TEP and Lichtenstein anatomy: does simulation accelerate acquisition among interns?

PURPOSE: The anatomy of the inguinal region is notoriously challenging to master. We sought to teach open inguinal hernia (OIH) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) anatomy with simulation models among general surgery (GS) interns. METHODS: Low-fidelity OIH and TEP models were constructed out of cardboard, plastic bins, fabric, and yarn. GS interns (n = 30) participated in a 3-h hernia session including a pretest, anatomy lecture, simulated OIH and TEP hernia repair, and posttest. Pre- and posttest scores were based on a difficult 30-point exam which included didactic questions (10 points), drawing relevant TEP (10 points), and OIH (10 points) anatomy. Participants were surveyed following the session. RESULTS: Median pretest scores were 13 % (range 0-60 %). Median posttest scores improved to 47 % (range 20-93 %, p < 0.001). Median number of structures drawn in the TEP image improved from 2 (range 0-14) to 11 (range 1-21, p < 0.001). Median number of structures drawn in the OIH image improved from 3 (range 0-15) to 7 (range 1-19, p < 0.001). 67 % (12/18) demonstrated improvement in knowledge of abdominal wall layers. 23 % (7/30) knew the triangles of pain/doom on the pretest vs. 77 % (23/30) on the posttest. Mean Likert scores favored session enjoyability (4.5), not a waste of training time (4.4), and improved understanding of OIH and TEP anatomy (4.4, 4.2). CONCLUSIONS: Low-fidelity simulators can be used to teach and assess knowledge of TEP and OIH anatomy. While enjoyable and useful, one 3-h session does not create master hernia surgeons or expert anatomists out of novice trainees.

A technique for visual confirmation of intrathoracic placement of tube thoracostomy using a fiberoptic laryngoscope in a cadaver.

PURPOSE: Safe intrathoracic placement of chest tubes is a continual challenge. Current techniques for determining the intrathoracic location of the thoracostomy site include blunt dissection and digital exploration, with subsequent tube placement. Using current techniques, complication rates for this procedure approach 30%. We present a novel technique using available endotracheal intubation technology for determining intrathoracic placement of tube thoracostomy. METHODS: One cadaver was used for placement of tube thoracostomy. Both sides of the thorax were prepared in the standard fashion for tube thoracostomy placement, and tube thoracostomy was performed on each hemithorax at interspaces 3 through 7. The right side of the thorax was used for standard thoracostomy placement, and the left side was used for fiberoptic visualization of thoracostomy placement using a video laryngoscope. Thoracic wall thickness was measured at all thoracostomy sites. Proper placement and any injuries were documented for each site. RESULTS: Chest wall thickness ranged from 2.4 to 3.8 cm on the right and 2.8 to 4.0 cm on the left. With use of fiberoptic thoracostomy, no injuries were generated. During the standard thoracostomy placement in the sixth intercostal space, a pulmonary laceration was caused using blunt dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a fiberoptic laryngoscope offers a novel technique for direct visualization the thoracic space during tube thoracostomy. Further studies are needed to determine the safety of this technique in patients.