Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomed Chromatogr ; 38(7): e5877, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38618898

ABSTRACT

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently used drugs that can cause liver toxicity. The aim of this study was to integrate bioanalytical and population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) assay to rapidly screen and quantify the concentrations of NSAIDs in plasma and monitor clinical safety. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of acetaminophen (APAP), flurbiprofen (FLB), aspirin (ASP), and ibuprofen (IBP), four commonly used NSAIDs. The PopPK model of the signature toxicant was analyzed based on the published literature. The LC-MS/MS method was successfully validated and applied to determine NSAID concentrations in patient plasma samples. APAP, ASP, and IBP data were best fitted using a one-compartment model, and FLB data were best fitted using a two-compartment model. Bootstrapping and visual predictive checks suggested that a robust and reliable pharmacokinetic model was developed. A fast, simple, and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for determining APAP, FLB, ASP, and IBP in human plasma. Combined with the PopPK model, this method was applied to rapidly analyze the concentrations of NSAIDs in clinical samples from patients presenting to the emergency department with acute liver dysfunction and monitored NSAIDs clinical safety.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/blood , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Linear Models , Drug Overdose/blood , Limit of Detection
2.
Mol Pharm ; 21(5): 2187-2197, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551309

ABSTRACT

This study aims to explore and characterize the role of pediatric sedation via rectal route. A pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model of midazolam gel was built and validated to support dose selection for pediatric clinical trials. Before developing the rectal PBPK model, an intravenous PBPK model was developed to determine drug disposition, specifically by describing the ontogeny model of the metabolic enzyme. Pediatric rectal absorption was developed based on the rectal PBPK model of adults. The improved Weibull function with permeability, surface area, and fluid volume parameters was used to extrapolate pediatric rectal absorption. A logistic regression model was used to characterize the relationship between the free concentrations of midazolam and the probability of sedation. All models successfully described the PK profiles with absolute average fold error (AAFE) < 2, especially our intravenous PBPK model that extended the predicted age to preterm. The simulation results of the PD model showed that when the free concentrations of midazolam ranged from 3.9 to 18.4 ng/mL, the probability of "Sedation" was greater than that of "Not-sedation" states. Combined with the rectal PBPK model, the recommended sedation doses were in the ranges of 0.44-2.08 mg/kg for children aged 2-3 years, 0.35-1.65 mg/kg for children aged 4-7 years, 0.24-1.27 mg/kg for children aged 8-12 years, and 0.20-1.10 mg/kg for adolescents aged 13-18 years. Overall, this model mechanistically quantified drug disposition and effect of midazolam gel in the pediatric population, accurately predicted the observed clinical data, and simulated the drug exposure for sedation that will inform dose selection for following pediatric clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Administration, Rectal , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Midazolam , Models, Biological , Humans , Midazolam/pharmacokinetics , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacokinetics , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Rectum/drug effects , Infant , Gels , Adolescent , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn
3.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn ; 51(4): 367-384, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554227

ABSTRACT

The new adjuvant chemotherapy of docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide has been recommended for treating breast cancer. It is necessary to investigate the potential drug-drug Interactions (DDIs) since they have a narrow therapeutic window in which slight differences in exposure might result in significant differences in treatment efficacy and tolerability. To guide clinical rational drug use, this study aimed to evaluate the DDI potentials of docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and epirubicin in cancer patients using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. The GastroPlus™ was used to develop the PBPK models, which were refined and validated with observed data. The established PBPK models accurately described the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of three drugs in cancer patients, and the predicted-to-observed ratios of all the PK parameters met the acceptance criterion. The PBPK model predicted no significant changes in plasma concentrations of these drugs during co-administration, which was consistent with the observed clinical phenomenon. Besides, the verified PBPK models were then used to predict the effect of other Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors/inducers on these drug exposures. In the DDI simulation, strong CYP3A4 modulators changed the exposure of three drugs by 0.71-1.61 fold. Therefore, patients receiving these drugs in combination with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors should be monitored regularly to prevent adverse reactions. Furthermore, co-administration of docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, or epirubicin with strong CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided. In conclusion, the PBPK models can be used to further investigate the DDI potential of each drug and to develop dosage recommendations for concurrent usage by additional perpetrators or victims.


Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A , Docetaxel , Drug Interactions , Epirubicin , Models, Biological , Humans , Epirubicin/pharmacokinetics , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/pharmacokinetics , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/pharmacokinetics , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Female , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/metabolism , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Adult , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Taxoids/pharmacokinetics , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Computer Simulation , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers/pharmacology , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage
4.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 189: 106534, 2023 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37480962

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. METHODS: The PBPK models for anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin were constructed using the GastroPlus™ software (Version 9.7) based on the physicochemical data and PK parameters obtained from literature, then were optimized and validated in healthy subjects to predict the plasma concentration-time profiles of these three drugs and assess the predictive performance of each model. According to the analysis of the properties of each drug, the developed and validated models were applied to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin. RESULTS: The developed PBPK models properly described the pharmacokinetics of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin well, and all predicted PK parameters (Cmax,ss, AUC0-τ,ss) ratios were within 2.0-fold of the observed values. Furthermore, the application of these models to predict the anaprazole-clarithromycin and anaprazole-amoxicillin DDIs demonstrates their good performance, with the predicted DDI Cmax,ss ratios and DDI AUC0-τ,ss ratios within 1.25-fold of the observed values, and all predicted DDI Cmax,ss, and AUC0-τ,ss ratios within 2.0-fold. The simulated results show no need to adjust the dosage when co-administered with anaprazole in patients undergoing eradication therapy of H. pylori infection since the dose remained in the therapeutic range. CONCLUSION: The whole-body PBPK models of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin were built and qualified, which can predict DDIs that are mediated by gastric pH change and inhibition of metabolic enzymes, providing a mechanistic understanding of the DDIs observed in the clinic of clarithromycin, amoxicillin with anaprazole.


Subject(s)
Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Humans , Clarithromycin/adverse effects , Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Amoxicillin/pharmacokinetics , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Drug Interactions , Models, Biological
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL