Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
Add more filters








Publication year range
1.
Genomics ; 116(5): 110908, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106913

ABSTRACT

DNA replication is a fundamental process for cell proliferation, governed by intricate mechanisms involving leading and lagging strand synthesis. In eukaryotes, canonical DNA replication occurs during the S phase of the cell cycle, facilitated by various components of the replicative machinery at sites known as replication origins. Leading and lagging strands exhibit distinct replication dynamics, with leading strand replication being relatively straightforward compared to the complex synthesis of lagging strands involving Okazaki fragment maturation. Central to DNA synthesis are DNA polymerases, with Polα, Polε, and Polδ playing pivotal roles, each specializing in specific tasks during replication. Notably, leading and lagging strands are replicated by different polymerases, contributing to the division of labor in DNA replication. Understanding the enzymology of asymmetric DNA replication has been challenging, with methods relying on ribonucleotide incorporation and next-generation sequencing techniques offering comprehensive insights. These methodologies, such as HydEn-seq, PU-seq, ribose-seq, and emRiboSeq, offer insights into polymerase activity and strand synthesis, aiding in understanding DNA replication dynamics. Recent advancements include novel conditional mutants for ribonucleotide excision repair, enzymatic cleavage alternatives, and unified pipelines for data analysis. Further developments in adapting techniques to different organisms, studying non-canonical polymerases, and exploring new sequencing platforms hold promise for expanding our understanding of DNA replication dynamics. Integrating strand-specific information into single-cell studies could offer novel insights into enzymology, opening avenues for future research and applications in repair and replication biology.


Subject(s)
DNA Replication , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase , Ribonucleotides , Ribonucleotides/metabolism , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Humans , DNA/metabolism , DNA/genetics
2.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 52(9): 5121-5137, 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520409

ABSTRACT

The S-phase checkpoint is involved in coupling DNA unwinding with nascent strand synthesis and is critical to maintain replication fork stability in conditions of replicative stress. However, its role in the specific regulation of leading and lagging strands at stalled forks is unclear. By conditionally depleting RNaseH2 and analyzing polymerase usage genome-wide, we examine the enzymology of DNA replication during a single S-phase in the presence of replicative stress and show that there is a differential regulation of lagging and leading strands. In checkpoint proficient cells, lagging strand replication is down-regulated through an Elg1-dependent mechanism. Nevertheless, when checkpoint function is impaired we observe a defect specifically at the leading strand, which was partially dependent on Exo1 activity. Further, our genome-wide mapping of DNA single-strand breaks reveals that strand discontinuities highly accumulate at the leading strand in HU-treated cells, whose dynamics are affected by checkpoint function and Exo1 activity. Our data reveal an unexpected role of Exo1 at the leading strand and support a model of fork stabilization through prevention of unrestrained Exo1-dependent resection of leading strand-associated nicks after fork stalling.


Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Single-Stranded , DNA Replication , Exodeoxyribonucleases , S Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints , Exodeoxyribonucleases/metabolism , Exodeoxyribonucleases/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Ribonuclease H/metabolism , Ribonuclease H/genetics , S Phase/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics
3.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 48(6): 3053-3070, 2020 04 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32020204

ABSTRACT

The S phase checkpoint is crucial to maintain genome stability under conditions that threaten DNA replication. One of its critical functions is to prevent Exo1-dependent fork degradation, and Exo1 is phosphorylated in response to different genotoxic agents. Exo1 seemed to be regulated by several post-translational modifications in the presence of replicative stress, but the specific contribution of checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation to Exo1 control and fork stability is not clear. We show here that Exo1 phosphorylation is Dun1-independent and Rad53-dependent in response to DNA damage or dNTP depletion, and in both situations Exo1 is similarly phosphorylated at multiple sites. To investigate the correlation between Exo1 phosphorylation and fork stability, we have generated phospho-mimic exo1 alleles that rescue fork collapse in rad53 mutants as efficiently as exo1-nuclease dead mutants or the absence of Exo1, arguing that Rad53-dependent phosphorylation is the mayor requirement to preserve fork stability. We have also shown that this rescue is Bmh1-2 independent, arguing that the 14-3-3 proteins are dispensable for fork stabilization, at least when Exo1 is downregulated. Importantly, our results indicated that phosphorylation specifically inhibits the 5' to 3'exo-nuclease activity, suggesting that this activity of Exo1 and not the flap-endonuclease, is the enzymatic activity responsible of the collapse of stalled replication forks in checkpoint mutants.


Subject(s)
14-3-3 Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Checkpoint Kinase 2/genetics , Exodeoxyribonucleases/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle/genetics , DNA Damage/genetics , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA Replication/genetics , Genome, Fungal/genetics , Genomic Instability/genetics , Phosphorylation/genetics , Protein Processing, Post-Translational/genetics , S Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics
4.
PLoS Genet ; 15(1): e1007876, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640914

ABSTRACT

CDKs (cyclin-dependent kinases) associate with different cyclins to form different CDK-complexes that are fundamental for an ordered cell cycle progression, and the coordination of this progression with different aspects of the cellular physiology. During meiosis programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate recombination that in addition to generating genetic variability are essential for the reductional chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division, and therefore for genome stability and viability of the gametes. However, how meiotic progression and DSB formation are coordinated, and the role CDKs have in the process, is not well understood. We have used single and double cyclin deletion mutants, and chemical inhibition of global CDK activity using the cdc2-asM17 allele, to address the requirement of CDK activity for DSB formation and recombination in fission yeast. We report that several cyclins (Cig1, Cig2, and the meiosis-specific Crs1) control DSB formation and recombination, with a major contribution of Crs1. Moreover, complementation analysis indicates specificity at least for this cyclin, suggesting that different CDK complexes might act in different pathways to promote recombination. Down-regulation of CDK activity impinges on the formation of linear elements (LinEs, protein complexes required for break formation at most DSB hotspot sites). This defect correlates with a reduction in the capability of one structural component (Rec25) to bind chromatin, suggesting a molecular mechanism by which CDK controls break formation. However, reduction in DSB formation in cyclin deletion mutants does not always correspondingly correlate with a proportional reduction in meiotic recombination (crossovers), suggesting that specific CDK complexes might also control downstream events balancing repair pathways. Therefore, our work points to CDK regulation of DSB formation as a key conserved feature in the initiation of meiotic recombination, in addition to provide a view of possible roles CDK might have in other steps of the recombination process.


Subject(s)
Cyclin B/genetics , Cyclins/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins/genetics , Cyclin-Dependent Kinases/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Genome, Fungal/genetics , Genomic Instability/genetics , Multiprotein Complexes/genetics , Nuclear Proteins , Schizosaccharomyces/genetics
5.
Open Biol ; 5(4): 140218, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25854683

ABSTRACT

Nucleosomes are the basic structural units of chromatin. Most of the yeast genome is organized in a pattern of positioned nucleosomes that is stably maintained under a wide range of physiological conditions. In this work, we have searched for sequence determinants associated with positioned nucleosomes in four species of fission and budding yeasts. We show that mononucleosomal DNA follows a highly structured base composition pattern, which differs among species despite the high degree of histone conservation. These nucleosomal signatures are present in transcribed and non-transcribed regions across the genome. In the case of open reading frames, they correctly predict the relative distribution of codons on mononucleosomal DNA, and they also determine a periodicity in the average distribution of amino acids along the proteins. These results establish a direct and species-specific connection between the position of each codon around the histone octamer and protein composition.


Subject(s)
Amino Acids/genetics , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Nucleosomes/genetics , Transcriptome , Amino Acids/metabolism , DNA, Fungal/genetics , Fungal Proteins/metabolism , Genome, Fungal/genetics , Nucleosomes/metabolism , Open Reading Frames/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Schizosaccharomyces/classification , Schizosaccharomyces/genetics , Schizosaccharomyces/metabolism , Species Specificity
6.
Sci Rep ; 5: 7886, 2015 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25601385

ABSTRACT

The checkpoint kinase Rad53 is crucial to regulate DNA replication in the presence of replicative stress. Under conditions that interfere with the progression of replication forks, Rad53 prevents Exo1-dependent fork degradation. However, although EXO1 deletion avoids fork degradation in rad53 mutants, it does not suppress their sensitivity to the ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU). In this case, the inability to restart stalled forks is likely to account for the lethality of rad53 mutant cells after replication blocks. Here we show that Rad53 regulates replication restart through the checkpoint-dependent transcriptional response, and more specifically, through RNR induction. Thus, in addition to preventing fork degradation, Rad53 prevents cell death in the presence of HU by regulating RNR-expression and localization. When RNR is induced in the absence of Exo1 and RNR negative regulators, cell viability of rad53 mutants treated with HU is increased and the ability of replication forks to restart after replicative stress is restored.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/biosynthesis , Checkpoint Kinase 2/biosynthesis , DNA Replication/genetics , Exodeoxyribonucleases/genetics , Ribonucleotide Reductases/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/biosynthesis , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Survival/drug effects , Checkpoint Kinase 2/genetics , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA Replication/drug effects , Exodeoxyribonucleases/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal/drug effects , Hydroxyurea/pharmacology , Mutation , Ribonucleotide Reductases/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics
7.
BMC Genomics ; 15: 791, 2014 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25218085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Eukaryotic genomes are replicated during S phase according to a temporal program. Several determinants control the timing of origin firing, including the chromatin environment and epigenetic modifications. However, how chromatin structure influences the timing of the activation of specific origins is still poorly understood. RESULTS: By performing high-resolution analysis of genome-wide nucleosome positioning we have identified different chromatin architectures at early and late replication origins. These different patterns are already established in G1 and are tightly correlated with the organization of adjacent transcription units. Moreover, specific early and late nucleosomal patterns are fixed robustly, even in rpd3 mutants in which histone acetylation and origin timing have been significantly altered. Nevertheless, higher histone acetylation levels correlate with the local modulation of chromatin structure, leading to increased origin accessibility. In addition, we conducted parallel analyses of replication and nucleosome dynamics that revealed that chromatin structure at origins is modulated during origin activation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that early and late replication origins present distinctive nucleosomal configurations, which are preferentially associated to different genomic regions. Our data also reveal that origin structure is dynamic and can be locally modulated by histone deacetylation, as well as by origin activation. These data offer novel insight into the contribution of chromatin structure to origin selection and firing in budding yeast.


Subject(s)
DNA Replication Timing , DNA, Fungal/genetics , Histone Deacetylases/genetics , Nucleosomes/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/cytology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Acetylation , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , Histones/metabolism , Mutation , Replication Origin , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism
8.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 41(19): 8943-58, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23901010

ABSTRACT

The structure-specific Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 endonuclease contributes importantly to DNA repair and genome integrity maintenance. Here, using budding yeast, we have studied its function and regulation during the cellular response to DNA damage and show that this endonuclease is necessary for successful chromosome replication and cell survival in the presence of DNA lesions that interfere with replication fork progression. On the contrary, Mus81-Mms4 is not required for coping with replicative stress originated by acute treatment with hydroxyurea (HU), which causes fork stalling. Despite its requirement for dealing with DNA lesions that hinder DNA replication, Mus81-Mms4 activation is not induced by DNA damage at replication forks. Full Mus81-Mms4 activity is only acquired when cells finish S-phase and the endonuclease executes its function after the bulk of genome replication is completed. This post-replicative mode of action of Mus81-Mms4 limits its nucleolytic activity during S-phase, thus avoiding the potential cleavage of DNA substrates that could cause genomic instability during DNA replication. At the same time, it constitutes an efficient fail-safe mechanism for processing DNA intermediates that cannot be resolved by other proteins and persist after bulk DNA synthesis, which guarantees the completion of DNA repair and faithful chromosome replication when the DNA is damaged.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , DNA Replication , DNA-Binding Proteins/physiology , Endonucleases/physiology , Flap Endonucleases/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/physiology , DNA Replication/drug effects , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Endonucleases/genetics , Flap Endonucleases/genetics , Gene Deletion , Holliday Junction Resolvases/genetics , Hydroxyurea/toxicity , Microbial Viability , RecQ Helicases/genetics , S Phase/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics
9.
EMBO J ; 29(5): 934-42, 2010 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20094030

ABSTRACT

DNA replication origins (ORI) in Schizosaccharomyces pombe colocalize with adenine and thymine (A+T)-rich regions, and earlier analyses have established a size from 0.5 to over 3 kb for a DNA fragment to drive replication in plasmid assays. We have asked what are the requirements for ORI function in the chromosomal context. By designing artificial ORIs, we have found that A+T-rich fragments as short as 100 bp without homology to S. pombe DNA are able to initiate replication in the genome. On the other hand, functional dissection of endogenous ORIs has revealed that some of them span a few kilobases and include several modules that may be as short as 25-30 contiguous A+Ts capable of initiating replication from ectopic chromosome positions. The search for elements with these characteristics across the genome has uncovered an earlier unnoticed class of low-efficiency ORIs that fire late during S phase. These results indicate that ORI specification and dynamics varies widely in S. pombe, ranging from very short elements to large regions reminiscent of replication initiation zones in mammals.


