Learning in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: development and rapid uptake of an online learning platform for vascular surgery.

INTRODUCTION: With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, alternative methods of delivering medical education were rapidly required. An online learning platform was developed with the aim of providing high-quality, accessible learning to vascular specialty trainees. We describe the design, delivery and analysis of the first 15 months of the platform. Although originally a regional initiative, we discuss how popularity and feedback led to a rapid expansion of the training programme internationally. METHODS: A fully online educational platform for vascular surgery specialist trainees was developed. The primary aims and ethos of the programme were that it should be easily accessible from any location, convenient, flexible, cooperative and collaborative, social and free financially to access. All learning resources were researched carefully and based on the UK vascular surgery curriculum and 20 seminal papers targeted in the Vascular Specialist Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons (FRCSVasc) examination. RESULTS: The project demonstrated that it is feasible to design, build and deliver a postgraduate clinical teaching platform with minimal time requirement, resources and cost while creating and maintaining high-quality content. Rapid national and international uptake has proven there is demand - in addition to overwhelmingly positive feedback from educators and learners, this demonstrates that previously perceived barriers to online education can be overcome. At present, 53 educational sessions have been delivered and are available in the online library, and in the past year (8 December 2020 to 8 December 2021) the website has been accessed 3,877 times. CONCLUSIONS: Although the programme has grown and evolved, a strong focus is being kept on its original ethos and aims - easily accessible, collaborative, free learning resources for all vascular professionals, based on the UK vascular surgery curriculum. Making learning convenient is key. The COVID-19 pandemic may be a watershed moment for a new era of learning. It is an opportunity for people from different backgrounds to share experiences and to develop cohesion within a hospital and network, nationally and worldwide.

Delays in the presentation to stroke services of patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke.

BACKGROUND: The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines state that carotid endarterectomy should be scheduled within 2 weeks of symptoms. The recent National Stroke Strategy has reduced the time interval to 48 h. This study aimed to review the possible delays. METHODS: This study analysed patients with confirmed transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke, referred to a single tertiary centre clinic and followed up 1 month after the event. A questionnaire was used to collect data on the rapid-access clinic pathway, and details of previous medication and treatment. RESULTS: Some 150 patients presented with a confirmed TIA or minor stroke during a 5-month interval (June to October 2014). Fifty-one (34·0 per cent) had a history of TIA or stroke and 35 (23·3 per cent) had undergone an 'index' event in the 5 days before presentation. Forty-five patients (30·0 per cent) experienced a reduction or loss of vision. Of this group, 32 had a deficit in vision only, none of whom attributed these symptoms to a cerebrovascular event. Overall 92 (61·3 per cent) of the 150 patients had a delay in presentation to medical services. Forty-seven (31·3 per cent) had residual symptoms at the clinic appointment. Eighty-eight patients (58·7 per cent) did not think they were having a stroke and 54 (36·0 per cent) were unaware of the National Stroke Strategy (FAST campaign - Face, Arm, Speech, Time). CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of patients were not aware they were having a stroke, one-third were unaware of the FAST campaign and nearly one-third presented with eye symptoms. Inclusion of eye symptoms and reaffirmation of the need to react might avoid unnecessary delays in the presentation of patients with TIA and minor stroke.

General or local anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy--the "real-world" experience.

Perioperative complications from carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are the main drawbacks of the procedure. The aim of this study was to assess the complication rates in patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia (GA) or regional anesthesia (local anesthesia [LA]) at our institution. Patients undergoing CEA at our regional vascular unit between 2000 and 2004 were included. Data were collated retrospectively from a prospective database. Follow-up was up to 62 months. In all, 383 endarterectomies were performed, 260 of which were under LA. Outcome measures included 30-day death (2.1%), stroke (1.8%), and combined stroke and death (2.8%). A 30-day incidence of stroke, death, and combined stroke and death was lower in the LA group. Incidence of myocardial infarction and transient ischemic attacks, and annual mortality were higher in the LA group. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups. In a unit where CEA is preferentially performed under LA, anesthesia technique failed to significantly influence outcome.

Appendicectomy deferred to a CEPOD list: the patients' opinion.

AIMS: Implementation of NCEPOD guidelines to avoid out-of-hours operating, Junior doctors' 'New Deal' and EWTD have significantly altered surgical practice. Patients admitted 'out of hours', who need an emergency procedure, are often deferred until the next day. We have attempted to assess patients' opinions of this management plan. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted with uncomplicated appendicitis and operation deferred to the next day according to NCEPOD guidelines were studied. A surgeon, other than the one carrying out the initial assessment, performed the operation on a scheduled morning emergency list. A full explanation was given to patients regarding reasons for deferring operation, and they found out that a different surgeon would be performing their operation. Patients completed a questionnaire post-operatively. RESULTS: 42 patients were studied; median age 24 years (range 17-69); 32 men, 10 women. Thirty presented after 6 p.m. and eight after midnight. The remaining four were admitted during the day. Only one third of the patients recalled reasons for deferred operation with seven not remembering being given an explanation. Two thirds (n=27) of the patients slept poorly pre-operatively, principally due to pain (17) and ward noise (10). Operation on the same night as their admission was the preferred option in 24 patients. All of these slept poorly. Some 22 patients would have preferred the admitting surgeon to have performed their operation; 16 expressed no preference. Only four patients preferred a 'new' surgeon the following day. Of the 42 patients, 28 did not know who had performed their operation. CONCLUSION: Despite being told why their operation was delayed most patients would prefer not to have their procedure delayed. Lack of sleep pre-operatively is a major determinant of patient opinion. Few patients wanted a 'new' surgeon to perform their operation.

Critical appraisal of femorofemoral crossover grafts.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine how often femorofemoral crossover grafting for critical ischaemia or intermittent claudication gives an ideal result. An ideal result is an uncomplicated operation with primary wound healing, relief of ischaemic symptoms without recurrence and no need for further intervention. METHODS: All patients undergoing primary femorofemoral crossover grafting between January 1988 and December 2003 were studied. RESULTS: Some 144 operations were analysed; 51 patients had critical ischaemia and 93 claudication. There was one postoperative death (0.7 per cent). Complications occurred within 30 days in 32 patients (22.2 per cent), including graft occlusion in three (2.1 per cent); six patients (4.2 per cent) required early reoperation. Primary patency for patients with critical ischaemia was 88, 82 and 74 per cent at 1, 3 and 5 years respectively. Respective figures for those who presented with claudication were 93, 92 and 90 per cent (P = 0.034). Late symptoms included graft occlusion (20 patients), disease progression (25), ongoing ulceration (six), graft infection (nine), false aneurysm formation (two) and late donor-site stenosis (two). CONCLUSION: When obtaining informed consent, simply describing patency and limb salvage rates does not provide an accurate picture of the outcome of femorofemoral grafting.