ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have provided evidence that the discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and chloroquine (CQ), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of disease flares, with limited information on the level of disease activity at the time of HCQ/CQ discontinuation. Here we aimed to describe the risk of SLE flare after withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission. METHODS: Case-control study (1:2) comparing the evolution of patients with SLE after HCQ/CQ withdrawal for antimalarial retinopathy (cases) with patients with SLE matched for sex, antimalarial treatment duration and age at SLE diagnosis, whose antimalarial treatment was continued throughout the entire follow-up period (controls). To be included in the study, patients had to be in remission for at least one year according to the DORIS classification. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient experiencing a flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index after a 36-month follow-up. RESULTS: We studied 48 cases and 96 controls. The proportion of patients experiencing a flare was significantly higher in the HCQ/CQ withdrawal group as compared to the maintenance group (15 [31.3%] patients versus 12 [12.5%]; OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.2-8.2], P=0.01). Withdrawal of HCQ/CQ was inferior with respect to occurrence of severe SLE flare (12 [25.0%] vs 11 [11.5%]; OR 2.5 [95%CI 0.9-6.9], P=0.053) and time to first flare (HR 6.3 [2.0-19.9], P<0.005). Elevated serum levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies were identified as a risk factor for SLE flare following HCQ/CQ discontinuation (HR 5.4 [1.5-18.7], P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Eosinophils have widespread procoagulant effects. In daily practice, eosinophil-related cardiovascular toxicity consists of endomyocardial damage, eosinophilic vasculitis and arterial or venous thrombosis. Here we aim to report on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with unexplained ophthalmic vascular manifestations and eosinophilia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study and a literature review of patients with eosinophilia (≥0.5 x109/L) and concomitant ophthalmic vascular manifestations independent of the underlying eosinophilic disease but with no alternative cause for ophthalmic manifestations. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included (20 from the observational study and 37 from the literature review). Ophthalmic vascular features were the initial manifestation of eosinophil-related disease in 34 (59%) patients and consisted of 29 central retinal artery occlusions, six branch retinal artery occlusions, five central retinal vein occlusions, two branch retinal vein occlusions, seven retinal vasculitides, two retinal vasospasms, 12 Purtscher's retinopathies, 13 anterior ischemic optic neuropathies and two posterior ischemic optic neuropathies. The median [IQR] absolute eosinophil count at onset of ophthalmic vascular manifestations was 3.5 [1.7-7.8] x109/L. Underlying eosinophil-related diseases included eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n=32), clonal hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (n=1), idiopathic HES (n=13), lymphocytic HES (n=2), adverse drug reactions (n=3), parasitosis (n=2), polyarteritis nodosa (n=1), IgG4-related disease (n=1), eosinophilic fasciitis (n=1) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (n=1). Other extra-ophthalmologic arterial or venous thromboses related to eosinophilia were reported in four (7%) and nine (16%) patients, respectively. Visual prognosis was poor: only eight (10%) patients achieved full recovery of ophthalmologic symptoms. After a median follow-up of 10.5 [1-18] months, one patient (3%) had a recurrence of an ophthalmic vascular manifestation, and three patients (10%) had a recurrence of other vascular symptoms (deep vein thrombosis in two and pulmonary embolism in one patient). At the time of recurrence, absolute eosinophil counts were above 0.5 x109/L in all cases (n=4). Discussion: This study broadens the spectrum of vascular manifestations associated with hypereosinophilia by adding ophthalmic vascular manifestations. In patients with ophthalmological vascular manifestations and hypereosinophilia, aggressive treatment of the underlying pathology (and normalization of blood count) should be implemented.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Eosinophils , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Retrospective Studies , Eosinophilia/etiology , Eosinophils/immunology , Aged , AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency and factors associated with disease flare following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in people with inflammatory/autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (I-RMDs). METHODS: Data from the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Coronavirus Vaccine physician-reported registry were used. Factors associated with flare in patients with I-RMDs were investigated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: The study included 7336 patients with I-RMD, with 272 of 7336 (3.7%) experiencing flares and 121 of 7336 (1.6%) experiencing flares requiring starting a new medication or increasing the dosage of an existing medication. Factors independently associated with increased odds of flare were: female sex (OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.05 to 1.87), active disease at the time of vaccination (low disease activity (LDA), OR=1.45, 95% CI=1.08 to 1.94; moderate/high disease activity (M/HDA), OR=1.37, 95% CI=0.97 to 1.95; vs remission), and cessation/reduction of antirheumatic medication before or after vaccination (OR=4.76, 95% CI=3.44 to 6.58); factors associated with decreased odds of flare were: higher age (OR=0.90, 95% CI=0.83 to 0.98), non-Pfizer/AstraZeneca/Moderna vaccines (OR=0.10, 95% CI=0.01 to 0.74; vs Pfizer), and exposure to methotrexate (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.37 to 0.90), tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (OR=0.55, 95% CI=0.36 to 0.85) or rituximab (OR=0.27, 95% CI=0.11 to 0.66), versus no antirheumatic treatment. In a multivariable model using new medication or dosage increase due to flare as the dependent variable, only the following independent associations were observed: active disease (LDA, OR=1.47, 95% CI=0.94 to 2.29; M/HDA, OR=3.08, 95% CI=1.91 to 4.97; vs remission), cessation/reduction of antirheumatic medication before or after vaccination (OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.33 to 3.78), and exposure to methotrexate (OR=0.48, 95% CI=0.26 to 0.89) or rituximab (OR=0.10, 95% CI=0.01 to 0.77), versus no antirheumatic treatment. CONCLUSION: I-RMD flares following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were uncommon. Factors associated with flares were identified, namely higher disease activity and cessation/reduction of antirheumatic medications before or after vaccination.
