudinal prospective study included 85 ears bearing sudden deafness. In them, the mean hearing loss compared to the healthy ear and the recovery ratio were measured at the onset and 6 months after a treatment with corticoids and piracetam. In addition, tinnitus or vestibular symptoms, whole blood filterability (WBF) and erythrocyte deformability -by means of the erythrocyte rigidity index (ERI)- were determined and noted at the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS: Mean hearing loss was 30.3±19.7% at the onset, and 25.8±39% at the end. Forty-one ears showed a recovery of more than 75%. In these (48% of the entire study group), an increase in WBF and a decrease in ERI were observed (P<.001). Ears without tinnitus or vestibular crisis recovered more hearing at 6 months and showed a significant improvement in WBF and ERI, not detected among patients with these clinical findings. There were good correlations between mean hearing loss at onset and WBF, and between recovery and ERI at 6 months, but without statistical significance. Patients with arterial hypertension, cardiopathy and hypercholesterolemia were the most frequently detected, while hypertension and hyperuricaemia showed a better hearing recovery ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The blood viscosity parameters WBF and ERI offer useful information about the risk of suffering sudden deafness and the capacity to recover hearing with reactive therapies.

[Hodgkin's lymphoma in otorhinolaryngology]. / Enfermedad de Hodgkin en otorrinolaringología.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the implication of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in Otorhinolaryngology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective study on patients with HL diagnosed, treated and followed-up in our Centre from 1996 to 2010. RESULTS: From 413 individuals having lymphoma, 120 were labelled as HL (29%). Patients were males in 76% and greater incidence was observed in ages between 15 and 30 years old, as well as between 45 and 60. Samples for biopsy from adenopathies were obtained in 84 cases (61 from the neck), and in 15 its origin was extranodal. The most usual finding at physical exploration was the presence of cervical (86%) and axillary nodes (68%), followed by B symptoms (37%). Waldeyer's ring was affected in 4%. The most frequent histopathological variety was classic HL with nodular sclerosis (50%) and mixed cellularity (28%). Patients were usually diagnosed at stages I (28%) and II (47%). Recurrence of disease in the neck after conventional oncologic therapies was detected in 17 patients, in 7 of which the pathologic study had varied. Mortality was 8%. The main unfavourable prognostic factors for neoplasm recurrence were lymphocyte depletion variety, lymphadenopathy larger than 10 cm and B symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical HL findings are strongly associated with the head and neck area, making its suspicion obligatory in differential diagnosis on cervical nodes.