Subject(s)
Replication Origin/genetics , Schizosaccharomyces/metabolism , AT Rich Sequence/genetics , Cell Cycle/genetics , Cell Cycle/physiology , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , DNA, Fungal/chemistry , DNA, Fungal/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Fungal Proteins/metabolism , Schizosaccharomyces/genetics
10.
Biol Cell ; 101(11): 617-27, 2009 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19686094

ABSTRACT

The S-phase checkpoint is a surveillance mechanism, mediated by the protein kinases Mec1 and Rad53 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ATR and Chk2 in human cells, respectively) that responds to DNA damage and replication perturbations by co-ordinating a global cellular response necessary to maintain genome integrity. A key aspect of this response is the stabilization of DNA replication forks, which is critical for cell survival. A defective checkpoint causes irreversible replication-fork collapse and leads to genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer cells. Although the precise mechanisms by which Mec1/Rad53 maintain functional replication forks are currently unclear, our knowledge about this checkpoint function has significantly increased during the last years. Focusing mainly on the advances obtained in S. cerevisiae, the present review will summarize our understanding of how the S-phase checkpoint preserves the integrity of DNA replication forks and discuss the most recent findings on this topic.


Subject(s)
DNA Replication , S Phase , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/cytology , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Checkpoint Kinase 2 , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism
11.
Genes Dev ; 22(13): 1816-27, 2008 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18593882

ABSTRACT

The DNA damage checkpoint plays a crucial role in maintaining functional DNA replication forks when cells are exposed to genotoxic agents. In budding yeast, the protein kinases Mec1 (ATR) and Rad53 (Chk2) are especially important in this process. How these kinases act to stabilize DNA replication forks is currently unknown but is likely to have important implications for understanding how genomic instability is generated during oncogenesis and how chemotherapies that interfere with DNA replication could be improved. Here we show that the sensitivity of rad53 mutants to DNA-damaging agents can be almost completely suppressed by deletion of the EXO1 gene, which encodes an enigmatic flap endonuclease. Deletion of EXO1 also suppresses DNA replication fork instability in rad53 mutants. Surprisingly, deletion of EXO1 is completely ineffective in suppressing both the sensitivity and replication fork breakdown in mec1 mutants, indicating that Mec1 has a genetically separable role in replication fork stabilization from Rad53. Finally, our analysis indicates that a second downstream effector kinase, Chk1, can stabilize replication forks in the absence of Rad53. These results reveal previously unappreciated complexity in the downstream targets of the checkpoint kinases and provide a framework for elucidating the mechanisms of DNA replication fork stabilization by these kinases.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , DNA Damage/physiology , DNA Replication/physiology , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/pharmacology , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Checkpoint Kinase 1 , Checkpoint Kinase 2 , DNA Damage/drug effects , DNA Replication/drug effects , Exodeoxyribonucleases/genetics , Exodeoxyribonucleases/metabolism , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins , Methyl Methanesulfonate/pharmacology , Protein Kinases/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism
12.
EMBO Rep ; 4(11): 1048-53, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14566325

ABSTRACT

Genome-wide analysis of replication dynamics requires the previous identification of DNA replication origins (ORIs). However, variability among the ORIs makes it difficult to predict their distribution across the genome on the basis of their sequence. We report here that ORIs in Schizosaccharomyces pombe coincide with discrete chromosomal A+T-rich islands of up to 1 kb long that are characterized by a distinctive A+T content that clearly differentiates them from the rest of the genome. Genome-wide analysis has enabled us to identify 384 of these regions, which predicts the position of most ORIs in the genome, as shown by functional replication analyses. A+T-rich islands occur at the mating locus, centromeres and subtelomeric regions at a density that is approximately fourfold higher than elsewhere in the genome, which suggests a link between the origin recognition complex (ORC) and transcriptional silencing in these regions. The absence of consensus elements in A+T-rich islands implies that different sequences can target the ORC to different ORIs.


Subject(s)
AT Rich Sequence , Genome, Fungal , Replication Origin , Schizosaccharomyces/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
13.
Mol Cell ; 10(4): 907-16, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12419233

ABSTRACT

We have studied the relationship between DNA replication and recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and functional analysis. Our results indicate that the activation of replication origins (ORIs) during the mitotic cell cycle is associated with the generation of joint DNA molecules between sister chromatids. The frequency of integration by homologous recombination was up to 50-fold higher than the genomic average within a narrow window overlapping the ars1 replication initiation site. The S. pombe rad22Delta, rhp51Delta, and rhp54Delta mutants, deficient in mitotic recombination, activate ORIs very inefficiently and accumulate abnormal replication intermediates. These results focus on the general link between replication and recombination previously found in several systems and suggest a role for recombination in the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication.


Subject(s)
DNA Replication/genetics , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , Replication Origin/genetics , Schizosaccharomyces/genetics , DNA, Fungal/biosynthesis , DNA, Fungal/chemistry , DNA, Fungal/metabolism , Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional , S Phase , Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL