Clinical trial on the effects of oral magnesium supplementation in stable-phase COPD patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COPD is a common chronic condition in older age that impacts on daily activities and quality of life. Previous studies suggest that magnesium deficit in COPD patients affects bronco-obstruction, inflammation, and physical performance. We investigated whether oral magnesium supplementation in stable-phase COPD patients improves lung function, physical performance, and quality of life. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized-controlled clinical study with 49 participants divided into two groups: one given 300 mg/day of magnesium citrate (n = 25) and the other one sachet/day of a placebo (n = 24). The following parameters were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 6 months: lung function (spirometry), physical performance (handgrip strength, lower limb strength, six-minute walk test), inflammation (e.g., C-reactive protein, CRP), disease-related symptoms, and quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, EuroQoL-5D, the Modified British Medical Research Council Questionnaire). RESULTS: Linear mixed models revealed significantly lower CRP values in the intervention group than in the placebo group at the 6 month follow-up (ß = - 3.2, 95% CI - 6.0, - 0.4, p = 0.03). Moreover, the maximum work for flexion tended to increase in both groups between the 3 and the 6 month assessments, especially in the placebo group. No significant differences within and between groups over the study period were observed for the other parameters tested. CONCLUSIONS: Although the established minimum sample size was not reached, our results suggests that oral magnesium supplementation may have a potential anti-inflammatory role. On the other hand, it does not seem to substantially influence lung function, physical performance, and quality of life in COPD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in clinicaltrial.gov (Trial Registration: NCT02680769, 13 June 2016, retrospectively registered).

Association of body surface area with fat mass, free fat mass and total weight in healthy individuals, and implications for the dosage of cytotoxic drugs.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In oncology, the dosage of anti-neoplastic drugs is generally adapted to the patient's body surface area (BSA). We investigated the potential differences between BSA and body weight (BW) in estimating the variability in body composition among individuals, especially older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 322 community-dwelling individuals with different age and sex: 45 adult men (AM, age 18-65 years), 86 older men (OM, age >65 years), 54 adult women (AW, age 18-65 years), and 137 older women (OW, age >65 years). For each participant, we estimated the body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and we calculated the BSA using the DuBois and DuBois formula. The strength of relationships between fat free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) with BSA, BW, and BMI were expressed as correlation (r) and determination coefficients (R2). RESULTS: Most of the included sample was normal weight (45.7%) or overweight (41.9%). FFM demonstrated a stronger association with BSA than with BW or BMI in all age/sex groups, with r ranging from 0.831 to 0.924 (p < 0.001 for all) and R2 from 0.691 to 0.853. Conversely, BW and BMI were more strongly related to FM than BSA, especially in women. For such relationship, BW, in particular, showed r ranging from 0.793 to 0.924 (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that BSA may be more appropriately used to estimate FFM, compared with BW. Instead, alternative parameters should be considered to estimate FM in patients at risk for adverse effects of lipophilic drugs, especially in older age.