Combining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy with repeated toilet bronchoscopies for respiratory failure due to excessive infected airway secretions: a case report and series from a non-intensive hospital ward.

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FBO) has diagnostic or therapeutic purposes but can cause respiratory deterioration, particularly in patients with pre-existing acute respiratory failure (ARF). Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) are used as respiratory support for ARF as well as to prevent significant oxygen deterioration during FBO. The combined use of NIV and early therapeutic FBO to clear retained abundant infected secretions from the airways may be an alternative to intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), but no data exist on the combined use of FBO and HFNC. A 78-year-old male patient with ARF secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation and pneumonia was admitted to our non-intensive geriatric ward. After an initial improvement, his respiratory conditions worsened. While continuing HFNC, he underwent a series of eight FBOs over 9 days, each performed in response to significant decreases in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). The goal was to remove copious and occlusive infected secretions from the airways, with each procedure resulting in good SpO2 recovery. After etiological targeted antibiotic therapy based on bronchial aspirate, the patient improved and was discharged. Next, six consecutive similar ARF patients were treated using the same strategy of combining HFNC with repeated toilet FBO performed within the ward to clear secretions. All patients showed improvement and were discharged. The combination of HFNC and repeated toilet FBO could be a safe and effective intervention in non-intensive wards to prevent intubation and IMV in frail and elderly patients with ARF secondary to copious and occlusive infected secretions in the airways.

Impact of high-flow oxygen therapy via high velocity nasal insufflation on diaphragmatic thickening fraction in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy [HFNC] on the diaphragm thickening fraction. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive, cohort study SETTING: The study was conducted in the Physiology and Respiratory Care Laboratory, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen healthy subjects >18 years old INTERVENTIONS: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Demographic data (age and gender), anthropometric data (weight, height, and body mass index), and clinical and respiratory variables (Diaphragm thickening fraction [DTf], esophageal pressure swing, respiratory rate [RR], esophageal pressure-time product per minute [PTPes/min]). RESULTS: Median DTf decreased significantly as flow increased (p < 0.05). The baseline DTf measurement was 21.4 %, 18.3 % with 20 L/m, and 16.4 % with 40 L/m. We also observed a significant decrease in RR as flow increased in HFNC (p < 0.05). In the 8 subjects with recordings, the PTPes/min was 81.3 (±30.8) cmH2O/sec/min and 64.4 (±25.3) cmH2O/sec/min at baseline and 40 L/m respectively (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The use of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula of HFNC in healthy subjects decreases the DTf and RR in association with increased flow. In addition, the use of 40 L/m flow may reduce the muscular work associated with respiration.

High flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Although cumulative studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, randomized trials to compare HFNC with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as initial treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure are limited. The aim of this randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial was to compare treatment failure rates between HFNC and NIV in such patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AECOPD with a baseline arterial blood gas pH between 7.25 and 7.35 and PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg admitted to two intensive care units (ICUs) at a large tertiary academic teaching hospital between March 2018 and December 2022 were randomly assigned to HFNC or NIV. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation or a switch to the other study treatment modality. Secondary endpoints were rates of intubation or treatment change, blood gas values, vital signs at one, 12, and 48 h, 28-day mortality, as well as ICU and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: 225 total patients (113 in the HFNC group and 112 in the NIV group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The failure rate of the HFNC group was 25.7%, while the NIV group was 14.3%. The failure rate risk difference between the two groups was 11.38% (95% CI 0.25-21.20, P = 0.033), which was higher than the non-inferiority cut-off of 9%. In the per-protocol analysis, treatment failure occurred in 28 of 110 patients (25.5%) in the HFNC group and 15 of 109 patients (13.8%) in the NIV group (risk difference, 11.69%; 95% CI 0.48-22.60). The intubation rate in the HFNC group was higher than in the NIV group (14.2% vs 5.4%, P = 0.026). The treatment switch rate, ICU and hospital length of stay or 28-day mortality in the HFNC group were not statistically different from the NIV group (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: HFNC was not shown to be non-inferior to NIV and resulted in a higher incidence of treatment failure than NIV when used as the initial respiratory support for AECOPD patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org (ChiCTR1800014553). Registered 21 January 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in seven cats with respiratory failure.

CASE SERIES SUMMARY: This case series describes seven cats that were treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNOT). Seven cats were prospectively (n = 5) or retrospectively (n = 2) included from three veterinary university referral centers between March 2020 and September 2023. Data on signalment, medical history, clinical and diagnostic findings, treatment administered, response to HFNOT and outcomes were recorded. All cats included in this case series failed to respond to oxygen cage or flow-by oxygen therapy and were subsequently transitioned to HFNOT. After this transition, these cats demonstrated a marked improvement in respiratory parameters, including respiratory rate, effort and oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry, within 1 h of initiating HFNOT. All cats tolerated HFNOT well without any complications. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: There is limited literature reporting the use of HFNOT in feline patients. This is the first case series in the literature of HFNOT utilized as an advanced oxygen delivery method for feline respiratory failure. This case series indicates that HFNOT improves oxygenation in feline patients that fail to respond to conventional oxygen therapy.

Seven cats with respiratory failure received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, which improved their oxygenation. Three were successfully weaned off the therapy, and one survived and was discharged.

Effectiveness, Adherence and Safety of Home High Flow Nasal Cannula in Chronic Respiratory Disease and Respiratory Insufficiency: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of home high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for the treatment of chronic respiratory failure in patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) has not been summarized. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness, adherence, and safety of HFNC in the long-term treatment of patients with chronic respiratory diseases and respiratory failure. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. PubMed, Web of science, and SCOPUS were search up to August 2023. Long-term HFNC studies (≥4 weeks) reporting dyspnea; exacerbations, hospitalizations; peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), comfort; patient experience, health-related quality of life or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2) were included. RESULTS: Thirteen articles (701 patients) based on 10 studies were selected: randomized control trials (n=3), randomized crossover trials (n=2), crossover (n=3) and retrospective (n=2) studies. COPD (n=6), bronchiectasis (n=2), COPD/bronchiectasis (n=1) and ILD (n=1) were the underlined CRDs. HFNC reduced exacerbations when compared to usual care/home respiratory therapies (n=6). Quality of life outcomes were also in favor of HFNC in patients with COPD and bronchiectasis (n=6). HFNC had significant effects on hospitalizations, paCO2, and lung function. Adherence ranged from 5.2 to 8.6h/day (n=5). Three studies reported no events, 3 non-serious events and 2 no differences compared with other home respiratory therapies. CONCLUSIONS: HFNC seems more effective than usual care or other home respiratory therapies in reducing exacerbations and improving quality of life in patients with COPD and bronchiectasis, while presenting good adherence and being safe. Its apparently superior effectiveness needs to be better studied in future real-world pragmatic trials.

The utility of the respiratory rate-oxygenation index as a predictor of treatment response in dogs receiving high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the respiratory rate-oxygenation index (ROX) and the ratio of pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (SpO2/FiO2, [SF]) to determine whether these indices are predictive of outcome in dogs receiving high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNOT). Design: This is a prospective observational study. Setting: This study was carried out at two university teaching hospitals. Animals: In total, 88 dogs treated with HFNOT for hypoxemic respiratory failure due to various pulmonary diseases were selected. Measurements and main results: The ROX index was defined as the SF divided by the respiratory rate (RR). ROX and SF were calculated at baseline and for each hour of HFNOT. The overall success rate of HFNOT was 38% (N = 33/88). Variables predicting HFNOT success were determined using logistic regression, and the predictive power of each variable was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). ROX and SF were adequately predictive of HFNOT success when averaged over 0-16 h of treatment, with similar AUCs of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.83) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.66-0.87), respectively (p < 0.05). SF showed acceptable discriminatory power in predicting HFNOT outcome at 7 h, with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.93, p = 0.013), and the optimal cutoff for predicting HFNC failure at 7 h was SF ≤ 191 (sensitivity 83% and specificity 76%). Conclusion: These indices were easily obtained in dogs undergoing HFNOT. The results suggest that ROX and SF may have clinical utility in predicting the outcomes of dogs on HFNOT. Future studies are warranted to confirm these findings in a larger number of dogs in specific disease populations.

Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery, with a Post-Extubation Atelectasis as a Complication.

Background: Utilizing high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy may prevent the collapse of alveoli and improve overall alveolar ventilation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of HFNC on postoperative atelectasis in individuals undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer were randomly assigned to the control or HFNC groups. After the surgical procedure was complete and the trachea was extubated, both groups underwent an initial lung ultrasound (LUS) scan. In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), the control group received conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy, while the HFNC group received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. A second LUS scan was conducted before the patient was transferred to the ward. The primary outcome measured was the total LUS score at the time of PACU discharge. Results: In the HFNC group (n = 39), the LUS score and the incidence of atelectasis at PACU discharge were significantly lower compared to the control group (n = 39) [(5 vs 10, P < 0.001), (48.72% vs 82.05%, P = 0.002)]. None of the patients in the HFNC group experienced hypoxemia in the PACU, whereas six patients in the control group did (P = 0.03). Additionally, the minimum SpO2 value in the PACU was notably higher in the HFNC group compared to the control group [99 vs 97, P < 0.001]. Conclusion: Based on the results, HFNC improves the extent of postoperative atelectasis and decreases the occurrence of atelectasis in individuals undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Continuous positive airway pressure versus high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The relative effectiveness of initial non-invasive respiratory strategies for acute respiratory failure using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of CPAP and HFNC on reducing the risk of meeting the prespecified criteria for intubation and improving clinical outcomes of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The primary endpoint was the time taken to meet the prespecified criteria for intubation within 28 days. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to the CPAP or HFNC group. Eleven (28.9%) in the CPAP group and twenty (42.6%) in the HFNC group met the criteria for intubation within 28 days. Compared with HFNC, CPAP reduced the risk of meeting the intubation criteria (hazard ratio [HR], 0.327; 95% CI, 0.148-0.724; p = 0.006). There were no significant between-group differences in the intubation rates, in-hospital and 28-day mortality rates, ventilator-free days, duration of the need for respiratory support, or duration of hospitalization for respiratory illness. Pulmonary oxygenation was significantly better in the CPAP group, with significantly lower pH and higher partial pressure of carbon dioxide, but there were no differences in the respiratory rate between groups. CPAP and HFNC were associated with few possibly causal adverse events. CONCLUSION: CPAP is more effective than HFNC at reducing the risk of meeting the intubation criteria in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy in COVID-19: retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes - single center experience.

Background: High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy emerged as the therapy of choice in COVID-19-related pneumonia and moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). HFNC oxygen therapy in COVID-19 has been recommended based its use to treat AHRF of other etiologies, and studies on assessing outcomes in COVID-19 patients are highly needed. This study aimed to examine outcomes in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and severe AHRF treated with HFNC. Materials and methods: The study included 235 COVID-19 patients with pneumonia treated with HFNC. Data extracted from medical records included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, clinical and oxygenation status, clinical complications, as well as the length of hospital stay. Patients were segregated into two groups based on their oxygen therapy needs: HDU group, those who exclusively required HFNC and ICU group, those whose oxygen therapy needed to be escalated at some point of hospital stay. The primary outcome was the need for respiratory support escalation (noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation) and the secondary outcome was the in-hospital all-cause mortality. Results: The primary outcome was met in 113 (48%) of patients. The overall mortality was 70%, significantly higher in the ICU group [102 (90.2%) vs. 62 (50.1%), p < 0.001]. The rate of intrahospital infections was significantly higher in the ICU group while there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay between the groups. The ICU group exhibited significant increases in D-dimer, NLR, and NEWS values, accompanied by a significant decrease in the SaO2/FiO2 ratio. The multivariable COX proportional regression analysis identified malignancy, higher levels of 4C Mortality Score and NEWS2 as significant predictors of mortality. Conclusion: High-Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy is a safe type of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with significantly less possibility for emergence of intrahospital infections. In 52% of patients, HFNC was successful in treating AHRF in COVID-19 patients. Overall, mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia with AHRF is still very high, especially in patients treated with noninvasive/invasive mechanical ventilation.

Effects of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in combination with type II respiratory failure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and type II respiratory failure. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with AECOPD and type II respiratory failure were randomly allocated to an HFNC oxygen therapy trial group or a non-invasive positive-pressure ventilator therapy (NIPPV) control group. Their arterial blood gas parameters and comfort, evaluated using a questionnaire, were compared before and after the therapeutic interventions. RESULTS: The PaCO2 and blood HCO3- concentration of both groups were significantly reduced by the treatments, whereas the pH, PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 were increased. The PaCO2 of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group following treatment. The PaO2 of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group. The tracheal intubation rates of the two groups did not significantly differ. After treatment, all the indices of comfort were rated higher in the HFNC group than in the NIPPV group. CONCLUSIONS: HFNC has a good therapeutic effect in patients with AECOPD and type II respiratory failure. It improves patient comfort and has clinical value.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy in intensive care unit patients after extubation.

BACKGROUND: Optimal oxygen supply is the cornerstone of the management of critically ill patients after extubation. High flow oxygen system is an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. This research explored the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients after extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed critically ill patients admitted to the ICU and subjected to HFNC or conventional oxygen therapy from January 2018 to June 2022 at the Suzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. Blood gas analysis, a cough and sputum assessment, and cardiovascular function examinations were performed to evaluate the effect of HFNC oxygen therapy on patients. Also, the 28-d mortality rate, reintubation rate and incidence of respiratory failure were analyzed to evaluate whether HFNC oxygen therapy could improve patients' outcome. RESULTS: In patients who received HFNC oxygen therapy, the partial pressure of oxygen and oxygenation index increased, and the respiratory rate decreased. HFNC oxygen therapy improved the patients' ability to cough up sputum and promoted the expulsion of sputum. In terms of cardiovascular function, patients who received HFNC oxygen therapy had a significant improvement in heart rate, but there was no real effect on patients' arterial pressure. There was no significant difference in the rates of reintubation (P = 0.202), 28-d mortality (P = 0.558) or respiratory failure (P = 0.677) between patients who received different oxygen therapies including HFNC oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: HFNC oxygen therapy improves the respiratory function of patients after extubation in their ICU and improves their coughing ability.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy versus Non-Invasive Ventilation in AIDS Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains the most common diagnosis for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, open-labeled, randomized controlled trial at the ICU, Beijing Ditan Hospital, China. AIDS patients with ARF were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) immediately after randomization. The primary outcome was the need for endotracheal intubation on day 28. RESULTS: 120 AIDS patients were enrolled and 56 patients in the HFNC group and 57 patients in the NIV group after secondary exclusion. Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) was the main etiology for ARF (94.7%). The intubation rates on day 28 were similar to HFNC and NIV (28.6% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.457). Kaplan-Meier curves showed no statistical difference in cumulative intubation rates between the two groups (log-rank test 0.401, p = 0.527). The number of airway care interventions in the HFNC group was fewer than in the NIV group (6 (5-7) vs. 8 (6-9), p < 0.001). The rate of intolerance in the HFNC group was lower than in the NIV group (1.8% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.032). The VAS scores of device discomfort in the HFNC group were lower than that in the NIV group at 2 h (4 (4-5) vs. 5 (4-7), p = 0.042) and at 24 h (4 (3-4) vs. 4 (3-6), p = 0.036). The respiratory rate in the HFNC group was lower than that in the NIV group at 24 h (25 ± 4/min vs. 27 ± 5/min, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Among AIDS patients with ARF, there was no statistical significance of the intubation rate between HFNC and NIV. HFNC had better tolerance and device comfort, fewer airway care interventions, and a lower respiratory rate than NIV. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Chictr.org (ChiCTR1900022241).

