ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents a serious complication of heparin treatment. IgG antibodies binding platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin trigger the clinical manifestations of HIT. However, only a portion of the antibodies have the ability to activate platelets, and these can be identified by a platelet aggregation test (functional testing). Current methods HIPA and SRA are time-consuming and difficult if HIT is clinically suspected; therefore, numerous new methods have recently been developed. METHODS: To determine HIT, impedance aggregometry using the Multiplate analyzer (MEA) as heparin-induced aggregation techniques and the Technozym HIT Ig ELISA test were used. The MEA method uses sensitization of donor platelets with patient plasma in the presence of heparin at a concentration of 0.5 IU/mL. The results were compared with the ELISA test. RESULTS: We examined 190 patients at clinically intermediate and higher risk of HIT according to the 4T score. All samples were examined by the ELISA test and MEA, with positive samples being further confirmed by high-concentration heparin. The methodology was modified with respect to the dilution for high positive samples and assessment has been extended to an index of inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: In the studied group, we demonstrated that MEA has sufficient sensitivity and higher specificity. In the group of patients, 10.0% showed positive results by MEA as compared with 7.3% determined by ELISA. Unlike the ELISA methods of the same quality, MEA is more suitable for detecting platelet-activating HIT antibodies in practice.
Subject(s)
Heparin/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation/drug effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Aged , Blood Platelets/cytology , Electric Impedance , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Heparin/chemistry , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/chemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Function Tests , Probability , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Static ElectricityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the surgical results, complications and pathological findings of laparoscopic ovarian ablation either with or without hysterectomy in women with early-stage breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Ninety women in early breast cancer stage who underwent laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) either with or without hysterectomy were identified in a retrospective study conducted between January 2000 and December 2006. Tamoxifen antiestrogen therapy was used prior to hysterectomy. RESULTS: Forty-eight consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 42 with ovarian ablation only. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or BSO alone was 82 min and 47.8 min, respectively. Blood loss was minimal in both groups (range: 20-250 ml). The rate of postoperative complications was very low (4.4%). One of all ovaries removed by laparoscopy showed ovarian breast carcinoma metastasis. Histopathologic examination revealed concomitant findings of leiomyoma, adenomyosis or endometrial abnormalities in 64.5% of hysterectomy specimens. CONCLUSION: Our experience with ovarian ablation either with or without hysterectomy confirmed that the use of a minimally invasive technique is feasible. We assume that ovarian ablation and hysterectomy is an appropriate treatment for premenopausal women at risk (BRCA positive) or for patients with concomitant benign uterine pathology, treated with tamoxifen in first-line therapy. Removing the uterus allows women to take only estrogens rather than combination HRT. Further investigation into the indications of disease where laparoscopic ablative surgery is appropriate in the management of early breast cancer is needed.