Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 34(2): 115-127, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242151

ABSTRACT

Applying evidence-based guidelines can enhance the quality of patient care. While robust guideline development methodology ensures credibility and validity, methodological variations can impact guideline quality. Besides methodological rigor, effective implementation is crucial for achieving improved health outcomes. This review provides an overview of recent literature pertaining to the development and implementation of guidelines in pediatric surgery. Literature was reviewed to provide an overview of sound guideline development methodologies and approaches to promote effective guideline implementation. Challenges specific to pediatric surgery were highlighted. A search was performed to identify published guidelines relevant to pediatric surgery from 2018 to June 2023, and their quality was collectively appraised using the AGREE II instrument. High-quality guideline development can be promoted by using methodologically sound tools such as the Guidelines 2.0 checklist, the GRADE system, and the AGREE II instrument. While implementation can be promoted during guideline development and post-publication, its effectiveness may be influenced by various factors. Challenges pertinent to pediatric surgery, such as limited evidence and difficulties with outcome selection and heterogeneity, may impact guideline quality and effective implementation. Fifteen guidelines were identified and collectively appraised as suboptimal, with a mean overall AGREE II score of 58%, with applicability being the lowest scoring domain. There are identified challenges and barriers to the development and effective implementation of high-quality guidelines in pediatric surgery. It is valuable to prioritize the identification of adapted, innovative methodological strategies and the use of implementation science to understand and achieve effective guideline implementation.


Subject(s)
General Surgery , Pediatrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , General Surgery/standards
2.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 34(2): 143-161, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272041

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be employed in both research and clinical care to enhance our understanding of outcomes that matter to patients. This narrative review aims to describe PROM use in recent pediatric surgical research, identify and describe psychometrically robust PROMs, providing an overview of those derived from pediatric patient input, and make recommendations for future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was conducted to identify articles published from 2021 to August 2023 describing the availability and/or use of at least one valid or reliable PROM in children with conditions including anorectal malformations, biliary atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, duodenal atresia, esophageal atresia, abdominal wall defects, Hirschsprung's disease, sacrococcygeal teratoma, and short bowel syndrome. Articles were categorized based on their objectives in applying PROMs. Psychometrically robust PROMs were identified and described. RESULTS: Out of the 345 articles identified, 49 met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen focused on esophageal atresia and 14 on Hirschsprung's disease. Twenty-nine PROMs were identified, with 12 deemed psychometrically robust. Seven psychometrically robust PROMs were developed using patient input in the primary item generation. Most PROMs were applied to advance understanding of conditions and/or treatment and fewer were developed or psychometrically evaluated. No PROMs were assessed for their impact or incorporated into an implementation study. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals gaps in the application of PROMs in recent pediatric surgical research. Emphasis should be placed on the development and utilization of psychometrically robust PROMs, broadening the scope of covered diseases, conducting impact assessments, and evaluating implementation strategies.


Subject(s)
Hirschsprung Disease , Short Bowel Syndrome , Humans , Child , Quality of Life , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(1): 11-14, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34320587

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: A European guideline on craniofacial microsomia was developed within the European Reference Network for rare and/or complex craniofacial anomalies and ear, nose, and throat disorders and published in 2020. The guideline provides an overview of optimal care provisions for patients with craniofacial microsomia and recommendations for the improvement of care. This document seeks to provide a tailored overview of this guideline for patients and their families.


Subject(s)
Craniofacial Abnormalities , Goldenhar Syndrome , Craniofacial Abnormalities/therapy , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL