ABSTRACT
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the major causes of hospital and community-acquired infections. Fewer drugs, such as vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin, are effective against it, but they come with high toxicity. Fifth-generation cephalosporins like ceftaroline and second-generation cefuroxime are effective against MRSA. Limited studies are available on ceftaroline resistance in the literature. This study was undertaken to determine ceftaroline resistance in MRSA in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. A cross-sectional, hospital-based study was carried out with MRSA isolates obtained from various clinical samples of patients. Identification of the isolates to the species level was performed by an automated Vitek system, and selected samples were genotypically confirmed by detecting the mecA gene via real-time PCR. Out of a total of 334 Staphylococcus aureus isolates examined in this study, the prevalence of MRSA was seen in 59.3% (198/334), and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was in 40.7% (136/334). Of the total 198 MRSA isolates, ceftaroline intermediate MRSA was seen in 8.6% (17/198), and ceftaroline sensitive MRSA was in 91.4% (181/198), respectively. Among the 17 ceftaroline intermediate MRSA isolates, 88.2% (15/17) showed a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 µg/ml, and 11.8% (2/17) showed an MIC of 3 µg/ml. All the remaining 91.4% (181/198) isolates were sensitive to ceftaroline and showed an MIC ≤1 µg/ml. Real-time PCR confirmed the presence of the mecA gene in MRSA isolates. In this present study, not a single isolate was resistant to ceftaroline, suggesting that it, being a safer drug, can be used in place of glycopeptides such as vancomycin or teicoplanin and linezolid, where resistance has already been detected. The rational use of ceftaroline could be useful in clinical settings, and further studies will confirm the findings.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Colistin is considered to be the last resort for the management of infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacilli (GNB). However, in the recent past, there has been a rise in colistin resistance among MDR isolates in clinical settings with no profound data on the incidences and causes. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of colistin-resistance (CLR) in MDR isolates collected from different intensive care units (ICUs) and to determine the clinical outcomes of the patients. Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted in the ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Eastern Odisha, India from March 2019 to February 2020. MDR GNB isolates from different clinical samples of ICU patients, not intrinsically resistant to colistin, were included in this study. Samples collected for culture and sensitivity testing were processed as per standard guidelines in the microbiology laboratory. MDR organisms were examined for colistin susceptibility by the broth dilution method. Clinical data was collected from hospital electronic medical records and presented as percentage, number (N), and median (range). RESULTS: The prevalence of colistin resistance MDR GNB was found to be 19.6% in the present study. Colistin resistance among the MDR isolates was found to be the highest (9.2% for Klebsiella pneumonia followed by 5% for Escherichia coli). CLR drug-resistant isolates were commonly (28.8%) isolated from samples of respiratory tract infections and the majority (54.1%) were from neurology ICU. In this study, co-morbidity was not found among 57.9% of the ICU patients and recovery was maximum i.e., 74.2%. CONCLUSION: This study found the prevalence of colistin resistance to be high (19.6%) among all MDR GNB isolates from samples of ICU patients, Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli commonly acquire colistin resistance. Patients in the neurology ICU were frequently infected with CLR MDR strains. Most of the patients who recovered were without any underlying comorbidities. Prolonged hospital stay and direct antibiotic pressure in the hospital can lead to the development of CLR variants.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The gold standard test for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) recommended by WHO is real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which has a turnaround time of five to six hours. Abbott ID NOW (Abbott Diagnostics Scarborough, Inc., Scarborough, ME, USA), the cartridge-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, was approved by FDA for Emergency Use Authorization as rapid point of care testing. The present study was planned to evaluate the performance of the cartridge-based Abbott ID NOW test by comparing it to the currently used standard probe-based real-time RT-PCR method for detection of SARS-CoV-2. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in the eastern part of India after getting institutional ethics committee (IEC) approval. Two hundred fifty-nine cases of various age groups of both sexes who were advised for testing for SARS-CoV-2 were included in the study. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected according to protocol advisory by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), India. Dry swabs were sent for Abbott ID NOW testing and swabs in viral transport medium were sent for probe-based RT-PCR assay using the CoviPath kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bangalore, India). The data were collected and statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for ID NOW were calculated taking RT-PCR as the gold standard. Results: Out of 259 patients enrolled in the study, 49% were symptomatic for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The prevalence rate of SARS-CoV-2 was 20.84% among the study population. Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ID NOW test in comparison to RT-PCR assay was found to be 87%, 98%, 92.1% and 96.8% respectively. ID NOW detected seven out of 54 (12.9%) cases as false negative who were found to be positive with RT-PCR, with mean Ct value of the target genes >34. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the overall sensitivity for ID NOW assay was found to be lower, but specificity, positive and negative predictive values were found to be higher. It had the highest correlation to RT-PCR among symptomatic patients and at higher viral loads. Due to the ease of use and shortest result time for detecting COVID-19, ID NOW test could be used as a point-of-care test. But for all tests, the results should be interpreted according to the clinical and epidemiological context.
ABSTRACT
Human infections by Chromobacterium violaceum are rare. Till date 6 cases have been reported from southern and eastern parts of India. We report here a case of puerperal sepsis by C. violaceum, probably the first case from Eastern part of Orissa. The patient was successfully treated with amikacin and gatifloxacin.