ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To optimize the design and demonstrate the integration of a helmet-shaped container filled with a high-permittivity material (HPM) slurry with RF head coil arrays to improve RF coil sensitivity and SNR for human-brain proton MRI. METHODS: RF reception magnetic fields ( B 1 - $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{-} $$ ) of a 32-channel receive-only coil array with various geometries and permittivity values of HPM slurry helmet are calculated with electromagnetic simulation at 7 T. A 16-channel transmit-only coil array, a 32-channel receive-only coil array, and a 2-piece HPM slurry helmet were constructed and assembled. RF transmission magnetic field ( B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ ), B 1 - $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{-} $$ , and MRI SNR maps from the entire human brain were measured and compared. RESULTS: Simulations showed that averaged B 1 - $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{-} $$ improvement with the HPM slurry helmet increased from 57% to 87% as the relative permittivity (εr) of HPM slurry increased from 110 to 210. In vivo experiments showed that the average B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ improvement over the human brain was 14.5% with the two-piece HPM slurry (εr ≈ 170) helmet, and the average B 1 - $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{-} $$ and SNR were improved 63% and 34%, respectively, because the MRI noise level was increased by the lossy HPM. CONCLUSION: The RF coil sensitivity and MRI SNR were largely improved with the two-piece HPM slurry helmet demonstrated by both electromagnetic simulations and in vivo human head experiments at 7 T. The findings demonstrate that incorporating an easily producible HPM slurry helmet into the RF coil array significantly enhances human-brain MRI SNR homogeneity and quality at ultrahigh field. Greater SNR improvement is anticipated using the less lossy HPM and optimal design.
ABSTRACT
The assessment of cervical intervertebral kinematics can serve as the basis for understanding any degenerative changes in the cervical spine due to the prolonged wear of a heavyweight, imbalanced firefighting helmet. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze cervical intervertebral kinematics using the OpenSim musculoskeletal modeling platform in order to provide much-needed insights into how the inertial properties of firefighter helmets affect cervical spinal mobility. A total of 36 firefighters (18 males and 18 females) were recruited to perform static and dynamic neck flexion, extension, and left and right lateral bending tasks for three conditions: 1) no-helmet, 2) US-style helmet with a comparatively superior center of mass (COM), and 3) European-style helmet with relatively higher mass but an inferior COM. Three custom-made OpenSim head-neck models were created to calculate cervical intervertebral kinematics for each helmet condition. Results showed that helmet use significantly (p < 0.001) affects neck and cervical spinal kinematics. Despite its lighter weight, the superior COM placement in the US-style helmet caused more pronounced angular changes and higher velocity of peak flexion and extension angles compared to the European-style helmet across all cervical joints. Moreover, results revealed discrepancies between OpenSim-derived neck and cervical range-of-motion and those reported in previous in-vivo studies. In conclusion, the present study underscores the importance of designing firefighter helmets with a lower profile (less superior COM) to enhance neck range of motion and minimize potential neck injuries.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The study purpose was to investigate the laboratory-based performance of three commercially available shell add-on products under varsity-level impact conditions. METHODS: Pendulum impact tests were conducted at multiple locations (front, front boss, rear, side) and speeds (3.1, 4.9, 6.4 m/s) using two helmet models. Tests were performed with a single add-on configuration for baseline comparisons and a double add-on configuration to simulate collisions with both players wearing shell add-ons. A linear mixed-effect model was used to evaluate peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration (PRA), and concussion risk, which was calculated from a bivariate injury risk function, based on shell add-on and test configuration. RESULTS: All shell add-ons decreased peak head kinematics and injury risk compared to controls, with the Guardian NXT producing the largest reductions (PLA: 7.9%, PRA: 14.1%, Risk: 34.1%) compared to the SAFR Helmet Cover (PLA: 4.5%, PRA: 9.3%, Risk: 24.7%) and Guardian XT (PLA: 3.2%, PRA: 5.0%, Risk: 15.5%). The same trend was observed in the double add-on test configuration. However, the Guardian NXT (PLA: 17.1%; PRA: 11.5%; Risk: 62.8%) and SAFR Helmet Cover (PLA: 12.2%; PRA: 9.1%; Risk: 52.2%) produced larger reductions in peak head kinematics and injury risk than the Guardian XT (PLA: 5.7%, PRA: 2.2%, Risk: 21.8%). CONCLUSION: In laboratory-based assessments that simulated varsity-level impact conditions, the Guardian NXT was associated with larger reductions in PLA, PRA, and injury risk compared to the SAFR Helmet Cover and Guardian XT. Although shell add-ons can enhance head protection, helmet model selection should be prioritized.
Subject(s)
Football , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Football/injuries , Biomechanical Phenomena , Acceleration , Brain Concussion/prevention & control , Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Equipment Design , Sports EquipmentABSTRACT
This study explores the effectiveness of architected lattice structures, specifically made of polyamide 12 (PA12) material, as potential helmet liners to mitigate traumatic brain injuries (TBI), with a focus on rotational acceleration. Evaluating three lattice unit cell topologies (simple cubic, dode-medium, and rhombic dodecahedron), the research builds upon prior investigations indicating that PA12 lattice liners may outperform conventional EPS liners. Employing a high-fidelity finite element male head model and utilizing direct and oblique impact scenarios, mechanical quantities, such as maximum principal strain (MPS) and shear strain, cumulative strain damage measure and intracranial pressure were measured at the tissue level in different brain regions. Results indicate that lattice liners, especially with dode-medium topology, exhibit promising reductions in brain tissue strains. On average, during oblique impacts, less than 1 % of the brain volume experienced an MPS level of 0.4 when the lattice liners were adopted, whereas that percentage was above 70 % with the expandable polystyrene (EPS) foam liners. Pressure-based assessments suggest that lattice liners may outperform EPS liners in oblique impacts, showcasing the limitations of EPS for effective TBI mitigation. Despite certain model limitations, this study emphasizes the need for advancements in helmet technology, particularly in the development of commercial lattice liners using additive manufacturing, to address the limitations of existing EPS liners in preventing rotational consequences of impacts and reducing TBI.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Positional plagiocephaly (PP) is an asymmetric deformation of the skull as a consequence of external forces acting on a normal and pliable skull. The prevalence of PP ranges between 19.6% and 46.6%. Treatment options for PP include repositioning, physical therapy, and helmet orthoses. Consensus regarding the treatment of PP remains elusive due to the condition's imprecise natural history, dissimilar diagnostic strategies, and unreliable data asserting treatments' efficacy. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of the tools used to diagnose, suggest treatment strategies, and assess outcomes for PP. METHODS: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to query a variety of databases. A total of 444 articles were imported into Covidence, a screening and data extraction tool for conducting systematic reviews. RESULTS: After a series of screenings, 60 articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. The information was entered into a data extraction list consisting of 16 variables in the categories of general information, diagnostic strategies, treatment modalities, and treatment outcomes. Most articles reported retrospective case series, which yielded level 4 evidence. Only one article reported the results of a randomized and blinded outcomes assessment trial. Such article yielded level 1 evidence and was rated as high quality for allocation, concealment, and blinding of personnel. CONCLUSION: The strategies used to diagnose and classify PP are a disparate list of measures most of which have no parallels making it impossible to offer treatment recommendations and generate generalizable knowledge.
ABSTRACT
Mopeds are small and move unpredictably, making them difficult for other drivers to perceive. This lack of visibility, coupled with the minimal protection that mopeds provide, can lead to serious crashes, particularly when the rider is not wearing a helmet. This paper explores the association between helmet usage and injury severity among moped riders involved in collisions with other vehicles. A series of joint bivariate probit models are employed, with injury severity and helmet usage serving as dependent variables. Data on two-vehicle moped crashes in Florida from 2019 to 2021 are collected and categorized into three periods: before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Crash involvement ratios are calculated to examine the safety risk elements of moped riders in various categories, while significant temporal shifts are also explored. The correlated joint random parameters bivariate probit models with heterogeneity in means demonstrate their superiority in capturing interactive unobserved heterogeneity, revealing how various variables significantly affect injury outcomes and helmet usage. Temporal instability related to the COVID-19 pandemic is validated through likelihood ratio tests, out-of-sample predictions, and calculations of marginal effects. Additionally, several parameters are noted to remain temporally stable across multiple periods, prompting the development of a partially temporally constrained modeling approach to provide insights from a long-term perspective. Specifically, it is found that male moped riders are less likely to wear helmets and are negatively associated with injury/fatality rates. Moped riders on two-lane roads are also less likely to wear helmets. Furthermore, moped riders face a lower risk of injury or fatality during daylight conditions, while angle crashes consistently lead to a higher risk of injuries and fatalities across the three periods. These findings provide valuable insights into helmet usage and injury severity among moped riders and offer guidance for developing countermeasures to protect them.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study explores the protective capabilities of bicycle helmets on serious head injury among bicyclists hospitalized in a Norwegian level 1 trauma centre. METHOD: Information on helmet use, demographic variables, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and surgical procedure codes was retrieved from the Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry for patients with bicycle-related injuries from 2005 through 2016. Outcomes were serious head injury defined as maximum AIS severity score ≥ 3 in the AIS region Head, any cranial neurosurgical procedure, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1256 hospitalized bicyclists were included. The median age was 41 years (quartiles 26-53), 73% were male, 5.3% had severe pre-injury comorbidities, and 54% wore a helmet at the time of injury. Serious head injury occurred in 30%, 9% underwent a cranial neurosurgical procedure, and 30-day mortality was 2%. Compared to non-helmeted bicyclists, helmeted bicyclists were older (43 years, quartiles 27-54, vs. 38 years, quartiles 23-53, p = 0.05), less often crashed during night-time (21% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), less frequently had serious head injury (22% vs. 38%, OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.22-0.39), and less often underwent cranial neurosurgery (6% vs. 14%, OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.24-0.54). No statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups was found (1.5% vs. 2.9%, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.11). CONCLUSION: Helmet use was associated with fewer and less severe head injuries and fewer neurosurgical procedures. This adds evidence to the protective capabilities of bicycle helmets.
Subject(s)
Bicycling , Craniocerebral Trauma , Head Protective Devices , Neurosurgical Procedures , Humans , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Bicycling/injuries , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Craniocerebral Trauma/mortality , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Norway/epidemiology , Registries , Trauma CentersABSTRACT
This multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel cranial remolding helmet (baby band2), which is completely custom-made based on the shape of an infant's cranium. The study included 224 full-term infants from moderate to very severe positional plagiocephaly in Japan. Cranial geometry was assessed before and after helmet therapy using a three-dimensional scanner, and changes in the cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) were analyzed. The CVAI improved significantly in all patients, with the most significant improvement observed in the most severely affected group [very severe group: -9.1, severe group: -6.6, moderate group: -4.4 (mean values), p < 0.001]. The group that started therapy before the age of 7 months showed greater improvement compared to those who started therapy at the age of 7 months or older; however, both groups demonstrated significant improvement (<7 months group: -6.6, ≥7 months group: -4.4 (mean values), p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in therapy efficacy between the centers (p = 0.402) and sex (p = 0.131). During the study period, helmet therapy did not lead to head circumference stunting, and the incidence of redness with baby band2 was five patients (2.2%). This study demonstrated that baby band2 is effective and safe for the therapy of positional plagiocephaly.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Shock wave overpressure exposures can result in blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) in warfighters. Although combat helmets provide protection against blunt impacts, the protection against blast waves is limited due to the observed high overpressures occurring underneath the helmet. One route to enhance these helmets is by incorporating viscoelastic materials into the helmet designs, reducing pressures imposed on the head. This study aims to further investigate this mitigation technique against under-helmet overpressures by adding a viscoelastic liner to the inside of a combat helmet. Methods: The liner's effectiveness was evaluated by exposing it to free-field blasts of Composition C-4 at overpressures ranging from 27.5 to 165 kPa (4 - 24 psi) and comparing shock waveform parameters to an unlined helmet. Blasts were conducted using an instrumented manikin equipped with and without a helmet and then with a helmet modified to incorporate a viscoelastic liner. Evaluation of blast exposure results focused on the waveform parameters of peak pressure, impulse and positive phase duration. Results: The results show that peak overpressure was higher when wearing a helmet compared to not wearing a helmet. However, the helmet with the viscoelastic liner reduced the average peak overpressures compared to the helmet alone. For the lowest overpressure tested, 27.5 kPa, the helmet liner decreased the overpressure on the top of the head by 37.6%, with reduction reaching 26% at the highest overpressure exposure of 165 kPa. Additionally, the inclusion of the viscoelastic material extended the shock waveforms' duration, reducing the rate the shock wave was applied to the head. The results of this study show the role a helmet and helmet design play in the level of blast exposure imposed on a wearer. The testing and evaluation of these materials hold promise for enhancing helmet design to better protect against bTBI.
ABSTRACT
Cycling remains a popular activity for children and youth around the world, combining the fun of moving at speed with numerous health and societal benefits. However, cycling is also associated with risk for serious injury and death. Over the past decade, research has increasingly shown that improving safety for cyclists depends, in large part, on the environment they are cycling in as well as on individual safety measures such as helmet use. The pandemic provided greater opportunity for many children and youth to engage in cycling, and refocused public attention on safer cycling infrastructure such as protected bike lanes. This statement reviews the evidence supporting safer cycling infrastructure for children and youth along with the physical and mental health benefits of cycling. The advantages of active transportation for young people, and how the built environment influences their cycling safety and uptake, are discussed. An overview of measures individuals can take to improve cycling safety is followed by recommendations for clinicians, the cycling community, parents, and policy-makers.
ABSTRACT
Use of noninvasive ventilation provided by a helmet increased globally during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This approach may reduce need for intubation and its associated clinical complications in critically ill patients. Use of helmet interface minimizes virus aerosolization while enabling verbal communication, oral feeding and coughing/expectoration of secretions during its administration. Although improved oral hydration is a recognized benefit of helmet NIV, relatively little is known about the safety and efficiency of swallowing during helmet NIV. Risk of aspiration is a key consideration given the fragile pulmonary status of critically ill patients requiring respiratory support, and therefore the decision to initiate oral intake is best made based on multidisciplinary input. We reviewed the current published evidence on NIV and its effects on upper airway physiology and swallowing function. We then presented a case example demonstrating preservation of swallowing performance with helmet NIV. Last, we offer provisional multidisciplinary guidance for clinical practice, and provide directions for future research.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Head injuries are the most common cause of death in some motorized vehicles for which helmet use can significantly decrease the risk. Our objective was to determine rural adolescents' attitudes regarding helmets and their use while riding ATVs, motorcycles and dirt bikes. METHODS: A convenience sample of 2022 Iowa FFA (formerly Future Farmers of America) Leadership Conference attendees were surveyed. After compilation, data were imported into the statistical program, R ( https://www.R-project.org/ ). Descriptive statistics, contingency table, logistic regression and non-parametric alternatives to ANOVA analyses were performed. RESULTS: 1331 adolescents (13-18 years) participated. One half lived on a farm, 21% lived in the country/not on a farm and 28% were from towns. Nearly two-thirds (65%) owned an ATV with 77% of all having ridden one in the past year. Farm residents had the highest ATV ownership (78%) and having ridden (80%) proportions, both p < 0.001. Overall, ownership and ridership for motorcycles (22% and 30%, respectively) and dirt bikes (29% and 39%, respectively) was significantly less than ATVs, all p < 0.001. Of ATV riders, those living on farms or in the country/not on a farm rode them more frequently than those from towns, p < 0.001. Higher percentages always/mostly wore helmets when riding dirt bikes (51%) and motorcycles (57%) relative to ATVs (21%), p < 0.001. Those from farms had lower proportions wearing helmets versus those living elsewhere for all vehicles. Helmet use importance ratings (1-10, 10 high) were not different for motorcycles (mean 8.6, median 10) and dirt bikes (mean 8.3, median 10), but much lower for ATVs (mean 6.1, median 6). Females, non-owners, and helmet law supporters all had higher helmet use importance ratings. Males, those from farms, and owners and riders of the vehicles all had lower proportions that supported helmet laws. Support for helmet laws was significantly lower for ATVs (30.7%) than dirt bikes (56.3%) or motorcycles (72.3%), both p < 0.001. Those whose families had strict ATV "No Helmet, No Riding" rules had much higher helmet use and helmet importance ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the safety culture surrounding helmet use is relatively poor among rural adolescents, especially on farms, and deserves targeted interventions.
ABSTRACT
Most maxillofacial traumas are caused by road traffic collisions and, in particular, by motorcycle accidents. Helmets represent an efficient protective tool in these traumas but they do not provide complete protection. The aim of this study was to perform an epidemiological analysis of facial fractures pattern in relation to the helmet type worn during the accident. The study was a retrospective analysis of 282 patients with a diagnosis of maxillofacial fracture caused by a motorcycle accident. The patients were divided in three groups based on helmet type (Group A: full-face helmet; Group B: modular [half-face] helmet; Group C: open-face helmet). For each group, fractures type and trauma severity, using the Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) scale, were recorded. Results showed that isolated midface fractures were strongly related to full-face helmet wearing (p < 0.001), while mandibular fractures and panfacial trauma/combined fractures were negatively correlated (p < 0.001). Mandibular fractures (p < 0.001) and panfacial trauma/combined fractures (p < 0.001) were strongly related to open helmet. Moreover, severe trauma (CFI 8.16) was recorded for open-face helmet wearing. In conclusion, full-face helmet wearing reduced the risk of facial fracture, in particular panfacial trauma/combined fractures, while open-face helmet wearing increased the risk of these fractures.
ABSTRACT
Understanding the origins of novel complex traits, the evolutionary transitions they enabled, and how those shaped the subsequent course of evolution, are all foundational objectives of evolutionary biology. Yet how developmental systems may transform to yield the first eye, limb, or placenta remains poorly understood. Seminal work by Courtney Clark-Hachtel, David Linz, and Yoshinori Tomoyasu published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2013 used the origins of insect wings - one of the most impactful innovations of animal life on Earth - to provide both a case study and a new way of thinking of how novel complex traits may come into being. This paradigm-setting study not only transformed the way we view insect wings, their origins, and their affinities to other morphological structures; even more importantly, it created entryways to envision innovation as emerging gradually, not somehow divorced from ancestral homology, but through it via the differential modification, fusion, and elaboration of ancestral component parts. In a conceptual universe of descent with modification, where everything new must ultimately emerge from the old, this work thereby established a powerful bridge connecting ancestral homology and novelty through a gradual process of innovation, sparking much creative and groundbreaking work to follow since its publication just a little over a decade ago.
ABSTRACT
Bicycle helmets are designed to protect against skull fractures and associated focal brain injuries, driven by helmet standards. Another type of head injury seen in injured cyclists is diffuse brain injuries, but little is known about the protection provided by bicycle helmets against these injuries. Here, we examine the performance of modern bicycle helmets in preventing diffuse injuries and skull fractures under impact conditions that represent a range of real-world incidents. We also investigate the effects of helmet technology, price, and mass on protection against these pathologies. 30 most popular helmets among UK cyclists were purchased within 9.99-135.00 GBP price range. Helmets were tested under oblique impacts onto a 45° anvil at 6.5 m/s impact speed and four locations, front, rear, side, and front-side. A new headform, which better represents the average human head's mass, moments of inertia and coefficient of friction than any other available headforms, was used. We determined peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration (PRA), peak rotational velocity (PRV), and BrIC. We also determined the risk of skull fractures based on PLA (linear risk), risk of diffuse brain injuries based on BrIC (rotational risk), and their mean (overall risk). Our results show large variation in head kinematics: PLA (80-213 g), PRV (8.5-29.9 rad/s), PRA (1.6-9.7 krad/s2), and BrIC (0.17-0.65). The overall risk varied considerably with a 2.25 ratio between the least and most protective helmet. This ratio was 1.76 for the linear and 4.21 for the rotational risk. Nine best performing helmets were equipped with the rotation management technology MIPS, but not all helmets equipped with MIPS were among the best performing helmets. Our comparison of three tested helmets which have MIPS and no-MIPS versions showed that MIPS reduced rotational kinematics, but not linear kinematics. We found no significant effect of helmet price on exposure-adjusted injury risks. We found that larger helmet mass was associated with higher linear risk. This study highlights the need for a holistic approach, including both rotational and linear head injury metrics and risks, in helmet design and testing. It also highlights the need for providing information about helmet safety to consumers to help them make an informed choice.
ABSTRACT
This study aims to explore the effects of helmet structure designs and wearing modes on the protective performance of safety helmets under the impact of falling objects. Four helmet types (no helmet, V-shaped, dome-shaped, and motorcycle helmets) and five wearing modes (left and right tilt by 5 deg, backward tilt by 15 deg, 0 deg without chin strap, 0 deg with chin strap) were included in this study. The axial impact of a concrete block under various impact velocities was simulated. The results indicate that the energy absorption and shock mitigation effects of the foam cushion are superior to those of the suspension system in traditional industrial safety helmets. The structure of the top of V-shaped helmets is designed to withstand greater impact. Regarding the wearing mode, the helmet strap's deflection angle increases stress in the brain tissue and skull, heightens intracranial pressure, and causes pressure diffusion toward the forehead.
Subject(s)
Equipment Design , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Mechanical Phenomena , SafetyABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: Previous evidence has shown that American football headgear (e.g., facemasks, visors/eye shields) differentially impairs reaction time (RT) to visual stimuli, most notably in peripheral fields of view. However, this has only been established with stationary RT testing, which may not translate to gameplay situations that require gross motor skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to build upon previous findings to elucidate the effects of various American football headgear on gross motor visuomotor drill performance. Methods: Division 1 NCAA football players (n = 16) with normal/corrected-to-normal vision participated and completed two experiments (EXP), each with differing conditions: EXP1- Varying facemask reinforcement and EXP2- Varying visor/eye shield light transmittance. In EXP1, participants completed an agility test for the following conditions: baseline/no helmet (BL), helmet + light (HL), helmet + medium (HM), and helmet + heavy (HH) face mask reinforcement. In EXP2, participants completed an agility test for the following conditions: baseline/no helmet (BL), helmet + clear visor (HCV), helmet + smoke-tinted visor (HSV), and helmet + mirrored visor (HMV). For each condition in EXP1 and EXP2, participants completed a reactive agility task using a FITLIGHT trainer system where five poles were equipped with a total of ten LED sensors and were placed in a semi-circle 1 m around a center point. Participants were asked to step and reach with their hands to hit each ten lights individually as fast as possible upon illumination. Each reactive agility test was repeated for a total of three attempts. Results: Average reaction time was analyzed and compared between conditions and according to visual fields of interest (e.g., central vs. peripheral). Results from EXP1 showed that compared to BL, reactive agility was worsened by HL (p = 0.030), HM (p = 0.034), and HH (p = 0.003) conditions. No differences between facemask conditions existed for overall performance (p > 0.05). For EXP2, HCV (p < 0.001), HSV (p < 0.001), and HMV (p < 0.001) conditions resulted in worsened reactive agility performance compared to BL. No differences between visor conditions existed for overall performance (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, these findings suggest that American football headgear impairs reactive agility, which could result in worsened game performance and safety. Future studies investigating training strategies to overcome impairments are warranted.
ABSTRACT
The improper wearing or absence of helmets represents a significant contributing factor to fatal accidents in motorcycle driving. This dataset serves the purpose of detecting whether individuals have correctly or incorrectly worn helmets through camera-based analysis. The Helmet dataset has been curated, comprising a total of 28,736 images featuring various helmet types, including Full-Face, Half-Face, Modular, and Off-Road Helmets, in both correct and incorrect configurations. Captured using an iPhone 13 and Mi10T mobile phones, the images exhibit diverse climatic conditions, ranging from daytime to night-time scenarios. Subsequent to image acquisition, a pre-processing phase was undertaken to standardize the dataset. This involved renaming the images and adjusting their dimensions to a uniform 768 × 576 resolution, after which they were organized into respective folders. The uniqueness of this dataset lies in its incorporation of diverse environmental conditions, comprehensive helmet types, variability in helmet orientations, and its status as a large and balanced dataset, thereby presenting a realistic representation of real-world scenarios. The dataset's utility extends to various machine learning tasks, including image classification, object detection, and pose estimation specifically geared towards helmet recognition. Its scientific value lies in its potential to advance research and development in the realm of safety measures associated with motorcycle helmet usage.
ABSTRACT
Neck pain associated with helmet-wear is an occupational health problem often observed in helicopter pilots and aircrew. Whether aircrew helmet wearing is associated with physiological and biomechanical differences between sexes is currently unknown. This study investigated neuromuscular activation patterns during different helmet-wearing conditions. The helmet load was manipulated through a novel Helmet Balancing System (HBS) in healthy, non-pilot male and female participants (n = 10 each, age 19-45 years) in two phases. Phase A assessed the acute effects of helmet-wear on neck muscles activation during head movements. Phase B examined changes in muscle activity and cervical disc height after wearing a helmet for 45 min. In Phase A, muscle activity was similar between sexes in many movements, but it was higher in female participants when wearing a helmet than in males. The HBS reduced muscle activity in both sexes. In Phase B, female participants exhibited a greater level of muscular fatigue, and male participants' cervical disc height was significantly decreased [5.7 (1.4) vs. 4.4 (1.5) mm, P < 0.001] after continuous wearing. Both sexes showed no significant change in muscle fatigue and disc height [male: 5.0 (1.3) vs. 5.2 (1.4) mm, P = 0.604] after applying HBS. These findings demonstrate sex-specific physiological and biomechanical responses to wearing a helmet. They may indicate different postural and motor control strategies, associated with different neck pain aetiologies in male and female aircrew, the knowledge of which is important to reduce or prevent musculoskeletal injuries associated with helmet wearing.
Subject(s)
Head Protective Devices , Muscle Fatigue , Neck Muscles , Humans , Female , Male , Neck Muscles/physiology , Adult , Muscle Fatigue/physiology , Middle Aged , Cervical Vertebrae , Young Adult , Sex Characteristics , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , ElectromyographyABSTRACT
The National Football League (NFL) is a highly popular sport in the United States, attracting numerous aspiring athletes due to its lucrative pay and fame. However, the pursuit of a career in the NFL comes with significant health risks, particularly concussions and their long-term effects. Repeated head traumas in the NFL can lead to chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by a spectrum ranging from cognitive and behavioral aberrations and has been linked to conditions such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. Despite growing evidence, NFL officials have historically downplayed the connection between concussions and CTE, attributing symptoms to other factors such as performance-enhancing drugs. To address the concussion crisis, the NFL has implemented rule changes and partnered with engineers to develop safer helmets. However, the most effective approach to combating CTE involves early detection through MRI brain scans, which are a potential method for identifying the disease in living patients and subsequently facilitating early intervention. While other contact sports such as boxing have been shown to increase the risk of traumatic brain injury as well as CTE, the impact the NFL has on CTE is the most prominent in today's society. This editorial emphasizes the need for the NFL to acknowledge the clear link between concussions and CTE and to invest in comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic strategies such as new monoclonal antibody therapies. Despite ethical and technical challenges, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and the risks associated with radioactive scans, advancing these methods could save lives and improve the long-term health outcomes of current and former NFL players. Enhanced understanding and proactive management of CTE are crucial for mitigating the severe impact of concussions in professional football.