ABSTRACT
While target-based small-molecule discovery has taken centre-stage in the pharmaceutical industry, there are many cancer-promoting proteins not easily addressed with a traditional target-based screening approach. In order to address this problem, as well as to identify modulators of biological states in the absence of knowing the protein target of the state switch, alternative phenotypic screening approaches, such as gene expression-based and high-content imaging, have been developed. With this renewed interest in phenotypic screening, however, comes the challenge of identifying the binding protein target(s) of small-molecule hits. Emerging technologies have the potential to improve the process of target identification. In this review, we discuss the application of genomic (gene expression-based), genetic (short hairpin RNA and open reading frame screening), and proteomic approaches to protein target identification.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/metabolism , Proteomics , Gene Expression , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/geneticsSubject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16 , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5 , Gene Fusion , Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic/genetics , Noonan Syndrome/genetics , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta/genetics , Site-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Adult , Base Sequence , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Translocation, GeneticABSTRACT
Mutations in exon 12 of the nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene occur in about 60% of adult AML with normal karyotype. By exploiting a specific feature of NPM1 mutants, that is insertion at residue 956 or deletion/insertion at residue 960, we developed highly sensitive, real-time quantitative (RQ) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, either in DNA or RNA, that are specific for various NPM1 mutations. In all 13 AML patients carrying NPM1 mutations at diagnosis, cDNA RQ-PCR showed >30 000 copies of NPM1-mutated transcript. A small or no decrease in copies was observed in three patients showing partial or no response to induction therapy. The number of NPM1-mutated copies was markedly reduced in 10 patients achieving complete hematological remission (five cases: <100 copies; five cases: 580-5046 copies). In four patients studied at different time intervals, the number of NPM1 copies closely correlated with clinical status and predicted impending hematological relapse in two. Thus, reliable, sensitive RQ-PCR assays for NPM1 mutations can now monitor and quantify MRD in AML patients with normal karyotype and NPM1 gene mutations.