Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Neurol ; 24(3): 468-474, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28052454

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evans index is an estimate of ventricular size used in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Values >0.3 are considered pathological and are required by guidelines for the diagnosis of iNPH. However, there are no previous epidemiological studies on Evans index, and normal values in adults are thus not precisely known. We examined a representative sample to obtain reference values and descriptive data on Evans index. METHODS: A population-based sample (n = 1235) of men and women aged ≥70 years was examined. The sample comprised people living in private households and residential care, systematically selected from the Swedish population register. Neuropsychiatric examinations, including head computed tomography, were performed between 1986 and 2000. RESULTS: Evans index ranged from 0.11 to 0.46. The mean value in the total sample was 0.28 (SD, 0.04) and 20.6% (n = 255) had values >0.3. Among men aged ≥80 years, the mean value of Evans index was 0.3 (SD, 0.03). Individuals with dementia had a mean value of Evans index of 0.31 (SD, 0.05) and those with radiological signs of iNPH had a mean value of 0.36 (SD, 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of subjects had ventricular enlargement according to current criteria. Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the range of values among older individuals.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Ventricles/anatomy & histology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Cerebral Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Dementia/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/diagnostic imaging , Male , Population , Reference Values , Sex Characteristics , Sweden , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Community Ment Health J ; 46(2): 139-47, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20063062

ABSTRACT

To evaluate discriminant validity, reliability, internal consistency, and dimensional structure of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) in a heterogeneous Iranian population. A clustered randomized sample of 2,956 healthy with 2,936 unhealthy rural and urban inhabitants aged 30 and above from two dissimilar Iranian provinces during 2006 completed the Persian version of the WHOQOL-BREF. We performed descriptive and analytical analysis including t-student, correlation matrix, Cronbach's Alpha, and factor analysis with principal components method and Varimax rotation with SPSS.15. The mean age of the participants was 42.2 +/- 12.1 years and the mean years of education was 9.3 +/- 3.8. The Iranian version of the WHOQOL-BREF domain scores demonstrated good internal consistency, criterion validity, and discriminant validity. The physical health domain contributed most in overall quality of life, while the environment domain made the least contribution. Factor analysis provided evidence for construct validity for four-factor model of the instrument. The scores of all domains discriminated between healthy persons and the patients. The WHOQOL-BREF has adequate psychometric properties and is, therefore, an adequate measure for assessing quality of life at the domain level in an adult Iranian population.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Educational Status , Female , Health Status , Humans , Iran , Male , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL