Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg ; 110(7): 4083-4095, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The molecular features of fibroblasts and the role of fibrosis in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response and breast cancer (BRCA) prognosis remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of interstitial fibrosis on the response and prognosis of patients with BRCA undergoing NAC treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The molecular characteristics of pathologic complete response (pCR) and non-pCR (npCR) in patients with BRCA were analyzed using multiomics analysis. A clinical cohort was collected to investigate the predictive value of fibrosis in patients with BRCA. RESULTS: Fibrosis-related signaling pathways were significantly upregulated in patients with npCR. npCR may be associated with distinct and highly active fibroblast subtypes. Patients with high fibrosis had lower pCR rates. The fibrosis-dependent nomogram for pCR showed efficient predictive ability [training set: area under the curve [AUC]=0.871, validation set: AUC=0.792]. Patients with low fibrosis had a significantly better prognosis than those with high fibrosis, and those with a high fibrotic focus index had significantly shorter overall and recurrence-free survival. Therefore, fibrosis can be used to predict pCR. Our findings provide a basis for decision-making in the treatment of BRCA. CONCLUSIONS: npCR is associated with a distinct and highly active fibroblast subtype. Furthermore, patients with high fibrosis have lower pCR rates and shorter long-term survival. Therefore, fibrosis can predict pCR. A nomogram that includes fibrosis can provide a basis for decision-making in the treatment of BRCA.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Fibrosis , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Adult , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Nomograms
2.
Langmuir ; 39(12): 4245-4256, 2023 03 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36913208

ABSTRACT

There are many treatments for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but none of them are very effective. Radiotherapy is used extensively in NPC treatment, but radioresistance is a major problem. Graphene oxide (GO) has been previously studied in cancer treatment, and this study is aimed to explore its role in radiosensitization of NPC. Therefore, graphene oxide nanosheets were prepared, and the relationship between GO and radioresistance was explored. The GO nanosheets were synthesized by a modified Hummers' method. The morphologies of the GO nanosheets were characterized by field-emission environmental scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The morphological changes and radiosensitivity of C666-1 and HK-1 cells with or without the GO nanosheets were observed by an inverted fluorescence microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). Colony formation assay and Western Blot were applied for analysis of NPC radiosensitivity. The as-synthesized GO nanosheets have lateral dimensions (sizes ∼1 µm) and exhibit a thin wrinkled two-dimensional lamellar structure with slight folds and crimped edges (thickness values ∼1 nm). C666-1 cells with the GO was significantly changed the morphology of cells postirradiation. The full field of view visualized by a microscope showed the shadow of dead cells or cell debris. The synthesized graphene oxide nanosheets inhibited cell proliferation, promoted cell apoptosis, and inhibited the expression of Bcl-2 in C666-1 and HK-1 cells but increased the level of Bax. The GO nanosheets could affect the cell apoptosis and reduce the pro-survival protein Bcl-2 related to the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway. The GO nanosheets could enhance radiosensitivity, which might be a radioactive material in NPC cells.


Subject(s)
Graphite , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Graphite/pharmacology , Graphite/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/metabolism , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/metabolism , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Biomol Biomed ; 23(4): 680-688, 2023 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36724018

ABSTRACT

Models for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer patients are lacking. We aimed to develop an efficient model to accurately predict ALNM. Three hundred fifty-five breast cancer patients were recruited and randomly divided into the training and validation sets. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were applied to identify predictors of ALNM. We developed nomograms based on these variables to predict ALNM. The performance of the nomograms was tested using the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve, and a decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical utility of the prediction models. The nomograms that included clinical N stage (cN), pathological grade (pathGrade), and hemoglobin accurately predicted ALNM in the training and validation sets (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80 and 0.80, respectively). We then explored the importance of the cN and pathGradesignatures used in the integrated model and developed new nomograms by removing the two variables. The results suggested that the combine-pathGrade nomogram also accurately predicted ALNM in the training and validation sets (AUC 0.78 and 0.78, respectively), but the combine-cN nomogram did not (AUC 0.64 and 0.60, in training and validation sets, respectively). We described a cN-based ALNM prediction model in breast cancer patients, presenting a novel efficient clinical decision nomogram for predicting ALNM.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Lymph Nodes , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Axilla/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Nomograms , Ultrasonography, Mammary
4.
Gland Surg ; 11(9): 1497-1506, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36221281

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been the most important strategy for preventing infection and controlling pandemics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Cancer patients have a significantly higher risk of infection with COVID-19 because of their impaired immunity. Breast cancer is the most common female malignant tumor in the world. However, studies on COVID-19 vaccination in breast cancer patients are scarce, so that more information is needed to guide vaccination in these. Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in breast cancer patient. Questionnaires completed by non-postoperative patients will be considered invalid. The main variables in the questionnaire including vaccination status, willingness to get the vaccines, candidate factors, and measures of adverse events in vaccinated individuals were used for analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the associations. Results: Among 947 valid online questionnaires, 341 (36.0%) accepted SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while 606 (64.0%) did not. There were significant differences in age, current treatment, time since surgery, and symptoms of anxiety and depression between the two groups. Compared to vaccinated patients, we identified current treatment [odds ratio (OR) =0.51 for endocrine therapy; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.89], time since surgery (OR =22.49 for 1-2 years; 95% CI: 12.31-41.10; OR =8.49 for 2-5 years; 95% CI: 4.98-14.46; OR =1.79 for >5 years; 95% CI: 1.11-2.89), and symptoms of depression (OR =2.48; 95% CI: 1.19-5.15) as significant factors for being unvaccinated. The overall incidence of adverse reactions was 43.1%, and the most common local and systemic adverse reactions were pain (28.4%) and fatigue (8.8%). However, about 76.6% of the unvaccinated participants were willing to be vaccinated. Conclusions: Compared to the general population, postoperative patients with breast cancer had a lower rate of vaccination for SARS-CoV-2. Receiving treatment, a shorter time since surgery, and symptoms of depression were associated with being unvaccinated. However, about 76.6% of the unvaccinated participants were willing to be vaccinated. Although our study showed that there were adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, such as pain, fatigue, they are common adverse effects of routine vaccination. We believe that vaccination against COVID-19 is safe in postoperative patients with breast cancer.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL