ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: High secondary injury rates after orthopedic surgeries have motivated concern toward the construct validity of return-to-sport test batteries, as it is evident that common strength and functional assessments fail to elicit pertinent behaviors like visual search and reactive decision making. This study aimed to establish the test-retest reliability of 2 reactive agility tasks and evaluate the impact of visual perturbation on physical performance. METHODS: Fourteen physically active individuals completed 2 agility tasks with reaction time (ie, 4 corner agility), working memory, and pathfinding (ie, color recall) components. Participants completed both tasks 4 times in 2 sessions scheduled 7 days apart. Outcomes included performance metrics of reaction time, time to target, number of targets, and total time assessed with reactive training timing gates. To assess test-retest reliability, we used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Stroboscopic goggles induced visual perturbation during the fourth trial of each task. To assess the effect of visual perturbation, we used paired t tests and calculated performance costs. RESULTS: The 4-corner agility task demonstrated excellent reliability with respect to reaction time (ICC3,1 = .907, SEM = 0.13, MDC = 0.35 s); time to light (ICC3,1 = .935, SEM = 0.07, MDC = 0.18 s); and number of lights (ICC3,1 = .800, SEM = 0.24, MDC = 0.66 lights). The color recall task demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for time to lights (ICC3,1 = .818-.953, SEM = 0.07-0.27, MDC = 0.19-0.74 s); test time (ICC3,1 = .969, SEM = 5.43, MDC = 15.04 s); and errors (ICC3,1 = .882, SEM = 0.19, MDC = 0.53 errors). Visual perturbation resulted in increased time to target (P = .022-.011), number of targets (P = .039), and total test time (P = .013) representing moderate magnitude degradation of performance (d = 0.55-0.87, performance costs = 5%-12%). CONCLUSIONS: Both tasks demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability. Performance degraded on both tasks with the presence of visual perturbation. These results suggest standardized reactive agility tasks are reliable and could be developed as components of dynamic RTS testing.
Subject(s)
Reaction Time , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Reaction Time/physiology , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Athletic Performance/physiology , Return to Sport , Psychomotor Performance/physiologyABSTRACT
Background/Purpose: Return to sport decision-making may be improved by assessing an athlete's ability to coordinate movement with opponents in sport. The purpose was to investigate whether previous injuries associated with female soccer players' interpersonal coordination during a collision avoidance task. The authors hypothesized that external perturbations would disrupt the strength and stability of coordinated movement, and that individuals with a history of injury would be less likely to recover coordinated movement. Study Design: Cross-Sectional. Methods: Nine female athletes with a history of lower extremity injuries and nine without injuries were paired into dyads. Each dyad completed twenty trials of an externally paced collision-avoidance agility task with an unanticipated perturbation. Participant trajectories were digitized and analyzed using cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA) to determine the strength and stability of interpersonal coordination dynamics. Trials in which participants with injury history assumed leader or follower roles within each dyad were then used to study how dyadic coordination varied across task stages (early, perturbation, and late) using linear mixed effect models. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated to demonstrate magnitude of differences. In exploratory analysis, psychological readiness (i.e., self-reported knee functioning, fear of injury, and risk-taking propensity) was evaluated for their association with leader-follower status. Results: Perturbation disrupted the strength (R2=0.65, p<0.001, early=49.7±1.7, perturbation=41.1±1.7, d=0.39) and stability (R2=0.71, p < 0.001, early=65.0±1.6, perturbation=58.0±1.7, d=0.38) of interpersonal coordination regardless of leader-follower status. Individuals with injury history failed to restore coordination after the perturbation compared to control participants (injury=44.2.0±2.1, control=50.8±2.6, d=0.39). Neither demographic nor psychological measures were associated with leader-follower roles (B=0.039, p=0.224). Conclusion: Individuals with a history of lower extremity injury may have a diminished ability to adapt interpersonal coordination to perturbations, possibly contributing to a higher risk of re-injury. Level of Evidence: 3.
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: While the landing phases of the single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) are commonly assessed, limited work reflects how the take-off phase influences hop performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). OBJECTIVE: To compare trunk and lower extremity biomechanics between individuals with ACLR and matched uninjured controls during take-off of the SLHD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design. SETTING: Laboratory setting. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: 16 individuals with ACLR and 18 uninjured controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Normalized quadriceps isokinetic torque, hop distance, and respective limb symmetry indices (LSI) were collected for each participant. Sagittal and frontal kinematics and kinetics of the trunk, hip, knee, and ankle, as well as vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces (GRF) were recorded for loading and propulsion of the take-off phase of the SLHD. RESULTS: Those with ACLR had weaker quadriceps peak torque in the involved limb (p=0.001) and greater strength asymmetry (p<0.001) compared to controls. Normalized hop distance was not statistically different between limbs or between groups (p>0.05) and hop distance symmetry was not different between groups (p>0.05). During loading, the involved limb demonstrated lesser knee flexion angles (p=0.030) and knee power (p=0.007) compared to the uninvolved limb, and lesser knee extension moments compared to the uninvolved limb (p=0.001) and controls (p=0.005). During propulsion, the involved limb demonstrated lesser knee extension moment (p=0.027), knee power (p=0.010), knee (p=0.032) and ankle work (p=0.032), anterior- posterior GRF (p=0.047), and greater knee (p=0.016) abduction excursions compared to the uninvolved limb. CONCLUSIONS: Between-limb differences in SLHD take-off suggest a knee underloading strategy in the involved limb. These results provide further evidence that distance covered during SLHD assessment can overestimate function and fail to identify compensatory biomechanical strategies.
ABSTRACT
Plantarflexor central drive is a promising biomarker of neuromotor impairment; however, routine clinical assessment is hindered by the unavailability of force measurement systems with integrated neurostimulation capabilities. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of a portable, neurostimulation-integrated, plantarflexor force measurement system we developed to facilitate the assessment of plantarflexor neuromotor function in clinical settings. Two experiments were conducted with the Central Drive System (CEDRS). To evaluate accuracy, experiment #1 included 16 neurotypical adults and used intra-class correlation (ICC2,1) to test agreement of plantarflexor strength capacity measured with CEDRS versus a stationary dynamometer. To evaluate validity, experiment #2 added 26 individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and used one-way ANOVAs to test for between-limb differences in CEDRS' measurements of plantarflexor neuromotor function, comparing neurotypical, non-paretic, and paretic limb measurements. The association between paretic plantarflexor neuromotor function and walking function outcomes derived from the six-minute walk test (6MWT) were also evaluated. CEDRS' measurements of plantarflexor neuromotor function showed high agreement with measurements made by the stationary dynamometer (ICC = 0.83, p < 0.001). CEDRS' measurements also showed the expected between-limb differences (p's < 0.001) in maximum voluntary strength (Neurotypical: 76.21 ± 13.84 ft-lbs., Non-paretic: 56.93 ± 17.75 ft-lbs., and Paretic: 31.51 ± 14.08 ft-lbs.), strength capacity (Neurotypical: 76.47 ± 13.59 ft-lbs., Non-paretic: 64.08 ± 14.50 ft-lbs., and Paretic: 44.55 ± 14.23 ft-lbs.), and central drive (Neurotypical: 88.73 ± 1.71%, Non-paretic: 73.66% ± 17.74%, and Paretic: 52.04% ± 20.22%). CEDRS-measured plantarflexor central drive was moderately correlated with 6MWT total distance (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and distance-induced changes in speed (r = 0.61, p = 0.002). CEDRS is a clinician-operated, portable, neurostimulation-integrated force measurement platform that produces accurate measurements of plantarflexor neuromotor function that are associated with post-stroke walking ability.
ABSTRACT
Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and subsequent physical therapy can help athletes return to competition; however, re-injury rates remain disproportionately high due, in part, to lingering biomechanical and neurological factors that are not fully addressed during rehabilitation. Prior reports indicate that individuals exhibit altered electrical activity in both brain and muscle after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). In this investigation, we aimed to extend existing approaches by introducing a novel non-linear analysis of corticomuscular dynamics, which does not assume oscillatory coupling between brain and muscle: Corticomuscular cross-recurrence analysis (CM-cRQA). Our findings indicate that corticomuscular dynamics vary significantly between involved (injured) and uninvolved legs of participants with ACLR during voluntary isometric contractions between the brain and both the vastus medialis and lateralis. This finding points to a potential lingering neural deficit underlying re-injury for athletes after surgical reconstruction, namely the dynamical structure of neuromuscular (brain to quad muscle) coordination, which is significantly asymmetric, between limbs, in those who have ACLR.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Reinjuries , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Reinjuries/surgery , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Extremities , Muscle Strength/physiologyABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the quality of neural drive and recruited quadriceps motor units' (MU) action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP) and discharge rate (mean firing rate (MFR)) relative to recruitment threshold (RT) between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and controls. Methods: Fourteen individuals with ACLR and 13 matched controls performed trapezoidal knee extensor contractions at 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100% of their maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Decomposition electromyography (dEMG) and torque were recorded concurrently. The Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and central activation ratio (CAR) were acquired bilaterally to detail the proportion of MU pool available and volitionally activated. We examined MUAPAMP-RT and MFR-RT relationships with linear regression and extracted the regression line slope, y-intercept, and RT range for each contraction. Linear mixed effect modelling used to analyze the effect of group and limb on regression line slope and RT range. Results: Individuals with ACLR demonstrated lower MVIC torque in the involved limb compared to uninvolved limb. There were no differences in H-reflex or CAR between groups or limbs. The ACLR involved limb demonstrated smaller mass-normalized RT range and slower MU firing rates at high contraction intensities (70% and 100% MVIC) compared to uninvolved and control limbs. The ACLR involved limb also demonstrated larger MU action potentials in the VM compared to the contralateral limb. These differences were largely attenuated with relative RT normalization. Conclusions: These results suggest that persistent strength deficits following ACLR may be attributable to a diminished quadriceps motor neuron pool and inability to upregulate the firing rate of recruited MUs.
Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Muscle Weakness , Quadriceps Muscle , Recruitment, Neurophysiological , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Knee/physiopathology , Knee/surgery , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Quadriceps Muscle/physiopathology , Muscle Weakness/etiology , Muscle Weakness/physiopathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare brain activity between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and controls during balance. To determine the influence of neuromodulatory interventions (external focus of attention [EF] and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS]) on cortical activity and balance performance. METHODS: Individuals with ACLR (n = 20) and controls (n = 20) performed a single-limb balance task under four conditions: internal focus (IF), object-based-EF, target-based-EF, and TENS. Electroencephalographic signals were decomposed, localized, and clustered to generate power spectral density in theta and alpha-2 frequency bands. RESULTS: Participants with ACLR had higher motor-planning (d = 0.5), lower sensory (d = 0.6), and lower motor activity (d = 0.4-0.8), while exhibiting faster sway velocity (d = 0.4) than controls across all conditions. Target-based-EF decreased motor-planning (d = 0.1-0.4) and increased visual (d = 0.2), bilateral sensory (d = 0.3-0.4), and bilateral motor (d = 0.4-0.5) activity in both groups compared to all other conditions. Neither EF conditions nor TENS changed balance performance. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with ACLR exhibit lower sensory and motor processing, higher motor planning demands, and greater motor inhibition compared to controls, suggesting visual-dependence and less automatic balance control. Target-based-EF resulted in favorable reductions in motor-planning and increases in somatosensory and motor activity, transient effects in line with impairments after ACLR. SIGNIFICANCE: Sensorimotor neuroplasticity underlies balance deficits in individuals with ACLR. Neuromodulatory interventions such as focus of attention may induce favorable neuroplasticity along with performance benefits.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Extremities , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Neuronal Plasticity , Brain/surgery , Knee Joint/physiology , Knee Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare quadriceps corticomuscular coherence (CMC) and force steadiness between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured controls during a force tracing task. METHODS: Individuals with ACLR ( n = 20) and controls ( n = 20) performed a knee extension force-control task at 50% of maximal voluntary effort. Electrocortical activity, electromyographic activity, and torque output were recorded concurrently. CMC in beta (13-30 Hz) and gamma (31-80 Hz) frequency bands was assessed using partial directed coherence between the contralateral motor cortex (e.g., C4-C2-Cz electrodes) and the ipsilateral quadriceps muscles (e.g., left vastus medialis and lateralis). Force steadiness was quantified using root-mean-square error and coefficient of variation. Active motor threshold was determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Differences between groups (ACLR vs control) and limbs (involved vs uninvolved) were assessed using peak knee extension strength and active motor threshold as a priori covariates. RESULTS: Participants with ACLR had lower gamma band connectivity bilaterally when compared with controls (vastus medialis: d = 0.8; vastus lateralis: d = 0.7). Further, the ACLR group demonstrated worse quadriceps force steadiness (root-mean-square error, d = 0.5), lower involved limb quadriceps strength ( d = 1.1), and higher active motor threshold ( d = 1.0) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Lower quadriceps gamma band CMC in the ACLR group suggests lower cortical drive (e.g., corticomotor decoupling) to the quadriceps compared with matched controls. Further, the ACLR group demonstrated worse quadriceps force steadiness, suggesting impaired ability to modulate quadriceps neuromuscular control. Notably, CMC differences were present only in the gamma frequency band, suggesting impairments may be specific to multisensory integration and force modulation.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Knee Joint/physiology , Knee , Muscle StrengthABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Low back pain (LBP) is hallmarked by activity limitations, especially for tasks involving bending. Back exosuit technology reduces low back discomfort and improves self-efficacy of individuals with LBP during bending and lifting tasks. However, the biomechanical efficacy of these devices in individuals with LBP is unknown. This study sought to determine biomechanical and perceptual effects of a soft active back exosuit designed to assist individuals with LBP sagittal plane bending. To understand patient-reported usability and use cases for this device. METHODS: Fifteen individuals with LBP performed two experimental lifting blocks once with and without an exosuit. Trunk biomechanics were measured by muscle activation amplitudes, and whole-body kinematics and kinetics. To evaluate device perception, participants rated task effort, low back discomfort, and their level of concern completing daily activities. RESULTS: The back exosuit reduced peak back extensor: moments by 9%, and muscle amplitudes by 16% when lifting. There were no changes in abdominal co-activation and small reductions maximum trunk flexion compared to lifting without an exosuit. Participants reported lower task effort, back discomfort, and concern about bending and lifting with an exosuit compared to without. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a back exosuit not only imparts perceptual benefits of reduced task effort, discomfort, and increased confidence in individuals with LBP but that it achieves these benefits through measurable biomechanical reductions in back extensor effort. The combined effect of these benefits implies back exosuits might be a potential therapeutic aid to augment physical therapy, exercises, or daily activities.
Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Humans , Low Back Pain/therapy , Feasibility Studies , Physical Exertion , Abdominal Muscles , ElectromyographyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare cortical motor planning activity during response selection and motor execution processes between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured controls during a reaction time and response selection task. METHODS: Individuals with ACLR ( n = 20) and controls ( n = 20) performed a lateralized choice reaction time (e.g., Go/NoGo) task. Electrocortical activity and reaction time were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and inertial measurement units. Separate stimulus locked and response-locked event-related potentials were computed for each limb. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) was computed as the interhemispheric differences between waveforms and the mean LRP area and onset latency were recorded. Active motor threshold was determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Differences between groups (ACLR vs control) and limbs (involved vs uninvolved) and the associations between LRP characteristics and response performance (number of errors) were assessed. RESULTS: Participants with ACLR have had smaller LRP area during periods of response selection ( P = 0.043, d = 0.4) and motor execution ( P = 0.015, d = 0.5) and committed more errors in both Go ( P < 0.001, d = 0.8) and NoGo ( P = 0.032, d = 0.5) response conditions. There were no differences in latency of response selection or motor execution. Participants with ACLR had higher active motor thresholds ( P < 0.001, d = 1.3) than controls, which was weakly associated with smaller LRP areas ( r = 0.32-0.42, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ACLR group demonstrated greater motor planning and response inhibition during a choice reaction time task. More errant performance also suggests poorer decision making in the presence of a "speed-accuracy" trade-off. Key features of the sample, including lower corticospinal excitability, lend support to an interpretation of widespread cortical inhibition contributing to impairments in response selection and motor execution.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Evoked Potentials , Reaction Time , Transcranial Magnetic StimulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe age-, sex-, and graft source-specific reference values for patient-reported, physical function, and strength outcome measures in adolescents at 5 to 7 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data were collected at 3 universities and 2 children's hospitals. The participants completed at least one of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Evaluation Form, Pediatric IKDC (Pedi-IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale. Participants also completed single-leg hop tests and/or isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength assessments (at 60°/s). Reference values were summarized using descriptive statistics and stratified for age, sex, and graft source. RESULTS: Reference values were reported for common patient-reported outcomes and measures of physical function and strength from 783 participants (56% females, age = 16. 4 ± 2.0 years) who were in early adolescence (12-14 years, N = 183, 52% females), middle adolescence (15-17 years, N = 456, 58% females), or late adolescence (18-20 years, N = 144, 55% females). Three hundred seventy-nine participants (48.4%) received a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, 292 participants (37.3%) received hamstring tendon autograft, and 112 participants (14.3%) received autograft or allograft from an alternative source. CONCLUSION: Reference values for common patient-reported outcomes and measures of physical function and strength differed depending on a patient's age, sex, and graft source. Using patient-specific reference values, in addition to previously described age-appropriate cutoff values, may help clinicians monitor and progress patients through rehabilitation and return to physical activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(4):1-8. Epub: 23 January 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11389.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Thigh , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Infant , Male , Leg , Reference Values , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Knee Joint , Quadriceps Muscle , Return to SportABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Despite the growing use of whole-body vibration (WBV) to enhance quadriceps neuromuscular function, the hamstrings-specific response is unclear among those without neuromuscular impairment, which is important to inform performance-based recommendations. Our objective was to determine the immediate and prolonged effects of WBV on hamstrings and quadriceps neuromuscular function in uninjured individuals. DESIGN: Crossover. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen, recreationally active individuals performed WBV and control exercise protocols, consisting of six 1-min repetitions of isometric squats, on separate days in a randomized order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electromyographic (EMG) amplitude, antagonist-to-agonist co-activation, rate of torque development, and peak torque of the hamstrings and quadriceps were measured pre-, immediately post-, and 20 min post-condition. Percentage change scores were calculated from baseline to each post-measurement. RESULTS: A condition main effect indicated that WBV reduced agonist semitendinosus EMG amplitudes more than the control (-12.1% vs. -1.5%, p < .001). Antagonist vastus medialis EMG amplitudes were reduced immediately, but not 20 min following WBV (-7.1% vs. 3.5%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: WBV induced an inhibitory effect on medial hamstrings activity during knee flexion contraction in a majority of our sample, yet this response was not uniformly observed and its functional relevance remains unclear in an uninjured population.
Subject(s)
Hamstring Muscles , Humans , Electromyography , Exercise , Muscle, Skeletal , Posture , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , VibrationSubject(s)
Disaster Planning , Emergency Medical Services , Mass Casualty Incidents , Humans , TriageABSTRACT
To determine the association between cortical activity and postural control performance changes with differing somatosensory perturbations. Healthy individuals (n = 15) performed a single-limb balance task under four conditions: baseline, unstable surface (foam), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied to the stance-limb knee, and combined foam + TENS. Cortical activity was recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) and postural sway via triaxial force plate. EEG signals were decomposed, localized, and clustered to generate power spectral density in theta (4-7 Hz) and alpha-2 (10-12 Hz) frequency bands in anatomical clusters. Postural sway signals were analyzed with center of pressure (COP) sway metrics (e.g., area, distance, velocity). Foam increased theta power in the frontal and central clusters (d = 0.77 to 1.16), decreased alpha-2 power in bilateral motor, right parietal, and occipital clusters (d = - 0.89 to - 2.35) and increased sway area, distance, and velocity (d = 1.09-2.57) relative to baseline. Conversely, TENS decreased central theta power (d = - 0.60), but increased bilateral motor, left parietal, and occipital alpha-2 power (d = 0.51-1.40), with similar to baseline balance performance. In combination, foam + TENS attenuated sway velocity detriments and cortical activity caused by the foam condition alone. There were weak and moderate associations between percent increased central theta and occipital activity and increased sway velocity. Somatosensory perturbations changed patterns of cortical activity during a single-limb balance task in a manner suggestive of sensory re-weighting to pertinent sensory feedback. Across conditions decreased cortical activity in pre-motor and visual regions were associated with reduced sway velocity.
Subject(s)
Feedback, Sensory , Postural Balance , Electroencephalography , Extremities , Humans , Knee Joint , Postural Balance/physiologyABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a common neurophysiological response to joint injury. While athletic trainers (ATs) are constantly treating patients with AMI, it is unclear how clinicians are using the available evidence to treat the condition. OBJECTIVE: To investigate ATs' general knowledge, clinical practice, and barriers for treating AMI. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was utilized. The survey was distributed to a random sample of 3000 ATs from the National Athletic Trainers' Association and through social media. 143 board certified ATs (age: 34.6 [10.3] y; experience: 11.7 [9.8] y) from various clinical settings and educational backgrounds were included in the analysis. RESULTS: One hundred one respondents were able to correctly identify the definition of AMI. The majority of these respondents correctly reported that joint effusion (n = 95, 94.1%) and abnormal activity from joint receptors (n = 91, 90.1%) resulted in AMI. Of the 101 respondents, only 58 (57.4%) reported using disinhibitory interventions to treat AMI. The most frequently used evidence supported interventions were transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 38, 65.5%), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (n = 33, 56.9%), and focal joint cooling (n = 25, 43.1%). The interventions used correctly most often based on current evidence were neuromuscular electrical stimulation (n = 29/33, 87.9%) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 26/38, 68.4%). Overall, difficulty quantifying AMI (n = 62, 61.24%) and lack of education (n = 71, 76.2%) were most frequently perceived as barriers. Respondents that did not use disinhibitory interventions perceived lack of experience treating AMI, understanding the terminology, and access to therapeutic modalities more often than the respondents that reported using disinhibitory interventions. CONCLUSION: Further education about concepts and treatment about AMI is warranted for ATs. Continued understanding of ATs' clinical practice in regard to AMI may help identify gaps in athletic training clinical education.
Subject(s)
Sports Medicine , Sports , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Muscle Strength , Physical Education and Training , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: External focus (EF) of attention leads to improved balance performance. Consideration of the neuromodulatory effects of EF may inform its clinical utility in addressing neuroplastic impairments after musculoskeletal injuries. This study aimed to determine whether electrocortical activity and balance performance changed with attentional foci that prioritized differing sensory feedback and whether changes in electrocortical activity and balance were associated. METHODS: Individuals who were healthy (n = 15) performed a single-limb balance task under 3 conditions: internal focus (IF), somatosensory focus (EF with a baton [EF-baton]), and visual focus (EF with a laser [EF-laser]). Electrocortical activity and postural sway were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and a triaxial force plate. Electroencephalographic signals were decomposed, localized, and clustered to generate power spectral density in θ and α-2 frequency bands. Postural sway signals were analyzed with center-of-pressure sway metrics (eg, area, distance, velocity) and knee angle. The relationship between percent change in clustered brain activity and task performance metrics was assessed. RESULTS: Both EF conditions resulted in increased cortical activity and improved balance performance compared with IF. EF-laser had the largest effect, demonstrating increased frontal θ power (d = 0.64), decreased central θ power (d = -0.30), and decreased bilateral motor, bilateral parietal, and occipital α-2 power (d = -1.38 to -4.27) as well as a shorter path distance (d = -0.94) and a deeper (d = 0.70) and less variable (d = -1.15) knee angle than IF. Weak to moderate associations exist between increases in cortical activity and improved balance performance (ρ = 0.405-0.584). CONCLUSION: EF resulted in increased cortical activity associated with cognitive, motor, somatosensory, and visual processing. EF-laser, which prioritized visual feedback, had the largest and broadest effects. Changes in cortical activity resulting from EF were independently associated with improved balance performance. IMPACT: This study demonstrates that goal-oriented attention results in functional increases in brain activity compared with internally directed self-focus. These results suggest EF may target neurophysiologic impairments and improve balance in clinical populations.
Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Feedback, Sensory/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Task Performance and Analysis , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hamstrings muscle morphology is determinant of muscle function (i.e. strength). Among individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), less cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the ACLR-limb are associated with muscle weakness, and may contribute to lower rates of return to preinjury activity level and an increased risk for long-term sequelae. OBJECTIVES: To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of differences in hamstrings morphology following ACLR is needed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe the morphology of the hamstring muscle complex after ACLR. METHODS: We searched five databases for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings size and architecture in individuals with ACLR. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow fixed-effect size meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included for final review. Eight categories of morphological outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) volume, (2) cross-sectional area (CSA), (3) muscle length, (4) muscle thickness, (5) fascicle length, (6) pennation angle, (7) fiber area, and (8) fiber type. Meta-analysis demonstrated lower hamstrings volume in the ACLR-limb in both contralateral and control group comparisons, and lower CSA, length, and thickness in the ACLR-limb in contralateral comparisons. The semitendinosus and gracilis were most profoundly impacted. Limited moderate evidence demonstrated greater biceps femoris pennation angle in the ACLR-limb. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with ACLR demonstrated large deficits in semitendinosus and gracilis muscle CSA and volume in the ACLR-limb compared contralaterally, with no differences observed in the biceps femoris or semimembranosus. Clinical implications regarding assessment and treatment of individuals with ACLR are discussed.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Hamstring Muscles , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Hamstring Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Muscle StrengthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hamstrings neuromuscular function is a crucial component of functional movement, and changes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury contribute to risk factors for secondary injury and long-term sequelae. To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of hamstrings neuromuscular function in patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is needed. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe and quantify hamstrings neuromuscular function in individuals with ACLR compared to controls. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases in October of 2020 for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings electromyography (EMG) between individuals with ACLR and controls. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow random-effect size (ES) meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included for final review. From these, 5 categories of neuromuscular outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) muscle activation levels (EMG amplitude), (2) co-activation, (3) onset timing, (4) electromechanical delay, and (5) time-to-peak activity. Moderate to strong evidence indicates that individuals with ACLR demonstrate higher hamstrings EMG amplitude (normalized to % maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during gait and stair ambulation compared to controls. In addition, there was moderate evidence of longer electromechanical delay during knee flexion and greater hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during knee extension compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Greater hamstrings EMG amplitude and co-activation during gait and ambulation tasks and longer electromechanical delay of the hamstrings in individuals with ACLR align with clinical impairments following ACLR and have implications for re-injury risk and long-term joint health, thus warranting attention in rehabilitation.