ABSTRACT
Treosulfan has shown promise in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for its myeloablative properties and low toxicity. In this single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study we compared treosulfan- and busulfan-based conditioning in allogeneic HCT for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This study included 138 adults who underwent allogeneic HCT for MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, from 2015 to 2022. Using propensity score matching, we compared transplant outcomes between 2 well-matched cohorts who received conditioning with either fludarabine-treosulfan (FT) (n = 46) or fludarabine-busulfan with total body irradiation (FBT200) (n = 92). A scoring system based on patient age, Karnofsky performance score, and hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index was used to assign patients based on fitness to low-dose (30 g/m2) or high-dose (42 g/m2) treosulfan: 32 (69.6%) received high-dose treosulfan. The racial composition of the 2 groups was similar, with 27.2% and 21.7% of FBT200 and FT recipients, respectively, identifying as non-Caucasian (P = .61). Primary outcomes were analyzed at a median follow-up of 747 days. Of all participants, 116 (84.0%) received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Patients who received FT had a superior 2-year overall survival (OS) compared to those who received FBT200: 66.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.1 to 81.2) versus 44.5% (95% CI: 34 to 54.4), hazard ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.84 (P = .013). In multivariate analysis (MVA), only the use of fresh grafts (P = .02) and FT (P = .01) were associated with improved OS. FT was associated with superior 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to FBT200: 63.1% (95% CI: 42.6 to 77.9) versus 39.1% (95% CI: 29.1 to 49.1), HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24 to 0.81), P = .008. In MVA, the use of fresh grafts (P = .03) and FT (P = .009) were associated with improved RFS. Recipients of FT demonstrated superior 2-year graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival (GRFS) compared to those who received FBT200: 57.4% (95% CI: 37.8 to 72.8) versus 35.1% (95% CI: 25.5 to 45). In MVA, only FT was associated with superior GRFS (P = .02). FT recipients exhibited markedly superior 1-year event-free survival compared to recipients of FBT200 in univariate analysis (40.3% (95% CI: 25.9 to 54.2) versus 9.2% (95% CI: 4.4 to 16.3), HR: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.72), P < .001) and MVA (P = .004). FT was associated with lower 1-year nonrelapse mortality compared to FBT200 in univariate analysis (9.9% (95% CI: 3.0 to 21.8) versus 29.7% (95% CI: 20.6 to 39.3), HR: 0.41 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.96), P = .04) and MVA (P = .04). Our study utilized propensity score matching to demonstrate superiority of treosulfan- over busulfan-based conditioning in stem cell transplantation of patients with MDS and is the first to evaluate the performance of treosulfan-based conditioning in combination with ATG and PTCY. As such, it contributes to the increasing body of evidence supporting the safety of treosulfan, even at the dose of 42 g/m2.
Subject(s)
Busulfan , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Propensity Score , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Homologous , Humans , Busulfan/analogs & derivatives , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Busulfan/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Adult , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Aged , Graft vs Host Disease , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Vidarabine/therapeutic use , Vidarabine/administration & dosage , Whole-Body IrradiationABSTRACT
Outcomes of 2-year survivours undergoing allo-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Oslo University Hospital were retrospectively assessed with the objectives of identification of risk factors for late death as possible means for precautionary measures and interventions to improve long-term survival. 421 patients with haematological malignancy, transplanted between 2005 and 2019, alive and free of disease after 2 years were included with data reported from The OUS-HSCT registry. Median follow-up was 6.2 years (2.016.1), and 232 patients (55%) were observed for minimum 5 years. The probability of being alive 5 and 10 years after HSCT was 86% and 76%. Primary risk factors for late death included initial diagnosis of age ≥ 60 years, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), previous blood stream- or invasive fungal infection (BSI, IFI), and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) and relapse at 5 years were 9.0% and 7.7%, respectively. Two factors were associated with the latter: cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donor