High-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure in primary respiratory support for preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Respiratory support is crucial for the survival of preterm infants, and High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy (HFNC) and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) are commonly used for neonatal respiratory support. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of HFNC and CPAP in primary respiratory support for preterm infants, to provide evidence-based support for clinical practice. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, VIP, WANFANG and SinoMed were searched for eligible studies. The primary outcomes included the incidence of treatment failure and the application of mechanical ventilation. A total of 27 eligible studies with 3,351 participants were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory support failure [RR = 1.17, 95%CI (0.88-1.56)] and the application of mechanical ventilation [RR = 1.00, 95%CI (0.84-1.19)] between HFNC group and CPAP group. HFNC resulted in lower rate of air leaks [RR = 0.65, 95%CI (0.46-0.92)], nasal trauma [RR = 0.36, 95%CI (0.29-0.45)] and abdominal distension [RR = 0.39, 95%CI (0.27-0.58)], and later time of mechanical ventilation initiating [SMD = 0.60, 95%CI (0.21-0.99)], less duration of oxygen therapy [SMD = -0.35, 95%CI (-0.68 to -0.02)] and earlier enteral feeding [SMD = -0.54, 95%CI (-0.95 to -0.13)]. Alternative non-invasive respiratory support after initial treatment failure resulted in no difference in the application of mechanical ventilation between the two groups [RR = 0.99, 95%CI (0.52-1.88)]. HFNC might be more effective and safer in primary respiratory support for preterm infants. Using CPAP as a remedy for the treatment failure of HFNC could not avoid intubation. For premature infants with the gestational age <28 weeks, HFNC as primary respiratory support still needs to be further elucidated. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022313479, identifier: CRD42022313479.

Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNC) may be an attractive first-line ventilatory support in COVID-19 patients. However, HNFC use for the management of COVID-19 patients and risk factors for HFNC failure remain to be determined. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) in the first (Mars-May 2020) and second (August 2020- February 202) French pandemic waves. Patients with limitations for intubation were excluded. HFNC failure was defined as the need for intubation after ICU admission. The impact of HFNC use was analyzed in the whole cohort and after constructing a propensity score. Risk factors for HNFC failure were identified through a landmark time-dependent cause-specific Cox model. The ability of the 6-h ROX index to detect HFNC failure was assessed by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: 200 patients were included: HFNC was used in 114(57%) patients, non-invasive ventilation in 25(12%) patients and 145(72%) patients were intubated with a median delay of 0 (0-2) days after ICU admission. Overall, 78(68%) patients had HFNC failure. Patients with HFNC failure had a higher ICU mortality rate (34 vs. 11%, p = 0.02) than those without. At landmark time of 48 and 72 h, SAPS-2 score, extent of CT-Scan abnormalities > 75% and HFNC duration (cause specific hazard ratio (CSH) = 0.11, 95% CI (0.04-0.28), per + 1 day, p < 0.001 at 48 h and CSH = 0.06, 95% CI (0.02-0.23), per + 1 day, p < 0.001 at 72 h) were associated with HFNC failure. The 6-h ROX index was lower in patients with HFNC failure but could not reliably predicted HFNC failure with an area under ROC curve of 0.65 (95% CI(0.52-0.78), p = 0.02). In the matched cohort, HFNC use was associated with a lower risk of intubation (CSH = 0.32, 95% CI (0.19-0.57), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In critically-ill COVID-19 patients, while HFNC use as first-line ventilatory support was associated with a lower risk of intubation, more than half of patients had HFNC failure. Risk factors for HFNC failure were SAPS-2 score and extent of CT-Scan abnormalities > 75%. The risk of HFNC failure could not be predicted by the 6-h ROX index but decreased after a 48-h HFNC duration.

[Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy and non-rebreather face mask in the treatment of mild carbon monoxide poisoning].

Objective: To compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-rebreather face mask (NRFM) in the treatment of mild acute carbon monoxide poisoning (ACOP) in reducing carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) , and to explore the feasibility of HFNC in the treatment of ACOP. Methods: Patients with mild ACOP with COHb >10% who were admitted to the emergency department of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020 were analyzed, and those with altered consciousness, mechanical ventilation and those requiring hyperbaric oxygen therapy were excluded. The patients were divided into HFNC group and NRFM group according to the oxygen therapy used in the emergency department. The COHb decline value and COHb half-life in the two groups were observed. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled, including 39 in the NRFM group and 32 in the HFNC group. The baseline COHb in the HFNC group was 24.8%±8.3%, and that in the NRFM group was 22.5%±7.1%, with no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.27, P=0.094) . At 60 min, 90 min and 120 min of treatment, COHb in both groups decreased, but the COHb in HFNC group was lower than that in NRFM group at the same time point (P<0.05) . After 1 h of treatment, the COHb decrease in the HFNC group (16.9%±4.5%) was significantly higher than that in the NRFM group (10.1%±7.8%) (t=4.32, P=0.013) . The mean half-life of COHb in the HFNC group (39.3 min) was significantly lower than that in the NRFM group (61.4 min) (t=4.69, P=0.034) . Conclusion: HFNC treatment of mild ACOP can rapidly reduce blood COHb level, it is a potential oxygen therapy method for clinical treatment of ACOP.

The quality and quantity of sleep on dexmedetomidine during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.

Purpose : High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is a new type of non-invasive respiratory support for acute respiratory failure patients. However, patients receiving HFNC often develop sleep disturbances. We therefore examined whether dexmedetomidine could preserve the sleep characteristics in patients who underwent HFNC. Patients and Methods : This was a pilot, randomized controlled study. We assigned critically ill patients treated with HFNC to receive dexmedetomidine (0.2 to 0.7 µg / kg / h, DEX group) or not (non-DEX group) at night (9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.). Polysomnograms were monitored during the study period. The primary outcomes were total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency and duration of stage 2 non-rapid eye movement (stage N2) sleep. Results : Of the 28 patients who underwent randomization, 24 were included in the final analysis (12 patients per group). Dexmedetomidine increased the TST (369 min vs. 119 min, p = 0.024) and sleep efficiency (68% vs. 22%, P = 0.024). The duration of stage N2 was increased in the DEX group compared with the non-DEX group, but this finding did not reach statistical significance. The incidences of respiratory depression and hemodynamic instability were similar between the two groups. Conclusions : In critically ill patients who underwent HFNC, dexmedetomidine may optimize the sleep quantity without any adverse events. J. Med. Invest. 69 : 266-272, August, 2022.

Effectiveness of high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients of acute pulmonary thromboembolism with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Background: Acute Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is associated with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), which is a leading cause of death in these patients. High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is a cornerstone of the treatment of respiratory failure. The aim of the present study is to explore the efficacy of HFNC in the treatment of patients of acute PTE with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in India. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients admitted to a tertiary care center with acute PTE with AHRF during the period from January 2018 to January 2020. After reviewing medical files, patients of acute PTE with AHRF treated with HFNC were included in the study. We analyzed the improvement in oxygenation parameters and respiratory rate, as well as outcome in these patients. Results: During the above specified period, 12 patients suffering from PTE with AHRF were treated with HFNC. After 1 h of the initiation of HFNC along with anticoagulation, the respiratory parameters of patients significantly improved. HFNC was applied for a period of 6-10 days. None of the patients required intubation for AHRF, and all patients were discharged from the hospital on oral anticoagulants. Conclusion: HFNC oxygen therapy in patients with acute PTE with AHRF showed rapid improvement of oxygenation and respiratory rate. HFNC oxygen therapy is an efficacious treatment for patients with AHRF secondary to acute PTE without any significant hemodynamic effect. It acts as a superior modality of oxygen therapy avoiding noninvasive and invasive ventilatory support.

Analysis of risk factors for the failure of respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in children with acute respiratory dysfunction: A case-control study.

Background: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines regarding high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use for respiratory support in critically ill children are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to determine the risk factors for early HFNC failure to reduce the failure rate and prevent adverse consequences of HFNC failure in children with acute respiratory dysfunction. Methods: Demographic and laboratory data were compared among patients, admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit between January 2017 and December 2018, who were included in a retrospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for eventual entry into the predictive model for early HFNC failure and to perform an external validation study in a prospective observational cohort study from January to February 2019. Further, the association of clinical indices and trends pre- and post-treatment with HFNC treatment success or failure in these patients was dynamically observed. Results: In total, 348 pediatric patients were included, of these 282 (81.0%) were included in the retrospective cohort study; HFNC success was observed in 182 patients (64.5%), HFNC 0-24 h failure in 74 patients (26.2%), and HFNC 24-48 h failure in 26 patients (9.2%). HFNC 24 h failure was significantly associated with the pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) III score [odds ratio, 1.391; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.249-1.550], arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide-to-arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaCO2/PaO2) ratio (odds ratio, 38.397; 95% CI: 6.410-230.013), and respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index (odds ratio, 0.751; 95% CI: 0.616-0.915). The discriminating cutoff point for the new scoring system based on the three risk factors for HFNC 24 h failure was ≥ 2.0 points, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.794 (95% CI, 0.729-0.859, P < 0.001), sensitivity of 68%, and specificity of 79%; similar values were noted on applying the model to the prospective observational cohort comprising 66 patients (AUC = 0.717, 95% CI, 0.675-0.758, sensitivity 83%, specificity 44%, P = 0.009). In this prospective cohort, 11 patients with HFNC failure had an upward trend in PaCO2/PaO2 ratio and downward trends in respiratory failure index (P/F ratio) and ROX index; however, opposite directions of change were observed in 55 patients with HFNC success. Furthermore, the fractional changes (FCs) in PaCO2/PaO2 ratio, P/F ratio, percutaneous oxygen saturation-to-fraction of inspired oxygen (S/F) ratio, and ROX index at 2 h post-HFNC therapy onset were statistically significant between the two groups (all, P < 0.05). Conclusion: In the pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency, pre-treatment PRISM III score, PaCO2/PaO2 ratio, and ROX index were risk factors for HFNC 24 h failure, and the direction and magnitude of changes in the PaCO2/PaO2 ratio, P/F ratio, and ROX index before and 2 h after HFNC treatment were warning indicators for HFNC 24 h failure. Further close monitoring should be considered for patients with these conditions.

Therapeutic effects and the influence on serum inflammatory factors of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in senior patients with lower respiratory tract infections.

BACKGROUND: Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a clinical multi-infectious disease caused by viral, bacterial, and other microbial infections. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to explore the therapeutic effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and its influence on the serum levels of inflammatory factors in senior patients with LRTI. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 84 senior patients with LRTI were enrolled between March 2017 and December 2019 and divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random number table method, with 42 cases in each group. Conventional nasal cannula (CNC) oxygen therapy was conducted in the control group and HFNC was conducted in the observation group. After 3 days of treatment, sputum properties, sputum volume, sputum viscosity, and sputum crust formation were recorded to determine the clinical efficacy. ELISA was performed to detect the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interlukein (IL)-8 before and after treatment. RESULTS: The total efficacy in the observation group was 92.86%, which was higher than in the control group (73.81%) (P< 0.05). Three days after treatment, the percentage of grade I sputum in the observation group (73.81%) was higher than in the control group (40.48%). Moreover, the percentage of grade II sputum (23.81%), the percentage of grade III sputum (2.38%), together with the sputum crust formation rate in the observation group (4.76%) were all lower than in the control group (45.24, 14.28, and 26.19%, respectively) (P< 0.05). Three days after treatment, the levels of IL-8 (0.21 ± 0.03 pg/L) and TNF-α (1.27 ± 0.14 ng/L) in the observation group were lower than in the control group (0.30 ± 0.04 pg/L, and 1.49 ± 0.18 ng/L) (t= 6.525, 11.665, 6.252, respectively; P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: The application of HFNC in senior patients with LRTI could improve respiratory humidification, reduce the number of sputum aspirations, and improve anti-inflammatory effects. It is worthy of application in elderly patients with LRTI.