Is HPV-negative cervical carcinoma a different type of cervical cancer?

OBJECTIVE: Human papillomavirus (HPV), which is known to play a very important role in genital area (vulva, vagina, and cervix) cancers in women, is responsible for almost all cervical cancers. However, a significant proportion of cervical carcinomas (approximately 7%) is HPV-negative. Therefore, there are still two important questions to be answered: 1. Why is HPV  Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) not found in all cervical carcinomas? 2. Are HPV-DNA-negative cervical cancers a specific subgroup of cervical cancers with different biological behavior (worse prognosis)? In this article, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and survival of patients with confirmed HPV-negative tumors in order to answer these two questions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 97 patients who underwent HPV-DNA testing and received a histological diagnosis of cervical cancer were included in the study. 14 HPV-DNA negative and 83 HPV-DNA positive cervical carcinoma patients were detected. Demographic profiles, clinicopathological characteristics, progression-free, and overall survival of all patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Women with HPV-negative tumors were diagnosed at an older age range (p=0.05), and their demographic data other than age range were similar to HPV-positive tumors. P16 staining pattern was not observed in any of the HPV-negative tumors (p=0.001), and a positive P53 staining pattern was detected in 35.7% of the HPV-negative tumors. Although disease-free survival (PFS) (p=0.224) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.219) were worse in the HPV-negative patient group, this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: HPV-negative cervical cancers do not have a poor prognosis unlike their counterparts in other anatomical regions where HPV-associated tumors are present.

Evaluation of T-cell subsets in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVE: Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are the main cause of tissue damage in coronavirus disease 2019. However, the pathophysiological mechanism of the disease has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to examine T cell subsets of pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 and evaluate the relationship between the possible differences in trimesters and clinical findings of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 and 61 healthy pregnant controls were included in the study. T cell subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The CD3+ total T cell (p = 0.006 and p = 0.027) of pregnant patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in second and third trimesters was found to be lower than in the control group. CD3+CD4+ helper T cell (p = 0.035), Treg (p = 0.001), and Treg/Th17 ratio (p = 0.001) were found to be lower in the third trimester patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 than in the controls. Significant decreases were observed only in the Treg (p = 0.001) and Treg/Th17 ratio (p = 0.001) in the first trimester patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared to the controls. When trimesters were compared in terms of T subsets, no difference was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The CD3+ total T cell (p = 0.001), CD3+CD4+ helper T cell (p = 0.011), Treg (p = 0.001), and Treg/Th17 ratio (p = 0.001) were found to be lower in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2. This difference was associated with the development of pneumonia but not with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Effect of lymph node sampling type on oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancers: comprehensive pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy vs. sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green.

OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy refers to an innovative and minimalist surgical approach that has been introduced to reduce both complications and morbidity. A definitive answer to the question of whether lymphadenectomy is performed for staging or curative purposes in endometrial cancer has not yet been found. The aim of this study is to compare patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy with indocyanine green and those who underwent laparoscopic complete surgical staging in terms of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 182 patients was included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the lymph node sample type. The two groups were compared in terms of oncological outcomes. RESULTS: 92 patients underwent sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM cohort) and 90 patients underwent extensive pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy (SCL cohort). Considering only patients with negative lymph nodes, the Sentinel cohort was associated with a reduced DFS and OS (p=0.008 and p=0.005, respectively). This difference may be due to the longer follow-up times of patients with comprehensive lymph node sampling. On the other hand, There was no difference in survival in lymph node positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node dissection has no negative effect on survival in lymph node positive patients.