ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The development of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has remarkably improved the prognosis of patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Alectinib, the second-generation ALK-TKI, has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement. Neoadjuvant therapy can achieve tumor downstaging and eradicate occult lesions in patients with potentially resectable disease. Whether neoadjuvant alectinib can be a conversion therapy in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients remains unclear. CASE SUMMARY: A 41-year-old man was pathologically diagnosed with locally advanced ALK-positive stage IIIB NSCLC. Alectinib was prescribed to induce tumor downstaging and facilitate the subsequent surgical resection. The tumor was successfully downstaged and pathological complete response was achieved. Left upper lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed after tumor downstaging. The patient has continued to receive alectinib as adjuvant therapy during postoperative follow-up with a recurrence-free survival of 29 mo as of writing this report. CONCLUSION: This case sheds light on the feasibility and safety of alectinib as a neoadjuvant treatment for stage IIIB NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement. Its efficacy needs to be validated in prospective clinical trials.
ABSTRACT
Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a novel intervention for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The outcomes of SBRT, liver resection (LR), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as the initial treatment for AJCC stage I HCC patients remain unclear. Methods: Patients with AJCC stage I HCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were analyzed for survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method and stratified according to tumor size: S subgroup (≤2 cm), M subgroup (>2-3 cm), and L subgroup (>3 cm). For factors including age, year of diagnosis, sex, race, grade, tumor size, AFP, and fibrosis score, propensity score matching was performed to eliminate the imbalance of baseline features and selection bias during groups. Results: A total of 4,002 patients were included; the difference in median overall survival (mOS) between the SBRT group and the LR or RFA group in the S subgroup was statistically insignificant (p=0.109 and p=0.744), while that of the RFA group was significantly worse than that of the LR group (p <0.001). In the M and L subgroups, the mOS of the SBRT group was worse than that of the RFA group (p=0.040 and p<0.001, respectively). The mOS of LR was the best when compared with either the SBRT or RFA group regardless of the subgroup M or L (all p<0.001). Conclusion: For HCC ≤ 2 cm, SBRT can be used as an alternative treatment for RFA. For patients with HCC larger than 2 cm, RFA can provide better long-term survival than SBRT, while LR remains the best choice.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory response is related to cancer progression and patient survival. However, the value in predicting survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy has not been elucidated. This study aimed to compare the predictive ability of inflammation-based scores for the prognosis of HCC patients after anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: A total of 442 patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy were included in the study. Representative inflammation-based prognostic scores, including the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein (CRP) ratio (LCR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), and prognostic index (PI), were assessed for prediction accuracy using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Harrell's concordance index (C-index) analyses. RESULTS: All the inflammation-based prognostic scores exhibited good discriminatory ability in overall survival (OS) (all P < 0.01), while the PNI score was a unique independent predictor for OS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.770; confidence interval, 1.309-2.393; P < 0.001). The areas under the ROC curves at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and the C-index (0.65) demonstrated that the predictive accuracy of the PNI score was superior to that of the other inflammation-based scores. CONCLUSION: The PNI score is a discriminatory prognostic indicator for OS in HCC patients with anti-PD-1 therapy and is superior to the other inflammation-based prognostic scores in terms of predictive ability.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The prediction model of postoperative survival for single large and huge hepatocellular carcinoma (SLH-HCC, diameter > 5.0 cm) without portal vein tumour thrombus has not been well established. This study aimed to develop novel nomograms to predict postoperative recurrence and survival of these patients. METHODS: Data from 2469 patients with SLH-HCC who underwent curative resection from January 2005 to December 2015 in China were retrospectively collected. Specifically, nomograms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using data from a training cohort were developed with the Cox regression model (n = 1012). The modes were verified in an internal validation cohort (n = 338) and an external cohort comprising four tertiary institutions (n = 1119). RESULTS: The nomograms of RFS and OS based on tumour clinicopathologic features (diameter, differentiation, microvascular invasion, α-fetoprotein), operative factors (preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation therapy, scope of liver resection and intraoperative blood transfusion), underlying liver function (albumin-bilirubin grade) and systemic inflammatory or immune status (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) achieved high C-indexes of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93) in the training cohort, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the five conventional HCC staging systems (0.62-0.73 for RFS, 0.63-0.75 for OS). The nomograms were validated in the internal cohort (0.83 for RFS, 0.84 for OS) and external cohort (0.87 for RFS, 0.88 for OS) and had well-fitted calibration curves. Our nomograms accurately stratified patients with SLH-HCC into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups of postsurgical recurrence and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The two nomograms achieved optimal prediction for postsurgical recurrence and OS for patients with SLH-HCC after curative resection.