Comparison of efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based anti-platelet therapy with non-sarpogrelate-based anti-platelet therapy following arterial endovascular therapy: a systematic review.

Objective: Sarpogrelate is a selective serotonin/5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor antagonist used in the management of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The drug has emerged as a promising choice for medical management post-endovascular therapy (EVT) due to its anti-platelet aggregation, vasoconstriction, and anti-vascular smooth muscle proliferation properties. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based APT following arterial EVTs in PAD. Material and methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane were systematically searched from inception to December 2023. Any randomized controlled trial studies in English that evaluated the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based APT after EVT in patients with PAD was included. Data on the restenosis rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and safety parameters were extracted and studied. The pooled differences in efficacy and safety parameters between sarpogrelate-based APT and non-sarpogrelate-based APT was calculated using the relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI. Results: A total of three randomized controlled trials were included out of 354 articles obtained through a literature search. No significant differences were observed in the risk of restenosis (RR=0.74, 95% CI= 0.55-1.00, P=0.954) and TLR (RR=0.76, 95% CI= 0.47-1.23, P=0.476) among patients being treated with sarpogrelate and non-sarpogrelate-based APT. Likewise, sarpogrelate-based APT had a similar safety profile as non-sarpogrelate-based APT. Conclusion: Sarpogrelate-based APT can be considered an effective alternative to clopidogrel-based conventional APT after EVTs. However, there is a huge need for a larger multicenter, multinational, and multiethnic global trial with sufficient participants in order to produce generalizable findings.

Optimized Methodology to Produce Platelet-Rich Plasma and Perform Platelet Aggregation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND:  Inter-individual differences in clopidogrel metabolism and platelet counts within platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intrigued us to optimize light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) assay in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients administered with clopidogrel and ticagrelor. The objective of the study was to optimize PRP preparation using separating gel PRP tubes to perform LTA among CAD patients on clopidogrel and ticagrelor. METHODOLOGY:  Initially, we optimized PRP preparation and platelet aggregation (PA) on healthy controls. To validate the protocol, we recruited 10 healthy controls and 28 CAD patients, comprising 16 on clopidogrel and 12 on ticagrelor regimen. Bio-X, India, supplied PRP tubes (9 mL) with 3.2% sodium citrate. PRP and autologous platelet-poor plasma (PPP) were prepared by centrifugation at 151 g for seven minutes and 3,780 g for 10 minutes, respectively. LTA was performed using platelet aggregometer TA-4V (Stago, Asnières-sur-Seine, France). Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (10 µM) was used as an agonist. RESULTS:  The mean maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) among controls, clopidogrel patients, and ticagrelor patients were 55.161±13.69%, 53.17±22%, and 35.84±20.79% (p=0.042), respectively. The mean platelet volumes among groups were 9.34±2.51 fL, 7.60±0.85 fL, and 10.99±1.62 fL (p≤0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION:  We successfully optimized PRP preparation for the LTA assay using a PRP tube. Its application to measure PA routinely in a cardiology clinic seems propitious.

Real-world evaluation of CYP2C19 guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using CYP2C19 genotype to guide selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm treatment with a flow diversion stent in a real-world clinical setting.Patients & methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in 112 patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair with flow-diversion stenting from 2014 to 2021. Data were abstracted from health records. The frequency of clopidogrel or alternative therapy (ticagrelor or prasugrel) use was compared across CYP2C19 status (intermediate or poor metabolizer [IM/PM] vs. normal, rapid, or ultrarapid metabolizer [NM/RM/UM]).Results: In the study population, CYP2C19 genotype testing was performed on 110 (98.2%) patients; of these, 106 (97.2%) had results available prior to the stent procedure and 28 (25.5%) were IM/PMs. Alternative therapy was used more frequently in IM/PMs compared with NM/RM/UMs (57.1 vs. 8.5%, respectively, p < 0.0001). The frequency of thromboembolic events over 12 months did not significantly differ across clopidogrel-treated IM/PMs, clopidogrel-treated NM/RM/UMs and patients on alternative therapy (p = 0.352); although, event numbers were low.Conclusion: A pre-emptive CYP2C19 genotyping strategy to guide antiplatelet therapy selection in intracranial aneurysm repair patients is feasible in a real-world clinical setting. Larger studies are needed to assess the impact on clinical outcomes.

This study offers new insight into how CYP2C19 genotyping can be used to more precisely select antiplatelet therapy in neurovascular disease patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair with flow diversion stenting.

ADVERSE EVENTS in PATIENTS with CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE TAKING PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS.

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) rank among the most frequently prescribed medications to treat acid-related diseases. Mounting concerns surround the potential for serious adverse events, including cardiovascular events, associated with their prolonged use/misuse. AREAS COVERED: This comprehensive review explores cardiovascular adverse events linked to PPI use among high-risk cardiovascular patients. A structured search was conducted on PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: Many patients with cardiovascular disease who require antiplatelet treatment will require long-term PPI treatment. Interpreting the published data is not straightforward. First, because there is no plausible mechanistic explanation for PPIs to induce cardiovascular events apart from the potential interaction with the metabolism of thienopyridines. Although several observational studies have shown an increased cardiovascular risk and mortality in patients taking long-term PPIs, most available clinical trials and meta-analyses of available studies do not. However, the absence of firm evidence of this link does not necessarily imply that this association does not exist, and other hypothesis must be explored. Anemia is a common event in patients who take antiplatelet therapy and PPIs, and it is a factor associated with cardiovascular events and death. Anemia in these patients is often attributed to erosive lesions of the small intestine, where PPI may play a key role by modifying the microbiota.

Role of ticagrelor in the peri-thrombolytic phase for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comprehensive review.

Recent years have seen ticagrelor, a potent P2Y12 inhibitor, emerge as a significant advancement in the peri-thrombolytic management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), offering a promising alternative to traditional antiplatelet drugs like clopidogrel. This review critically examines the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor during the peri-thrombolytic phase in STEMI patients, drawing on evidence from key clinical trials such as TREAT and MIRTOS, as well as other relevant studies. These investigations underscore ticagrelor's superior platelet inhibition capabilities, which are crucial for minimizing thrombotic complications post-thrombolysis without increasing bleeding risks. Despite its potential, clopidogrel remains the guideline-recommended choice for such patients, leaving the appropriateness of ticagrelor in this context open to debate. By summarizing the current evidence and identifying gaps in our understanding, this study advocates for targeted research to clarify the long-term benefits and optimal deployment of ticagrelor, highlighting its evolving significance in cardiovascular care.

Switching from cangrelor to oral P2Y12 inhibitors: a focused review on drug-drug interactions.

INTRODUCTION: . Cangrelor, the only intravenous platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is characterized by a prompt and potent platelet inhibition, with a rapid offset of action. Large-scale clinical trials have shown that cangrelor reduce peri-procedural thrombotic events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and not pre-treated with an oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, high P2Y12 receptor occupancy provided by cangrelor raises concerns for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when transitioning to oral P2Y12 inhibitors. AREAS COVERED: An understanding of the pharmacology of cangrelor and oral P2Y12 inhibitors is essential to define the optimal approach to transition to oral P2Y12 inhibitors without incurring the risk of DDIs. This review, based on a thorough literature search in major scientific databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science), synthesizes the pharmacology of cangrelor and the oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, providing the rationale for the occurrence of DDIs and strategies to avoid such risk. EXPERT OPINION: The timing of transition from cangrelor to oral P2Y12 inhibitors plays a crucial role in the occurrence of DDIs, especially with clopidogrel and prasugrel. Currently, no evidence suggests a DDI when transitioning to ticagrelor. Adhering to product labels and guideline recommendations is crucial for optimizing safety and efficacy of cangrelor.

Paraoxonase-1 as a Cardiovascular Biomarker in Caribbean Hispanic Patients Treated with Clopidogrel: Abundance and Functionality.

Clopidogrel, a prescription drug to reduce ischemic events in cardiovascular patients, has been extensively studied in mostly European individuals but not among Caribbean Hispanics. This study evaluated the low abundance and reduced activity of paraoxonase-1 (PON1) in clopidogrel-resistant patients as a predictive risk biomarker of poor responders and disease severity in this population. Thirty-six patients on clopidogrel (cases divided into poor and normal responders) were enrolled, along with 11 cardiovascular patients with no clopidogrel indications (positive control) and 13 healthy volunteers (negative control). Residual on-treatment platelet reactivity unit (PRU), PON1 abundance by Western blotting, and PON1 activity by enzymatic assays were measured. PON1 genotyping and computational haplotype phasing were performed on 512 DNA specimens for two genetic loci (rs662 and rs854560). No statistical differences in mean relative PON1 abundance were found among the groups (p > 0.05). However, a significantly lower enzymatic activity was found in poor responders (10.57 ± 6.79 µU/mL) when compared to controls (22.66 ± 8.30 µU/mL and 22.21 ± 9.66 µU/mL; p = 0.004). PON1 activity among carriers of the most prevalent PON1 haplotype (AA|AA) was significantly lower than in wild types (7.90 µU/mL vs. 22.03 µU/mL; p = 0.005). Our findings suggested that PON1 is a potential biomarker of cardiovascular disease severity in Caribbean Hispanics.

Genetic Determinants of Response to P2Y12 Inhibitors and Clinical Implications.

The CYP2C19 enzyme metabolizes clopidogrel, a prodrug, to its active form. Approximately 30% of individuals inherit a loss-of-function (LoF) polymorphism in the CYP2C19 gene, leading to reduced formation of the active clopidogrel metabolite. Reduced clopidogrel effectiveness has been well documented in patients with an LoF allele following an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Prasugrel or ticagrelor is recommended in those with an LoF allele as neither is affected by CYP2C19 genotype. Although data demonstrate improved outcomes with a CYP2C19-guided approach to P2Y12 inhibitor selection, genotyping has not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice.

Accuracy and technical characteristics of CYP2C19 point of care tests: a systematic review.

Aim: To assess the accuracy and technical characteristics of CYP2C19 point of care tests (POCTs).Patients & methods: Systematic review of primary studies, in any population or setting, that evaluated POCTs for detecting CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) alleles.Results: Eleven studies provided accuracy data (eight Spartan; one Genomadix Cube; one GMEX; one Genedrive). The POCTs had very high sensitivity and specificity for the alleles they tested for. Twenty-two studies reported technical characteristics: POCTs were easy to operate and provided results quickly. Limited data were reported for test failure rate and cost.Conclusion: CYP2C19 POCTs may be a useful alternative to laboratory-based testing to guide antiplatelet therapy. Further data are required on accuracy (GMEX; Genedrive), test failure and cost (all POCT).

[Box: see text].

Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin as Chronic Maintenance Antiplatelet Monotherapy in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the HOST-EXAM Trial.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel monotherapy improved clinical outcomes compared with aspirin monotherapy during a chronic maintenance period in patients who underwent coronary stenting in the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Extended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial. However, it is uncertain whether the beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin is different according to the renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM trial. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission due to acute coronary syndrome, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type ≥3, during the 2-year follow up. Among the 5438 patients enrolled in the HOST-EXAM trial, 4844 patients (mean age, 63.3±10.6 years; 74.9% men) with a baseline creatinine value were analyzed in this study. A total of 508 (10.5%) patients had CKD, who were at higher risk of the primary end point compared with those without CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01 [95% CI, 1.51-2.67]). Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower rate of the primary end point in both patients with CKD (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.44-1.25]) and patients without CKD (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56-0.91]). No significant interaction was observed between the treatment effect and CKD status (P for interaction=0.889). CONCLUSIONS: During the chronic maintenance period after coronary stenting, the risk of thrombotic and bleeding events was significantly higher in patients with CKD compared with those without CKD. There was no statistical difference in the treatment effect of clopidogrel monotherapy in those with versus without CKD.

Aspirin-clopidogrel combination therapy for ischemic stroke patients: Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness analyses in low-resource setting.

Understanding the cost-effectiveness of aspirin-clopidogrel combination therapy is crucial in determining its influence on coagulation parameters, specifically prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of using the aspirin-clopidogrel combination compared to aspirin alone in managing ischemic stroke. Employing an observational research design, inpatient ischemic stroke cases receiving the aspirin-clopidogrel combination were compared to those treated with aspirin alone. Focusing on the hospital's perspective on costs, the research specifically analyzed medical expenses without discounting costs or effects. The analysis involved comparing the direct medical costs and coagulation parameters between the two treatment groups. Our data revealed that the aspirin-clopidogrel combination demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness over aspirin alone, indicated by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values for PT (IDR -246,930/second) and APTT (IDR -119,270/second). This indicated that the combination therapy was associated with lower costs while yielding better clinical parameter values. The ICER analysis placed the aspirin-clopidogrel combination in the southeast quadrant, marking its dominance over aspirin monotherapy by demonstrating higher effectiveness at lower costs. These results suggest that combination therapy might be a favorable alternative for managing ischemic stroke, presenting a viable option for consideration in clinical practice. The findings underscore the potential economic and clinical advantages of employing the aspirin-clopidogrel combination in routine stroke management protocols.

Evaluation of pharmacogenetic automated clinical decision support for clopidogrel.

Aim: Clopidogrel requires CYP2C19 activation to have antiplatelet effects. Pharmacogenetic testing to identify patients with impaired CYP2C19 function can be coupled with clinical decision support (CDS) alerts to guide antiplatelet prescribing. We evaluated the impact of alerts on clopidogrel prescribing.Materials & methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 866 patients in which CYP2C19-clopidogrel CDS was deployed at a single healthcare system during 2015-2023.Results: Analyses included 2,288 alerts. CDS acceptance rates increased from 24% in 2015 to 63% in 2023 (p < 0.05). Adjusted analyses also showed higher acceptance rates when clopidogrel had been ordered for a percutaneous intervention (OR: 28.7, p < 0.001) and when cardiologists responded to alerts (OR: 2.11, p = 0.001).Conclusion: CDS for CYP2C19-clopidogrel was effective in reducing potential drug-gene interactions. Its influence varied by clinician specialty and medication indications.

[Box: see text].

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel resistance genotype testing after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and economic model.

Background: Stroke or transient ischaemic attack patients are at increased risk of secondary vascular events. Antiplatelet medications, most commonly clopidogrel, are prescribed to reduce this risk. Factors including CYP2C19 genetic variants can hinder clopidogrel metabolism. Laboratory-based or point-of-care tests can detect these variants, enabling targeted treatment. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of genetic testing to identify clopidogrel resistance in people with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Specific objectives: Do people tested for clopidogrel resistance, and treated accordingly, have a reduced risk of secondary vascular events? Do people with loss-of-function alleles associated with clopidogrel resistance have a reduced risk of secondary vascular events if treated with alternative interventions compared to clopidogrel? Do people with loss-of-function alleles associated with clopidogrel resistance have an increased risk of secondary vascular events when treated with clopidogrel? What is the accuracy of point-of-care tests for detecting variants associated with clopidogrel resistance? What is the technical performance and cost of CYP2C19 genetic tests? Is genetic testing for clopidogrel resistance cost-effective compared with no testing? Design: Systematic review and economic model. Results: Objective 1: Two studies assessed secondary vascular events in patients tested for loss-of-function alleles and treated accordingly. They found a reduced risk, but confidence intervals were wide (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 2.74 and hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 1.18). Objective 2: Seven randomised controlled trials compared clopidogrel with alternative treatment in people with genetic variants. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of secondary vascular events than clopidogrel (summary hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.90; two studies). Objective 3: Twenty-five studies compared outcomes in people with and without genetic variants treated with clopidogrel. People with genetic variants were at an increased risk of secondary vascular events (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 2.08; 18 studies). There was no difference in bleeding risk (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40; five studies). Objective 4: Eleven studies evaluated Genomadix Cube accuracy; no studies evaluated Genedrive. Summary sensitivity and specificity against laboratory reference standards were both 100% (95% confidence interval 94% to 100% and 99% to 100%). Objective 5: Seventeen studies evaluated technical performance of point-of-care tests. Test failure rate ranged from 0.4% to 19% for Genomadix Cube. A survey of 8/10 genomic laboratory hubs revealed variation in preferred technologies for testing, and cost per test ranging from £15 to £250. Most laboratories expected test failure rate to be < 1%. Additional resources could enhance testing capacity and expedite turnaround times. Objective 6: Laboratory and point-of-care CYP2C19 testing strategies were cost-saving and increase quality-adjusted life-years compared with no testing. Both strategies gave similar costs, quality-adjusted life-years and expected net monetary benefit. Conclusions: Our results suggest that CYP2C19 testing followed by tailored treatment is likely to be effective and cost-effective in both populations. Future work: Accuracy and technical performance of Genedrive. Test failure rate of Genomadix Cube in a National Health Service setting. Value of testing additional loss-of-function alleles. Appropriateness of treatment dichotomy based on loss-of-function alleles. Limitations: Lack of data on Genedrive. No randomised 'test-and-treat' studies of dipyramidole plus aspirin. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42022357661. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135620) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 57. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

The most common type of stroke occurs when the supply of blood to the brain is cut off. Symptoms of stroke happen suddenly and vary depending on which part of the brain is affected. They usually include problems with movement, speech, vision and the face drooping on one side. A 'transient ischaemic attack' is a milder related condition. There are around 100,000 strokes and 60,000 transient ischaemic attacks every year in the UK. People who have a stroke or transient ischaemic attack are at greater risk of having another stroke. To reduce the chances of this happening, doctors will often prescribe medication. The most common medication used is called 'clopidogrel'. However, clopidogrel does not work for everyone. One reason for this is having specific variations of a gene called the CYP2C19 gene. Around one in three people in the UK have this variation. We wanted to know whether introducing genetic testing to identify variations in the CYP2C19 gene for people who have had a stroke or transient ischaemic attack can help doctors prescribe a treatment that will work for them, reducing the risk of having another stroke. We also wanted to know if doing this test would be a good use of NHS money. Doing a genetic test to identify variations in the CYP2C19 gene, and prescribing an alternative medication for people with these variations, may reduce the chances of having a new stroke. It is likely that a genetic test for variations of the CYP2C19 gene would represent value for money for the NHS.

A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy one year after coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: The ideal single antiplatelet therapy for long-term maintenance after coronary stenting remains uncertain. In a head-to-head comparison, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of aspirin and clopidogrel as monotherapies in this patient cohort. METHOD: We reviewed 1044 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) at the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, between January 2019 and December 2021 and completed a 12-month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) treatment. They were divided into two groups: 582 were assigned to the aspirin group (100 mg/day) and 422 to the clopidogrel group (75 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the composite cardiac death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding type 3 or greater. Secondary endpoint events included all-cause death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, bleeding (defined as a BARC type ≥ 2 bleeding), and gastrointestinal complications. RESULTS: After a mean observation period of 25 ± 8.4 months, the primary endpoint event occurred in 29 (6.8%) patients in the clopidogrel group and 30 (5.1%) in the aspirin group, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.253). In BARC type 2 or greater bleeding events, there were 9 (1.5%) in the aspirin group compared to 7 (1.7%) in the clopidogrel group, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.160). CONCLUSION: After 12-month DAPT in Chinese patients undergoing DES implantation, aspirin monotherapy versus clopidogrel monotherapy showed no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of safety and efficacy in terms of hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiac death, and bleeding with BARC type 2 or greater.

Interindividual variability in platelet reactivity among individuals with or without antiplatelet therapy: results from a large tertiary care hospital.

Antiplatelet therapy is crucial for reducing thrombotic events in patients with atherosclerotic disease, but the response vary widely among individuals. The identification of patients at high (HPR), optimal (OPR) or low platelet reactivity (LPR) is dependent on high interlaboratory variability. We report results of a large dataset of patients to assess the gold standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA). A total of 11,913 patients who sequentially underwent LTA assessment using several stimuli (ADP-2µM, collagen-2 µg/ml, arachidonic acid 0.5 mM, epinephrine 10µM) with a standardized methodology between 2004 and 2022 were screened. After application of inclusion-exclusion criteria, 5,901 patients were included and divided into five groups: healthy-volunteers (HV; N = 534); controls (CTR; N = 1073); aspirin-treated patients (ASA; 75-150 mg/die; N = 3280); clopidogrel-treated patients (CLOP; 75 mg/die; N = 495) and patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, ASA plus CLOP (DAPT; N = 519). The mean PA% in response to ADP 2 µm was 72.4 ± 33.3 in the CTR population, 40.6 ± 29.9 in the ASA group, 25.1 ± 35.1 in the CLOP group and 10.2 ± 18.5 in the DAPT group. The mean PA% in response to collagen 2 ug/ml was 90.7 ± 10.5 in the CTR population, 40.8 ± 26.3 in the ASA group, 79.4 ± 21.8 in the CLOP group and 17.9 ± 19.9 in the DAPT group. The percentage of patients at OPR following ADP stimuli was 66%, 25%, and 26%, in the ASA, CLOP, and DAPT group, respectively. The percentage of patients at OPR following collagen stimuli was 56%, 22%, and 41%, in the ASA, CLOP, and DAPT group, respectively. LTA was significantly increased in response to ADP (72.4 ± 33.3vs62.7 ± 37.1; p < 0.001) and AA (90.7 ± 15.6vs87.6 ± 20.5; p < 0.001) in CTR compared to HV. Our findings support the concept that a significant proportion of individuals present a hyper- or hypo-reactive platelet phenotype potentially affecting the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy. The variability in response to antiplatelet therapy was particularly evident in patients undergoing single as opposed to dual antiplatelet therapy regimens. These data support ongoing strategies of guided selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Time to treatment and disability attributed to index stroke in the POINT trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with reduced disability attributable to the index stroke compared to antiplatelet monotherapy. However, it is unknown whether earlier treatment with DAPT versus aspirin is associated with greater benefit. METHODS: We analyzed patients enrolled in POINT with minor ischemic stroke who had available data recording the treatment initiation time and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Patients were randomized to DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) vs. aspirin alone within 12 h of symptom onset. We estimated the effect of DAPT on disability (defined as mRS>1) ascribed to the index event and major hemorrhage at 90 days, stratified by tertiles of time from symptom onset-to-treatment-initiation. RESULTS: A total of 2559 patients were included; median onset-to-treatment-initiation time was 8.3 h (IQR:5.8-11.0). Comparing DAPT to aspirin, the rate of disability attributed to the index event at 90-day follow-up was 5.1 % vs. 8.6 % (OR 0.57; 95 % CI:0.33-0.99) in patients treated <6.7 h, 7.5 % vs. 9.9 % (OR 0.74; 95 % CI:0.45-1.19) in those treated 6.7-10.0 h, and 8.6 % vs. 10.6 % (OR 0.80; 95 % CI:0.50-1.26) in those treated >10.0 h after symptom onset (p for interaction=0.65). There was no difference in major hemorrhage across time strata. CONCLUSIONS: While not statistically significant, these results suggest the possibility of greater efficacy at reducing disability ascribed to minor stroke with earlier treatment with DAPT compared to aspirin. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Identifier: NCT00991029.

Comparison of Ticagrelor with Clopidogrel on Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance.

PURPOSE: This research aimed to assess the impact of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and prognosis following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), using the angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) as a non-invasive assessment tool. METHODS: In this retrospective study, angio-IMR was performed to evaluate CMD before and after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with either ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily, n = 184) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily, n = 72). The primary endpoint is the improvement of CMD evaluated by angio-IMR (delta angio-IMR) following DAPT. Secondary endpoints included myocardial reinfarction and readmission for heart failure during 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor exhibited a significantly higher delta angio-IMR [- 3.09 (5.14) versus - 1.99 (1.91), P = 0.008], indicating a superior improvement of CMD with ticagrelor treatment. Multivariate Cox regression indicated that ticagrelor treatment was related to a reduced risk of readmission for heart failure [8 (4.3) versus 9 (12.5), adjusted HR = 0.329; 95% CI = 0.116-0.934; P = 0.018] and myocardial reinfarction [7 (3.8) versus 8 (11.1), adjusted HR = 0.349; 95% CI = 0.125-0.975; P = 0.026]. Furthermore, ticagrelor treatment serves as an independent predictor of readmission for heart failure (HR = 0.322; 95% CI = 0.110-0.943; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate a potential association between ticagrelor treatment and improved CMD, as well as a reduced risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial reinfarction and readmission for heart failure in AMI patients. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm the potential benefits of ticagrelor on CMD and cardiovascular prognosis. This clinical trial was registered in www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT05978726).

Elevated High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Level Enhances the Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Platelet Reactivity in PCI Patients Treated with Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the effect of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on thrombogenesis has aroused great interest, while inflammation has been reported to modify the Lp(a)-associated risks through an unidentified mechanism. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between platelet reactivity with Lp(a) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in percutaneous intervention (PCI) patients treated with clopidogrel. METHODS: Data were collected from 10,724 consecutive PCI patients throughout the year 2013 in Fuwai Hospital. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) were defined as thrombelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet (MAADP) > 47 mm and < 31 mm, respectively. RESULTS: 6615 patients with TEG results were finally enrolled. The mean age was 58.24 ± 10.28 years and 5131 (77.6%) were male. Multivariable logistic regression showed that taking Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L as the reference, isolated Lp(a) elevation [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L] was not significantly associated with HTPR (P = 0.153) or LTPR (P = 0.312). However, the joint elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/L] exhibited enhanced association with both HTPR (OR:1.976, 95% CI 1.677-2.329) and LTPR (OR:0.533, 95% CI 0.454-0.627). CONCLUSIONS: The isolated elevation of Lp(a) level was not an independent indicator for platelet reactivity, yet the concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP levels was significantly associated with increased platelet reactivity. Whether intensified antiplatelet therapy or anti-inflammatory strategies could mitigate the risks in patients presenting combined Lp(a) and hs-CRP elevation requires future investigation.

Recurrent cardiovascular and limb events in 294,428 patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease or ischemic stroke on antiplatelet monotherapy: The RESRISK cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Utilising real-world data, we quantified the burden of cardiovascular risk factors and long-term residual risk of atherothrombotic events among routine care cohorts with coronary (CAD) or peripheral (PAD) artery disease or ischemic stroke (IS) on guideline-recommended antiplatelet monotherapy (APMT). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using data (2010-2020) from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics, including adults with CAD, PAD or IS who were first prescribed APMT (CAD/IS: aspirin; PAD: clopidogrel). Primary outcomes (recurrent events): major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for CAD/PAD/IS cohorts, major adverse limb events (MALE) for PAD. RESULTS: 266,478 CAD, 13,162 PAD, and 14,788 IS patients were included (mean age: 71 years; women 37.7%-47.5 %). Risk factor burden was high and attainment of recommended goals was low. There were 73,691, 3,121 and 7,137 MACE among CAD, PAD and IS patients, respectively (median follow-up: 89.9, 42.4 and 75.9 months, respectively), and 4,767 MALE among PAD patients. MACE incidence rate per 1000 person-years was higher in IS (268.7; 95%CI 265.3-272.0) than CAD (92.9; 95%CI 92.5-93.4) or PAD cohorts (97.2; 95%CI 94.6-99.8). MALE incidence rate was 195.9 (95%CI 192.2-199.6) per 1000 person-years. IS patients presented a lower rate of hospitalisations and longer time-to-first hospitalisation, but once hospitalised, they had a longer length-of-stay. PAD patients had the highest hospitalisation rate. CONCLUSIONS: Among a contemporary cohort with cardiovascular disease on APMT, long-term residual atherothrombotic risk remains high despite being on APMT. Greater attention to risk factor control and use of appropriate evidence-based therapy is required to reduce residual risk among this very high-risk population.