and CLL. Compared with the age- and gender-matched Norwegian general population, life expectancy was lower for each disease, except for CML. The prospect for the long-term survival is good for 2-year survivors of the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, life expectancy remains inferior to the age- and gender-matched general population. Optimising prophylaxis and treatment for chronic GVHD, BSI and IFI are needed along with the improved adherence to guidelines for early detection of secondary malignancies. Measures to improve immune reconstitution, possibly the microbiota, and the use of CMV seropositive donors regardless of recipient sero-status may be warranted and should be addressed in further studies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Letermovir is a novel antiviral agent that prevents CMV reactivation in alloHCT patients, with limited data regarding influence on post-alloHCT outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 273 alloHCT recipients, 158 in the non-letermovir cohort (NLC), and 115 in the cohort using letermovir prophylaxis (LC). Patients that received letermovir were CMV-seropositive and met criteria for high risk of CMV reactivation. RESULTS: Median start of letermovir was 21 days post-alloHCT, median duration of prophylaxis was 86 days. Letermovir prophylaxis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in first CMV reactivation (at 200 days post 63.9% in the NLC vs. 35.7% in the LC; p < .001). On univariate analysis at 1 year, overall survival (OS) for NLC was 79.6% and 79.5% for LC (p = .54). Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year for NLC was 12% and 12.3% for LC (p = .69). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 1 year was 13.9% for NLC versus 17.1 for the LC (p = .27). On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts for OS, NRM, and CIR. CONCLUSIONS: Letermovir prophylaxis started at day +21 post-alloHCT reduced CMV reactivation, with no impact on posttransplant outcomes.
Subject(s)
Acetates , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Quinazolines , Humans , Cytomegalovirus , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/etiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplant Recipients , Retrospective Studies , Canada/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is used to cure hematologic malignancies or deficiencies of the hematopoietic system. It is associated with severe immunodeficiency of the host early after transplant and therefore early reactivation of latent herpesviruses such as CMV and EBV within the first 100 days are frequent. Small studies and case series indicated that application of herpes virus specific T cells can control and prevent disease in this patient population. Methods: We report the results of a randomized controlled multi centre phase I/IIa study (MULTIVIR-01) using a newly developed T cell product with specificity for CMV and EBV derived from the allogeneic stem cell grafts used for transplantation. The study aimed at prevention and preemptive treatment of both viruses in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation targeting first infusion on day +30. Primary endpoints were acute transfusion reaction and acute-graft versus-host-disease after infusion of activated T cells. Results: Thirty-three patients were screened and 9 patients were treated with a total of 25 doses of the T cell product. We show that central manufacturing can be achieved successfully under study conditions and the product can be applied without major side effects. Overall survival, transplant related mortality, cumulative incidence of graft versus host disease and number of severe adverse events were not different between treatment and control groups. Expansion of CMV/EBV specific T cells was observed in a fraction of patients, but overall there was no difference in virus reactivation. Discussion: Our study results indicate peptide stimulated epitope specific T cells derived from stem cell grafts can be administered safely for prevention and preemptive treatment of reactivation without evidence for induction of acute graft versus host disease. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02227641.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Herpesvirus 4, Human/physiology , T-Lymphocytes , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effectsABSTRACT
The choice between an older matched sibling donor (MSD) and a younger matched unrelated donor (MUD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a subject of ongoing debate. In this single-center retrospective study of 377 patients who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we compared outcomes of 85 patients who received grafts from MSDs age >60 years and 292 patients who received grafts from MUDs age <30 years. Compared to recipients of MSD transplants, recipients of MUD transplants were younger and more likely to receive dual T cell depletion (TCD), a higher CD34+ cell dose, and a fresh graft. Recipients of MSD transplants were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy longer than those who received MUD grafts. We found no differences in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, engraftment, graft failure, and acute GVHD between recipients of MSD grafts and recipients of MUD grafts. We report a higher 30-day incidence, but not 1-year incidence, of bloodstream infections among recipients of MUD transplants compared to subjects who received their grafts from a MSD. The incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was higher in MSD graft recipients compared with MUD graft recipients in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Although this difference could reflect the greater use of dual TCD, known to be associated with very low rates of chronic GVHD in MUD transplant recipients, the incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was no different between MSD and MUD transplant recipients following propensity score matching, suggesting that other variables could be responsible. Taken together, our data suggest that in patients with AML or MDS who receive PBSC transplants, such factors as convenience, ease of access, and costs should be considered when selecting an older MSD over a younger MUD.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Humans , Middle Aged , Adult , Unrelated Donors , Retrospective Studies , Siblings , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The literature comparing outcomes between myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is conflicting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 451 patients who underwent allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for AML in complete remission (CR) with either RIC (n = 331) or MAC (n = 120) with the use of dual T-cell depletion as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was 19.1% for MAC and 22.5% for RIC (p = .44). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 19.8% for MAC and 24.5% for RIC (p = .15). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 61% and 53% for MAC and RIC, respectively (p = .02). Two-year graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 40.8% for MAC and 33.7% for RIC (p = .30). A propensity score-matched analysis was done matching patients for age, HLA match, in vivo T-cell depletion, and Disease Risk Index (DRI). Two-year OS was 67% for MAC, 66% for RIC (p = .95). A subgroup analysis identified that matched related donor transplants benefit from MAC with OS at 2 years 82.6% versus 57.3% for RIC (p = .006). CONCLUSIONS: In the matched-related donor setting, MAC regimens may offer superior survival. Overall, for our cohort of predominantly in vivo T-cell depleted patients the outcomes of MAC and RIC were similar.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Remission Induction , Recurrence , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effectsABSTRACT
This study investigates the incidence and predictors of hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) in 960 adults undergoing allo- hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Two hundred fifty-two (26.5%) patients received myeloablative conditioning regimens, and 81.4% received high-dose intravenous busulfan (HD Bu). Six hundred ninety-five (72.4%) patients received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY)-based prophylaxis, and 91.4% additionally received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and Cyclosporine A (CsA) (PTCY-ATG-CsA). Two hundred twenty-eight (23.8%) patients developed HC. The day 100 cumulative incidences of grades 2-4 and 3-4 HC were 11.1% and 4.9%. BK virus was isolated in 58.3% of urinary samples. Using HD BU myeloablative regimens increased the risk for grade 2-4 HC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97, P = .035), and HD BU combined with ATG-PTCY-CsA increased this 4 times (HR = 4.06, P < .001) for grade 2-4 HC compared to patients who received neither of these drugs. A significant correlation was documented between grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease and grade 2-4 HC (HR = 2.10, P < .001). Moreover, patients with BK-POS grade 2-4 HC had lower 1-year overall survival (HR = 1.51, P = .009) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR = 2.31, P < .001), and patients with BK-NEG grade 2-4 HC had comparable post-transplantation outcomes. In conclusion, intravenous HD Bu was identified as a predictor for grade 2-4 HC. Moreover, when HD Bu was combined with PTCY-ATG-CsA, the risk increased 4-fold. Based on the results provided by this study, preventing the onset of HC, especially in high-risk patients, is mandatory because its presence significantly increases the risk for mortality.
Subject(s)
Cystitis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/etiology , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Cystitis/etiology , Cystitis/prevention & control , Cystitis/drug therapy , CyclosporineABSTRACT
Intensive induction chemotherapy achieves complete remissions (CR) in >60% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but overall survival (OS) is poor for relapsing patients not eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Oral azacytidine may be used as maintenance treatment in AML in first remission, but can be associated with substantial side effects, and less toxic strategies should be explored. Twenty AML patients in first CR (CR1) ineligible for allo-HSCT were treated with FDC101, an autologous RNA-loaded mature dendritic cell (mDC) vaccine expressing two leukemia-associated antigens (LAAs). Each dose consisted of 2.5-5 × 106 mDCs per antigen, given weekly until week 4, at week 6, and then monthly, during the 2-year study period. Patients were followed for safety and long-term survival. Treatment was well tolerated, with mild and transient injection site reactions. Eleven of 20 patients (55%) remained in CR, while 4 of 6 relapsing patients achieved CR2 after salvage therapy and underwent allo-HSCT. OS at five years was 75% (95% CI: 50-89), with 70% of patients ≥60 years of age being long-term survivors. Maintenance therapy with this DC vaccine was well tolerated in AML patients in CR1 and was accompanied by encouraging 5-year long-term survival.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Transplantation, Homologous , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Remission Induction , Recurrence , Dendritic Cells , Retrospective Studies , Antigens, Neoplasm , WT1 Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a serious immune-mediated complication after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but in patients with malignancy, cGVHD development is associated with superior survival. Lack of reliable biomarkers and clinical underreporting means there is insufficient understanding of cGVHD clinical outcomes and balance between cGVHD treatment and maintaining beneficial graft-versus-tumour effects. METHODS: We performed a Swedish population-wide registry study following patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT 2006-2015. cGVHD status was retrospectively classified using a real-world method based on the timing and extent of systemic immunosuppressive treatment. RESULTS: cGVHD incidence among patients surviving ≥6 months post-HSCT (n = 1246) was 71.9%, significantly higher than previously reported. 5-year overall survival in patients surviving ≥6 months post-HSCT was 67.7%, 63.3%, and 65.3%, in non-, mild, and moderate-severe cGVHD, respectively. Non-cGVHD patients had a mortality risk almost five-fold higher compared to moderate-severe cGVHD patients 12-months post-HSCT. Moderate-severe cGVHD patients had greater healthcare utilization compared with mild and non cGVHD patients. CONCLUSION: cGVHD incidence was high among HSCT survivors. Non-cGVHD patients had higher mortality during the first 6 months of follow-up; however, moderate-severe cGVHD patients had more comorbidities and healthcare utilization. This study highlights the urgent need for new treatments and real-time methods to monitor effective immunosuppression after HSCT.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematologic Neoplasms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only curative treatment for several malignant and non-malignant haematological diseases, and is associated with a risk of serious complications. In recent years, several changes have been introduced with the aim of reducing treatment-related complications. This retrospective study reviews quality indicators for patients who underwent transplantation in the period 2015-21. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study included 589 adult patients who were treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for the first time at Oslo University Hospital in the period May 2015 to May 2021. Three two-year periods are compared using descriptive methods. RESULTS: In the period 2015-2021, the number of first-time transplant patients per year increased from 85 to 113. One-year survival increased from 68 % in the first two-year period to 74 % in the second period and 82 % in the last period. Both acute and chronic GVHD were reduced, and one-year GVHD-free and relapse-free survival increased from 42 % to 60 % during the study period. INTERPRETATION: Since 2015, the number of transplants has increased, while survival has improved and the risk of complications is lower.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Adult , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Recurrence , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is frequently used to treat moderate-severe chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD), however limited data exists describing ECP treatment effects on healthcare and societal costs. We aimed to characterize clinical and health economic outcomes and productivity loss in cGVHD patients exposed to ECP. METHODS: We identified 2708 patients aged ≥ 18 years with a record of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the Swedish Patient Register between 2006 and 2020. Patients exposed to ECP from 3-months post HSCT (index) were included (n= 183). Data was linked to the Prescribed Drug Register, the Cause of Death Register, and the Longitudinal Integrated Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies (LISA). RESULTS: The median patient age at index was 51 years (IQR1-3; 38-61). In the 