ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) and many fatty acids (FAs) have been linked to cardiovascular disease. Associations of serum CRP with FAs in different populations have not been established. METHODS: Participants were 926 men aged 40-49 (2002-2006) from a population-based sample; 310 Whites from Pennsylvania, U.S., 313 Japanese from Shiga, Japan, and 303 Japanese Americans from Hawaii, U.S. Serum CRP (mg/L) was measured using immunosorbent assay while serum FAs (%) were measured using capillary-gas-liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Whites had CRP (mg/L) levels higher than Japanese with Japanese Americans in-between (age-adjusted geometric mean "GM" 0.96, 0.38, 0.66, respectively). Whites had also higher levels of total n-6 FAs (%) and trans fatty acids (TFAs) but lower levels of marine-derived n-3 FAs compared to Japanese (41.78 vs. 35.05, 1.04 vs. 0.58, and 3.85 vs. 9.29, respectively). Japanese Americans had FAs levels in-between the other two populations. Whites had significant inverse trends between CRP and tertiles of total n-6 FAs (GM 1.20, 0.91 and 0.80; p=0.002) and marine-derived n-3 FAs (GM 1.22, 1.00 and 0.72; p<0.001) but a significant positive trend with TFAs (GM 0.80, 0.95 and 1.15; p=0.007). Japanese had a significant inverse trend between CRP and only total n-6 FAs (GM 0.50, 0.35 and 0.31; p<0.001). Japanese Americans had CRP associations with n-3 FAs, n-6 FAs, and TFAs similar to but weaker than Whites. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of consistent inverse association of CRP with total n-6 FAs, there are considerable variations across the three populations in the associations of CRP with different FAs.
Subject(s)
Asian People , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/blood , Fatty Acids, Omega-6/blood , Trans Fatty Acids/blood , White People , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hawaii , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Pennsylvania , United StatesABSTRACT
AIMS: Little is known about diabetes in hospitalized Native Hawaiians and Asian Americans. We determined the burden of diabetes (both diagnosed and undiagnosed) among hospitalized Native Hawaiian, Asian (Filipino, Chinese, Japanese), and White patients. METHODS: Diagnosed diabetes was determined from discharge data from a major medical center in Hawai'i during 2007-2008. Potentially undiagnosed diabetes was determined by Hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5% or glucose ≥200 mg/dl values for those without diagnosed diabetes. Multivariable log-binomial models predicted diabetes (potentially undiagnosed and diagnosed, separately) controlling for socio-demographic factors. RESULTS: Of 17,828 hospitalized patients, 3.4% had potentially undiagnosed diabetes and 30.5% had diagnosed diabetes. In multivariable models compared to Whites, Native Hawaiian and all Asian subgroups had significantly higher percentages of diagnosed diabetes, but not of potentially undiagnosed diabetes. Potentially undiagnosed diabetes was associated with significantly more hospitalizations during the study period compared to both those without diabetes and those with diagnosed diabetes. In all racial/ethnic groups, those with potentially undiagnosed diabetes also had the longest length of stay and were more likely to die during the hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized Native Hawaiians (41%) and Asian subgroups had significantly higher overall diabetes burdens compared to Whites (23%). Potentially undiagnosed diabetes was associated with poor outcomes. Hospitalized patients, irrespective of race/ethnicity, may require more effective inpatient identification and management of previously undiagnosed diabetes to improve clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
We examined the association between serum lipoprotein subclasses and the three measures of arterial stiffness, that is, (i) carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), which is a gold standard measure of central arterial stiffness, (ii) brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV), which is emerging as a combined measure of central and peripheral arterial stiffness and (iii) femoral-ankle PWV (faPWV), which is a measure of peripheral arterial stiffness. Among a population-based sample of 701 apparently healthy Caucasian, Japanese American and Korean men aged 40-49 years, concentrations of lipoprotein particles were assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and the PWV was assessed with an automated waveform analyzer (VP2000, Omron, Japan). Multiple linear regressions were performed to analyse the association between each NMR lipoprotein subclasses and PWV measures, after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors and other confounders. A cutoff of P<0.01 was used for determining significance. All PWV measures had significant correlations with total and small low-density lipoprotein particle number (LDL-P) (all P<0.0001) but not LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) (all P>0.1), independent of race and age. In multivariate regression analysis, no NMR lipoprotein subclass was significantly associated with cfPWV (all P>0.01). However, most NMR lipoprotein subclasses had significant associations with both baPWV and faPWV (P<0.01). In this study of healthy middle-aged men, as compared with cfPWV, both baPWV and faPWV had stronger associations with particle numbers of lipoprotein subclasses. Our results may suggest that both baPWV and faPWV are related to arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis, whereas cfPWV may represent arterial stiffness alone.
Subject(s)
Lipoproteins/blood , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Vascular Stiffness , Adult , Ankle Brachial Index , Asian , Biomarkers/blood , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hawaii/epidemiology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Linear Models , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/blood , Peripheral Arterial Disease/ethnology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Pulse Wave Analysis , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , White PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Numerous studies reported beneficial effects of marine n-3 fatty acids (n-3 FAs) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its risk factors. However, the association of marine n-3 FAs with plasma fibrinogen, a risk factor for CVD, remains uncertain. SUBJECTS/METHODS: In a population-based, cross-sectional study of 795 men aged 40-49 without CVD (262 whites in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, USA, 302 Japanese in Kusatsu, Japan and 229 Japanese Americans in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA), we examined the association of marine n-3 FAs with plasma fibrinogen. Serum FAs were measured by capillary gas-liquid chromatography. Marine n-3 FAs were defined as the sum of docosahexaenoic, eicosapentaenoic and docosapentaenoic acids. Plasma fibrinogen was measured by an automated clot-rate assay. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the association. RESULTS: White, Japanese and Japanese-American men had mean marine n-3 FAs levels of 3.47%, 8.78% and 4.46%, respectively. Japanese men had a significant inverse association of marine n-3 FAs with fibrinogen (standardized regression coefficient of -0.11, P=0.049), after adjusting for age, body-mass index and current smoking. The significant inverse association remained after further adjusting for diabetes, C-reactive protein, triglycerides and other variables. White or Japanese-American men did not show a significant association. CONCLUSIONS: We observed the significant inverse association of marine n-3 FAs with fibrinogen in Japanese, but not in whites or Japanese Americans. The observation suggests that marine n-3 FAs at very high levels, as seen in the Japanese, may decrease plasma fibrinogen levels.
Subject(s)
Asian People , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diet , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/pharmacology , Fibrinogen/metabolism , Fish Oils/pharmacology , White People , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dietary Fats/pharmacology , Hawaii , Humans , Japan , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pennsylvania , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine if patient assessments (reports and ratings) of primary care differ by patient ethnicity. DATA SOURCES/STUDY DESIGN: A self-administered patient survey of 6,092 Massachusetts employees measured seven defining characteristics of primary care: (1) access (financial, organizational); (2) continuity (longitudinal, visit based); (3) comprehensiveness (knowledge of patient, preventive counseling); (4) integration; (5) clinical interaction (communication, thoroughness of physical examinations); (6) interpersonal treatment; and (7) trust. The study employed a cross-sectional observational design. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Asians had the lowest primary care performance assessments of any ethnic group after adjustment for socioeconomic and other factors. For example, compared to whites, Asians had lower scores for communication (69 vs. 79, p = .001) and comprehensive knowledge of patient (56 vs. 48, p = .002), African Americans and Latinos had less access to care, and African Americans had less longitudinal continuity than whites. CONCLUSIONS: We do not know what accounts for the observed differences in patient assessments of primary care. The fact that patient reports as well as the more subjective ratings of care differed by ethnicity suggests that quality differences might exist that need to be addressed.
Subject(s)
Asian/psychology , Attitude to Health/ethnology , Black or African American/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care , White People/psychology , Adult , Communication , Continuity of Patient Care/economics , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Physical Examination/standards , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Health Care/economics , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Allergy and Immunology/education , Cardiology/education , Education, Medical , Endocarditis/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence , Physicians, Family/education , Practice Guidelines as Topic , American Heart Association , Analysis of Variance , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , United StatesABSTRACT
Despite the fact that Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are the fastest growing minority population in the United States, little is known about their treatment patterns and outcomes, particularly for Asian American and Pacific Islander sub-groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare differences in revascularization and mortality rates following acute coronary syndromes among Asian American and Pacific Islander sub-groups [Japanese (n = 1342), Chinese (n = 249), Filipino (n = 314), Native Hawaiian (n = 361)) and Caucasians (n = 569)] during the initial hospitalization using administrative (claims) data from 1997 to 1999. Analyses were stratified by gender and controlled for age, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, ACG morbidity level and system of care. We found that the type of procedures received during the initial hospitalization differed according to patient ethnicity for male patients but not for female ones. Compared to Caucasians, male Asian Amercian and Pacific Islanders patients were less likely to undergo percutaneous coronary interventions and more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In the future, a more comprehensive outcomes study is needed, to examine the impact of any interethnic differences in revascularization rates on intermediate and long-term mortality, patient satisfaction, and self-reported functioning and well-being. The trend toward higher mortality following acute coronary syndromes among Asian Americans and Pacific Islander males emphasizes the importance of such a study.
Subject(s)
Asian , Heart Diseases/mortality , Heart Diseases/therapy , Hospitalization , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/surgery , Humans , Male , Myocardial Revascularization/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , United States , White PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: PTCA is performed primarily to improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. In patients undergoing PTCA, smoking has been shown to increase risks of late myocardial infarction and death. Whether smoking also affects HRQOL after PTCA is currently unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the relation between smoking status and HRQOL among 1432 patients who underwent PTCA as part of 2 multicenter clinical trials. HRQOL was assessed with the use of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 questionnaire. Patients were classified as smokers (n=301), quitters (n=141), or nonsmokers (n=990) on the basis of their smoking status at the time of their index procedure and during the first year of follow-up. For the overall population, HRQOL improved significantly after PTCA for all scales except general health perception, with improvements ranging from 5.5 points for mental health to 23.2 points for role-physical functioning. After adjustment for baseline characteristics and initial HRQOL, nonsmokers had gains at 6 months that were larger than those of smokers for all health domains: physical function (15.4 versus 10.4 points), role-physical (24.5 versus 13.9), pain (18.4 versus 13.3), general health perception (1.7 versus -4.5), vitality (11.0 versus 4. 7), social function (12.8 versus 3.5), role-emotional (13.5 versus 6. 7), and mental health (6.8 versus 0.8; P:<0.02 for all comparisons). Quitters had 6-month HRQOL improvements that were greater than those in smokers for all domains as well. Findings were similar at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Quality-of-life benefits of PTCA are diminished by continued smoking. Efforts to promote smoking cessation at the time of PTCA may substantially improve the health outcomes of these procedures.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Quality of Life , Smoking/adverse effects , Age Factors , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/psychology , Educational Status , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Smoking/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is frequently performed in elderly patients, but little is known about its impact on overall health and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in health-related quality of life among elderly patients after PCI. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: 75 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Participants in two clinical trials of PCI. MEASUREMENTS: Health-related quality of life was assessed by using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) survey and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: Serial data on health-related quality of life were available for 295 elderly (> or =70 years) and 1150 nonelderly (<70 years) patients. At 6 months, physical health had improved in 51% of elderly patients and mental health had improved in 29%. Cardiovascular-specific health status had improved in 58% to 75% of elderly patients. Improvement did not significantly differ between elderly and non-elderly patients at 6 months or 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients selected for participation in a trial of PCI had substantial improvements in health-related quality of life after PCI that were similar to those in younger patients.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Health Status , Humans , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The American Heart Association recommendations for infectious endocarditis (IE) prophylaxis, published in June 1997, sought to improve patient and physician compliance by simplifying the dosing regimen and clarifying endocarditis risk. Adherence to these updated recommendations in patients with echocardiographic verification of their endocarditis risk profile is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the recommended and actual use of IE prophylaxis as reported by patients undergoing echocardiography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent outpatient transthoracic echocardiography at a university-based tertiary hospital in Boston, Mass, during December 1997 were contacted 6 to 9 months later to respond to a survey, completed by 218 (80%) eligible subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients' report of their physicians' instructions on actual use of IE prophylaxis in accordance with patient risk category, determined by echocardiographic data. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients (49.5%) had clinical or echocardiographic findings for which prophylaxis was indicated. Of these 108 patients, 71 (65.7%) reported that they were instructed to take IE prophylaxis. Sixteen high-risk patients (88. 9%) but only 55 moderate-risk patients (61.1%) reported that they were instructed to take prophylaxis. Among the 110 negligible-risk patients, 29 (26.4%) reported that they had been instructed to take IE prophylaxis. Overall, 100 patients (45.9%) reported that they received physician instructions to take IE prophylaxis. Of those who subsequently underwent a procedure for which IE prophylaxis was indicated (n=68), 9 (13.2%) elected not to follow their physician's advice to take prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: We found that although most patients reported receiving instructions for IE prophylaxis use consistent with American Heart Association guidelines, IE prophylaxis overuse among negligible-risk patients and underuse among moderate-risk patients was common. Continued physician and patient education may lead to improved adherence to the current American Heart Association recommendations. JAMA. 2000;284:68-71
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence , Patient Compliance , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , RiskABSTRACT
A case is presented of a man who had 5 hours of atrial fibrillation followed by spontaneous conversion and maintained sinus rhythm that persisted as shown by surface electrocardiography. Transesophageal echocardiography performed 24 hours after electrocardiographic conversion documented an atrial fibrillation pattern within the left atrial appendage, with a normal sinus Doppler pattern in the body of the left atrium. This apparent regional discrepancy in atrial function may partially explain the increased risk for "late" thromboembolism among patients with atrial fibrillation who appear to be successfully converted with sustained sinus rhythm.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Heart Diseases/etiology , Thromboembolism/etiology , Aged , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Blood Flow Velocity , Echocardiography, Doppler, Color , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Electrocardiography , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Diseases/prevention & control , Heart Rate , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Procainamide/administration & dosage , Procainamide/therapeutic use , Thromboembolism/diagnostic imaging , Thromboembolism/physiopathology , Thromboembolism/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used to expedite early cardioversion for patients with atrial fibrillation in whom TEE excludes the presence of atrial thrombi. However, the management of patients with atrial thrombi on initial TEE is controversial. Some advocate cardioversion after 3 to 4 weeks of anticoagulant therapy, whereas others perform a follow-up TEE to document thrombus resolution. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the two strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A computer-based decision analysis model was used to compared 2 strategies: No Follow-up TEE-patients with thrombi on initial TEE complete 4 weeks of anticoagulation and undergo elective cardioversion. Follow-up TEE-patients undergo a follow-up TEE after 4 weeks of anticoagulant therapy. If a thrombus is detected, cardioversion is not performed and patients remain in atrial fibrillation; patients without a thrombus undergo cardioversion. Under our baseline estimates, the Follow-up TEE strategy is less costly and slightly more effective than the No Follow-up TEE strategy. The results are most sensitive to changes in the risk of postcardioversion stroke for patients with atrial thrombi on initial TEE who have completed 4 weeks of anticoagulation and to the probability of residual thrombi on follow-up TEE. CONCLUSIONS: In this cost-effectiveness analysis for patients with atrial fibrillation and left atrial thrombi detected on initial TEE, a Follow-up TEE strategy may be more cost-effective than the No Follow-up TEE strategy. However, the decision is particularly dependent on the risk of postcardioversion stroke in patients with undetected residual left atrial thrombi.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Decision Trees , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/economics , Electric Countershock/economics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Probability , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/prevention & controlSubject(s)
Coronary Disease/mortality , Seasons , Hawaii/epidemiology , Humans , Regression Analysis , Survival RateABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends that physicians assess patients' health risk behaviors, addressing those needing modification. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between patient income, health risk behaviors, the prevalence of physician discussion of these behaviors, and the receptiveness of patients to their physicians' advice. DESIGN: Employee survey. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 6549 Massachusetts state employees in 12 health plans. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were obtained using a patient-completed mail survey. Trend tests were used to discern differences in the prevalence of health risk behaviors, physician discussion of these behaviors, and patient receptiveness to discussions by patient income. RESULTS: Although unhealthy behaviors were common among all income groups, physician discussion of health risk behaviors fell far short of the universal risk assessment recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Low-income patients were more likely to be obese and smoke than high-income patients and were less likely to wear seat belts and exercise. In contrast, stress and alcohol consumption increased with income, while the proportion of heavy drinkers did not vary significantly. Physicians were more likely to discuss diet and exercise with high-income patients in need of these discussions than with low-income patients, but were more likely to discuss smoking with low-income patients who smoked than with high-income patients who smoked. Among patients with whom discussions occurred, low-income patients were much more likely to report attempting to change their behavior based on physician advice. CONCLUSIONS: Physician counseling of patients regarding health risk behaviors should be greatly improved if the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations are to be fulfilled. Improvement is especially needed in regard to alcohol consumption, safe sex, and seat belt use. Physicians also need to be more vigilant in properly identifying and counseling low-income patients at risk in regard to diet and exercise and high-income patients who smoke.
Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Income , Patient Education as Topic , Physician-Patient Relations , Risk-Taking , Adult , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Social ClassABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine how Asian-American patients' ratings of primary care performance differ from those of whites. Latinos, and African-Americans. DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of data collected in a cross-sectional study using patient questionnaires. SETTING: University hospital primary care group practice. PARTICIPANTS: In phase 1, successive patients who visited the study site for appointments were asked to complete the survey. In phase 2, successive patients were selected who had most recently visited each physician, going back as far as necessary to obtain 20 patients for each physician. In total, 502 patients were surveyed, 5% of whom were Asian-American. MAIN RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, Asian-Americans rated overall satisfaction and 10 of 11 scales assessing primary care significantly lower than whites did. Dimensions of primary care that were assessed include access, comprehensiveness of care, integration, continuity, clinical quality, interpersonal treatment, and trust. There were no differences for the scale of longitudinal continuity. On average, the rating scale scores of Asian-Americans were 12 points lower than those of whites (on 100-point scales). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Asian-American patients rate physicians primary care performance lower than do whites, African-Americans, and Latinos. Future research needs to focus on Asian-Americans to determine the generalizability of these findings and the extent to which they reflect differences in survey response tendencies or actual quality differences.
Subject(s)
Asian/psychology , Family Practice/standards , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/standards , Adult , Black or African American , Attitude to Health , Boston , Cross-Sectional Studies , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Family Practice/methods , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/classification , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , White PeopleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Using a decision-analytic model, we sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of three strategies for cardioversion of patients admitted to the hospital with atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE)-guided cardioversion has been proposed as a method for early cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation. The cost-effectiveness of this approach, relative to conventional therapy, has not been studied. METHODS: We ascertained the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of three strategies: 1) conventional therapy--transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and warfarin therapy for 1 month before cardioversion; 2) initial TTE, followed by TEE and early cardioversion if no thrombus is detected; 3) initial TEE, with early cardioversion if no thrombus is detected. With strategies 2 and 3, if a thrombus is seen, follow-up TEE is performed. If no thrombus is seen, cardioversion is then performed. All strategies utilized anticoagulation before and extending for 1 month after cardioversion. Life expectancy, utilities (quality-of-life weights) and event probabilities were ascertained from published reports. Cost estimates were based on published data and hospital accounting information. RESULTS: Transesophageal echocardiographic-guided early cardioversion (strategy 3: cost $2,774, QALY 8.49) dominates TTE/TEE-guided cardioversion (strategy 2: cost $3,106, QALY 8.48) and conventional therapy (strategy 1: cost $3,070, QALY 8.48) because it is the least costly with similar effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that TEE-guided cardioversion (strategy 3) dominates conventional therapy if the risk of stroke after TEE negative for atrial thrombus is slightly less than that after conventional therapy (baseline estimate 0.8%). The results also depend on the risk of major hemorrhage but are less sensitive to baseline estimates of morbidity from TEE, cost of TTE, cost of hospital admission for cardioversion and utilities for health states. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a decision-analytic model, TEE-guided early cardioversion, without TTE, is a reasonable cost-saving alternative to conventional therapy for patients admitted to the hospital with atrial fibrillation. Such a strategy appears particularly beneficial for patients with an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Future clinical studies examining the TEE strategy should consider eliminating initial TTE and carefully assess both the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Decision Support Techniques , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Electric Countershock/economics , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Cerebrovascular Disorders/epidemiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Echocardiography/economics , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/economics , Electric Countershock/methods , Female , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine if women cared for by female physicians are more likely to receive postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy than women cared for by male physicians. DESIGN: Case-control study with follow-up telephone survey. SETTING: An outpatient practice at an urban teaching hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were women begun on estrogen replacement therapy during an 18-month period; controls were matched on age and month of visit. Seventy-one cases (mean age 60 years, 41% nonwhite) and 142 controls (mean age 60 years, 48% nonwhite) were identified. Fifty-two (82%) of 64 eligible case patients and 89 (80%) of 111 eligible control patients completed a follow-up telephone interview assessing their preferences for female physicians and interest in estrogen replacement therapy. MAIN RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders using conditional logistic regression, patients with female physicians were more likely to begin estrogen replacement therapy than those seen by male physicians (odds ratio [OR] 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8, 15.3). Case patients selected their primary care physician more often than control patients and were more interested in estrogen replacement therapy. After adjusting for potential confounders including patients' preferences to select their physician and their interest in estrogen replacement therapy, patients with female physicians were still more likely to begin estrogen replacement therapy than those seen by male physicians (OR 11.4, 95% CI 1.1, 113.6). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that female patients are more likely to be prescribed estrogen replacement therapy if they are cared for by female physicians rather than male physicians even after accounting for patient preferences. Further research is required to determine whether these differences reflect differences in physicians' knowledge or attitudes regarding estrogen replacement therapy or reflect gender differences in how physicians discuss estrogen replacement therapy with their patients.