ABSTRACT
According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, breast cancer is more common than lung cancer globally. By 2040, mortality from breast cancer will rise by 50% and 40%, respectively. Despite advances in chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and HER2-targeted therapy, breast cancer metastases and recurrences remain challenging to treat. Cancer vaccines are an effective treatment option because they stimulate a long-lasting immune response that will eliminate tumor cells. In studies on the breast cancer vaccine, no appreciable advantages were discovered. A recent study claims that immune checkpoint inhibitors or anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies may be used in vaccinations. This vaccination strengthens the immune system to fight off breast cancer cells. Clinical trials have been conducted on DNA, dendritic cells, and peptide-based breast cancer vaccines. Studies on the breast cancer vaccine have employed subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intradermal injections. Clinical studies have shown that these efforts have not been successful. Several factors might have slowed the development of a breast cancer vaccine. The complexity of the immune system makes it challenging to create cancer vaccines. Given the heterogeneity of breast cancer, there may be a need for different vaccination strategies. Despite these obstacles, research into breast cancer vaccines continues. Effective methods for creating vaccines include immune checkpoint inhibition and anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies. Research is also being done on specialized tumor vaccinations.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cancer Vaccines , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Breast , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Melanoma, Cutaneous MalignantABSTRACT
Breast cancer has become the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally. The relapse and metastasis of breast cancer remain a great challenge despite advances in chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and HER2 targeted therapy in the past decades. Innovative therapeutic strategies are still critically in need. Cancer vaccine is an attractive option as it aims to induce a durable immunologic response to eradicate tumor cells. Different types of breast cancer vaccines have been evaluated in clinical trials, but none has led to significant benefits. Despite the disappointing results at present, new promise from the latest study indicates the possibility of applying vaccines in combination with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies or immune checkpoint blockade. This review summarizes the principles and mechanisms underlying breast cancer vaccines, recapitulates the type and administration routes of vaccine, reviews the current results of relevant clinical trials, and addresses the potential reasons for the setbacks and future directions to explore.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , Antigens, Neoplasm/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cancer Vaccines/classification , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Drug Delivery Systems , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptor, ErbB-2/immunologyABSTRACT
The E75 peptide vaccine, derived from tumor-associated antigen HER2, is the most frequently studied anti-HER2 vaccination strategy for the treatment of breast cancer patients. It has been investigated in the several phases Ι/Π of the clinical trials and is currently being evaluated in a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the outcomes of the E75 peptide vaccine including the therapeutic efficacy, the disease recurrence, the survival rate, and the side effects. Three peer-reviewed literature databases including the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were sought. Of 29 trials assessed for eligibility, 16 were considered based on our inclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were performed by The Excel and STATA v.11.0. Meta-analysis of delayed-type hypersensitivity)DTH( reactions and CD8+-T cell levels, as immune responses, displayed the significant differences in the vaccinated groups compared to their non-vaccinated counterparts. In addition, the recurrence, and the overall and the disease-free survival were significantly different in the vaccinated subjects versus the control. Evaluation of the local and systemic toxicity of the E75 peptide vaccine demonstrated the minimal side effects. It seems that the E75 peptide vaccine is safe and effective, and can be used for further randomized clinical trials.