Clinical trial of arthroscopic debridement combined with functional exercise in the treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced knee osteoarthritis (KOA) impacts both knees, resulting in pain, deformity, and substantial restrictions in joint mobility. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the effectiveness of combining arthroscopic debridement with functional exercise in treating advanced KOA. METHODS: A total of 296 patients diagnosed with advanced KOA were divided into two groups: the observation group (n= 152) received arthroscopic debridement combined with functional exercise, while the control group (n= 144) underwent arthroscopic debridement only. The study compared and observed the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in knee joint function, inflammation level, and oxidative stress between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05). Following treatment for six months, the observation group exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale (VAS) score, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels compared to the control group (P< 0.05). Meanwhile, the observation group showed significantly higher levels of Lysholm score, hospital for special surgery (HSS) score, range of motion (ROM) of knee, peak torque (PT) and total work (TW) for knee extension and flexion, superoxide dismutase (SOD), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), and glutathione (GSH) compared to the control group (P< 0.05). Besides, the effective treatment rate in the observation group was notably higher than that in the control group (80.92% vs. 69.44%, P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of arthroscopic debridement with functional exercise is an effective treatment for advanced KOA. This approach not only enhances the function and strength of knee joint and reduces inflammatory response but also boosts the body's antioxidant capacity. The treatment exhibits encouraging outcomes and warrants broad implementation.

Low Correlation between Gait and Quality of Life in Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis.

Advanced knee osteoarthritis patients' gait usually undergoes alterations leading to decreased mobility and lower functional performance, which can result in a worsening of their quality of life (QoL). While several authors have reported a moderate correlation between gait parameters and QoL assessed by generic questionnaires, the literature is scarce. This study aimed to explore the relationship between gait and QoL parameters assessed by a generic and a disease-specific questionnaire in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 129 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis scheduled for elective total knee replacement were selected. The patients' gait was evaluated by means of a validated wireless device while they walked 30 m at a comfortable speed. Patient function was also analysed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). QoL was measured with the EQ-5D and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaires. Patients showed a mean walking speed of 0.95 ± 0.19 m/s, a mean cadence of 105.6 ± 9.9 steps/min, and a mean stride length of 1.25 ± 0.17 m on both legs. They presented poor knee status (KSS < 60) and poor QoL, with an EQ-5D of 0.44 ± 0.24 and a total KOOS of 29.77 ± 13.99. Positive low correlations (r <0.5, p <0.5) were found only between the speed, propulsion and stride length of both legs, and the overall and ADLs subscale scores of the total KOOS questionnaire. In conclusion, several gait parameters have a significant low correlation with the QoL of patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis, as assessed by an osteoarthritis-specific questionnaire.

Clinical outcomes of knee joint distraction combined with marrow stimulation procedures for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Knee joint distraction (KJD) has received much attention as a joint preserving surgery, especially in young patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: This study included 16 patients with advanced knee OA who underwent KJD combined with marrow stimulating techniques and were followed up for more than 2 years. The patients' clinical scores, including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, ROM, joint space width, and semiquantitative MRI were evaluated. The factors affecting clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the JOA score and the individual scores of the KOOS subscales improved significantly (JOA score: P = 0.0028, KOOS-symptoms: P = 0.0016, -pain: P = 0.0011, -ADL: P = 0.0009, -sports/recreation: P = 0.0144, and -QOL: P = 0.0034). Although the extension of the knee joint did not change throughout the follow-up period, flexion of the joint deteriorated at the time of device removal but recovered to the preoperative level at the final follow-up. Preoperative joint space width was 2.4 ± 2.0 mm and at the final follow-up, it increased to 3.3 ± 1.5 mm, showing statistically significant improvement (P = 0.034). The postoperative semiquantitative MRI score also improved significantly (from 6.0 ± 3.0 to 42.1 ± 28.7, P = 0.0001). A high BMI was associated with a poor clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Although the effect of marrow stimulating techniques for cartilage repair was not well clarified and the complication rate was high, the clinical and radiographic outcomes showed significant improvement after KJD combined with marrow stimulating techniques in patients with advanced knee OA. However, we should be careful about suggesting this procedure in obese patients.

Mediolateral coronal laxity does not correlate with knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: It remains controversial whether coronal laxity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a critical factor in determining clinical outcomes such as knee range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between postoperative ROM and coronal laxity, which was defined as the angular motion from the neutral, unloaded position to the loaded position, in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis undergoing TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and 1-year postoperative coronal laxity were assessed using radiographs by applying a force of 150 N with an arthrometer. A consecutive series of 204 knees was examined. A knee was defined as clinically "balanced" when the difference between medial and lateral laxity was 3° or less. Active ROM was measured using a goniometer. Values were expressed as median values. RESULTS: The ROM was 105° preoperatively and 110° postoperatively, with the correlation being weak (r = 0.372, p < 0.001) between the periods. The total laxity also revealed a weak correlation (r = 0.270, p < 0.001) between the periods. Preoperative laxity was significantly larger (4° vs. 3°) on the medial side (p < 0.001) and postoperative laxity was larger (4° vs. 3°) laterally (p = 0.001). There was no significant correlation between postoperative ROM and laxity pre- and postoperatively. Additionally, there were no differences in ROM between the balanced and unbalanced groups in the pre- and postoperative periods. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that mediolateral coronal laxity in patients with an osteoarthritic knee did not correlate with knee ROM after TKA when 3°-4° of laxity in the medial and lateral orientations was maintained.

Medial and lateral laxity in knees with advanced medial osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: An increase in coronal laxity is recognized as a risk factor for progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate coronal laxity, which was defined as the angular motion from the neutral, unloaded (baseline) position to the loaded position, in patients with advanced medial knee OA. METHOD: Preoperative coronal laxity was assessed using radiographs in patients with medial knee OA undergoing total knee arthroplasty by applying a force of 150 N with an arthrometer. A consecutive series of 211 knees with OA and 40 normal control knees were examined. A knee with OA was defined as clinically "balanced" when the difference between medial and lateral laxity was 3° or less. Values are expressed as median [25th, 75th percentile]. RESULTS: The laxity was 4° [3, 5] from the baseline on the medial side and 3° [2, 4] on the lateral side. The distribution of medial and lateral laxity indicated that 90% (189/211) of patients fell within 3°. The equivalence test showed that the medial and lateral laxity was similar, with an equivalence margin of 3° (P < 0.001). In the control knees, the laxity was 3° [2, 4] from the baseline on the medial side and 2° [2, 4] on the lateral side. The differences between the knees with advanced OA and the controls were significant (P = 0.005, medial; P = 0.006, lateral). CONCLUSION: This study showed that a clinically balanced knee was maintained even in patients with advanced medial knee OA.