Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Oral Rehabil ; 45(5): 386-392, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29446471

ABSTRACT

To clinically evaluate the patient satisfaction and associated costs of dentures made using a simplified procedure that eliminates assembly on the articulator and dentures made with the conventional technique. Single-blind randomised clinical trial. Forty edentulous patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. One group received dentures made using the conventional method (CG), and the other using a simplified technique (SG) that omits the use of functional impressions (with modelling compound and ZOE impression paste) and an articulator to assemble the models. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 and 6 months by means of a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The comparisons were made using a repeated measures ANOVA (P = .05). No significant differences were found in terms of the satisfaction stated by the patients or the quality of the prosthesis evaluated by a professional among the dentures made using the traditional (n = 17) and simplified (n = 21) techniques. The rehabilitation of an edentulous patient with a simplified technique for the preparation of a total prosthesis is a feasible, more economical alternative and accepted by most patients.


Subject(s)
Dental Impression Technique , Denture Design , Denture, Complete , Mouth, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dental Impression Technique/economics , Denture Design/economics , Denture Retention , Denture, Complete/economics , Esthetics, Dental , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL