Repair of Type C Tracheo-esophageal Fistula/Esophageal Atresia With or Without Trans Anastomotic Tube: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of trans anastomotic feeding tube (TAFT) during the repair of Esophageal atresia/Tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) aims to enhance outcomes by enabling early feeding, reducing the requirement for parenteral nutrition, and reducing complications such as anastomotic leak by stenting the anastomosis. However, TAFT's benefits and drawbacks are debated due to conflicting reports. Thus, we conducted a prospective pilot randomized control trial to elucidate the impact of TAFT on postoperative outcomes and the potential benefits of avoidance of TAFT. METHODS: We performed a single-center randomized controlled trial in 53 neonates diagnosed with Type C EA/TEF who were operated on from January 2022 to June 2023. The patients were randomized into TAFT (n = 30) and non-TAFT (n = 23) groups. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months following discharge. The primary objective of the study was to compare the rate of anastomotic leaks following primary repair of EA/TEF in both groups. Secondary objectives included early postoperative outcomes such as the occurrence of anastomotic stricture, time taken to initiate feeding, the time required to reach full feeding, the incidence of brief resolved unexplained events (BRUE) or acute life-threatening events (ALTE), the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER), somatic growth, and all-cause mortality within 30 days post-surgery. RESULT: The study demonstrated that TAFT placement was associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic leaks (20 % vs 0, p = 0.03). However, there was no difference in the 30-day mortality between both groups. Although the rate of anastomotic strictures and GER was higher in the TAFT group (54.5 % vs 27.8 %, p = 0.08 and 25 % vs 57.1 %, p = 0.076), it did not reach statistical significance. Avoiding TAFT resulted in earlier initiation of enteral feeding (18 vs 22 days, p = 0.002), shorter time to achieve full feeds (15 vs 21 days, p = 0.03), reduced duration of TPN (3 vs 10 days; p = 0.001), improved weight gain at the 2-week follow-up (27.5 vs. 24.4 g/kg/day, p-value = 0.037) and lesser incidence of ALTE/BRUE (11.1 % vs 48 %, p = 0.01) at 6 months. CONCLUSION: While previous research has covered TAFT's impact on complications such as anastomotic leak, stricture, use of TPN and enteral feed, prospective randomized studies remain limited, and the impact on GER, somatic growth, and occurrence of ALTE/BRUE is still unexplored. This study evaluated the short-term outcomes of EA/TEF in a resource-challenged setting, shedding light on the potential benefits of repair without TAFT such as reduction in the rate of anastomotic leak, earlier feeding, reduced GER, better somatic growth and reduced incidence of ALTE/BRUE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Treatment study/Randomized controlled trial).

Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence in the Assessment of Vascularity of Anastomotic Margins in Colorectal Surgery in a Lower Middle-Income Country (LMIC) Hospital.

Background and Objective: One of the uses of indocyanine green (ICG) in the surgical field is the evaluation of the anastomotic margins in colorectal surgery. This is of particular importance because fluorescence imaging may aid in detecting vascular compromise, allowing the surgeon to change the resection margin thereby decreasing the chance of an anastomotic leak. To date, there has been no study with its use locally. This study aimed to determine whether the use of ICG can safely identify if the margins of resection are well-vascularized in patients undergoing left-sided colon or rectal surgery, which in turn may reduce anastomotic leak rates. Methods: Through a retrospective study design, the investigators gathered data of patients who underwent left-sided colon or rectal surgery. The groups were divided into those with and without the use of ICG and a comparative data on the anastomotic leak rates were analyzed. Results: Eighty-six (86) patients with similar patient characteristics, tumor staging, and surgical approach were compared. Both the leak rates identified during the initial hospital stay and at 30 days post-operatively were lower in those where ICG was used (p=0.035, p=0.047, respectively) than those where ICG was not used. Conclusion: ICG fluorescence imaging may reduce the anastomotic leak rates in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Minimally invasive vs open vs hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal carcinoma has emerged as the contemporary alternative to conventional laparoscopic minimally invasive (LMIE), hybrid (HE) and open (OE) surgical approaches. No single study has compared all four approaches with a view to postoperative outcomes. A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken. A network meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-network meta-analysis guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R and Shiny. Seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 1063 patients were included. Overall, 32.9% of patients underwent OE (350/1063), 11.0% underwent HE (117/1063), 34.0% of patients underwent LMIE (361/1063), and 22.1% of patients underwent RAMIE (235/1063). OE had the lowest anastomotic leak rate 7.7% (27/350), while LMIE had the lowest pulmonary 10.8% (39/361), cardiac 0.56% (1/177) complications, re-intervention rates 5.08% (12/236), 90-day mortality 1.05% (2/191), and shortest length of hospital stay (mean 11.25 days). RAMIE displayed the lowest 30-day mortality rate at 0.80% (2/250). There was a significant increase in pulmonary complications for those undergoing OE (OR 3.63 [95% confidence interval: 1.4-9.77]) when compared to RAMIE. LMIE is a safe and feasible option for esophagectomy when compared to OE and HE. The upcoming RCTs will provide further data to make a more robust interrogation of the surgical outcomes following RAMIE compared to conventional open surgery to determine equipoise or superiority of each approach as the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy continues to evolve (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registration: CRD42023438790).

Early warning model to detect anastomotic leakage following colon surgery: a clinical observational study.

Purpose: We aimed to develop a predictive tool for anastomotic leakage (AL) following colon cancer surgery by combining a clinical early warning score (EWS) with the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Methods: The records of 1,855 patients who underwent colon cancer surgery at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between January 2013 and December 2018, with or without AL, were retrospectively reviewed. EWS and CRP levels were assessed daily from the first postoperative day until discharge. AL was defined as an anastomotic defect observed at reoperation, the presence of feculent fluid in a pelvic drain, or evidence of AL on computed tomography. The tool incorporated postoperative EWS and CRP levels for the accurate early detection of AL. Results: From postoperative days 3 to 7, the mean CRP level exceeded 200 mg/L in patients with AL and was under 200 mg/L in those without AL (P<0.05). From postoperative days 1 to 5, the mean EWS among patients with leakage exceeded 2, while scores were below 2 among those without leakage (P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified postoperative day 3 as the most predictive of early leakage, with cutoff values of 2.4 for EWS and 180 mg/L for CRP; this yielded an area under the curve of 0.87 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 70%). Conclusion: We propose using an EWS of 2.4 and a CRP level of 180 mg/L on postoperative day 3 following colon surgery with anastomosis as threshold values to prompt investigation and treatment of AL.

Conduit Ischemia After Esophagectomy: A Spectrum of Clinical Manifestations, Prevention, and Management.

This article outlines the anatomic and physiologic basis for gastric conduit ischemia and the range of its possible manifestations, from superficial mucosal ischemia to gross conduit necrosis. Methods by which these complications are suspected and ultimately diagnosed are discussed, focusing on clinical and laboratory signs as the harbingers and the use of imaging and endoscopy for confirmation. From there, management options are detailed based on the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification of esophageal leak and gastric necrosis. Finally, the short- and long-term implications of these complications are reviewed.

Impact of Clostridium difficile Infection Versus Colonization on Postoperative Outcomes After Oncological Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Single-Center Study With Propensity Score Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited research available concerning the risk anastomotic leakage in the context of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Herein, we aim to elucidate the correlation between CDI, encompassing both preoperative asymptomatic C. difficile carriers (CDC) and postoperative hospital acquired C. difficile infections (HA-CDI), and the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing oncological colorectal surgery. METHODS: This is an observational, single-center study. Data were sourced from surgical logs between 2018 and 2023, via the hospital's electronic system. Patients were split into three subgroups: CDC, HA-CDI, and control group (CG). Groups were compared in terms of patient characteristics, morbidity, and mortality via Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 522 patients were analyzed, split into three subgroups: CDC, n = 35; HA-CDI, n = 27; CG, n = 460. One-to-one propensity score matching reduced the CG to 62 patients. Patients in the HA-CDI group had higher rates of overall morbidity (p < 0.0001), higher rates of anastomotic leaks (p = 0.002), more surgical site infections (SSI) (p = 0.001), and a longer length of stay (26 vs. 11.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.001), while patients in the CDC group had comparable rates of complications with the CG. CONCLUSION: HA-CDI is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak after oncological colorectal surgery, while asymptomatic CDC do not have higher morbidity and may be operated electively, under standard CD treatment.

The Effect of Local Papaverine Use in an Experimental High-Risk Colonic Anastomosis Model: Reduced Inflammatory Findings and Less Necrosis.

Objectives: To assess the impact of topical papaverine administration in complete and incomplete colonic anastomosis, by examining bursting pressure, hydroxyproline concentration, collagen content, inflammation levels, inflammatory cell infiltration, neoangiogenesis, and necrosis grades. Methods: We performed an experimental study on rats, in which they were divided into the following 4 groups of 16 subjects each. Group 1 [complete anastomosis (CA) without papaverine (CA -P) group], Group 2 [CA with papaverine (CA +P) group], Group 3 [incomplete anastomosis (ICA) without papaverine (ICA -P) group], and Group 4 [ICA with papaverine (ICA +P) group]. Results: The lymphocyte infiltration score of the ICA +P3 (day 3) group was significantly higher compared to the ICA -P3 group (p = 0.018). The median Ehrlich-Hunt score (p = 0.012), inflammation score (p = 0.026), and neutrophil infiltration score (p = 0.041) of the CA +P7 (day 7) group were significantly lower than the corresponding data of the CA -P7 group. Additionally, the necrosis score of the ICA +P7 group was significantly lower than that of the ICA -P7 group (p = 0.014). Conclusions: Data from the current study reveal that, although topical papaverine seems to suppress inflammation in anastomosis tissue and reduce necrosis at 7 days, definite conclusions regarding its impact on anastomotic leak cannot be drawn without further studies investigating anastomotic wound healing and anastomotic leak, preferably with both shorter- and longer-term evaluations.

Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) remains the most important complication after left-sided colic anastomoses and technical complications during anastomotic construction are responsible of higher leakage incidence. Powered circular stapler (PCS) in colorectal surgery has been introduced in order to reduce technical errors and post-operative complications due to the manual circular stapler (MCS). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. An electronic systematic search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase of studies comparing PCS and MCS. The incidence of AL, anastomotic bleeding (AB), conversion, and reoperation were assessed. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644. RESULTS: Five observational studies were eligible for inclusion reporting on 2379 patients. The estimated pooled Risk Ratios for AL and AB rates following PCS were significantly lower than those observed with MCS (0.44 and 0.23, respectively; both with p < 0.01). Conversion and reoperation rate did not show any significant difference: 0.41 (95% CI 0.09-1.88; p = 0.25) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.33-1.84; p = 0.57); respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of PCS demonstrates a lower incidence of AL and AB compared to MCS but does not exhibit a discernible influence on reintervention or conversion rates. The call for future randomized clinical trials aims to definitively clarify these issues and contribute to further advancements in refining surgical strategies for left-sided colonic resection.

Ileoanal pouch salvage rates with endoluminal vacuum therapy for early vs late anastomotic leaks.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) significantly compromise patient outcomes and increase healthcare resource utilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endoluminal vacuum therapy (EndoVac) for pouch leaks. We hypothesized that EndoVac for early compared with late leaks was associated with a higher pouch survival rate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive pouch anastomotic leaks treated with EndoVac therapy at our institution between 2013 and 2023. Patients were stratified into early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) leak groups. Anastomotic healing was defined as complete closure of the leak site and resolution of symptoms. Pouch failure was defined as a permanent ileostomy or pouch excision. The probability of pouch survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients with IPAA were included: median age, 34 years; 71% were males; and median body mass index, 23.46 kg/m2. The following were the diagnoses made: ulcerative colitis (n = 12) and familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 2). The median (IQR) time from pouch construction to leak was 44.5 (12-192) days; of these, 6 (43%) were early, and 8 (57%) were late. All (100%) leaks were at the anastomosis; all (100%) were diverted at the time of EndoVac therapy: 10 (71%) still diverted, and 4 (29%) rediverted. Patients underwent a median of 5.5 EndoVac changes (3-7) over a 13.5 (6-21) day period from initiation of treatment to cessation of therapy. After EndoVac therapy, healing was observed in 10 (71%) patients; 2 of whom required a minor handsewn anastomotic revision but healed completely, and 4 did not heal; 3 had pouch excision, and 1 underwent redo pouch surgery. Anastomotic healing (66.7% vs 75%, P = .7) and pouch survival (83.3% vs 75%, P = .73) were not significantly different between the early and late leak groups. The overall pouch salvage rate was 78.5%. CONCLUSION: EndoVac therapy was effective in achieving high rates of pouch salvage and anastomotic healing in patients with ileoanal pouch leaks, irrespective of the timing of intervention postoperatively. This supports the use of EndoVac as a viable treatment option for both early and late anastomotic leaks.

Single-stapled colorectal anastomotic techniques: Do not cross the line.

The double-stapled technique is the most common method of colorectal anastomosis. Despite its widespread use, emerging data suggests that this technique may be a risk factor for anastomotic complications, as it is believed that crossing staple lines and resultant dog-ears are potentially weak points that are prone to ischemia and anastomotic leak. Herein, we describe technical variations of single-stapled colorectal anastomoses which surgeons can readily adopt and integrate into their armamentarium of anastomotic techniques.

Quadruple Assessment of Colorectal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Rectal Resection: A Retrospective Analysis of a Propensity-Matched Cohort.

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications in colorectal surgery, with an incidence of 12-39% and associated risk of mortality of 2-24%. The causes of AL and the ways to prevent it are currently under investigation. This study aims to verify if a quadruple assessment of colorectal anastomosis could reduce AL incidence. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on rectal cancer surgery performed from January 2015 to December 2017 and from January 2021 to December 2023 at a tertiary referral cancer centre was performed. Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated. Results: A total of 293 patients were enrolled. AL incidence was lower in the quadruple assessment group than in the control group, reaching a statistically significant result (7.7% vs. 16%; p = 0.001). This result was also confirmed after a propensity score match analysis (PSM), in which the AL rate was lower in the quadruple assessment group (5.4% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.01). Conclusions: This study shows how the systematic implementation of a quadruple assessment when performing a colorectal anastomosis could increase awareness on anastomotic success and reduce the incidence of AL.

PROFUGO study protocol: Predictive model for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and gastrectomy.

In esophagogastric surgery, the appearance of an anastomotic leak is the most feared complication. Early diagnosis is important for optimal management and successful resolution. For this reason, different studies have investigated the value of the use of markers to predict possible postoperative complications. Because of this, research and the creation of predictive models that identify patients at high risk of developing complications are mandatory in order to obtain an early diagnosis. The PROFUGO study (PRedictivO Model for Early Diagnosis of anastomotic LEAK after esophagectomy and gastrectomy) is proposed as a prospective and multicenter national study that aims to develop, with the help of artificial intelligence methods, a predictive model that allows for the identification of high-risk cases. of anastomotic leakage and/or major complications by analyzing different clinical and analytical variables collected during the postoperative period of patients undergoing esophagectomy or gastrectomy.

Venous Supercharging Relieves Venous Congestion and Salvages Gastric Conduit Post-esophagectomy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating additional venous anastomoses (venous super charging) in improving gastric conduit congestion and preventing complications such as conduit loss and anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy. We included two consecutive patients, one undergoing esophagectomy and the other undergoing laryngo-pharyngo-esophagectomy. Additional venous anastomoses were performed to alleviate venous congestion at the oral end of the gastric conduit. The perfusion assessment of the anastomosis was evaluated using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG FA) by Stryker's SPY PHI device. Both patients experienced anastomotic leakage, with one having a grade 2 leak and the other a grade 1 leak. Fortunately, conservative measures proved successful in managing these complications and there was no conduit loss. The incorporation of additional venous anastomoses effectively relieves venous congestion in the gastric conduit after esophagectomy and prevent conduit loss, indicating its potential in improving patient outcomes.

Worth the Wait? The Impact of Timing of Repair of Esophageal Atresia With Tracheoesophageal Fistula on Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) are at increased risk for respiratory compromise and gastric perforation until fistula ligation. We sought to describe current practice regarding the timing of EA/TEF repair and hypothesized that age at repair is a predictor of adverse outcomes. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was used to identify patients with EA/TEF who underwent fistula ligation and esophago-esophagostomy at US children's hospitals from July 2016-June 2021. Patients with a repair >10 days of age, a long-gap atresia, or H-type fistula were excluded. Comorbidities including prematurity and operative congenital heart disease were noted. Outcomes including anastomotic leak, gastric perforation, and post-operative respiratory failure were assessed for association with age and day of the week of operation. RESULTS: Among 863 patients that were evaluated, the plurality of operations was on DOL 2 (36%) and 83% were on a weekday (random rate = 71%). Later operations had shorter LOS (p = 0.04) and more recurrent nerve injuries (p = 0.01). Weekend repairs were associated with equivalent outcomes. Gastric perforations occurred in 18 (2.0%) patients; 11 (61%) of these occurred after DOL 2. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in outcomes other than more recurrent nerve injury and decreased LOS with EA/TEF repair at older ages. Although repair beyond DOL 2 was safe from a respiratory standpoint, most gastric perforations occurred after this point. In the absence of contraindications or significantly reduced weekend capabilities, we recommend repair of EA/TEF by DOL 2. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Anastomotic leak occurs independently from microbiota shifts associated with surgical bowel preparation.

Following bowel surgery, infectious complications, including anastomotic leak (AL), remain major sources of morbidity and mortality. Bowel preparation is often administered with the assumption that gut decontamination reduces post-surgical complications. In this study, we tested this hypothesis using a murine model of colon surgery. The mice were fed either regular chow or a high-fat, high-sugar Western diet. The day before surgery, the mice received one of four interventions: water (control), mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotics (OA), or both MBP and OA. We found no differences in the rates of AL among the experimental groups, and diet did not appear to affect the outcomes. Exploratory analyses showed changes in the gut microbiome consistent with the different treatments, but investigations of fecal short-chain fatty acids and RNA sequencing of colonic tissue did not reveal specific effects of the treatments or the presence of AL. However, we did identify bacterial genera that may be causally associated with AL and developed a predictive index from stool samples as a marker for the presence of AL. Future research is needed to identify and validate a microbial predictive tool and to uncover the microbial-driven mechanisms that lead to AL.

Evaluation of the gastric conduit perfusion using indocyanine green in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Objective: Indocyanine green has been used in the assessment of the gastric conduit perfusion in thoracoscopic esophagectomy to prevent malperfusion-associated anastomotic leak. This study aims to evaluate the initial results of investigating the gastric conduit perfusion with indocyanine green in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Patients and methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out on 54 esophageal cancer patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction. The blood flow in the gastric conduit was observed using an infrared camera and indocyanine green after completion of the conduit and after tunneling the conduit through the mediastinum to the neck. Results: The gastric conduit width and length were 5.2 ± 0.3 cm, and 31.5 ± 1.6 cm, respectively. The length of the gastric conduit from the junction between the right and left gastroepiploic to the point where the distal end of the gastric conduit still has a vascular pulse was 11.9 ± 4.3 cm. Seventeen patients (31.5%) had poor blood supply at the distal end of the gastric conduit, with indocyanine green appearance time ⩾ 60 s, in whom anastomotic leaks occurred in five patients (9.3%). The lack of connection between the right and left gastroepiploic vessels was associated with poor blood supply of the distal gastric conduit (p = 0.04). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed association between the time of indocyanine green appearance at the distal gastric conduit and the risk of anastomotic leak (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.10-3.60, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Investigation of gastric conduit perfusion using indocyanine green in gastric conduit reconstruction detected 31.5% of patients with poor blood supply at the distal end of the conduit, in whom 9.3% had anastomotic leak. The longer indocyanine green appearance time in the distal gastric conduit (segment BC), was associated with the higher rate of the anastomotic leak.

Major coronary artery calcifications as predictors of postoperative complications in Ivor Lewis esophagectomies: a five-year retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the relationship between preoperative arterial calcifications and postoperative outcomes after Ivor Lewis esophagectomies. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of Ivor Lewis esophagectomies from 2013 to 2018. Preoperative CT imaging was reviewed, and arterial calcifications were graded (absent, minor, or major) in various locations. The primary outcome included major complications (defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification III-V) and the secondary outcomes were 90-day reoperations, readmissions, and mortality. Significant associations (p < 0.05) between calcifications and outcomes on univariable analysis were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratios, OR; 95% confidence intervals, CI). RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent esophagectomies from 2013 to 2018 (79% male, 90% White, median age 68 years), and 85% were classified as ASA III. Ninety-four patients had accessible preoperative imaging. Arterial calcifications in specific areas were observed: 82 in coronary arteries (major in 33 patients), 54 in the aortic valve, 78 in supra-aortic arteries, 79 in the thoracic aorta, 82 in the abdominal aorta, and 71 in common iliac. Furthermore, 60 patients exhibited celiac axis calcifications, with 40 patients classified as major. Twenty-five patients experienced major complications. Anastomotic leak occurred in two patients, and graft necrosis occurred in one patient. Ninety-day readmission was 10%, reoperation was 12%, and mortality was 4%. On univariable analysis, major coronary artery calcifications were significantly associated with major complications (OR 4.04; 95% CI 1.34-12.16; p = 0.02) and 90-day readmissions (OR 8.20; 95% CI 1.01-68.47; p = 0.04). However, no significant associations were identified between 90-day reoperations or mortality and arterial calcifications. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that preoperative coronary calcifications increase the risk of postoperative complications, as this may be a surrogate of overall health. Nonetheless, the correlation between splanchnic calcifications and postoperative outcomes needs further exploration.

A case report of an early gastrocolic fistula following Roux-en Y gastric bypass, a unique and uncommon complication.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Gastrocolic fistula (GCF) following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is uncommon. Usually it presents late with nonspecific symptoms and originates from the gastrojejunostomy (GJ). Management of such complication can be surgical, but endoscopic management can be implemented in selected patients. To our knowledge this is the first case reporting an early GCF originating from gastric pouch successfully managed with endoscopic stenting. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old female, with surgical history of open vertical band gastroplasty (VBG), complaining of weight regain and reflux symptoms. The plan was to laparoscopically convert VBG to RYGB. Two weeks after, she presented unusually with only fatigue and epigastric pain. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Leak was suspected and needed to be ruled out. The patient was presenting in an unusual presentation, i.e. vitally stable and only fatigued. Workup including laboratories, computed tomography, and endoscopy confirmed staple line disruption with development of early GCF. Management included endoscopic fully covered stent, total preantral nutrition. CONCLUSION: With a well-trained team and the availability of expertise, GCF can be managed with endoscopic stents.

The anastomotic leak triad: preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine perioperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leak (AL) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and its association with cancer recurrence and overall survival. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of electronic health record data included patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer between September 2013 and July 2023 at a tertiary center. The primary outcome was AL after esophagectomy, whereas the secondary outcomes included time to cancer recurrence and overall survival. Perioperative patient factors were evaluated to determine their associations with the primary and the secondary outcomes. Propensity score-matched logistic regression assessed the associations between perioperative factors and AL. Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared cancer recurrence and overall survival by AL. RESULTS: A total of 251 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer were included in the analysis; 15 (6%) developed AL. Anemia, hospital complications, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmissions significantly differed from those with and without AL (P = .037, <.001, <.001, and.016, respectively). Moreover, 30- and 90-day mortality were not statistically affected by the presence of AL (P = .417 and 0.456, respectively). Logistic regression modeling showed drug history and anemia were significantly associated with AL (P = .022 and.011, respectively). The presence of AL did not significantly impact cancer recurrence or overall survival (P = .439 and.301, respectively). CONCLUSION: The etiology of AL is multifactorial. Moreover, AL is significantly associated with drug history, preoperative anemia, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmissions, but it was not significantly associated with 30- or 90-day mortality, cancer recurrence, or overall survival. Patients should be optimized before undergoing MIE with special consideration for correcting anemia. Ongoing research is needed to identify more modifiable risk factors to minimize AL development and its associated morbidity.