Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Surg Endosc ; 37(8): 6062-6070, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37126191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although it is known that excessive intraoperative fluid and vasopressor agents are detrimental for anastomotic healing, optimal anesthesiology protocols for colorectal surgery are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: To scrutinize the current hemodynamic practice and vasopressor use and their relation to colorectal anastomotic leakage. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a previously published prospective observational study: the LekCheck study. STUDY SETTING: Adult patients undergoing a colorectal resection with the creation of a primary anastomosis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) within 30 days postoperatively, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1548 patients, 579 (37%) received vasopressor agents during surgery. Of these, 201 were treated with solely noradrenaline, 349 were treated with phenylephrine, and 29 received ephedrine. CAL rate significantly differed between the patients receiving vasopressor agents during surgery compared to patients without (11.8% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). CAL was significantly higher in the group receiving phenylephrine compared to noradrenaline (14.3% vs 6%, p < 0.001). Vasopressor agents were used more often in patients treated with Goal Directed Therapy (47% vs 34.6%, p < 0.001). There was a higher mortality rate in patients with vasopressors compared to the group without (2.8% vs 0.4%, p = 0.01, OR 3.8). Mortality was higher in the noradrenaline group compared to the phenylephrine and those without vasopressors (5% vs. 0.4% and 1.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, patients with intraoperative vasopressor agents had an increased risk to develop CAL (OR 2.1, CI 1.3-3.2, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study contributes to the evidence that intraoperative use of vasopressor agents is associated with a higher rate of CAL. This study helps to create awareness on the (necessity to) use of vasopressor agents in colorectal surgery patients in striving for successful anastomotic wound healing. Future research will be required to balance vasopressor agent dosage in view of colorectal anastomotic leakage.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Colorectal Surgery , Adult , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Risk Factors , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Phenylephrine/therapeutic use , Norepinephrine/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications
2.
JMIR Hum Factors ; 9(3): e31529, 2022 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35802406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A successful innovative medical device is not only technically challenging to develop but must also be readily usable to be integrated into health care professionals' daily practice. Through a user-centered design (UCD) approach, usability can be improved. However, this type of approach is not widely implemented from the early stages of medical device development. OBJECTIVE: The case study presented here shows how UCD may be applied at the very early stage of the design of a disruptive medical device used in a complex hospital environment, while no functional device is available yet. The device under study is a connected sensor system to detect colorectal anastomotic leakage, the most detrimental complication following colorectal surgery, which has a high medical cost. We also aimed to provide usability guidelines for the initial design of other innovative medical devices. METHODS: UCD was implemented by actively involving health care professionals and all the industrial partners of the project. The methodology was conducted in 2 European hospitals: Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital (France) and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam (the Netherlands). A total of 6 elective colorectal procedures and 5 ward shifts were observed. In total, 4 workshops were conducted with project partners and clinicians. A formative evaluation was performed based on 5 usability tests using nonfunctional prototype systems. The case study was completed within 12 months. RESULTS: Functional specifications were defined for the various components of the medical device: device weight, size, design, device attachment, and display module. These specifications consider the future integration of the medical device into current clinical practice (for use in an operating room and patient follow-up inside the hospital) and interactions between surgeons, nurses, nurse assistants, and patients. By avoiding irrelevant technical development, this approach helps to promote cost-effective design. CONCLUSIONS: This paper presents the successful deployment over 12 months of a UCD methodology for the design of an innovative medical device during its early development phase. To help in reusing this methodology to design other innovative medical devices, we suggested best practices based on this case.

3.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 71: 102997, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34840752

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence shows that patients with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) are at risk for adverse outcome after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of MetS and preoperative hyperglycemia, as an individual component of MetS, on adverse outcome after colorectal surgery. METHODS: A literature review was systematically performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were observational studies that evaluated the relationship between MetS or preoperative hyperglycemia and outcomes after colorectal surgery (i.e. any complication, severe complication defined as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III, anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, mortality and length of stay). RESULTS: Six studies (246.383 patients) evaluated MetS and eight studies (9.534 patients) reported on hyperglycemia. Incidence rates of MetS varied widely from 7% to 68% across studies. Meta-analysis showed that patients with MetS are more likely to develop severe complications than those without MetS (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.01-2.59). Moreover, a non-significant trend toward increased risks for any complication (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.91-2.00), anastomotic leakage (RR 1.67, 95% CI 0.47-5.93) and mortality (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.00-1.43) was found. Furthermore, preoperative hyperglycemia was associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81). CONCLUSION: MetS seem to have a negative impact on adverse outcome after colorectal surgery. As a result of few studies meeting inclusion criteria and substantial heterogeneity, evidence is not conclusive. Future prospective observational studies should improve the amount and quality in order to verify current results.

4.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(6): 1201-1209, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33393053

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel end-to-end "true" reinforced stapling colorectal anastomosis and to assess surgical outcomes in a large case series of advanced cancer patients undergoing this procedure. Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains the main concern following surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between September 2006 and May 2018, in the context of the Catalonian Program of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, 1193 consecutive patients with advanced abdominal and/or pelvic tumors were included in a prospective single-center study. They underwent cytoreductive radical surgery (CRS) in most cases combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Among other surgical procedures, 374 patients underwent rectal resection and colorectal/ileorectal anastomosis, whether alone or associated to other digestive anastomosis. Key aspects of colorectal anastomosis technique were: (1) complete dissection and mobilization of the distal third of the rectum, (2) placement of a stitch that included both ends of the linear stapling of the rectal stump that was knotted on the anvil of the circular stapler, (3) "cleaning" the fatty tissue of the intestinal ends, (4) adjustment of the height of staples to the thickness of the intestinal wall, and (5) a second layer of interrupted nonperforating sutures placed circumferentially to reinforce the stapled anastomoses. A diverting stoma was not performed. RESULTS: According to clinical criteria, of the 1193 patients included, 296 cases underwent CRS (group 1) and 897 cases CRS + HIPEC (group 2). In group 1, 332 surgical procedures were performed, with 248 digestive anastomoses, of which 98 (39.5%) were colorectal anastomoses, associated to other digestive anastomosis in 37 cases. In group 2, 972 surgical procedures were performed, with 707 digestive anastomoses, of which 263 were colorectal (37.2%), 116 were associated with other digestive anastomosis. Ileocolic anastomosis was the most frequently associated digestive anastomosis. 71 major urinary reconstructions, 283 radical hysterectomies and no diverting stoma were performed. Globally, there was only three colo-ileorectal AL (3/374 = 0.8%). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 0.25%. CONCLUSIONS: A technical modification to create a "true" end-to-end and completely circular reinforced anastomosis effectively prevents anastomotic leakage in patients with advanced tumors undergoing radical resection of the rectum, with no need of diverting stoma.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Colon/surgery , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Aged , Anastomosis, Surgical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
5.
J Surg Res ; 236: 230-237, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery, which remains a serious clinical problem that causes augmented morbidity and mortality, is usually favored by ischemia. The aim of this study was to determine whether alprostadil may improve anastomotic wound healing under ischemic condition. METHODS: Ninety-three adult Wistar rats were randomized into three groups: control, ischemia (by devascularization along the first 2 cm at each anastomotic end), and ischemia plus alprostadil. Resection of a colonic segment at the colorectal junction and an anastomosis was performed. Animals were euthanized at 8 d. Surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and grade of intra-abdominal adhesions using a validated scale were determined. Bursting pressure and tension were calculated and histologic examination of the anastomosis was performed. RESULTS: The ischemic group revealed an increased anastomotic leak rate (14/31 versus 3/31) and a lower bursting pressure and tension when compared to control group, validating therefore the experimental model. After intraperitoneal injection of alprostadil, anastomotic leak rate was significantly lower (5/31) and the bursting pressure and tension were significantly increased. Histologic examination revealed a lower presence of inflammatory cells, and a significantly higher neovascularization and a higher presence of fibroblasts in treated animals when compared with the ischemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Alprostadil may have a positive effect on colonic anastomotic wound healing under relative ischemic condition. Alprostadil administration increases anastomotic bursting pressure, decreases leak rate, and reverses most of the histological changes caused by blood flow decrease. These protective effects could be caused by vasodilation, stimulation of neovascularization, and immunomodulatory properties.


Subject(s)
Alprostadil/administration & dosage , Colon/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Ischemia/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Animals , Colon/blood supply , Colon/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Ischemia/etiology , Male , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Rectum/blood supply , Rectum/pathology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Tissue Adhesions/epidemiology , Tissue Adhesions/etiology , Tissue Adhesions/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/drug effects
6.
World J Gastroenterol ; 23(33): 6172-6180, 2017 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28970733

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the level of consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) among Dutch and Chinese colorectal surgeons. METHODS: Dutch and Chinese colorectal surgeons were asked to partake in an online questionnaire. Consensus in the online questionnaire was defined as > 80% agreement between respondents on various statements regarding a general definition of CAL, and regarding clinical and radiological diagnosis of the complication. RESULTS: Fifty-nine Dutch and 202 Chinese dedicated colorectal surgeons participated in the online survey. Consensus was found on only one of the proposed elements of a general definition of CAL in both countries: 'extravasation of contrast medium after rectal enema on a CT scan'. Another two were found relevant according to Dutch surgeons: 'necrosis of the anastomosis found during reoperation', and 'a radiological collection treated with percutaneous drainage'. No consensus was found for all other proposed elements that may be included in a general definition. CONCLUSION: There is no universally accepted definition of CAL in the Netherlands and China. Diagnosis of CAL based on clinical manifestations remains a point of discussion in both countries. Dutch surgeons are more likely to report 'subclinical' leaks as CAL, which partly explains the higher reported Dutch CAL rates.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/diagnostic imaging , Colon/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Consensus , Rectum/surgery , Surgeons/psychology , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Radiography/methods , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 32(3): 305-313, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27942836

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite extensive research, anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most dreaded complications after colorectal surgery. Since butyrate enemas are known to enhance anastomotic healing, several administration routes have been explored in this study. METHODS: Three intraluminal approaches involving butyrate were investigated: (1) butyrin-elucidating patch, (2) a single injection of hyaluronan-butyrate (HA-But) prior to construction of the proximal anastomosis and (3) rectal hyaluronan-butyrate (HA-But) enemas designed for distal anastomoses. The main outcome was AL and secondary outcomes were bursting pressure, histological analysis of the anastomosis, zymography to detect MMP activity and qPCR for gene expression of MMP2, MMP9, MUC2 and TFF3. RESULTS: Neither the patches nor the injections led to a reduction of AL in experiments 1 and 2. In experiment 3, a significant reduction of AL was accomplished with the (HA-But) enema compared to the control group together with a higher bursting pressure. Histological analysis detected only an increased inflammation in experiment 2 in the hyaluronan injection group compared to the control group. No other differences were found regarding wound healing. Zymography identified a decreased proenzyme of MMP9 when HA-But was administered as a rectal enema. qPCR did not show any significant differences between groups in any experiment. CONCLUSION: Butyrate enemas are effective in the enhancement of colonic anastomosis. Enhanced butyrate-based approaches designed to reduce AL in animal models for both proximal and distal anastomoses were not more effective than were butyrate enemas alone. Further research should focus on how exogenous butyrate can improve anastomotic healing after gastrointestinal surgery.


Subject(s)
Butyric Acid/administration & dosage , Butyric Acid/pharmacology , Colon/drug effects , Colon/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical , Anastomotic Leak/pathology , Animals , Collagen/metabolism , Drug Administration Routes , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Inflammation/pathology , Matrix Metalloproteinases/metabolism , Pressure , Rats, Wistar , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
8.
World J Gastroenterol ; 22(32): 7226-35, 2016 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27621570

ABSTRACT

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) remains a major complication after colorectal surgery. Despite all efforts during the last decades, the incidence of CAL has not decreased. In this review, we summarize the available strategies regarding prevention, prediction and intervention of CAL and categorize them into three categories: communication, infection and healing disturbances. These three major factors actively interact during the onset of CAL. We aim to provide an integrated approach to CAL based on its etiology. The intraoperative air leak test, intraoperative endoscopy, radiological examinations and stoma construction mainly aim to detect and to prevent communication between the intra- and extra-luminal content. Other strategies including postoperative drainage, antibiotics, and infectious-parameter evaluation are intended to detect and prevent anastomotic or peritoneal infection. Most currently available interventions for CAL focus on the control of communication and infection, while strategies targeting the healing disturbances such as lifestyle changes, oxygen therapy and evaluation of metabolic biomarkers still lack wide clinical application. This simplified categorization may contribute to an integrated understanding of CAL. We strongly believe that this integrated approach should be taken into consideration during clinical practice. An integrated approach to CAL could contribute to a better understanding of the etiology of CAL and eventually better patient outcome.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL