Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 83
Filter
1.
S Afr Med J ; 112(6): 426-432, 2022 05 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36217872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inclisiran significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in individuals with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD risk equivalents (type 2 diabetes, familial hypercholesterolaemia or a 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event ≥20%) in the ORION phase III clinical trials. Infrequent dosing at days 1, 90, 270 and 450 resulted in a mean LDL-C reduction of ~50%. A total of 298 participants from South Africa (SA) were enrolled. Local data are needed to support the use of inclisiran in the SA population, potentially addressing an unmet need for additional LDL-C-lowering therapies. Objectives. To analyse the ORION phase III trial data to assess the efficacy and safety of inclisiran in SA participants. Methods. ORION-9, 10 and 11 were randomised, double-blind, phase III trials. Participants were receiving maximally tolerated statins with or without other lipid-lowering therapies (excluding protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors). Participants were randomised 1:1 to inclisiran sodium 300 mg/284 mg (free acid) or placebo administered at days 1, 90, 270 and 450. The co-primary endpoints were the LDL-C percentage change from baseline to day 510 and the time-averaged percentage change in LDL-C from baseline after day 90 up to day 540. Key secondary endpoints included the absolute change in LDL-C from baseline to day 510, the time-averaged absolute change from baseline after day 90 up to day 540, and changes in other lipids and lipoproteins. Results. The mean age of the participants was 58.6 years (56% male). The mean LDL-C level at baseline was 3.6 mmol/L. At day 510, inclisiran reduced LDL-C levels by 54.2% compared with placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) -61.3 - -47.2; p<0.0001). The corresponding time-averaged reduction in LDL-C was 52.8% (95% CI -57.9 - -47.8; p<0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more common with inclisiran compared with placebo (10.1% v. 0.7%); however, all were mild or moderate in nature and none were persistent. Conclusion. Inclisiran, given in addition to maximally tolerated standard lipid-lowering therapy, is effective and safe and results in robust reductions in LDL-C in SA patients at high cardiovascular risk.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol, LDL , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Proprotein Convertase 9/therapeutic use , RNA, Small Interfering , Risk Factors , Sodium/therapeutic use , South Africa , Subtilisins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
5.
Hernia ; 23(4): 647-654, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30244343

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite the frequency with which inguinal hernia repairs (IHR) are performed, the real-world comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open repairs is not well established. We compared the rate of recurrent inguinal hernia after laparoscopic and open mesh procedures. METHODS: We designed a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked administrative databases including adult patients in Ontario, Canada, who underwent primary IHR from April 1, 2003 to December 31, 2012. Patients were followed to August 31, 2014. Our primary outcome was reoperation for recurrent IHR, with covariate adjustment using Cox proportional hazards modeling. We constructed separate models to evaluate the effect of surgeon caseload on recurrence rates. RESULTS: We identified 93,501 adults undergoing primary IHR (85.4% open with mesh and 14.6% laparoscopic) with a median follow-up of 5.5 years. The 5-year cumulative risk of recurrent IHR was 2.0% in the open group and 3.4% in the laparoscopic group. After adjusting for patient and surgeon factors, we found that patients who underwent laparoscopic repair had a higher risk of recurrent IHR than those who underwent open repair when annual surgeon volume in the preceding year was ≤25 technique-specific cases (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.45-2.13) or 26-50 technique-specific cases (HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.08-2.93). Few high-volume laparoscopic surgeons (> 50 cases/year) could be identified. Laparoscopic IHR did not carry a higher risk of recurrence for patients whose surgeons had performed > 50 technique-specific cases in the preceding year (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.45-3.26). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic IHR is generally associated with a higher risk of recurrence than open IHR. Though high-volume surgeons may be able to achieve equivalent results with laparoscopic and open techniques, few surgeons in our study population met this volume criterion for laparoscopic repairs.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Reoperation , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Hernia, Inguinal/etiology , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies
6.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 56(5): 328-336, 2017 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476068

ABSTRACT

In Germany, medical-occupational rehabilitation represents an essential link between rehabilitation programs focusing either on medical or occupational rehabilitation. Its main objective is return to work. The current study presents the vocational integration 5 years after medical-occupational rehabilitation and determines possible prognostic factors for long-term occupational integration. To evaluate the effectiveness of medical-occupational rehabilitation, a 5-year-follow-up interview was conducted with participants (n=105) of the multicenter study on medical-occupational rehabilitation (MEmbeR). As a main result, 76% of the participants were still employed 5 years after medical-occupational rehabilitation and the return to work rate was 57%. Prognostic factors for long-term occupational integration could not be identified. However, a low degree of disability, an unrestricted capacity for teamwork as well as an unrestricted ability to judge might be beneficial factors for a successful reintegration. The high amount of participants who returned to work 5 years after medical-occupational rehabilitation, supports the concept of medical-occupational rehabilitation. However, more studies are needed to identify further factors influencing the outcome.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation, Vocational , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent , Adult , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
7.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(5): 472-8, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25809620

ABSTRACT

This prospective population-based study was designed to evaluate treatment choices in patients with new manometrically diagnosed achalasia and their outcomes. Patients referred to the esophageal function laboratory were enrolled after a new manometric diagnosis of achalasia. Patients completed an initial achalasia symptom score validated questionnaire on their symptom severity, duration, treatment pre-diagnosis and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) survey. Treatment decisions were made by the referring physician and the patient. Follow-up questionnaires were completed every 3 months for 1 year. Patients who chose not to undergo treatment at 1-year follow-up completed another questionnaire after 5 years. Between January 2004 and January 2005, 83 of 124 eligible patients were enrolled. Heller myotomy was performed on 31 patients, three patients received botulinum toxin injections, and 25 patients received 29 pneumatic balloon dilatations. Twenty-four patients chose to receive no treatment. Following treatment, patients treated with surgery, dilatation and botulinum toxin had an average improvement in achalasia symptom score of 23 +/- 12.2, 17 +/- 10.9, and 9 +/- 14, respectively. Patients receiving no treatment had worsening symptoms with a symptom score change of -3.5 +/- 11.4. Surgery and dilatation resulted in significant improvement (P < 0.01) relative to no treatment. In univariate logistic regression, symptom severity score (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.08), sphincter tone (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09), difficulty swallowing liquids (OR 3.21, 95% 1.15 to 8.99), waking from sleep (OR 2.75, 95% 1.00 to 7.61), and weight loss (OR 5.99, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.58) were all significant in predicting that patients would select treatment. In the multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09) and weight loss (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.02 to 15.2) were statistically significant for undergoing treatment. At 5 years, five (21%) of those who had initially declined treatment at 1 year ultimately chose a treatment. Patients who finally chose Heller myotomy had lower mental component dimension scores on the SF-36 at 1 year than those who did not. This study shows that almost one third of patients with manometrically diagnosed achalasia choose not to undergo treatment within 1 year of their diagnosis. Patients who are more symptomatic appear to be more likely to undergo treatment by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, increasing age and weight loss are predictive of those who will undergo treatment, with weight loss having the greatest influence. Patients who choose not to undergo treatment make lifestyle changes to maintain their quality of life, and only a minority of them ultimately undergo treatment.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/therapy , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Botulinum Toxins/administration & dosage , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/statistics & numerical data , Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neurotoxins/administration & dosage , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
8.
Curr Oncol ; 21(2): e195-202, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24764704

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a cornerstone of cancer treatment, but significant differences in the quality of surgery have been reported. Surgical process improvement tools (spits) modify the processes of care as a means to quality improvement (qi). We were interested in developing spits in the area of gastrointestinal (gi) cancer surgery. We report the recommendations of an expert panel held to define quality gaps and establish priority areas that would benefit from spits. METHODS: The present study used the knowledge-to-action cycle was as a framework. Canadian experts in qi and in gi cancer surgery were assembled in a nominal group workshop. Participants evaluated the merits of spits, described gaps in current knowledge, and identified and ranked processes of care that would benefit from qi. A qualitative analysis of the workshop deliberations using modified grounded theory methods identified major themes. RESULTS: The expert panel consisted of 22 participants. Experts confirmed that spits were an important strategy for qi. The top-rated spits included clinical pathways, electronic information technology, and patient safety tools. The preferred settings for use of spits included preoperative and intraoperative settings and multidisciplinary contexts. Outcomes of interest were cancer-related outcomes, process, and the technical quality of surgery measures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical process improvement tools were confirmed as an important strategy. Expert panel recommendations will be used to guide future research efforts for spits in gi cancer surgery.

9.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 53(2): 87-93, 2014 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24254520

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: MEmbeR is a prospective multi-center study on medical-occupational rehabilitation in Germany. METHODS: 196 neurological, psychiatric, orthopaedic, and internal medicine patients from 21 rehabilitation centres all across Germany have been enrolled and followed-up for 2 years after discharge. Primary outcome parameter was defined as return to work. Further, the SF-12 and a Mini-ICF-Rating have been used. RESULTS: Mean age was 34.1 (9.9) years, length of stay 150.0 (223.5) days. Prior to occupational rehabilitation, 69.9% were unable to work, 2 years after discharge only 5.6%. Rate of participants seeking a job was reduced from 19.7% to 3.1%. In summary, 78.1% returned to work. Employed participants were younger (32.8 [9.7] vs. 38.5 [9.4] years, p=0.001) and less disabled (Degree of Disablement [GdB]: 20.0 [31.2] vs. 36.1 [33.7], p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The multicenter cohort study MEmbeR provides further knowledge about the outcome of medical-occupational rehabilitation in Germany.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Rehabilitation, Vocational , Treatment Outcome , Utilization Review , Young Adult
10.
Chirurg ; 84(10): 841-50, 2013 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24173577

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: For the acquisition of practical skills, the separate learning atmosphere of a skills lab(oratory) is very suitable. Numerous educational objectives of surgical teaching can be pursued using phantoms, manikins or mutual training among students prior to real practical use during clinical traineeships or internships. AIM AND METHOD: This article provides a compact, systematic overview of the skills lab concept, based on published aspects in selected and relatively recent topic-related references from PubMed® including our own approaches, as well as comments and experiences with regard to its further development. In particular, the Magdeburg concept to use the local skills lab MAMBA for surgical teaching within the practical training is demonstrated, which has developed step by step from a basically pure bedside teaching and which includes student tutors in practical teaching in surgery. RESULTS: By founding the Magdeburg educational and training center options for a practical education, in particular, in surgery were created. The great majority of students accepted the conceptual idea and it has so far been well received. As a first step several well selected topics of practical training during human medical studies were increasingly taught by students who received a didactic course of instruction which also included aspects of the educational objectives. For the future tutorials led by students are planned going beyond the teaching contents of the practical courses and can, thus, lead to a networking with educational objectives of other disciplines. There are not only curricular but also facultative courses in MAMBA which have been steadily optimized since the beginning. This Magdeburg's concept is planned to be further developed for which there is enough room for development with regard to organizational aspects (personnel and room).


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate , General Surgery/education , Surgical Procedures, Operative/education , Attitude of Health Personnel , Germany , Internship and Residency , Manikins , Physician Assistants/education , Teaching Rounds
11.
Dis Esophagus ; 25(3): 209-13, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21899655

ABSTRACT

Achalasia is a rare disease of the esophagus that has an unknown etiology. Genetic, infectious, and autoimmune mechanisms have each been proposed. Autoimmune diseases often occur in association with one another, either within a single individual or in a family. There have been separate case reports of patients with both achalasia and one or more autoimmune diseases, but no study has yet determined the prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the achalasia population. This paper aims to compare the prevalence of autoimmune disease in patients with esophageal achalasia to the general population. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 193 achalasia patients who received treatment at Toronto's University Health Network between January 2000 and May 2010 to identify other autoimmune diseases and a number of control conditions. We determined the general population prevalence of autoimmune diseases from published epidemiological studies. The achalasia sample was, on average, 10-15 years older and had slightly more men than the control populations. Compared to the general population, patients with achalasia were 5.4 times more likely to have type I diabetes mellitus (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-19), 8.5 times as likely to have hypothyroidism (95% CI 5.0-14), 37 times as likely to have Sjögren's syndrome (95% CI 1.9-205), 43 times as likely to have systemic lupus erythematosus (95% CI 12-154), and 259 times as likely to have uveitis (95% CI 13-1438). Overall, patients with achalasia were 3.6 times more likely to suffer from any autoimmune condition (95% CI 2.5-5.3). Our findings are consistent with the impression that achalasia's etiology has an autoimmune component. Further research is needed to more conclusively define achalasia as an autoimmune disease.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Esophageal Achalasia/epidemiology , Esophageal Achalasia/immunology , Adult , Age Factors , Canada/epidemiology , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypothyroidism/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Sjogren's Syndrome/epidemiology , Uveitis/epidemiology
12.
Med Health Care Philos ; 15(1): 61-77, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21290189

ABSTRACT

While every health care system stakeholder would seem to be concerned with obtaining the greatest value from a given technology, there is often a disconnect in the perception of value between a technology's promoters and those responsible for the ultimate decision as to whether or not to pay for it. Adopting an empirical ethics approach, this paper examines how five Canadian medical device manufacturers, via their websites, frame the corporate "value proposition" of their innovation and seek to respond to what they consider the key expectations of their customers. Our analysis shows that the manufacturers' framing strategies combine claims that relate to valuable socio-technical goals and features such as prevention, efficiency, sense of security, real-time feedback, ease of use and flexibility, all elements that likely resonate with a large spectrum of health care system stakeholders. The websites do not describe, however, how the innovations may impact health care delivery and tend to obfuscate the decisional trade-offs these innovations represent from a health care system perspective. Such framing strategies, we argue, tend to bolster physicians' and patients' expectations and provide a large set of stakeholders with powerful rhetorical tools that may influence the health policy arena. Because these strategies are difficult to counter given the paucity of evidence and its limited use in policymaking, establishing sound collective health care priorities will require solid critiques of how certain kinds of medical devices may provide a better (i.e., more valuable) response to health care needs when compared to others.


Subject(s)
Diffusion of Innovation , Equipment and Supplies/ethics , Health Care Sector/ethics , Birth Injuries/prevention & control , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Canada , Cryosurgery/ethics , Cryosurgery/methods , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/ethics , Female , Home Care Services/ethics , Humans , Internet/ethics , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/ethics , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Molecular Imaging/ethics , Molecular Imaging/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/ethics , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/ethics , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Social Values
15.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 30(5): 493-6, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19899398

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To facilitate the planning of resources for cancer services in Ontario, Cancer Care Ontario commissioned an evaluation of operative services delivered for cervical cancer. METHODS: Women with an incident diagnosis of cervical cancer were identified from 1 April, 2003 to 31 March, 2004 using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Record linkages were created to other provincial health databases such as the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. RESULTS: There were 513 incident cases. Disease-specific rates of cancer were higher in rural areas and those from lower income quintiles. Forty-three percent of women had no surgery. Use of surgery did not appear to vary by SEC, urban/rural residence or LHIN. Women of younger age were more like to receive surgery for cervical cancer. Gynecologists conducted 63% of the operations. Gynecologics were most likely to complete a lymphadenectomy (70.3%). All women were assessed by CXR. Only 22% of women had a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis. Radiation consults were performed in half of the women with cervix cancer but treatment was only delivered to half of those seen. Medical oncologists saw about 10% of women with cervical cancers. CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be variations in incidence rates of cervical cancer, with cancers being more frequent in rural areas. In two-thirds of the population, surgery is performed in the region where the patient lives. Subspecialty care from gynecologic oncologists was provided to one-third of women. These preliminary data would be enhanced with further information such as comorbidity, treatment intent (palliative/curative), histology, grade and stage.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Women's Health Services , Adult , Aged , Conization , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Rural Population , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaginal Smears
16.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 30(5): 503-5, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19899401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To facilitate the planning of future resources for cancer services in Ontario, Cancer Care Ontario commissioned an evaluation of operative services delivered for vulvar cancer. METHODS: Women with an incident diagnosis of vulvar malignancy were identified from 1, April 2003 to 31 March, 2004 using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Record linkages were created to other provincial health databases such as the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. RESULTS: Vulvar cancers affected 148 women. Disease specific rates of cancer were higher in rural areas and in women in the lower income quintiles. No surgery occurred in 17.6% of women. Use of surgery did not appear to vary by urban/rural residence or LHIN. Ontario's 17 gynecologic oncologists performed 75% of the surgeries. Groin lymphadenectomy rate was 52.8%. Surgery was performed in the LHIN of residence for 41% of women. All women were assessed by CXR. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis occurred in 77%. MRIs were done infrequently. Radiation consults were preformed in half of the women with vulvar cancer but treatment was only delivered in half of those seen. Medical oncologists saw about 10% of women with gynecologic cancers. CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be variations in incidence rates of vulvar cancer with disease being more frequent in rural areas. Subspecialty care from gynecologic oncologists was provided to 75% of women. Rates of lymphadenectomy as part of a surgical attempt occurred in 52.8% of women. These data would be enhanced with further information such as comorbidity, treatment intent (palliative/curative), histology, grade and stage.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Lymph Node Excision , Vulvar Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Groin/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Ontario , Perioperative Care , Waiting Lists , Young Adult
17.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 30(4): 361-4, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19761122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To facilitate the planning of future resources for cancer services in Ontario, Cancer Care Ontario commissioned an evaluation of operative services delivered for ovarian cancers. The affected population was characterized in terms of age, location of residence, and SES. Operative care delivery was described in terms of inpatient verses outpatient access, LHIN of treatment, surgical specialist providing treatment, and specific operative procedures. The investigations and consults around the time of diagnosis are described. METHODS: Women with an incident diagnosis of an ovarian malignancy were identified from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Record linkages were created to other provincial health databases such as the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. RESULTS: We report on 963 women with ovarian cancer. The incidence of disease was related to increasing age. Access to surgery correlated with the highest income quintile, urban residence and LHIN. Twenty-seven percent of women did not have surgery for their ovarian cancer. Women of younger age were more like to receive surgery for ovarian cancer. Use of a laparotomy for biopsy was most common in community hospital (40%). Lymphadenectomy rates were low overall; rates for gynecologic oncologists were 13.2%. All women were assessed by CXR. CT scan of abdomen and pelvis occurred in 77% of women. MRIs were done infrequently. Medical oncology were involved in 26.6% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data would be enhanced with further information such as comorbidity, treatment intent (palliative/curative), histology, grade and stage. However, there are clear referral patterns to academic centres which means a need for manpower and hospital resources to deal with this population.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Middle Aged , Ontario , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Specialties, Surgical , Waiting Lists , Young Adult
18.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 30(3): 255-8, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19697615

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To facilitate the planning of future resources for cancer services in Ontario, Cancer Care Ontario commissioned an evaluation of operative services delivered for uterine cancer. METHODS: Women with an incident diagnosis of a uterine malignancy were identified from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Record linkages were created to other provincial health databases such as the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. RESULTS: Uterine cancer affected 1,436 women. Disease specific rates of cancer were higher in rural areas and those from the highest income quintiles. Surgery occurred in 94.7% of women. Use of surgery did not appear to vary by SEC, urban/rural residence or LHIN. Gynecologists conducted 76.1% of the operations. Lymphadenectomy took place in 18.7% of women. Lymphadenectomy rates were highest in gynecologic oncologists (43.3%). All women were assessed by CXR. Radiation therapy consults were preformed in half of the women with uterine cancer but treatment was only delivered in half of those seen. Medical oncologists saw about 6.3% of women with uterine cancers. CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be variations in incidence rates of uterine cancer with disease being more frequent in those of the highest SES. In two-thirds of the population, surgery is delivered in the region where the patient lives. Subspecialty care from gynecologic oncologists was provided to one-third of women. Rates of lymphadenectomy as part of a surgical attempt to assess disease spread appear low. These pilot data would be enhanced with further information such as comorbidity, treatment intent (palliative/curative), histology, grade and stage.


Subject(s)
Uterine Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Income , Lymph Node Excision , Medicine , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Rural Health Services , Specialization , Urban Health Services , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis
19.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 16(10): 2731-7, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19662458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer care is complex and multimodal therapy is now considered the standard of care. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) offer a venue to prospectively discuss cancer patients and plan treatment. MCCs are believed to improve patient outcomes and consequently have been internationally adopted. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of MCCs in Ontario and identify individual and organizational barriers to their adoption. METHODS: A cross-sectional, mailed questionnaire of general surgeons in Ontario, Canada who care for patients with cancer was used to assess prevalence, and organizational and individual barriers to MCC implementation. Responses were summarized overall, by hospital, and by academic status. RESULTS: The response rate was 44.2% (170/385). Respondents worked at 57 unique hospitals, of which 29 (52%) were reported to have MCCs, including all academic hospitals (7/7) and 22 of 50 (44%) community hospitals. Forty-nine MCCs were reported at 29 hospitals. MCCs occurred weekly at academic centers and biweekly or monthly at community hospitals. Few MCCs (28%) had a designated coordinator. Surgeons perceived that MCCs helped them to incorporate multidisciplinary opinions into their patient care plans, improved collegiality, and provided opportunity for continuing professional development. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perceived benefits expressed by respondents, administrative support for MCCs may be minimal. In particular, surgeons at community hospitals may have limited access to multidisciplinary patient care planning. This information will be utilized to shape a provincial strategy for implementing MCCs. However, further research is required to understand barriers and enablers to establish and maintain MCCs, especially in community practice.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Team , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Information Dissemination , Interprofessional Relations , Ontario , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL