Hereditary Gastric Cancer Is Linked With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a bacterium which chronically infects the stomach of approximately half the world's population, is a risk factor for the development of gastric cancer (GC). However, the underlying mechanism whereby H. pylori infection induces GC development remains unclear. Intermittent injection of the H. pylori cytotoxin-associated gene A antigen (CagA) protein into its host cell inhibits nuclear translocation of BRCA1/BRCA2, DNA repair proteins involved in the development of breast cancer/ovarian cancer. Interestingly, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is associated with GC development. Here, we aimed to clarify the molecular link between H. pylori infection, BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs), GC and higher GC incidence in HBOC families. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from Japanese patients undergoing precision treatment using cancer genomic medicine. Results: We found a higher GC incidence in HBOC families having germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) of BRCA1/2 (2.95% vs. 0.78% in non-HBOC families). Next, we found that 96.1% of H. pylori-infected patients received cancer genomic medicine for advanced GC, and > 16% advanced GC patients had gBRCA2 PVs. Furthermore, expressing wild-type BRCA1/2 in Gan mice (a mouse model of human GC) inhibited GC development. Thus, gBRAC1/2 PVs and H. pylori infection synergistically increase the risk of GC development. Conclusion: Our study highlights the need to investigate the potential of therapeutic agents against BRCA1/2 PVs to avoid the development of GC in HBOC families. In addition, our results suggest that poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors could potentially inhibit GC development and progression with gBRCA1/2 PVs.

BRCA-associated hereditary male cancers: can gender affect the prevalence and spectrum of germline pathogenic variants?

Introduction: Although hereditary male neoplasms are quite rare, individuals harbouring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) may have a risk of developing tumours associated with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome, including male breast (MBC), prostate (PCa) and pancreatic (PC) cancers, and melanoma. Women and men showed a comparable genetic architecture of cancer susceptibility, but there are some gender-specific features. Since little is known about cancer genetic susceptibility in male population, our study was aimed at investigating the frequency of BRCA1/2 PVs in men with HBOC syndrome-associated tumors, in order to understand whether differences in gender may reflect in the prevalence and spectrum of germline alterations. Patients and methods: We retrospectively collected and analysed clinical information of 352 HBOC-associated male cancer patients genetically tested for germline BRCA1/2 PVs by Next-Generation Sequencing analysis, enrolled, from February 2018 to January 2024, at the "Regional Center for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of rare and heredo-familial tumors of adults" of the University-Hospital Policlinico "P. Giaccone" of Palermo (Italy). Results: Our investigation revealed that 7.4% of patients was carrier of a germline BRCA PV, with an almost total prevalence of BRCA2 alterations. In particular, 65.4% of BRCA-positive patients developed MBC, 19.2% had PC, 11.6% developed PCa, and only 3.8% had melanoma. Specifically, MBC individuals showed a BRCA-associated genetic predisposition in 17% of cases, whereas patients with PCa or PC exhibited a lower frequency of BRCA2 PVs, taking into account the current national criteria for access to germline genetic testing. Discussion: Our study showed a high heterogeneity in prevalence of germline BRCA2 PVs among men which could reflect a potential gender-specific genetic heterogeneity. Therefore, BRCA-associated male tumours could be due to BRCA2 PVs different from those usually detected in women. In the event that it is demonstrated, in future, that male cancers are genetically distinct entities from those female this could improve personalized risk evaluation and guide therapeutic choices for patients of both sexes, in order to obtain a gender equality in cancer care.

Enhanced cancer cell proliferation and aggressive phenotype counterbalance in breast cancer with high BRCA1 gene expression.

PURPOSE: While comprehensive research exists on the mutation of the DNA repair gene BRCA1, limited information is available regarding the clinical significance of BRCA1 gene expression. Given that cancer cell proliferation is aggrevated by DNA repair, we hypothesized that high BRCA1 gene expression breast cancer (BC) might be linked with aggressive tumor biology and poor clinical outcomes. METHODS: The cohorts: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 1069), METABRIC (n = 1903), and SCAN-B (n = 3273) were utilzed to obtain data of 6245 BC patients. RESULTS: BC patients without BRCA1 mutation exhibited higher BRCA1 expression, which was associated with DNA repair functionality. However, no such correlation was observed with BRCA2 expression. The association of high BRCA1 expression with cancer cell proliferation was evidenced by significant enrichment of cell proliferation-related gene sets, higher histological grade, and proliferation score. Furthermore, increased levels of homologous recombination deficiency, intratumoral heterogeneity, and altered fractions were associated with high BRCA1 expression. Moreover, BC with high BRCA1 expression exhibited reduced infiltration of dendritic cells and CD8 T-cells, while showing increased infiltration of Th1 cells. Surprisingly, BRCA1 expression was not associated with the survival of BC irrespective of the subtypes. Conversely, BC with low BRCA1 expression enriched cancer aggravating pathway gene sets, such as Cancer Stem Cell-related signaling (NOTCH and HEDGEHOG), Angiogenesis, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Inflammatory Response, and TGF-beta signaling. CONCLUSION: Despite being linked to heightened proliferation of cancer cells and unassertive phenotype, BRCA1 expression did not show any association with survival in BC.

Unraveling the Role of BRCA1 variants in Dysregulation of Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Mechanisms in Breast Cancer.

Objective: To screen BRCA1 gene variants and predict potential role of the identified variants in breast cancer. Method: This case-control study included two hundred and fifty breast cancer patients and equal healthy individuals from the Federal Breast Cancer Screening Centre, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad from March 2021- January 2023. Demographic data was collected through questionnaires and clinical data was assessed using mammograms, ultrasound, histopathology and immunohistochemistry reports. Polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing approach were used to detect variants in BRCA1 gene. In-silico analyses were carried out to predict mutation effect, miRNA binding site alterations and change in mRNA structure and stability. Results: Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most prevalent type of breast cancer. Old age [OR: 2.8149 (1.5995 to 4.9538) p value = 0.0003] and family history [OR: 4.3186 (1.7336 to 10.7581) p value = 0.001] were significant breast cancer risk. Six variants were identified. Two novel missense variants, Chr17:43082553A>T and Chr17:43093710A>T were predicted deleterious as these disrupted interaction with PALB2 and importin alpha's NLS2 site, respectively. In silico analysis predicted the loss of hsa-miR-1179 binding site due to variant Chr17:43093220T>C. Moreover, four variants were predicted to affect the mRNA structure and stability. Conclusion: Two novel variants were predicted to be pathogenic. In-silico analysis predicted the loss of miRNA binding site along with change in mRNA secondary structure plus stability, possible mechanisms for oncogenesis. Further, expressional studies are required to confirm BRCA1 gene dysregulation in breast cancer due to these variants.

BRCA1 foci test as a predictive biomarker of olaparib response in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft models.

Standard therapy for high-grade ovarian carcinoma includes surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). Deficiency in homologous recombination repair (HRD) characterizes almost half of high-grade ovarian carcinomas and is due to genetic and epigenetic alterations in genes involved in HR repair, mainly BRCA1/BRCA2, and predicts response to PARPi. The academic and commercial tests set up to define the HRD status of the tumor rely on DNA sequencing analysis, while functional tests such as the RAD51 foci assay are currently under study, but have not been validated yet and are available for patients. In a well-characterized ovarian carcinoma patient-derived xenograft platform whose response to cisplatin and olaparib, a PARPi, is known, we assessed the association between the BRCA1 foci score, determined in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor slices with an immunofluorescence technique, and other HRD biomarkers and explored the potential of the BRCA1 foci test to predict tumors' response to cisplatin and olaparib. The BRCA1 foci score was associated with both tumors' HRD status and RAD51 foci score. A low BRCA1 foci score predicted response to olaparib and cisplatin, while a high score was associated with resistance to therapy. As we recently published that a low RAD51 foci score predicted olaparib sensitivity in our xenobank, we combined the two scores and showed that the predictive value was better than with the single tests. This study reports for the first time the capacity of the BRCA1 foci test to identify HRD ovarian carcinomas and possibly predict response to olaparib.

Breast Cancer High-Penetrance Genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations Using Next-Generation Sequencing Among Iraqi Kurdish Women.

Background BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the main high-penetrance genes that are responsible for most cases of inherited breast cancer. The present study aimed to detect the frequencies of inherited breast cancer caused by BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes among Kurdish breast cancer patients, including all the exome of these two genes, using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Methodology Seventy women who were diagnosed with breast cancer and registered at Nanakali Hospital in Erbil, Iraq, were included. Blood samples were collected for molecular testing (polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) targeting all exomes of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. All exome regions are sequenced by NGS using the Miseq system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). Obtained data were visualized using Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV 2.3 Software, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA). Data were interpreted based on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Clinically Relevant Variation (ClinVar) archives, and other databases. Results Among 70 samples, more than forty-two variants have been detected, 20 on BRCA1 and 22 on BRCA2. Regarding clinical significance, six (14.28%) variants were pathogenic, four of them on the BRCA1 gene, which were: c.3607C>T, c.3544C>T, c.68_69del, and c.224_227delAAAG, and two pathogenic variants were on BRCA2 gene: c.100G>T, and c.1813delA. Also, two (4.76%) variants were conflict interpretations of pathogenicity, one (2.38%) was a variant of uncertain significant VUS, and the rest 29 (69%) variants were benign. In addition, four new variants (three in BRCA1 and one in BRCA2 gene), never previously reported, were identified. Conclusions In conclusion, analyzing the BRCA1/2 genes provide a better prediction for the risk of developing breast cancer in the future. Variant types and frequencies differ among different populations and ethnicities, the common mutations worldwide may not be prevalent in the Kurdish population. The current research findings will be useful for future screening studies of these two genes in the Kurdish population.

Neoadjuvant talazoparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation-positive, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: exploration of tumor BRCA mutational status.

BACKGROUND: Talazoparib monotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed activity in the neoadjuvant setting in the phase II NEOTALA study (NCT03499353). These biomarker analyses further assessed the mutational landscape of the patients enrolled in the NEOTALA study. METHODS: Baseline tumor tissue from the NEOTALA study was tested retrospectively using FoundationOne®CDx. To further hypothesis-driven correlative analyses, agnostic heat-map visualizations of the FoundationOne®CDx tumor dataset were used to assess overall mutational landscape and identify additional candidate predictive biomarkers of response. RESULTS: All patients enrolled (N = 61) had TNBC. In the biomarker analysis population, 75.0% (39/52) and 25.0% (13/52) of patients exhibited BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Strong concordance (97.8%) was observed between tumor BRCA and germline BRCA mutations, and 90.5% (38/42) of patients with tumor BRCA mutations evaluable for somatic-germline-zygosity were predicted to exhibit BRCA loss of heterozygosity (LOH). No patients had non-BRCA germline DNA damage response (DDR) gene variants with known/likely pathogenicity, based on a panel of 14 non-BRCA DDR genes. Ninety-eight percent of patients had TP53 mutations. Genomic LOH, assessed continuously or categorically, was not associated with response. CONCLUSION: The results from this exploratory biomarker analysis support the central role of BRCA and TP53 mutations in tumor pathobiology. Furthermore, these data support assessing germline BRCA mutational status for molecular eligibility for talazoparib in patients with TNBC.

Molecular landscape of borderline ovarian tumours: A systematic review.

Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) show intriguing characteristics distinguishing them from other ovarian tumours. The aim of the systematic review was to analyse the spectrum of molecular changes found in BOTs and discuss their significance in the context of the overall therapeutic approach. The systematic review included articles published between 2000 and 2023 in the databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. After a detailed analysis of the available publications, we qualified for the systematic review: 28 publications on proto-oncogenes: BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, ERBB2, and PIK3CA, 20 publications on tumour suppressor genes: BRCA1/2, ARID1A, CHEK2, PTEN, 4 on adhesion molecules: CADM1, 8 on proteins: B-catenin, claudin-1, and 5 on glycoproteins: E-Cadherin. In addition, in the further part of the systematic review, we included eight publications on microsatellite instability and three describing loss of heterozygosity in BOT. Molecular changes found in BOTs can vary on a case-by-case basis, identifying carcinogenic mutations through molecular analysis and developing targeted therapies represent significant advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian malignancies. Molecular studies have contributed significantly to our understanding of BOT pathogenesis, but substantial research is still required to elucidate the relationship between ovarian neoplasms and extraneous disease, identify accurate prognostic indicators, and develop targeted therapeutic approaches.

Mutation spectra of the BRCA1/2 genes in human breast and ovarian cancer and germline.

Annotating genomic sequence alterations is sometimes a difficult decision, particularly in missense variants with uncertain pathogenic significance and also in those presumed as germline pathogenic variants. We here suggest that mutation spectrum may also be useful for judging them. From the public databases, 982 BRCA1/1861 BRCA2 germline missense variants and 294 BRCA1/420 BRCA2 somatic missense variants were obtained. We then compared their mutation spectra, i.e., the frequencies of two transition- and four transversion-type mutations, in each category. Intriguingly, in BRCA1 variants, A:T to C:G transversion, which was relatively frequent in the germline, was extremely rare in somatic, particularly breast cancer, cells (p = .03). Conversely, A:T to T:A transversion was most infrequent in the germline, but not rare in somatic cells. Thus, BRCA1 variants with A:T to T:A transversion may be suspected as somatic, and those with A:T to C:G as being in the germline. These tendencies of mutation spectrum may also suggest the biological and chemical origins of the base alterations. On the other hand, unfortunately, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were not distinguishable by mutation spectrum. Our findings warrant further and more detailed studies.

Spectrum of germline pathogenic variants in Brazilian hereditary breast/ovarian cancer cases.

PURPOSE: To define the spectrum of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) and copy number variant (CNV) in cancer susceptibility genes to the burden of breast and ovarian cancer (BC, OvC) in high-risk Brazilians in Minas Gerais with health insurance, southeast Brazil, undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT). METHODS: Genotyping eligible individuals with health insurance in the Brazilian healthcare system for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome to undergo molecular testing for 44 or 141-gene panels, a decision that was insurance driven. RESULTS: Overall, 701 individuals clinically defined as high BC/OvC risk, underwent MGPT from 1/2021 to 10/2022, with ~ 50% genotyped with a 44-gene panel and the rest with a 141-gene panel. Overall, 16.4% and 22.6% of genotyped individuals harbored PVs using 44-gene and the 141 gene panel, respectively. The most frequently mutated genes were: BRCA2 (3.7%); BRCA1 (3.6%) and monoallelic MUTYH (3.1%). CONCLUSION: The rate of PVs detected in high-risk individuals in this study was twice the 10% threshold used in Brazilian health guidelines. MGPT doubled the detection rate of PVs in cancer susceptibility genes in high-risk individuals compared with BRCA1/BRCA2 genotyping alone. The spectrum of PVs in Southern Brazil is diverse, with few recurring variants such as TP53 (0.6%), suggesting regional founder effects. The use of MGPT in hereditary cancer in Minas Gerais significantly increased the detection rate of P/LPVs compared to existing guidelines and should be considered as the primary genotyping modality in assessing hereditary cancer risk in Brazil.

Incidence of Peritoneal Cancer Following Oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the incidence of primary peritoneal cancer following preventive bilateral oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS: A total of 6,310 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who underwent a preventive bilateral oophorectomy were followed for a mean of 7.8 years from oophorectomy. The 20-year cumulative incidence of peritoneal cancer post-oophorectomy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A left-truncated Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with the age at oophorectomy, year of oophorectomy, and family history of ovarian cancer as well as hormonal and reproductive risk factors. RESULTS: Fifty-five women developed primary peritoneal cancer (n = 45 in BRCA1, 8 in BRCA2, and 2 in women with a mutation in both genes). Their mean age at oophorectomy was 48.9 years. The annual risk of peritoneal cancer was 0.14% for women with a BRCA1 mutation and was 0.06% for women with a BRCA2 mutation. The 20-year cumulative risk of peritoneal cancer from the date of oophorectomy was 2.7% for BRCA1 carriers and was 0.9% for BRCA2 mutation carriers. There were no peritoneal cancers in BRCA1 carriers who had the operation before age 35 or in BRCA2 carriers who had the operation before age 45. CONCLUSIONS: For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the annual risk of peritoneal cancer for 20 years post-oophorectomy is 0.14% per year. The risk is lower for BRCA2 carriers (0.06% per year).

Digenic Inheritance of Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes in Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and CHEK2 are known cancer predisposition genes (CPGs), but tumor risk in patients with simultaneous pathogenic variants (PVs) in CPGs remains largely unknown. In this study, we describe six patients from five families with multiple cancers who coinherited a combination of PVs in these genes. METHODS: PVs were identified using NGS DNA sequencing and were confirmed by Sanger. RESULTS: Families 1, 2, and 3 presented PVs in BRCA2 and ATM, family 4 in BRCA2 and BRCA1, and family 5 in BRCA2 and CHEK2. PVs were identified using NGS DNA sequencing and were confirmed by Sanger. The first family included patients with kidney, prostate, and breast cancer, in addition to pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In the second family, a female had breast cancer, while a male from the third family had prostate, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. The fourth family included a male with pancreatic cancer, and the fifth family a female with breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The early age of diagnosis and the development of multiple cancers in the reported patients indicate a very high risk of cancer in double-heterozygous patients associated with PVs in HR-related CPGs. Therefore, in families with patients who differ from other family members in terms of phenotype, age of diagnosis, or type of cancer, the cascade testing needs to include the study of other CPGs.

[18F]F-Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Radiotracers for Imaging PARP Expression and Their Potential Clinical Applications in Oncology.

Including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in managing patients with inoperable tumors has significantly improved outcomes. The PARP inhibitors hamper single-strand deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair by trapping poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) at sites of DNA damage, forming a non-functional "PARP enzyme-inhibitor complex" leading to cell cytotoxicity. The effect is more pronounced in the presence of PARP upregulation and homologous recombination (HR) deficiencies such as breast cancer-associated gene (BRCA1/2). Hence, identifying HR-deficiencies by genomic analysis-for instance, BRCA1/2 used in triple-negative breast cancer-should be a part of the selection process for PARP inhibitor therapy. Published data suggest BRCA1/2 germline mutations do not consistently predict favorable responses to PARP inhibitors, suggesting that other factors beyond tumor mutation status may be at play. A variety of factors, including tumor heterogeneity in PARP expression and intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors, may be contributing factors. This justifies the use of an additional tool for appropriate patient selection, which is noninvasive, and capable of assessing whole-body in vivo PARP expression and evaluating PARP inhibitor pharmacokinetics as complementary to the currently available BRCA1/2 analysis. In this review, we discuss [18F]Fluorine PARP inhibitor radiotracers and their potential in the imaging of PARP expression and PARP inhibitor pharmacokinetics. To provide context we also briefly discuss possible causes of PARP inhibitor resistance or ineffectiveness. The discussion focuses on TNBC, which is a tumor type where PARP inhibitors are used as part of the standard-of-care treatment strategy.

BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 mRNA Expression as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer (BC) poses a challenge in establishing new treatment strategies and identifying new prognostic and predictive markers due to the extensive genetic heterogeneity of BC. Very few studies have investigated the impact of mRNA expression of these genes on the survival of BC patients. METHODS: We examined the impact of the mRNA expression of breast cancer gene type 1 (BRCA1), breast cancer gene type 2 (BRCA2), and partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) on the metastasis-free survival (MFS) of patients with early BC using microarray gene expression analysis. RESULTS: The study was performed in a cohort of 461 patients with a median age of 62 years at initial diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 147 months. We could show that the lower expression of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is significantly associated with longer MFS (p < 0.050). On the contrary, the lower expression of PALB2 was correlated with a shorter MFS (p = 0.049). Subgroup survival analysis identified the prognostic influence of mRNA expression for BRCA1 among patients with luminal-B-like BC and for BRCA2 and PALB2 in the subset of patients with luminal-A-like BC (p < 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: According to our observations, BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 expression might become valuable biomarkers of disease progression.

A Molecular Characterization of the Allelic Expression of the BRCA1 Founder Δ9-12 Pathogenic Variant and Its Potential Clinical Relevance in Hereditary Cancer.

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is a genetic condition that increases the risk of breast cancer by 80% and that of ovarian cancer by 40%. The most common pathogenic variants (PVs) causing HBOC occur in the BRCA1 gene, with more than 3850 reported mutations in the gene sequence. The prevalence of specific PVs in BRCA1 has increased across populations due to the effect of founder mutations. Therefore, when a founder mutation is identified, it becomes key to improving cancer risk characterization and effective screening protocols. The only founder mutation described in the Mexican population is the deletion of exons 9 to 12 of BRCA1 (BRCA1Δ9-12), and its description focuses on the gene sequence, but no transcription profiles have been generated for individuals who carry this gene. In this study, we describe the transcription profiles of cancer patients and healthy individuals who were heterozygous for PV BRCA1Δ9-12 by analyzing the differential expression of both alleles compared with the homozygous BRCA1 control group using RT-qPCR, and we describe the isoforms produced by the BRCA1 wild-type and BRCA1Δ9-12 alleles using nanopore long-sequencing. Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, our results showed a similar transcript expression of the wild-type allele between the healthy heterozygous group and the homozygous BRCA1 control group. An association between the recurrence and increased expression of both alleles in HBOC patients was also observed. An analysis of the sequences indicated four wild-type isoforms with diagnostic potential for discerning individuals who carry the PV BRCA1Δ9-12 and identifying which of them has developed cancer.

The Manchester Scoring System for predicting BRCA1/2 mutations underperforms in Arabic Omani breast cancer patients.

Risk assessment models that are applied to assess the lifetime risk of cancer and pathogenic variant risk are more commonly used in Western populations. Using these models, without validation, for non-Western populations has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the use and consistency of the Manchester Scoring System as a risk assessment model for the Omani population. A retrospective, file-based analysis was performed on breast cancer patients seen in a genomics department over a two-year period. Personal cancer history and family history were used to analyze the Manchester scores of 409 breast and/or cancer patients. The results show that, overall, the Manchester scores were low. If this risk assessment model had been used to determine eligibility for a priori service and genetic testing decisions, 12 BRCA pathogenic cases would have been missed. At this time, the Manchester Scoring System does not seem to be the best risk assessment model for use in the Omani population, unless the eligibility threshold of ≥6 is used, which could provide a better sensitivity for the Omani population. We propose using concepts of the Manchester Scoring model to create a scoring system that is more suitable for the Omani and Arabic population.

Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in Young BRCA Carriers With Breast Cancer.

Approximately 10% to 15% of breast cancer cases in young women are diagnosed in patients harbouring germline (g) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BReast CAncer 1 (BRCA1) or BReast CAncer 2 (BRCA2) genes. Preclinical and clinical studies showed a potential negative effect of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) PVs on ovarian reserve and reproductive potential, even before starting anticancer therapies. The aim of this article is to summarize the current literature on the fertility potential of young gBRCA1/2 PVs carriers with breast cancer and the risk of gonadotoxicity associated with anticancer treatments. Moreover, we describe the available evidence on the efficacy of fertility preservation techniques in young gBRCA1/2 PVs carriers and the safety data on having a pregnancy after breast cancer treatment.

A case of BRCA1-mutated giant pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma successfully treated with modified FOLFIRINOX therapy and radical resection.

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare type of pancreatic cancer; further, its pathogenesis and treatment strategies remain unclear. We report the case of a 70-year-old man who presented with a chief complaint of abdominal distention. Computed tomography scans revealed a large lobulated mass (tumor diameter: 150 mm) in the pancreatic body tail, which was diagnosed as a PACC through endoscopic ultrasonography fine needle aspiration. The other imaging modalities did not reveal distant metastases, and the tumor was classified as resectable. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was planned after staging laparoscopy ruled out microscopic distant metastasis. First-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel failed due to tumor growth and worsening abdominal distention. Evaluation using the BRACAnalysis® device indicated that the patient was positive for BRCA1 mutation. Second-line modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) resulted in a marked decrease in elastase 1 levels; moreover, a partial antitumor response was observed, which prompted radical resection. After distal pancreatectomy, the patient has survived for 3.5 years without recurrence. BRCA-mutated pancreatic cancer is more likely to respond to mFFX, including platinum, and BRCA mutations have been reported to be highly prevalent in PACC. It is important to evaluate the presence of BRCA mutations in patients with PACC prior to treatment.

Parallel DNA/RNA NGS Using an Identical Target Enrichment Panel in the Analysis of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition.

Germline DNA testing using the next-gene-ration sequencing (NGS) technology has become the analytical standard for the diagnostics of hereditary diseases, including cancer. Its increasing use places high demands on correct sample identification, independent confirmation of prioritized variants, and their functional and clinical interpretation. To streamline these processes, we introduced parallel DNA and RNA capture-based NGS using identical capture panel CZECANCA, which is routinely used for DNA analysis of hereditary cancer predisposition. Here, we present the analytical workflow for RNA sample processing and its analytical and diagnostic performance. Parallel DNA/RNA analysis allowed credible sample identification by calculating the kinship coefficient. The RNA capture-based approach enriched transcriptional targets for the majority of clinically relevant cancer predisposition genes to a degree that allowed analysis of the effect of identified DNA variants on mRNA processing. By comparing the panel and whole-exome RNA enrichment, we demonstrated that the tissue-specific gene expression pattern is independent of the capture panel. Moreover, technical replicates confirmed high reproducibility of the tested RNA analysis. We concluded that parallel DNA/RNA NGS using the identical gene panel is a robust and cost-effective diagnostic strategy. In our setting, it allows routine analysis of 48 DNA/RNA pairs using NextSeq 500/550 Mid Output Kit v2.5 (150 cycles) in a single run with sufficient coverage to analyse 226 cancer predisposition and candidate ge-nes. This approach can replace laborious Sanger confirmatory sequencing, increase testing turnaround, reduce analysis costs, and improve interpretation of the impact of variants by analysing their effect on mRNA processing.

Unlocking the Potential of Rucaparib: A Case Series on Its Impact in Metastatic Breast Cancer With Mutations.

Triple-negative breast cancer poses distinct challenges because it lacks hormone receptors and does not have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification. Mutations in BRCA1/2 genes are associated with homologous recombination deficiency tumors, rendering them susceptible to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Notably, germline BRCA1/2 mutations are linked to distinct clinical features, including an increased risk of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and a younger age of onset. PARP inhibitors such as olaparib and talazoparib have demonstrated efficacy in patients with BRCA mutations, leading to FDA approvals for ovarian and breast cancers. However, there remains limited data on PARP inhibitor response rates in patients with somatic BRCA mutations. This case series demonstrates the use of rucaparib in metastatic breast cancer patients harboring both germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, discussing the advancing landscape of targeted therapies in breast cancer management. In the first case, despite undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy, disease progression ensued. However, transitioning to rucaparib yielded a remarkable complete response lasting over two years, highlighting its efficacy in this clinical setting. Similarly, in the second case, rucaparib demonstrated effectiveness as a maintenance therapy subsequent to achieving a near-complete response to taxane and platinum-based treatment. These findings emphasize the promising role of rucaparib in managing metastatic breast cancer in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, further contributing to the expanding armamentarium of targeted therapies in breast cancer care.