Use of DWI in identification of small solid pancreatic focalities (≤ 2 cm).

Incidental finding of pancreatic focalities has increased thanks to a larger use of radiological examinations (Ultrasound, CT). The differential diagnosis between focal inflammatory and heteroplastic disease is frequently complicated by the wide spectrum of lesions and by the aspecificity of clinical and medical history, as well as of imaging findings. MRI is the second level choice of examination thanks to its higher intrinsic contrast resolution and parametric capability (1); furthermore, the use of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) sequences provides additional diagnostic informations.

MRI findings of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).

Cystic lesions of the pancreas are relatively frequent imaging findings due to the improvement of imaging technologies. They may be secondary to both benign and malignant disease processes and their prevalence increases with age. In most cases, these lesions are detected incidentally by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed for other reasons. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) represent 25% of the cystic neoplasms, morphologically classified into "main pancreatic duct IPMN" (MPD-IPMN), "side branches IPMN" (SB-IPMN) and mixed forms. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a multiparametricity not invasive radiological technique that doesn't use ionizing radiation or organ iodinized contrast agents; it allows an accurate characterization of the lesions (number and size of cystic lesions, internal features of a cyst, ducts dilation, communication with main pancreatic duct) that is important to guide the differential diagnosis and establish a correct follow-up. International guidelines consider IPMN of MPD and mixed forms to be an indication for surgery, while clinical and radiological follow-up is indicated in asymptomatic patients with SB-IPMN, especially when lesions are < 2,5-3 cm in diameter and there are no mural nodules or dilation of MPD.

Gynecomastia: a common indication for mammography in men of all age.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gynecomastia (GM) is the most frequent cause of male breast-related signs and symptoms and represents also the most common indication for mammography (MX) in men. In this article, our 7-year long experience with MX in men suffering from GM is reviewed, and the mammographic features of GM are presented. METHODS: MXs performed in male patients at our institution from January 2009 to January 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and patients with mammographic features of GM were selected. Informed consent was waived by the local institutional review board given the retrospective nature of the study. Mammograms were performed in both cranio-caudal (CC) and medio-lateral-oblique (MLO) views according to diagnostic needs. Clinical and pathologic data were obtained by review of patient charts. RESULTS: 37 males (aged between 13-79 years, mean 59 years) referred for MX at our institution because of palpable lump (31/37; 83.8%), breast enlargement (33/37; 89.2%), tenderness or pain (25/37; 67.6%). Of the 37 patients evaluated, 32 (86.5%) had true GM while 5 (13.5%) had pseudoGM. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of GM can be complex but a stepwise approach that starts with careful history taking and physical examination may obviate the need for extensive work-up. In this context, MX has been shown to be an accurate diagnostic tool for detecting GM and should be the first imaging examination to be performed in all clinically suspicious lesions referred for imaging.