Are there important differences in comorbidity between surgical and medical inpatients?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Scientific and technological advances are changing medical practice and transforming hospitals, and both the age and comorbidities of hospitalized patients are rapidly increasing. The increasing complexity of these patients and the scant clinical differences between medical and surgical inpatients calls for changes in the organization and delivery of in-hospital care. Our objective has been to assess differences in age and comorbidity between surgical and medical inpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, descriptive study in patients aged ≥16 years discharged from all medical and surgical services during 2019, except for obstetrics and intensive care. All data were obtained from the hospital's minimum basic data set and analyzed using univariate analysis. RESULTS: The study included 31,264 patients: 16,397 from the medical area and 14,867 from the surgical area. Those in the surgical area were 8 years younger (62.69 years [95% CI 62.4-62.98]), with a slightly higher proportion of women (OR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.17]) compared to the medical area, and fewer non-scheduled admissions (OR 0.11 [95% CI 0.10-0.12]). There were no significant differences in comorbidity burden between study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the surgical area have a high burden of medical comorbidity, similar to those in the medical area. This information is important for surgeons and anesthetists, and should compel hospitals to change the current organizational model.

A brief history of medical cross-consultations.

Physicians have long needed and sought out the support and advice of experienced colleagues. This practice, endorse by Hippocrates and Galen, remaining unchanged until the Enlightenment. During that age, cross-consultations boomed. Monographic works were written, the characteristics and qualities that consulting physician had to possess were studied the problems that it could cause were examined, and rules and guidelines to follow during a cross-consultation were established. It remained unchanged until the end of the 19th century, when the emergence of various medical specialties offered the possibility of seeking specialized assistance. This specialization gave rise to a fragmentation of medical care which favored the emergence of the internist as a "universal consultant." In the last quarter of the 20th century, in light of the importance of and problems arising from cross-consultation, it began to be studied on its own, specialized services were created to attend to them, and, finally, comanagement appeared.

Which surgical patients require shared care? / ¿Qué pacientes quirúrgicos necesitan asistencia compartida?

Most hospitalized surgical patients have significant medical comorbidity and are treated with a considerable number of drugs and/or experience significant complications. Shared care (SC) is the shared responsibility and authority in managing hospitalized patients. In this article, we discuss whether patients should be selected for SC or not. The various selection criteria are not an exact science nor are they easy to apply. Furthermore, they may leave out many patients who may be good candidates for SC. Perioperative management is essential for preventing postoperative mortality. Failure to rescue (in-hospital mortality secondary to postoperative complications) is the main factor linked to in-hospital surgical mortality and can affect any patient regardless of age, comorbidity, or type of surgery. The component that most reduces failure to rescue is the presence of internists in surgical wards. We believe that all patients hospitalized in surgery departments should receive SC.

Analysis of the activity of interconsultations conducted by the departments of internal medicine. REINA-SEMI study: Registry of Interconsultations and Shared Care of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. / Análisis de la actividad de interconsulta realizada por los servicios de medicina interna. Estudio REINA-SEMI: Registro de Interconsultas y Asistencia Compartida de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the activity of interconsultations conducted by internal medicine (IM) departments, their formal aspects and the profile of clinical care required and to quantify the workload they represent. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A multicentre, observational prospective study was conducted with consecutive hospitalised patients treated by IM departments using interconsultations between May 15 and June 15, 2016. We estimated the workload related to this activity (1time unit [TU]=10min). RESULTS: We recorded 1,141 interconsultations from 43 hospitals. The mean age of the patients involved was 69.4 years (SD: 16.2), and 51.2% were men. The mean Charlson index was 2.3 (SD: 2.2). The most common reasons for the consultations were general assessments (27.4%), fever (18.1%), dyspnoea (13.6%), metabolic disorder (9.6%), arterial hypertension (6.3%) and delirium (5.3%). The duration of the first visit was 4 TUs (SD: 5.9) and 7.3 (SD: 21.5) for the sum of all subsequent visits. The surgical patients were older (70.6 [SD, 15.9] vs. 64.4 [SD, 16.3] years; P=.0001) and required more follow-up time (5 [SD, 7.3] vs. 3.5 [SD, 4.2] days; P=.009). The following issues were more common in the interconsultation format performed by medical services: number of regular interconsultations (response >24h), specification of the reason for the interconsultation, minimal data regarding the medical history and agreement on the appropriateness of the time spent with the consultant. CONCLUSION: The patients treated through interconsultations by the IM departments represented a significant workload. The interconsultations from the medical departments were more in line with the request format.

Characteristics and temporal pattern of readmissions of patients with atrial fibrillation hospitalized in medical departments. / Características y patrón temporal de reingresos de los pacientes con fibrilación auricular hospitalizados en servicios médicos.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of patients with auricular fibrillation (AF) in the hospital setting and their successive hospitalisations. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all hospital admissions in the medical area of hospital of Lugo between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013. The data source was the centre's minimum basic data set. RESULTS: A total of 149,271 hospital admissions corresponding to 66,286 patients were recorded. Of the total, the percentage of admissions and patients with AF was 17.3% (25,870) and 18.9% (12,512), respectively. The patients with AF were characterized by a larger proportion of women (49.7 vs. 44.3%; P<.0001), advanced age (78.3 [DE 10.2] vs. 67.1 years [DE 17.9]; P<.0001), more chronic diseases (4.2 [DE 2.1] vs. 2.9 [DE 1.9]; P<.001), longer hospital stays (12.5 [DE 12.5] vs. 10.6 [DE 19.9] days; P<.0001) and a high rate of readmissions (3.0 [DE 2.75] vs. 2.1 [DE 2.28]; P<.001), with a progressive shortening of the time between hospitalisations. The department of internal medicine was responsible for the care of more than half of the patients with AF. The most common associated secondary diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, other respiratory system diseases and arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: AF occurs in highly complex patients, who are mostly hospitalized in internal medicine departments, and is associated with a high rate of readmissions. We need to consider the diseases associated with AF for an overall approach to these patients.