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Nomograms , Adolescent , Adult , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Validation Studies as Topic , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The importance of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been studied extensively in Japan, where hepatitis C virus is the predominant aetiology of HCC. The clinical profiles of HCC regarding the state of AFP and DCP in a hepatitis B virus epidemic area have not been comprehensively investigated, and the value of these tumour markers in evaluating the response to treatment and the detection of recurrence has yet to be determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 4792 patients treated in our centre were continuously analysed regarding accessible AFP and DCP data pre- and posttreatment. Baseline characteristics were summarized, and comparisons of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were made independently. The prognostic significance of each factor was tested with the Cox proportional hazards model. Patients who had AFP and DCP data pretreatment, pre- and posttreatment, and those who were continuously monitored more than twice were analysed separately. RESULTS: A total of 2600 patients (53.4%) were positive for AFP and DCP; 362 (7.6%) and 1211 (25.3%) patients were AFP- or DCP-positive, respectively, and 619 patients (12.9%) were negative for both AFP and DCP. Patients in the AFP single-positive or double-negative groups had the best OS (P<0.001). Patients with less than 50% responses in AFP and DCP after treatments suffered from worse prognostic survival (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, elevated AFP and DCP were identified as independent prognostic factors of PFS and OS. In addition, different tumour markers were related to different clinical and pathological traits. CONCLUSION: The present study comprehensively explored the clinical value of classical tumour markers for HCC using the "point-to-line" method. Positivity of pretreatment AFP and DCP or less than 50% treatment response rates exhibited more aggressive HCC, resulting in poor PFS and OS in HCC patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy have shown promising outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), respectively. However, the combination of the two treatments has not been reported. In this study, we compared the efficacy of HAIC combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (HAICAP) and HAIC in patients with advanced HCC. METHODS: Between November 2018 and December 2019, advanced HCC patients that were treated with either HAICAP or HAIC were retrospectively recruited and reviewed for eligibility. Efficacy was evaluated according to tumor response and survival. RESULTS: As a result, 229 patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into HAICAP group (n = 81) and HAIC group (n = 148) accordingly. The follow-up time ranged from 1.0 to 21.6 months, with a median of 11.0 months. The median overall survival was 18.0 months in the HAICAP group and 14.6 months in the HAIC group (p = 0.018; HR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.34-0.91). The median progression-free survival was 10.0 months in the HAICAP group and 5.6 months in the HAIC group (p = 0.006; HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.87). The disease control rate in overall response (83% vs 66%; p = 0.006) and intrahepatic response (85% vs 74%, respectively; p = 0.045) were higher in the HAICAP group than in the HAIC group. CONCLUSION: In comparison to HAIC, HAICAP was associated with a better treatment response and survival benefits for patients with advanced HCC.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the prognostic impact of body mass index (BMI) in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) had been extensively studied, its effect among metastatic NPC patients remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of BMI in patients with metastatic NPC. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 819 patients who were diagnosed with distant metastasis from NPC and received treatment between 1998 and 2007. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to the World Health Organization classifications for Asian populations: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (BMI 18.5-22.9 kg/m(2)), and overweight/obese (BMI ≥23.0 kg/m(2)). The associations of BMI with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 819 patients, 168 (20.5%) were underweight, 431 (52.6%) were normal weight, and 220 (26.9%) were overweight/obese. Multivariate analysis adjusted for covariates showed that overweight/obese patients had a longer OS than underweight patients [hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.84] and normal weight patients (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90); no significant difference in PFS was observed among these three groups (P = 0.407). Moreover, in stratified analysis, no statistically significant differences in the effect of overweight/obese status among different subgroups were observed. CONCLUSION: For patients with metastatic NPC, overweight/obese status was associated with longer OS but not longer PFS compared with underweight or normal weight status.