Adherence to guideline recommendations for Barrett's esophagus (BE) surveillance endoscopies: Effects of dedicated BE endoscopy lists.

Background and study aims For non-dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus (BE) patients, guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance every 3 to 5 years with four-quadrant random biopsies every 2 cm of BE length. Adherence to these guidelines is low in clinical practice. Pooling BE surveillance endoscopies on dedicated endoscopy lists performed by dedicated endoscopists could possibly enhance guideline adherence, detection of visible lesions, and dysplasia detection rates (DDRs). Patients and methods Data were used from the ACID-study (Netherlands Trial Registry NL8214), a prospective trial of BE surveillance in the Netherlands. BE patients with known or previously treated dysplasia were excluded. Guideline adherence, detection of visible lesions, and DDRs were compared for patients on dedicated and general endoscopy lists. Results A total of 1,244 patients were included, 318 on dedicated lists and 926 on general lists. Endoscopies on dedicated lists showed significantly higher adherence to the random biopsy protocol (85% vs. 66%, P <0.01) and recommended surveillance intervals (60% vs. 47%, P <0.01) compared to general lists. Detection of visible lesions (8.8% vs. 8.1%, P =0.79) and DDRs were not significantly different (6.9% and 6.6%, P =0.94). None (0.0%) of the patients scheduled on dedicated lists and 10 (1.1%) on general lists were diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma ( P =0.07). In multivariable analysis, dedicated lists were significantly associated with biopsy protocol adherence and adherence to surveillance interval recommendations with odds ratios of 4.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-9.57) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.03-2.61), respectively. Conclusions Dedicated endoscopy lists are associated with better adherence to the random biopsy protocol and surveillance interval recommendations.

[Severe malnutrition after gastric: the importance of lifelong follow-up]. / Ernstige malnutritie na gastric bypass.

Two cases are described of patients who present with severe malnutrition more than five years after undergoing a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and who have deficiencies of both micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) and macronutrients (proteins). This problem appears to be caused by both iatrogenic malabsorption after gastric bypass as well as dysphagia due to a local anastomotic complication (stenosis and marginal ulcer). Although both the severity of the deficiencies and the timing are exceptional, we want to emphasize the importance of lifelong supplement use and follow-up after bariatric surgery. Given the important role of general practitioners in this, we argue for implementation of this topic in national guidelines to improve the quality of follow-up.

Tachyduodenia in mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy.

In a 38-year-old male patient diagnosed with mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy an abnormally high duodenal contraction frequency of 20 per minute was found to be present. It is speculated that this tachyduodenia is caused by a metabolic effect on Cajal cells.

Effect of proximal gastric volume on hiatal hernia.

BACKGROUND: Spatial separation of the diaphragm and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) occurs frequently and intermittently in patients with a sliding hiatus hernia and favors gastro-esophageal reflux. This can be studied with high-resolution manometry. Although fundic accommodation is associated with a lower basal LES pressure, its effect on esophagogastric junction configuration and hiatal hernia is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between proximal gastric volume, the presence of a hiatal hernia profile and acid reflux. METHODS: Twenty gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients were studied and compared to 20 healthy controls. High-resolution manometry and pH recording were performed for 1 h before and 2 h following meal ingestion (500 mL per 300 kcal). Volume of the proximal stomach was assessed with three-dimensional ultrasonography before and every 15 min after meal ingestion. KEY RESULTS: During fasting, the hernia profile [2 separate high-pressure zones (HPZs) at manometry] was present for 31.9 +/- 4.9 min h(-1) (53.2%) in GERD patients, and 8.7 +/- 3.3 min h(-1) (14.5%) in controls (P < 0.001). In GERD patients, the presence of hernia profile decreased during the first postprandial hour to 15.9 +/- 4.2 min h(-1), 26.5%, P < 0.01 whilst this phenomenon was not observed in controls. The rate of transition between the two profiles was 5.7 +/- 1.1 per hour in GERD patients and 2.5 +/- 1.0 per hour in controls (P < 0.001). The pre and postprandial acid reflux rate in GERD patients during the hernia profile (6.4 +/- 1.1 per hour and 18.4 +/- 4.3 per hour respectively) was significantly higher than during reduced hernia (2.1 +/- 0.6 per hour; P < 0.05 and 3.8 +/- 0.9 per hour; P < 0.05). A similar difference was found in controls. Furthermore, an inverse correlation was found between fundic volume and the time the hernia profile was present (r = -0.45; P < 0.05) in GERD patients, but not in controls. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: (i) In GERD patients a postprandial increase in proximal gastric volume is accompanied by a decrease in hernia prevalence, which can be explained by a reduction of the intra-thoracic part of the stomach. (ii) A temporal hernia profile also occurs in healthy subjects. (iii) During the hernia profile, acid reflux is more prevalent, especially after meal ingestion.

Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Robotic systems for minimally invasive surgery may be of added value during extensive dissection and suturing in confined spaces, such as laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). The purpose of this trial was to compare standard LNF with robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication (RNF). METHODS: Between 2003 and 2005, 50 patients with confirmed refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were assigned to LNF (25) or RNF (25). Patients who had undergone previous antireflux surgery were excluded. Independent assessment of dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn and general well-being was performed before and 6 months after surgery using questionnaires. Objective outcome was studied 6 months after surgery by oesophageal manometry, 24-h pH monitoring, barium oesophagram series and upper endoscopy. RESULTS: Operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, hospital stay and complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. Reoperation rates were the same (one incisional hernia after LNF and one patient with repeat Nissen after RNF because of persistent dysphagia). Postoperative self-rated change in reflux symptoms and quality of life improved equally in both groups. The reduction in oesophageal acid exposure, increase in lower oesophageal sphincter tone and mucosal healing were comparable in both groups at follow-up. CONCLUSION: RNF yielded similar subjective and objective results to LNF in this study. Therefore no additive value of robotic systems for this procedure was detected up to 6 months after surgery.

Relationship between the mechanism of gastro-oesophageal reflux and oesophageal acid exposure in patients with reflux disease.

This study investigated the relationship between the oesophageal acid exposure time and the underlying manometric motor events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). In 31 patients, 3-hour oesophageal motility and pH were measured after a test meal. Ten patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory manometry and pH recording. In the 3-hour postprandial study, of 367 reflux episodes 79% was associated with a transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR), 14% with absent basal lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure and the remaining 7% with other mechanisms, representing 62, 28 and 10% of the acid exposure time, respectively. Acid reflux duration per motor mechanism was longer for absent basal LOS pressure than for TLOSR (189 +/- 23 s and 41 +/- 5 s, respectively, P < 0.001). In the 24-hour ambulatory study, the contribution of TLOSRs to reflux frequency vs acid exposure time were 65 vs 54% interprandially and 74 vs 53% after the meal. During the night, absence of basal LOS pressure accounted for 36% of reflux events representing 71% of acid exposure time. In conclusion, the duration of oesophageal acid exposure following a TLOSR is shorter than reflux during absent basal LOS pressure. TLOSRs are, the major contributor to oesophageal acid exposure during the day. At night, however, reflux during absent basal LOS pressure is the major contributor to acid exposure.

Impaired bolus transit across the esophagogastric junction in postfundoplication dysphagia.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effect of fundoplication on liquid and solid bolus transit across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in relation to EGJ dynamics and dysphagia. METHODS: Twelve patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) were studied before and after fundoplication. Concurrent high-resolution EGJ manometry and fluoroscopy were performed whilst swallowing liquid barium and a solid bolus. The EGJ transit time, EGJ opening duration, transit efficacy, and EGJ relaxation were measured. During the test symptoms of dysphagia were scored using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: The minimal opening aperture at fluoroscopy was located at the manometric EGJ in all subjects. Fundoplication markedly reduced the EGJ opening diameter from 1.0 +/- 0.1 to 0.6 +/- 0.1 cm (p < 0.01) and rendered deglutative EGJ relaxation incomplete. After fundoplication, a higher intrabolus pressure was found (p < 0.05) associated with a reduced axial bolus length (p < 0.001). EGJ transit time increased from 6.9 +/- 0.9 to 9.8 +/- 1.0 s for liquids (p < 0.01) and from 2.8 +/- 0.5 to 5.8 +/- 0.8 s (p < 0.01) for solids after fundoplication. No relation between EGJ transit and dysphagia scores was observed before fundoplication. In contrast, EGJ transit time significantly correlated with dysphagia scores both during liquid (r = 0.84; p < 0.01) and solid (r = 0.69; p < 0.05) bolus transit following fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: Fundoplication patients exhibit a restricted hiatal opening and an incomplete deglutative EGJ relaxation. To facilitate EGJ transit despite these altered EGJ dynamics a higher intrabolus pressure is created by augmented bolus compression. Fundoplication increases EGJ transit time, the degree of which is associated with postoperative dysphagia.

Relationship between partial gastric volumes and dyspeptic symptoms in fundoplication patients: a 3D ultrasonographic study.

OBJECTIVES: Impaired gastric accommodation may induce dyspeptic symptoms in postfundoplication patients. Our aim was to assess the effect of a meal on total and partial gastric volumes in relation to dyspeptic symptoms in both dyspeptic and nondyspeptic fundoplication patients using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography. METHODS: Eighteen postfundoplication patients of whom eight with and ten without dyspeptic symptoms and eighteen controls were studied. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic images of the stomach were acquired and symptoms were scored while fasting and at 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after ingesting of a 500-ml liquid meal. From the 3D ultrasonographic images of the stomach the total, proximal, and distal gastric volumes were computed. RESULTS: Dyspeptic and nondyspeptic fundoplication patients exhibited similar total gastric volumes at 5 min postprandially compared to controls, whereas smaller total gastric volumes were observed from 15 to 60 min postprandially (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001, respectively). Postprandial proximal/total gastric volume ratios were markedly reduced in both dyspeptic (0.39 +/- 0.016; p < 0.05) and nondyspeptic (0.38 +/- 0.016; p < 0.01) fundoplication patients compared to controls (0.47 +/- 0.008). In contrast, distal/total gastric volume ratios were larger in dyspeptic fundoplication patients (0.14 +/- 0.008) compared to both nondyspeptic fundoplication patients (0.11 +/- 0.007); p < 0.05) and controls (0.07 +/- 0.003); p < 0.001). Dyspeptic fundoplication patients had a higher postprandial score for fullness, nausea, and pain than nondyspeptic patients (p < 0.05) and controls (p < 0.05). Meal-induced distal gastric volume increase correlated significantly with the increase in fullness (r = 0.68; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: After a liquid meal, fundoplication patients exhibit a larger volume of the distal stomach compared with controls. Distal stomach volume was more pronounced in dyspeptic fundoplication patients and related with the increase in postprandial fullness sensations.

Long-term effect of fundoplication on motility of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the long-term effect of Nissen fundoplication on oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) motility. METHODS: Symptoms were scored and oesophageal manometry performed in 34 consecutive patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, before, 3 months after and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Distal peristaltic amplitude increased from a median of 57 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 18 to 107) mmHg to 86 (95 per cent c.i. 54 to 208) mmHg (P < 0.001) at 3 months and 92 (45 to 210) mmHg (P < 0.001) at 2 years. In four patients the amplitude increased to more than 180 mmHg and three of these patients reported odynophagia. After surgery, a linear relationship was observed between the peristaltic amplitude and nadir OGJ relaxation pressure at 3 months (r(s) = 0.68, P < 0.001) and 2 years (r(s) = 0.64, P < 0.001). A significant correlation was also found between amplitude and both basal OGJ pressure and intrabolus pressure at 3 months (r(s) = 0.58, P < 0.001 and r(s) = 0.63, P < 0.001 respectively) and 2 years (r(s) = 0.71, P < 0.001 and r(s) = 0.49, P = 0.024). There was a relationship between peristaltic amplitude and the odynophagia score at 2 years (r(s) = 0.60, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Within 3 months of fundoplication the amplitude of oesophageal peristalsis increased substantially, leading to a nutcracker oesophagus and odynophagia in a subgroup of patients. These phenomena did not appear to progress with time.

Reduced tLESR elicitation in response to gastric distension in fundoplication patients.

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (tLESRs) are vagally mediated in response to gastric cardiac distension. Nine volunteers, eight gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, and eight fundoplication patients were studied. Manometry with an assembly that included a barostat bag was done for 1 h with and 1 h without barostat distension to 8 mmHg. Recordings were scored for tLESRs and barostat bag volume. Fundoplication patients had fewer tLESRs (0.4 +/- 0.3/h) than either normal subjects (2.4 +/- 0.5/h) or GERD patients (2.0 +/- 0.3/h). The tLESRs rate increased significantly in normal subjects (5.8 +/- 0.9/h) and GERD patients (5.4 +/- 0.8/h) during distension but not in the fundoplication group. All groups exhibited similar gastric accommodation (change in volume/change in pressure) in response to distension. Fundoplication patients exhibit a lower tLESR rate at rest and a marked attenuation of the response to gastric distension compared with either controls or GERD patients. Gastric accommodation was not impaired with fundoplication. This suggests that the receptive field for triggering tLESRs is contained within a wider field for elicitation of gastric receptive relaxation and that only the first is affected by fundoplication.

Elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in response to gastric distension and meal ingestion.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of graded gastric barostat distension and meal-induced fundic relaxation on the elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR). In 15 healthy subjects, stepwise fundic distension and oesophageal manometry were performed simultaneously. Next, the effect of meal ingestion on proximal stomach volume and lower oesophageal sphincter function was studied. During stepwise barostat distension of the proximal stomach, a significant linear correlation between intragastric pressure (r = 0.91; P < 0.01) and the TLOSR rate during inflation and subsequent deflation (r = 0.96; P < 0.01) was found. A similar relationship was found for volume. In addition, after meal ingestion, the TLOSR rate increased significantly from 1.40 +/- 3 to 5.4 +/- 1.5 h-1 (P < 0.01) and 5.2 +/- 1.7 h-1 (P < 0.01), respectively, during the first and second 30-min postprandially. However, at similar calculated intragastric volumes, barostat distension led to a significantly higher TLOSR rate than the meal. Similarly, distension-induced increase in gastric wall tension, estimated from the measured bag pressure and volume using Laplace's law, was associated with significantly higher TLOSR rates (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the rate of TLOSRs in healthy volunteers is directly related to the degree of proximal gastric distension and pressure-controlled barostat distension is a more potent trigger of TLOSRs than a meal. The latter finding suggests that tension receptor activation is an important stimulus for TLOSRs.