ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare and heterogeneous breast cancer subtype, and there are critical gaps in our understanding of its long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study aimed to address these gaps by scrutinizing the pathologic and clinical aspects of MBC to enhance clinical decision-making and refine patient care strategies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This registry-based retrospective cohort study included women aged ≥21 years diagnosed with MBC or matrix-producing carcinoma. The data were obtained from January 2001 to August 2020 from the Joint Breast Cancer Registry of Singapore Health Services, which included 23,935 patients. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, neoadjuvant chemotherapy responses, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Statistical assessments involved univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: This study enrolled 170 patients; 87.1% had non-metastatic disease, and 12.9% had metastatic disease. The age of patients at diagnosis ranged from 46 to 65 years (median, 56 years). The cohort's predominant characteristics were triple negative breast cancer (64%), advanced clinical stage (77.6%), node negativity (67.6%), and grade 3 disease (74.1%). In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent treatment (17.6%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy yielded a pathologic complete response of 19.2% and a disease progression rate of 46.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved overall survival and disease-free survival, with hazard ratios of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.13-0.62; P < .005) and 0.23 (95% CI, 0.10-0.50; P < .005), respectively. Clinical T3 and T4 stages and nodal involvement were associated with poor outcomes. Stable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with poor overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds light on the complex landscape of MBC and emphasizes the pivotal role of adjuvant radiation therapy in enhancing patient outcomes. Despite advancements, challenges persist that warrant continued research to refine neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies and delve into the nuanced factors that influence treatment responses.