ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop priority recommendations for the service level implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into clinical cancer care. METHODS: Development of draft guidance statements was informed by a literature review, the Knowledge to Action (KTA) implementation framework, and discussion with PRO experts and cancer survivors. A two-round modified Delphi survey with key stakeholders including cancer survivors, clinical and research experts, and Information Technology specialists was undertaken. Round 1 rated the importance of the statements and round 2 ranked statements in order of priority. RESULTS: Round 1 was completed by 70 participants with round 2 completed by 45 participants. Forty-seven statements were rated in round 2. In round 1, the highest agreement items (>90% agreement) included those that focused on the formation of strong stakeholder partnerships, ensuring ongoing communication within these partnerships, and the use of PROs for improvement and guidance in clinical care. Items ranked as the highest priorities in round 2 included assessment of current staff capabilities and service requirements, mapping of workflows and processes to enable collection, and using collected PROs to guide improved health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This stakeholder consultation process has identified key priorities in PRO implementation into clinical cancer care that include clinical relevance, stakeholder engagement, communication, and integration within the existing processes and capabilities. IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Routine adoption of PRO collection by clinical cancer services requires multiple implementation steps; of highest priority is strong engagement and communication with key stakeholders including cancer survivors.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Delivery of Health Care , Delphi Technique , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Stakeholder Participation , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sydney Cancer Survivorship Centre (SCSC) clinic provides multidisciplinary care after primary adjuvant treatment, with ~ 40% of attendees continuing follow-up with SCSC. METHODS: SCSC survivors completed measures of symptoms, quality-of-life and lifestyle factors at initial visit (T1), first follow-up (T2) and 1 year (T3). Analyses used mixed effect models, adjusted for age, sex and tumour type. RESULTS: Data from 206 survivors (2013-2019) were included: 51% male; median age 63 years; tumour types colorectal 68%, breast 12%, upper gastrointestinal 12%, other 8%. Mean time from: T1 to T2, 3.6 months; T1 to T3, 11.8 months. Mean weight remained stable, but 45% (35/77) of overweight/obese survivors lost weight from T1 to T3. Moderately-intense aerobic exercise increased by 63 mins/week at T2, and 68 mins/week T3. Proportion meeting aerobic exercise guidelines increased from 20 to 41%. Resistance exercise increased by 26 mins/week at T2. Global quality-of-life was unchanged from T1 to T2, improving slightly by T3 (3.7-point increase), mainly in males. Mean distress scores were stable, but at T3 the proportion scoring 4+/10 had declined from 41 to 33%. At T3, improvements were seen in pain, fatigue and energy, but > 20% reported moderate-severe fatigue, pain or sleep disturbance. Proportion reporting 5+ moderate-severe symptoms declined from 35% at T1 to 26% at T3, remaining higher in women. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors attending SCSC increased exercise by 3 months, and sustained it at 1 year. Most overweight/obese survivors avoided further weight gain. Survivors had relatively good quality-of-life, with improvement in many symptoms and lifestyle factors at 1 year.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Survivorship , Australia , Cancer Care Facilities , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in oncology have significantly increased the chance of survival of cancer patients, even those with metastatic disease. However, cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is frequently reported in patients treated for non-central nervous system cancers, particularly during and after chemotherapy. DESIGN: This review provides an update of the state of the art based on PubMed searches between 2012 and March 2019 on 'cognition', 'cancer', 'antineoplastic agents' or 'chemotherapy'. It includes the most recent clinical, imaging and pre-clinical data and reports management strategies of CRCI. RESULTS: Evidence obtained primarily from studies on breast cancer patients highlight memory, processing speed, attention and executive functions as the most cognitive domains impaired post-chemotherapy. Recent investigations established that other cancer treatments, such as hormone therapies and targeted therapies, can also induce cognitive deficits. Knowledge regarding predisposing factors, biological markers or brain functions associated with CRCI has improved. Factors such as age and genetic polymorphisms of apolipoprotein E, catechol-O-methyltransferase and BDNF may predispose individuals to a higher risk of cognitive impairment. Poor performance on neuropsychological tests were associated with volume reduction in grey matter, less connectivity and activation after chemotherapy. In animals, hippocampus-based memory and executive functions, mediated by the frontal lobes, were shown to be particularly susceptible to the effects of chemotherapy. It involves altered neurogenesis, mitochondrial dysfunction or brain cytokine response. An important next step is to identify strategies for managing cognitive difficulties, with primary studies to assess cognitive training and physical exercise regimens. CONCLUSIONS: CRCI is not limited to chemotherapy. A multidisciplinary approach has improved our knowledge of the complex mechanisms involved. Nowadays, studies evaluating cognitive rehabilitation programmes are encouraged to help patients cope with cognitive difficulties and improve quality of life during and after cancer.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Cognition/drug effects , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Apolipoproteins E/genetics , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Cancer Survivors , Catechol O-Methyltransferase/genetics , Cognitive Dysfunction/chemically induced , Cognitive Dysfunction/genetics , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Cytokines/genetics , Exercise , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/genetics , Neurogenesis/drug effects , Polymorphism, Genetic , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) improves fatigue and quality of life (QOL) in cancer survivors. Our aim was to assess whether a 2-month PA intervention improves fatigue and QOL for people with advanced lung cancer. METHODS: Participants with advanced lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≤2, >6 months life expectancy, and ability to complete six-min walk test, were stratified (disease stage, PS 0-1 versus 2, centre) and randomized (1:1) in an open-label study to usual care (UC) (nutrition and PA education materials) or experimental intervention (EX): UC plus 2-month supervised weekly PA and behaviour change sessions. Assessments occurred at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary endpoint was fatigue [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) questionnaire] at 2 months. The study was designed to detect a difference in mean FACT-F subscale score of 6. Analysis was intention-to-treat using linear mixed models. RESULTS: We recruited 112 patients: 56 (50.4%) were randomized to EX, 55(49.5%) to UC; 1 ineligible. Male 55%; median age 64 years (34-80); 106 (96%) non-small cell lung cancer; 106 (95.5%) stage IV. At 2, 4 and 6 months, 90, 73 and 62 participants were assessed, respectively, with no difference in attrition between groups. There were no significant differences in fatigue between the groups at 2, 4 or 6 months: mean scores at 2 months EX 37.5, UC 36.4 (difference 1.2, 95% CI - 3.5, 5.8, P = 0.62). There were no significant differences in QOL, symptoms, physical or functional status, or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the intervention was good but the intervention group did not increase their PA enough compared to the control group, and no difference was seen in fatigue or QOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry No. ACTRN12609000971235.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/physiopathology , Exercise , Fatigue , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming increasingly important in cancer studies, particularly with the emphasis on patient centered outcome research. However, multiple PROs, using different scales, with different directions of favorability are often used within a trial, making interpretation difficult. To enhance interpretability, we propose the use of a standardized effect size graph, which shows all PROs from a study on the same figure, on the same scale. Plotting standardized effects with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on a single graph clearly showing the null value conveys a comprehensive picture of trial results. We demonstrate how to create such a graph using data from a randomized controlled trial that measured 12 PROs at two time points. The 24 effect sizes and CIs are shown on one graph and clearly indicate that the intervention is effective and sustained.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Clinical Trials as Topic , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is associated with cancer and chemotherapy and may be sustained. Here, we describe a prospective longitudinal study evaluating fatigue and putative mechanisms in people with colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: People with localized CRC completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Fatigue (FACT-F) questionnaire at baseline (before chemotherapy, if given), 6, 12, and 24 months. Healthy controls (HCs) were assessed at the first three time points. Fatigue was defined by standardized FACT-F scores ≤68/100. Quality-of-life (QoL, assessed by the FACT-G questionnaire), affective, and cognitive symptoms were evaluated. Associations were sought between fatigue, baseline factors, and blood tests (including hemoglobin, cytokines, and sex hormones). Regression analyses, Fisher's exact tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests assessed levels of fatigue at each time point and change in fatigue from baseline. A repeated-measures analysis investigated prognostic factors of fatigue across all time points. RESULTS: A total of 289 subjects with localized CRC (173 received chemotherapy) and 72 HCs were assessed. More CRC patients had fatigue than HCs at baseline (52% versus 26%, P < 0.001). Fatigue was increased in the chemotherapy (CTh) group at 6 months [CTh+ 70% versus CTh- 31% (P < 0.001), HCs 22%] and remained more common at 12 [CTh+ 44% versus CTh- 31% (P = 0.079)] and 24 months [CTh+ 39% versus CTh- 24% (P = 0.047)]. There was no significant difference between those not receiving chemotherapy and HCs at follow-up assessments. Fatigue was associated with poor QoL, affective and cognitive symptoms, but not consistently with cytokine levels. Predictors for sustained fatigue were baseline fatigue, treatment group, cognitive and affective symptoms, poorer QoL, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: CRC patients have more fatigue than HCs at baseline. Fatigue peaks immediately after adjuvant chemotherapy, but remains common for 2 years in those who receive chemotherapy. Cognitive and affective symptoms, QoL, comorbidities, chemotherapy, and baseline fatigue predict for longer term fatigue.
Subject(s)
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fatigue/pathology , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Fatigue/chemically induced , Fatigue/epidemiology , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Alcohol is responsible for a proportion of emergency admissions to hospital, with acute alcohol intoxication and chronic alcohol dependency (CAD) implicated. This study aims to quantify the proportion of hospital admissions through our emergency department (ED) which were thought by the admitting doctor to be (largely or partially) a result of alcohol consumption. SETTING: ED of a UK tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All ED admissions occurring over 14â weeks from 1 September to 8 December 2012. Data obtained for 5497 of 5746 admissions (95.67%). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of emergency admissions related to alcohol as defined by the admitting ED clinician. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of emergency admissions due to alcohol diagnosed with acute alcohol intoxication or CAD according to ICD-10 criteria. RESULTS: 1152 (21.0%, 95% CI 19.9% to 22.0%) of emergency admissions were thought to be due to alcohol. 74.6% of patients admitted due to alcohol had CAD, and significantly greater than the 26.4% with 'Severe' or 'Very Severe' acute alcohol intoxication (p<0.001). Admissions due to alcohol differed to admissions not due to alcohol being on average younger (45 vs 56â years, p<0.001) more often male (73.4% vs 45.1% males, p<0.001) and more likely to have a diagnosis synonymous with alcohol or related to recreational drug use, pancreatitis, deliberate self-harm, head injury, gastritis, suicidal ideation, upper gastrointestinal bleeds or seizures (p<0.001). An increase in admissions due to alcohol on Saturdays reflects a surge in admissions with acute alcohol intoxication above the weekly average (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol was thought to be implicated in 21% of emergency admissions in this cohort. CAD is responsible for a significantly greater proportion of admissions due to alcohol than acute intoxication. Interventions designed to reduce alcohol-related admissions must incorporate measures to tackle CAD.
Subject(s)
Alcoholic Intoxication/epidemiology , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcoholic Intoxication/diagnosis , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Tertiary Care Centers , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young AdultSubject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/prevention & control , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vitamin B Complex/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Chemoprevention/methods , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Transplant Recipients , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the clinical application of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for chemotherapy-induced leucopenia and to evaluate its effectiveness and safety. METHODS: We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with no limitation of publication type or language. Participants were cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Trial designs included comparisons of CHM with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, supportive treatments for leucopenia, and/or placebo. Main outcomes were white blood cell count and incidence of leucopenia. Screening, data extraction, and analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Eighty-three RCTs (n = 8,012) met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen Chinese patent medicines and 47 different modified formulas were used as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced leucopenia. Compared with no treatment, CHMs were shown to decrease the incidence of leucopenia (odds ratio (OR) -0.23 [-0.20, -0.27]), P < 0.00001), with the number needed to treat (NNT) -3.45 [-3.13, -3.85]. Subgroup analysis suggested a prophylactic benefit for white blood cell counts with Fufang E-jiao Jiang, Diyu Shengbai Pian, combination Huangqi and Shengmai Zhusheye, and Fuzhong Shengbai Fang for patients undergoing chemotherapy. No serious adverse events were reported. Only three articles (3/83, 4 %) were rated as having adequate methodological quality with a low level of bias. Funnel plots were asymmetrical. CONCLUSIONS: Some CHMs may be efficacious in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced leucopenia, but the majority of reviewed studies were of poor quality. Results need to be confirmed in rigorously conducted high-quality trials, including pharmacokinetic studies to ensure that there are no interactions between the CHM agent and chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Asian People , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment and fatigue have been associated with cancer and its treatment. We present baseline data from a large longitudinal study that evaluates cognitive function, fatigue, and potential underlying mechanisms following diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated CRC patients with stage I-III disease before or after surgery, participants with limited metastatic disease and healthy controls (HC). Neuropsychological evaluation included clinical and computerised tests. Participants completed questionnaires for fatigue and quality of life (QOL)-(FACT-F), anxiety/depression, and cognitive symptoms (FACT-Cog). Ten cytokines, clotting factors, sex hormones, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and apolipoprotein E genotype were evaluated. Primary end points were cognitive function on clinical tests evaluated by a Global Deficit score (GDS) and fatigue. Associations between test results, demographic, and disease related factors were explored. RESULTS: We assessed 291 participants with early-stage disease [median age 59 (23-75) years, 63% men], 72 with metastatic disease, and 72 HC. Using GDS, 45% (126/281) of participants with early-stage CRC had cognitive impairment versus 15% (11/72) of HC (odds ratio 4.51, 95% confidence interval 2.28-8.93; P < 0.001), with complex processing speed, attention/working memory, and verbal learning efficiency being most affected. Women with early-stage CRC had greater cognitive impairment than men [55/105 (52%) versus 71/176 (40%), P < 0.050]. Cognitive symptoms were self-reported by 21% (59/286) of early-stage patients versus 17% (12/72) of HC; fatigue by 52% (149/287) of early-stage patients and 26% (19/72) of HC (P < 0.0001). Women reported more fatigue than men (P = 0.003). Fatigue, QOL, anxiety/depression, and cognitive symptoms were associated with each other (r = 0.43-0.71), but not with neuropsychological performance. Most cytokines were elevated in cancer patients. Cognitive function was not associated with cytokines, sex hormones, clotting factors, CEA, or apolipoprotein E genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cognitive impairment was three to five times higher in CRC patients than HC, with women having higher impairment rates than men. The cognitive impairment profile suggests dysfunction primarily in fronto-subcortical brain systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00188331.
Subject(s)
Cognition , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Fatigue , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis of most patients presenting with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is poor, a small proportion survives long term. We investigated factors associated with survival in a large patient series. METHODS: All patients registered with the NSW Dust Diseases Board (2002-2009) were included in an analysis of prognostic factors using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. On the basis of these analyses, we developed a risk score (Prognostic Index (PI)). RESULTS: We identified 910 patients: 90% male; histology (epithelioid 60%; biphasic 13%; sarcomatoid 17%); stage (Tx-I-II 48%; III-IV 52%); and calretinin expression (91%). TREATMENT: chemotherapy(CT) 44%, and extrapleural-pneumonectomy (EPP) 6%. Median overall survival (OS) was 10.0 months. Longer OS was associated with: age <70 (13.5 vs 8.5 months; P<0.001); female gender (12.0 vs 9.9 months; P<0.001); epithelioid subtype (13.3 vs 6.2 months; P<0.001); ECOG status 0 (27.4 vs 9.7 months; P=0.015), calretinin expression (10.9 vs 5.5 months; P<0.001); neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) <5 (11.9 vs 7.5 months; P<0.001); platelet count <400 (11.5 vs 7.2 months; P<0.001); and normal haemoglobin (16.4 vs 8.8 months; P<0.001). On time-dependent analysis, patients receiving pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (HR=0.83; P=0.048) or EPP (HR=0.41; P<0.001) had improved survival. Age, gender, histology, calretinin and haematological factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. In all, 24% of patients survived >20 months: 16% of these receiving EPP, and 66% CT. The PI offered improved prognostic discrimination over one of the existing prognostic models (EORTC). CONCLUSIONS: We identified calretinin expression, age, gender, histological subtype, platelet count and haemoglobin level as independent prognostic factors. Patients undergoing EPP or pemetrexed-based chemotherapy demonstrated better survival, but 84% and 34% of long survivors, respectively, did not receive radical surgery or chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Mesothelioma/mortality , Pleural Neoplasms/mortality , Pneumonectomy/mortality , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lymphocytes/pathology , Male , Mesothelioma/pathology , Mesothelioma/therapy , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Neoplasm Staging , Neutrophils/pathology , New South Wales , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology , Pleural Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Survival RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Collaboration between the orthopaedic and emergency medicine (ED) services has resulted in standardised treatment pathways, leaflet supported discharge and a virtual fracture clinic review. Patients with minor, stable fractures are discharged with no further follow-up arranged. We aimed to examine the time taken to assess and treat these patients in the ED along with the rate of unplanned reattendance. DESIGN: A retrospective study was undertaken that covered 1â year before the change and 1â year after. Prospectively collected administrative data from the electronic patient record system were analysed and compared before and after the change. SETTING: An ED and orthopaedic unit, serving a population of 300â 000, in a publicly funded health system. PARTICIPANTS: 2840 patients treated with referral to a traditional fracture clinic and 3374 patients managed according to the newly redesigned protocol. OUTCOME MEASURES: Time for assessment and treatment of patients with orthopaedic injuries not requiring immediate operative management, and 7-day unplanned reattendance. RESULTS: Where plaster backslabs were replaced with removable splints, the consultation time was reduced. There was no change in treatment time for other injuries treated by the new discharge protocol. There was no increase in unplanned ED attendance, related to the injury, within 7â days (p=0.149). There was a decrease in patients reattending the ED due to a missed fracture clinic appointment. CONCLUSIONS: This process did not require any new time resources from the ED staff. This process brought significant benefits to the ED as treatment pathways were agreed. The pathway reduced unnecessary reattendance of patients at face-to-face fracture clinics for a review of stable, self-limiting injuries.
Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Emergency Treatment , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Clinical Protocols , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent data show a falling cancer mortality in the general population without a similar shift in immigrant outcomes, leading to a greater cancer burden and mortality for immigrants. Our aims were to compare perceived patterns of care in immigrants and native-born cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a hospital-based sample of first-generation immigrants and Australian-born Anglo patients in the first year following diagnosis. It was restricted to Chinese, Arabic, or Greek speakers. Eligible participants, recruited via 16 oncology clinics, were over 18, with cancer (any type or stage), and having commenced treatment at least 1 month previously. Five hundred and seventy-one CALD patients (comprising 145 Arabic, 248 Chinese, and 178 Greek) and a control group of 274 Anglo-Australian patients participated. RESULTS: Immigrants had difficulty communicating with the doctor (73% versus 29%) and understanding the health system (38% versus 10%). Differences were found in 'difficulty knowing who to see' (P = 0.0002), 'length of time to confirm diagnosis' (P = 0.04), wanting more choice about a specialist and hospital (P < 0.0001); being offered the opportunity to see a counselor (P < 0.0001); and actually seeing one (P < 0.0001). There were no significant self-reported differences regarding how cancer was detected, time to see a health professional, or type first seen; however, immigrants reported difficulty knowing who to see. Previous studies showed differences in patterns of care according to socioeconomic status (SES) and educational level. Despite adjusting for age, sex, education, marital status, SES, time since diagnosis, and type of cancer, we did not find significant differences. Instead, we found that understanding of the health system and confidence understanding English were important factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that immigrants with cancer perceive an inferior quality of cancer care. We highlight potentially modifiable factors including assistance in navigating the health system, translated information, and cultural competency training for health professionals.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Perception , Quality of Health Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The silent epidemic of mesothelioma in Australia is steadily increasing, and 30% of cases occur in New South Wales (NSW). AIM: To describe the patterns of care and outcomes of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in NSW. METHODS: MPM patients in NSW applying for compensation at the NSW Dust Diseases Board from 2007 to 2009 were included. Survival from time of diagnosis was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Chi-squared test was used to determine if there was an association between utilisation of treatment and geographical location. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients was included: median age was 72.5; 91.3% male; 60.1% epithelial subtype; and 65.2% lived in major cities. All patients had at least one chest X-ray and computed tomography scan, and 21% had a positron emission tomography scan; 93.5% and 4.3% had histological or cytological confirmation respectively. Thoracoscopy (59.4%) was the most commonly used diagnostic procedure. Treatment utilisation: 53.6% chemotherapy; 35.5% radiotherapy; 9.4% extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP); and 72.5% had palliative care involvement. There were no major differences in treatment utilisation between patients living in major cities and those in regional NSW (chemotherapy P = 0.42; radiotherapy P = 0.13 and palliative care P = 0.60), except for a higher rate of EPP in regional patients (16.7% vs 5.6%; P = 0.03). Median survival was 9.7 versus 12.3 months for city and regional patients respectively (P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Survival and treatment utilisation was not significantly different between MPM patients living in major cities and regional NSW, except for a higher rate of EPP in patients in regional NSW.
Subject(s)
Dust , Mesothelioma/therapy , Occupational Exposure , Pleural Neoplasms/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Workers' Compensation/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dust/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Middle Aged , New South Wales/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Patient Care/methods , Patient Care/trends , Pleural Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pleural Neoplasms/epidemiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Uncertainty remains about the optimal anti-emetic regimen for control of delayed nausea and vomiting after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Many patients receive dexamethasone but complain of insomnia, anxiety/agitation, and indigestion. The aim was to determine if patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer prefer treatment with dexamethasone or placebo for prophylaxis against delayed nausea and vomiting, and to compare quality of life (QOL) between the two treatments. In this randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial, we compared oral dexamethasone (4 mg twice daily for 2 days) versus placebo for chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast cancer. All patients received intravenous granisetron and dexamethasone pre-chemotherapy and oral granisetron on day 2. Primary endpoints were: (i) patient preference; (ii) difference between cycles in change of QOL from days 1 to 8. Median age of the 94 women was 51 years (range 27-76): 79 received fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and 15 received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. Thirteen withdrew pre-cycle 2 with no differences between arms. Of 80 patients stating a preference, 31 preferred placebo (39 %, 95 % CI: 28-50 %) and 37 (46 %, 95 % CI: 35-58 %) preferred dexamethasone; 12 had no preference. There were no differences in intensity of vomiting, nausea, or time to onset of vomiting. There was greater decrease in global QOL (p = 0.06) when patients received dexamethasone. No other symptom/QOL domains differed significantly. In conclusion, no significant difference was found in patient preference, QOL, or symptoms regardless of whether dexamethasone or placebo was used after adjuvant chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Dexamethasone , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/chemically induced , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Granisetron/administration & dosage , Granisetron/adverse effects , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Migrant patients comprise a significant proportion of Western oncologists' clientele. Although previous research has found that barriers exist in the communication between ethnically diverse patients and health professionals, little is known about their personal preferences for communication and information, or the concordance of views held between patients and family members. METHODS: Seventy-three patients (31 Anglo-Australians, and 20 Chinese, 11 Arabic and 11 Greek migrants) and 65 relatives (25 Anglo-Australians, and 23 Chinese, 11 Arabic and 7 Greek migrants) were recruited through nine Sydney oncology clinics. Following prognostic consultations, participants were interviewed in their preferred language about their experiences and ideals regarding information and communication with oncologists. Interviews were audio-taped, translated and transcribed, and then thematically analysed using N-Vivo software. RESULTS: Consistency was found in patient preferences, regardless of ethnicity, in that almost all patients preferred prognostic information to be delivered in a caring and personalised manner from an authoritative oncologist. Contrary to previous research, migrant patients often expressed a desire for prognostic disclosure. Discordance was found between migrant patients and their families. These families displayed traditional non-Western preferences of non-disclosure of prognosis and wanted to actively influence consultations by meeting with oncologists separately beforehand and directing the oncologists on what and how information should be conveyed to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the communication issues facing patients in the metastatic cancer setting are shared amongst Anglo-Australian and migrant patients alike. Understanding the dynamics within migrant families is also an important component in providing culturally sensitive communication. Future directions for research are provided.
Subject(s)
Communication Barriers , Communication , Language , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Preference , Physician-Patient Relations , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Child , Child, Preschool , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/ethnology , Prognosis , Truth DisclosureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The selection criteria for phase III trials are often stringent. We aimed to determine how many advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients would have been eligible for phase III targeted therapy trials and the proportion receiving anticancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2007 to May 2008, all advanced NSCLC patients presented at our lung cancer multidisciplinary team meeting were included to assess eligibility for the targeted therapy trials: ECOG-4599, AVAiL, FLEX, TALENT, INTACT-1, INTACT-2, ESCAPE, NEXUS and MONET1. Medical records were examined to determine treatment utilisation and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were registered: 63% male; median age 71 years; 61% stage IIIB disease. Percentages that met criteria were: ECOG-4599 31%, AVAiL 24%, FLEX 69%, TALENT 27%, INTACT-1 50%, INTACT-2 42%, ESCAPE 39%, NEXUS 63% and MONET1 34%. Common reasons for ineligibility were insufficient life expectancy, poor performance status, abnormal bloods, proteinuria and associated cancer problems. Systemic therapies were received by 66% of patients and median survival was 10.3 months. CONCLUSION: Only 24%-69% were eligible for targeted therapy trials but 66% received anticancer treatment. Clinical trials in patients with advanced NSCLC need to be more representative of the majority of patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/methods , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Disease Progression , Eligibility Determination , Female , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Life Expectancy , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Chemotherapy has improved survival rates in patients with many of the common cancers. However, there is reliable evidence that, as a result of treatment, a subset of cancer survivors experience cognitive problems that can last for many years after the completion of chemotherapy. The etiology of this phenomenon is largely unknown, and currently there are no proven treatments. This article explores the clinical and preclinical literature on potential therapies for chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairments. Emerging results suggest that both pharmacological and behavioral approaches may offer patients some benefits. However, research in this area has been limited and is sometimes fraught with methodological flaws. As a result, it is difficult to draw definite conclusions regarding treatment efficacy. These issues, along with predictors of cognitive decline, are discussed in the light of possible interventions.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Cognition Disorders/chemically induced , Cognition Disorders/therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cognition Disorders/diet therapy , Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Genotype , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Research Design , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive tumour that commonly affects the mesothelial surfaces of the pleural and peritoneal cavities, and occasionally, the tunica vaginalis and the pericardium. Formerly a rare tumour, MM is increasing in incidence in Australia due to the heavy nationwide use of asbestos from 1940 until the 1980s. The incidence is expected to peak in Australia in the next decade, mirroring the long latency period between asbestos exposure and development of MM. Diagnosis of MM can be difficult. Definitive pathological diagnosis is required and it often requires an experienced pathologist to differentiate MM from other benign or malignant processes. Treatment of MM requires a multidisciplinary approach, regardless of palliative or curative intent. Treatment options, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and active symptom control or a combination of these, may be used. Further research is needed to advance the therapeutic options for MM, and strategies to realize personalisation of therapy through discovery of predictive markers. In the Australian society where asbestos contamination of the built environment is very high, education and stringent public health measures are required to prevent a second wave of increased MM incidence.