ABSTRACT
We conducted a national in-depth analysis including pharmacovigilance reports and clinical study to assess the reporting rate (RR) and to determine the clinical profile of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals. First, based on the French pharmacovigilance database, we estimated the RR of PMR and GCA cases in individuals aged over 50 who developed their initial symptoms within one month of receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines. We then conducted a nationwide survey to gather clinical profiles, therapeutic management, and follow-up data from individuals registered in the pharmacovigilance study. A total of 70 854 684 COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered to 25 260 485 adults, among which, 179 cases of PMR (RR 7. 1 cases/1 000 000 persons) and 54 cases of GCA (RR 2. 1 cases/1 000 000 persons) have been reported. The nationwide survey allowed the characterization of 60 PMR and 35 GCA cases. Median time to the onset of first symptoms was 10 (range 2-30) and 7 (range 2-25) days for PMR and GCA, respectively. Phenotype, GCA-related ischemic complications and -large vessel vasculitis as well as therapeutic management and follow-up seemed similar according to the number of vaccine shots received and when compared to the literature data of unvaccinated population. Although rare, the short time between immunization and the onset of first symptoms of PMR and GCA suggests a temporal association. Physician should be aware of this potential vaccine-related phenomenon.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Giant Cell Arteritis/epidemiology , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Ad26COVS1 , BNT162 Vaccine , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report a case of uveitis associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) that was refractory to multiple lines of therapy but achieved remission with tocilizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the patient's medical record including clinical, biological and imaging data. RESULTS: A 33-year-old female patient with a history of MS inactive for 5 years on teriflunomide, and no significant medical or ophthalmological history, presented with bilateral granulomatous panuveitis. Initial examination revealed a visual acuity of 0.4 logMAR and 1.3 logMAR in the right eye and the left eye, respectively, along with a significant anterior chamber flare in both eyes, posterior synechiae, large granulomatous keratic precipitates, bilateral vitritis, bilateral macular edema with foveolar pigment epithelial detachment, and significant bilateral venous and arterial vasculitis. The patient underwent several lines of treatment, all of which proved unsuccessful, including corticosteroids alone or in combination with azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. As a final therapeutic option, tocilizumab was initiated, leading to the remission of uveitis. One year later, the uveitis remained inactive under a 5 mg/day prednisone regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab appears to be an efficient option for managing uveitis associated with MS and may be a valuable choice for clinicians dealing with such cases.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-term hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine (CQ) intake causes retinal toxicity in 0.3-8 % of patients with rheumatic diseases. Numerous risk factors have been described, eg, daily dose by weight, treatment duration, chronic kidney disease, concurrent tamoxifen therapy and pre-existing retinal or macular disease. However, those factors cannot explain the entire risk of developing antimalarial retinopathy. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify new risk factors associated with HCQ or CQ retinopathy (QRNP) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: This case-control (1:2) study compared SLE patients with QRNP (cases) to those without (controls). Controls were matched for sex and known QRNP risk factors: HCQ and/or CQ treatment duration (±1 year) and age (±5 year) at SLE diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-eight cases were compared to 96 SLE controls. Multivariable logistic-regression analysis retained the following as independent determinants significantly associated with QRNP: concomitant selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin- and norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) intake (OR [95 % confidence interval] 6.6 [1.2 to 40.9]; p < 0.01); antiphospholipid syndrome (OR=8.9 [2.2 to 41.4] p < 0.01); blood hydroxychloroquine/desethylchloroquine concentration ([HCQ]/[DCQ]) ratio <7.2 (OR 8.4 [2.7 to 30.8]; p < 0.01) or skin phototype ≥4 (OR 5.5 [1.4 to 26.5]; p = 0.02), but not daily HCQ dose, blood [HCQ] or body mass index. CONCLUSION: The results of this case-control study identified blood [HCQ]/[DCQ] ratio, concurrent SSRI/SNRI therapy, skin phototype ≥4 and antiphospholipid syndrome as new risk factors for QRNP.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Chloroquine , Hydroxychloroquine , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Retinal Diseases , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/chemically induced , Female , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Retinal Diseases/chemically induced , Risk Factors , Male , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Middle Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Antimalarials/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Coronary Vasospasm , Eosinophilia , Recurrence , Humans , Coronary Vasospasm/diagnosis , Male , Female , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Europe/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis are rare complications of GCA. OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics and outcome of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) -related scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis. METHODS: A retrospective nationwide multicenter study included 20 GCA patients with scalp, tongue, and/or lip necrosis diagnosed between 1998 and 2021 and 80 GCA control patients matched for age, sex and management period. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify baseline characteristics associated with scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients with scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis showed significantly more cranial manifestations (headache, p=0.045; scalp tenderness, p=0.006; jaw claudication, p=0.02). No differences were observed between both groups regarding the occurrence of visual symptoms or large vessel involvement. At diagnosis, GCA patients with necrosis more likely received IV methylprednisolone infusions and higher doses of oral prednisone. There were no differences regarding vascular complications during follow up. Compared to controls, survival was decreased in GCA patients with necrosis (p=0.003). In a multivariable logistic regression model, scalp tenderness [odds ratio (OR) 4.81(95 % CI: 1.57, 14.79), p = 0.006] and cognitive disorder [OR 6.42 (95 % CI: 1.01, 40.60), p=0.048] were identified as factors associated to scalp, tongue, and/or lip necrosis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that scalp, tongue, and/or lip necrosis is associated to higher mortality in GCA patients. Scalp tenderness and cognitive disorder were significant factors associated to this very rare complication of GCA.
Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Humans , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Scalp , Lip , Necrosis/complications , TongueABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The landscape of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) has substantially changed during the last decades. Recent data regarding causes, characteristics, and prognosis of systemic PAN in the modern era are lacking. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with systemic PAN referred to the French Vasculitis Study Group between 2005 and 2019. Characteristics, associated conditions and outcomes were collected, and predictors of relapse and death were analyzed. RESULTS: 196 patients were included. Main clinical symptoms were constitutional (84%), neurological (59%), skin (58%) and musculoskeletal (58%) manifestations. Secondary PAN accounted for 55 (28%) patients, including myelodysplastic syndrome (9%), solid cancer (7%), lymphoma (4%) and autoinflammatory diseases (4%). No patient had active HBV infection. All treated patients (98.5%) received glucocorticoids (GCs), alone (41%) or in combination with immunosuppressants (59%), with remission achieved in 90%. Relapses were independently associated with age >65 years (HR 1.85; 95% CI1.12-3.08), gastrointestinal involvement (1.95; 95% CI1.09-3.52) and skin necrotic lesions (HR 1.95; 95%CI 1.24-3.05). One-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 93%, 87% and 81%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, age >65 years (HR 2.80; 95%CI 1.23-6.37), necrotic purpura (HR 4.16; 95%CI 1.62-10.70), acute kidney injury (HR 4.89; 95% 1.71-13.99) and secondary PAN (HR 2.98; 95%CI 1.29-6.85) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Landscape of PAN has changed during the last decades, with the disappearance of HBV-PAN and the emergence of secondary PAN. Relapse rate remains high, especially in aged patients with gastrointestinal and cutaneous necrosis, as well as mortality.
Subject(s)
Polyarteritis Nodosa , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Polyarteritis Nodosa/diagnosis , Polyarteritis Nodosa/epidemiology , Polyarteritis Nodosa/etiology , Recurrence , PrognosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Aseptic abscess (AA) syndrome is a rare disease whose pathophysiology is unknown. It is often associated with inflammatory bowel disease and characterised by sterile inflammation with collections of neutrophils affecting several organs, especially the spleen. Microbiota are known to influence local and systemic immune responses, and both gut and oral microbiota perturbations have been reported in diseases associated with AA syndrome. However, interactions between these factors have never been studied in AA syndrome. The purpose of this translational case-control study (ABSCESSBIOT) is to investigate gut and/or oral microbiota in patients with AA syndrome compared with healthy controls. Moreover, microbiota associated metabolites quantification and Treg/Th17 balance characterisation will give a mechanistic insight on how microbiota may be involved in the pathophysiology of AA syndrome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This French multicentre case-control study including 30 French centres (University hospital or regional hospital) aims to prospectively enrol 30 patients with AA syndrome with 30 matched controls and to analyse microbiota profiling (in stools and saliva), microbial metabolites quantification in stools and circulating CD4+ T cell populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was reviewed and approved by an independent French regional review board (n° 2017-A03499-44, Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France 1) on 10 October 2022, and declared to the competent French authority (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé, France). Oral and written informed consent will be obtained from each included patient and the control participant. Study results will be reported to the scientific community at conferences and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials web-based platform (NCT05537909).
Subject(s)
Abscess , Microbiota , Humans , Case-Control Studies , France/epidemiology , Hospitals, University , Multicenter Studies as TopicABSTRACT
Procalcitonin (PCT) was established as a biomarker to discriminate bacterial infections from other proinflammatory conditions. Our objective was to determine whether PCT is effective in differentiating infection from antineutrophil-cytoplasmic-antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) flare. In this retrospective, case-control study, PCT and other inflammatory biomarkers of patients with AAV relapse (relapsing group) were compared to infected AAV patients (infected group). In our population of 74 patients with AAV, PCT was significantly higher in the infected group than in the relapsing group (0.2 µg/L [0.08; 0.935] vs. 0.09 µg/L [0.05; 0.2], p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity were 53.4% and 73.6%, respectively, for an ideal threshold of 0.2 µg/L. C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher in cases of infection than in relapse (64.7 mg/L [25; 131] vs. 31.5 mg/L, [10.6; 120], p = 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for infections were 94.2% and 11.3%, respectively. Fibrinogen, white blood cell count, eosinophil count, and neutrophil count were not significantly different. In the multivariate analysis, the relative risk of infection was 2 [1.02; 4.5] (p = 0.04) for a PCT above 0.2 µg/L. In AAV, PCT may be useful for discriminating between infections and flare in patients suffering from AAVs.
Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis , Bacterial Infections , Humans , Procalcitonin , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Cell Differentiation , RecurrenceABSTRACT
Aseptic abscess (AA) syndrome is a rare type of inflammatory disorder involving polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study sought to describe the clinical characteristics and evolution of this syndrome in a large cohort. We included all patients included in the French AA syndrome register from 1999 to 2020. All patients fulfilled the criteria outlined by André et al. in 2007. Seventy-one patients were included, 37 of which were men (52.1%), of a mean age of 34.5 ± 17 years. The abscesses were located in the spleen (71.8%), lymph nodes (50.7%), skin (29.5%), liver (28.1%), lung (22.5), and rarer locations (brain, genitals, kidneys, ENT, muscles, or breasts). Of all the patients, 59% presented with an associated disease, primarily IBD (42%). They were treated with colchicine (28.1%), corticosteroids (85.9%), immunosuppressants (61.9%), and biologics (32.3%). A relapse was observed in 62% of cases, mostly in the same organ. Upon multivariate analysis, factors associated with the risk of relapse were: prescription of colchicine (HR 0.52; 95% CI [0.28-0.97]; p = 0.042), associated IBD (HR 0.57; 95% CI [0.32-0.99]; p = 0.047), and hepatic or skin abscesses at diagnosis (HR 2.14; 95% CI [1.35-3.40]; p = 0.001 and HR 1.78; 95% CI [1.07-2.93]; p = 0.024, respectively). No deaths occurred related to this disease. This large retrospective cohort study with long follow up showed that AA syndrome is a relapsing systemic disease that can evolve on its own or be the precursor of an underlying disease, such as IBD. Of all the available treatments, colchicine appeared to be protective against relapse.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in people with inflammatory/autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (I-RMD). METHODS: Physician-reported registry of I-RMD and non-inflammatory RMD (NI-RMDs) patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. From 5 February 2021 to 27 July 2021, we collected data on demographics, vaccination, RMD diagnosis, disease activity, immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatments, flares, adverse events (AEs) and SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: The study included 5121 participants from 30 countries, 90% with I-RMDs (n=4604, 68% female, mean age 60.5 years) and 10% with NI-RMDs (n=517, 77% female, mean age 71.4). Inflammatory joint diseases (58%), connective tissue diseases (18%) and vasculitis (12%) were the most frequent diagnostic groups; 54% received conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 42% biological DMARDs and 35% immunosuppressants. Most patients received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (70%), 17% AstraZeneca/Oxford and 8% Moderna. In fully vaccinated cases, breakthrough infections were reported in 0.7% of I-RMD patients and 1.1% of NI-RMD patients. I-RMD flares were reported in 4.4% of cases (0.6% severe), 1.5% resulting in medication changes. AEs were reported in 37% of cases (37% I-RMD, 40% NI-RMD), serious AEs in 0.5% (0.4% I-RMD, 1.9% NI-RMD). CONCLUSION: The safety profiles of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with I-RMD was reassuring and comparable with patients with NI-RMDs. The majority of patients tolerated their vaccination well with rare reports of I-RMD flare and very rare reports of serious AEs. These findings should provide reassurance to rheumatologists and vaccine recipients and promote confidence in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety in I-RMD patients.