Navigating Through the Rare and Accepting the New Shift: Laparoscopic Gastro-Jejunostomy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction Secondary to Eosinophilic Gastritis in a Pediatric Patient.

Eosinophilic gastritis, a rare variant of gastritis, presents with inflammation of the stomach lining due to eosinophil infiltration. This case report describes a complex presentation of eosinophilic gastritis in a 12-year-old boy, highlighting the challenges encountered in management. A 12-year-old male presented with symptoms consistent with gastritis, including abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Despite extensive medical workup to identify potential etiologies (parasitic infections, autoimmune conditions), the diagnosis of eosinophilic gastritis was established. Unfortunately, the patient exhibited persistent symptoms despite aggressive medical management. The case was further complicated by pyloric stenosis, a narrowing of the stomach outlet. Laparoscopic intervention, a minimally invasive surgical approach, was initially attempted but deemed challenging due to the patient's specific condition. The presence of metabolic abnormalities added further complexity. Alternative approaches, such as endoscopic dilatation, were considered but ultimately deemed unsuitable due to the severity of the stenosis and the desire for a minimally invasive solution compared to laparotomy. This case exemplifies the challenges associated with managing rare gastrointestinal conditions like eosinophilic gastritis, particularly in pediatric patients. The report emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving collaboration between gastroenterologists, surgeons, and potentially other specialists depending on the specific complications, to achieve optimal outcomes. This case highlights the complexities in managing this patient, especially when accompanied by complications like pyloric stenosis. It underscores the crucial role of a multidisciplinary team in navigating challenging presentations and exploring minimally invasive surgical options when feasible.

Confronting the uncommon: Cholecystitis and cholangitis in a young adult arising from a bilobed gallbladder with subvesicle duct - A case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Bilobed gallbladder is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the duplication of the gallbladder. It presents a unique challenge for surgeons due to its infrequency and the potential for perioperative complications. Anatomical variations, including the presence of the subvesicle duct of Luschka, should be suspected in these cases. CASE PRESENTATION: In our case report, we present the clinical details of a **23-year-old male** who presented with symptoms of acute cholecystitis and cholangitis. Preoperative imaging revealed a bilobed gallbladder, and incidentally, intraoperative evidence of the subvesicle duct/duct of Luschka was also observed during a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Importantly, the patient experienced no postoperative complications. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case highlights considering bilobed gallbladder as a differential diagnosis in patients with cholecystitis or cholangitis is crucial. Surgeons should be vigilant about this anomaly when evaluating patients with gallbladder-related symptoms. CONCLUSION: We understand precise imaging plays a pivotal role in guiding surgical planning. Detecting bilobed gallbladder preoperatively allows for better assessment of biliary structures and helps prevent bile leaks during surgery. Although rare, awareness of bilobed gallbladder and its associated anatomical variants is essential for optimal patient management and successful surgical outcomes. Surgeons should remain attentive to such anomalies to ensure safe and effective procedures.

Splenic lymphangioma masquerading as splenic abscess managed by laparoscopic splenectomy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary benign splenic tumours are unique and account for < 0.007% of all tumours identified during surgery and autopsy. Splenic lymphangiomas are rarely seen in adults. Splenic lymphangiomas may be asymptomatic, or may present with upper left abdominal pain, splenomegaly, hypersplenism, or splenic rupture with haemorrhagic shock. The clinical and radiological features of these lesions are not specific. This case report serves to remind the clinician to consider the rare but important differential diagnosis of splenic lymphangioma while treating splenic lesions. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of splenic lymphangioma in a 22-year-old woman who presented with left upper quadrant abdominal pain for three months. Initial investigations were unremarkable; however, computed tomography later revealed multiple splenic micro-abscesses. The patient underwent laparoscopic splenectomy, and histopathological examination revealed splenic lymphangioma. The patient was discharged on postoperative day three. One month after surgery, the abdominal pain resolved completely, with no new complaints. Splenic lymphangiomas present clinically as splenomegaly or left upper quadrant abdominal pain; prompt intervention is necessary for avoiding complications. CONCLUSION: This case report concludes that splenic lymphangiomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of splenomegaly or left upper quadrant pain, even in adults, because they are amenable to curative treatment. Delays in surgical intervention may lead to severe complications, such as infection, rupture, and hemorrhage. Such lesions can be safely managed with laparoscopy, involving less postoperative pain and early patient discharge with excellent cosmetic outcomes.

An Observational Comparative Study of the Impact of Accidental Pneumoperitoneum in Understanding the Learning Curve for Totally Extraperitoneal and Extended Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernia repair is among the fundamental procedures in general surgical practice. Subsequent to the advent of minimally invasive repair, there have been efforts to find the most reliable technique, with easily reproducible results that can be practiced by surgeons worldwide. From an analytical point of view, this study aimed to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of two techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 participants were divided into two groups of 30 patients: the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and the extended TEP (eTEP) hernia repair groups. Covariates and outcomes were analyzed using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. The study was carried out at a tertiary postgraduate teaching hospital in the western zone of Maharashtra, Pune, India, by a single surgeon. The operative procedures were as per standard surgical practice for both groups. The study was conducted to understand types of difficulties observed in the early implantation stages and the learning curve of these procedures. RESULTS: Ten percent of the procedures in the TEP group and 6.7% of procedures in the eTEP group required Veress needle use to manage accidental pneumoperitoneum (P=0.64). The mean operative time in the eTEP group was significantly shorter than that of the TEP group (P=0.031). CONCLUSION: Compared with the TEP approach, eTEP repair is associated with shorter operative times, owing to a shorter learning curve, a wider-angle view, a wider range of motion for instrument manipulation, and an ergonomically superior operative experience.