3-month period before ECP initiation compared to 9-12 months post-ECP, the cumulative three-month dose per patient decreased prednisolone/prednisone (1,381 mg vs. 658 mg, p < 0.001) and cyclosporin (12,242 mg vs. 3,501 mg, p < 0.001). Infection incidence also decreased over the same period (79.2% vs 59.1%, p < 0.001). Time spent in healthcare decreased from 68.9% to 22.1% from the first and fifth follow-up year respectively, and corresponding annual healthcare cost reduced from 27,719 to 1,981. Among patients < 66 years of age, sickness-related workplace absence decreased from 73.2% to 31.9% between the first and fifth follow-up year, with median annual productivity loss decreasing from 20,358 to 7,211 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: ECP was associated with reduced use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and fewer infections. Furthermore, cost and healthcare utilization decreased over time.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Photopheresis , Humans , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Sweden/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mixed results surround the accuracy of commonly used prognostic risk scores to predict overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. We hypothesize that a simple prognostic score performs better than conventional scoring systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: OS risk factors, HCT-CI, age-HCT-CI, and augmented-HCT-CI were studied in 299 patients who underwent allo-HCT for myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. A scoring system was developed based on results and validated in a different cohort of 455 patients. RESULTS: Two-year OS was 51% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.56); 2-year NRM was 34% (95% CI 0.29-0.39). HCT-CI and associated scores were grouped into 0-2 and ≥3. Age and HLA mismatch status were the only risk factors to affect OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.02 and 0.05, respectively). HCT-CI and associated scores were not informative for OS prediction. The weighted scoring system assigned 0 to 2 points for age < 50, 50-64, or ≥65, respectively, and 0-1 points for no HLA mismatch versus any mismatch (except HLA-DQ). Distinct 2-year OS (62%, 53%, and 38% [p = <0.001]) and NRM (24%, 34%, and 43% [p = 0.02]) groups were characterized. The scoring system was validated in a second independent cohort with similar results on OS and NRM (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A simple scoring system based on recipient's age and mismatch status accurately predict OS and NRM in two distinct cohorts of allo-HCT patients. Its simplicity makes it a helpful tool to aid clinicians and patients in clinical decision-making.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Transplantation, Homologous , Prognosis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Tissue Donors , Risk Factors , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/methodsABSTRACT
Up-to-date information on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes and risk factors in haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients is required to inform on decisions about cancer treatment and COVID-19 mitigation strategies. We performed a meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. All studies with at least five patients who reported COVID-19-related deaths in HCT recipients were included. The primary outcome was COVID-19-related death. Secondary outcomes were COVID-19-related mechanical ventilation (MV) and intensive care unit (ITU) admission. The cumulative COVID-19-related death rate among HCT recipients was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18%-24%), while MV and ITU admission rates were 14% (95% CI 11%-17%) and 18% (95% CI 14%-22%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed higher death rates in patients who developed COVID-19 within 12 months of HCT (risk ratio [RR] 1.82, 95% CI 1.09-3.03), within 6 months of receiving immunosuppressant drugs (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.38-3.20) or in the context of active graft-versus-host disease (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.10-5.16). Our findings support the idea that HCT should remain an integral part of cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic but also highlight the need to prioritise preventative measures in those patients who are at increased risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Evidence is emerging to support an association between certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). The primary aim of this study was to identify HLA alleles associated with resistance or susceptibility to CMV reactivation. METHODS: We studied 586 adults who underwent allo-HSCT for high-risk hematological malignancies. High-resolution HLA typing data were available for recipients and donors. HLA class I and II alleles observed at a frequency of >5% in our population were included in the analysis. A CMV viremia level of more than 200 IU/ml on weekly monitoring was considered to be indicative of CMV reactivation. RESULTS: The median follow-up time in surviving patients was 21 months (range 4-74 months). The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation at 6 months in the entire cohort was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.8%-59.2%). Mismatched donors, increasing recipient age, occurrence of acute graft versus host disease and recipient CMV seropositivity were associated with an increased risk of CMV reactivation. HLA B*07:02 (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.83) was associated with a decreased risk of CMV reactivation. Patients who developed CMV reactivation had a lower incidence of relapse, higher transplant-related mortality (TRM) and lower overall survival (OS) than those without CMV reactivation. There was an adverse correlation of OS and TRM with increasing numbers of CMV reactivations. CONCLUSION: We observed that HLA B*07:02 was associated with a decreased risk of CMV reactivation. CMV reactivation was associated with lower relapse post-transplant, but this did not translate into a survival benefit due to higher TRM.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Alleles , Cytomegalovirus , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The quality of cells in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts is important for allogeneic stem cell transplantation outcome. The viability of PBSC grafts may decrease during transportation time between donor and transplant center. We hypothesize that the graft viability based on apoptosis and necrosis in the graft may better reflect graft quality and clinical outcome. METHODS: PBSC graft viability from unrelated donors was analyzed in 91 patients. Viable cells were defined as 7-aminoactinomycin D- and Annexin V-negative. The clinical outcome, including survival, transplant-related mortality and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), was correlated to graft viability. RESULTS: Grafts transported for 1 day had a median viability of 86.4% (range 63.8 to 98.9%), and grafts transported for 2 days had median viability of 83.2% (range 52.8% to 96.2%) (P = .003). Grafts were divided into two groups based on the median graft viability of 85.1%. Patients who received low viability grafts had lower 1-year survival of 63.7% compared with 88.9% for those who received high viability grafts (P = .007). In the multivariate analysis, transplant-related mortality (TRM) was higher in the low viability group (P = .03), whereas overall survival was not significantly associated with graft viability. The incidence of acute GvHD grade II to IV, chronic GvHD and relapse risk remained comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Low graft viability was an independent predictor of 1-year survival and TRM after adjusting for multiple confounders. Better graft quality markers are important for the detection of clinically important variations in the stem cell graft.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Apoptosis , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Unrelated DonorsABSTRACT
The implementation of dual T-cell depletion comprising 4.5 mg/kg of antithymocyte globulin (ATG), post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine A for reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) independent of donor source in 2015 significantly improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) control at our Institution. Further advances were made between 2017 to 2020 in supportive care of allogeneic HCT recipients and were the subject of this study, with 651 adults included. Transplant outcomes were compared between patients who underwent transplantation during Period 1 (2017-2018) and Period 2 (2019-2020). Main changes implemented during the study period were reduction of ATG dose from 4.5 to 2 mg/kg in matched unrelated donor transplants, abandoning of dual T-cell depletion in matched related donor transplants, combining dual T-cell depletion with myeloablative conditioning for selected patients, and reduction of the target therapeutic cyclosporine level from 200 to 400 ng/L to 150 to 250 ng/L. Other improvements included addition of ursodiol until day 100, implementation of a double responsible physician model, and personalized patient supportive care plan focused on activity and calorie intake. The reduction in intensity of GVHD prophylaxis provided comparable acute GVHD and moderate-severe chronic GVHD between both time periods. Altogether the described improvements in transplant methodology and supportive care showed that compared to Period 1, patients transplanted in Period 2 had superior 1-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and non-relapse mortality and showed a trend toward better GVHD- and relapse-free survival, without an increase in relapse risk. This study reports the results of outcomes-directed improvements in transplantation design, GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care, highlighting how transplantation outcomes can be improved through careful modifications in response to meticulously monitored outcomes.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effectsABSTRACT
In donor selection for allogeneic stem cell transplant, several factors are considered for potential impact on transplant outcome. Previous publications suggested single HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) may be equivalent to 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUDs). We retrospectively examined factors affecting outcome in a single-center study using ATG followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide, termed ATG-PTCy, GvHD prophylaxis. Fifty-two patients who received grafts from MMUD and 188 patients transplanted from MUD between January 2015 and December 2019, at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada, were enrolled. All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning. Overall survival for 9/10 recipients at 2 years was significantly worse, 37.2% versus 68.5% for 10/10 MUDs, p < .001, as were NRM at 1 year 39.5% versus 11.7%, p < .001, and GRFS at 2 years 29.8% versus 58.8%, p < .001, respectively, potentially due to higher incidence of infections including CMV. By multivariable analysis, factors correlating with survival negatively were DRI, and MMUD, whereas for NRM MMUD and increasing age were unfavorable. For GRFS significant unfavorable factors included donor age ≤32 years, female donor to male recipient, DRI high-very high and MMUD. These data suggest that MMUD, primarily HLA-A and HLA-B MMUD, confer significantly inferior outcome despite use of ATG-PTCy. Further development of novel conditioning regimens and GvHD prophylaxis is needed to mitigate these risks.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , HLA-A Antigens , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Unrelated DonorsABSTRACT
During 2020, the concurrent novel COVID-19 pandemic lead to widespread cryopreservation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant grafts based on National Marrow Donor Program and European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation recommendations, in order to secure grafts before the start of conditioning chemotherapy. We sought to examine the impact of this change in practice on patient outcomes. We analyzed the outcomes of 483 patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between August 2017 and August 2020, at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada, in the retrospective study, comparing the outcomes between those who received cryopreserved or fresh peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Overall compared with those who received fresh grafts (n = 348), patients who received cryopreserved grafts (n = 135) had reduced survival and GRFS, reduced incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), delay in neutrophil engraftment, and higher graft failure (GF), with no significant difference in relapse incidence or acute GvHD. However, recipients of cryopreserved matched-related donor HSCT showed significantly worse OS, NRM, GRFS compared with fresh grafts. Multivariable analysis of the entire cohort showed significant impact of cryopreservation on OS, relapse, cGvHD, GF, and GRFS. We conclude that cryopreservation was associated with inferior outcomes post-HSCT, possibly due to the combination of ATG and post-transplant cyclophosphamide impacting differential tolerance to cryopreservation on components of the stem cell graft; further studies are warranted to elucidate mechanisms for this observation.
Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Cryopreservation/methods , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Graft vs Host Disease , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
This study investigated the single-center incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections (BSIs) in 651 adults who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) between 2015 and 2019 and explored the impact of these BSIs on post-transplantation outcomes. Antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was given during the aplastic phase. Overall, the median patient age was 57 years, 79.7% of patients received an alternative donor graft, and 68.7% received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as part of their graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Of the 651 patients, 358 (55.0%) had at least 1 episode of BSI, and the overall mortality rate secondary to this complication was 7.5% (12.6% among those diagnosed with at least 1 episode of BSI). BSI was more often diagnosed during the first 30 days (58.7%), and gram-positive bacteria were the most prevalent microorganisms isolated during the entire post-transplantation follow-up (62%). A high Disease Risk Index (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; P < .029) and receipt of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis (HR, 3.33; P < .001) were identified as risk factors for BSI. Additionally, univariate analysis showed that patients diagnosed with a BSI during post-transplantation follow-up had worse overall survival (HR, 2.48; P < .001) and higher nonrelapse mortality (HR, 2.68; P < .001) than those without BSI. In conclusion, alloHCT recipients with a BSI had a higher risk of mortality compared with those who did not develop BSI. The inclusion of PTCy as part of GVHD prophylaxis was identified as an independent risk factor for BSI during early post-transplantation follow-up. Single-center analyses focused on reporting the incidence and risk factors for BSI highlight the need for active implementation of preemptive strategies to decrease BSI incidence in the alloHCT setting. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Sepsis , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous , United StatesABSTRACT
The use of anti-T cell globulin (ATG) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation with matched unrelated donors (MUDs) is considered standard of care in many transplant centers, as these patients are at higher risk of developing acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Several publications have reported reduced incidence of chronic GVHD compared to matched related donors (MRDs). This may support the idea of introducing ATG in prospective clinical trials, also in MRDs, in an effort to reduce the long-term complications with moderate and severe GVHD. We retrospectively analyzed 169 patients, in whom ATG was given to patients who underwent transplantation with MUDs (n = 124) and not MRDs (n = 45). The incidence acute GVHD II to IV and III to IV was significantly lower in the MUD group compared to the MRD group (28.2% versus 51.3% and 8.1% versus 24.7%). Extensive chronic GVHD incidence was 5% versus 40%. Our results further support the rationale for examining the efficacy of ATG in MRDs in prospective randomized trials.