The interaction between Pseudomonas C27 and Thiobacillus denitrificans in the integrated autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification process.

Compared to autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification process, the integrated autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification (IAHD) shows wider foreground of applications in the actual wastewaters with organic carbon, nitrogen and sulfur co-existing. The efficient co-removal of sulfur, nitrogen, and carbon in the IAHD system is guaranteed by the interaction between heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrificans. In order to further explore the interaction between functional bacteria, Pseudomonas C27 and Thiobacillus denitrifcans were selected as typical heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria, and their characteristics metabolic responses to different sulfide concentrations were studied. Pseudomonas C27 had higher metabolic activity than T. denitrificans in the IAHD medium with sulfide concentration of 3.12-15.62 mmol/L. Moreover, the fastest sulfide removal rate (0.35 mmol/L·h) was achieved with a single inoculation of Pseudomonas C27. Meanwhile, in mixed inoculant conditions, the interaction between Pseudomonas C27 and T. denitrificans (P:T = 3:1, P:T = 1:1 and P:T = 1:3) yielded the highest sulfide removal efficiency (more than 85%) when sulfide concentration was 6.25-12.5 mmol/L. Additionally, the sulfide removal rate increased with the inoculation proportion of Pseudomonas C27. Thus, this apparent interaction provided a theoretical basis for further understanding and guidance on the efficient operation of IAHD system.

[Electron Equilibrium Analysis of Integrated Autotrophic and Heterotrophic Denitrification Process Under Micro-aerobic Conditions].

The integrated autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification (IAHD) process, which can simultaneously degrade sulfide, nitrate, and organic carbon with nitrate as a solo electron acceptor, has gained increasing attention as a key unit in industrial wastewater treatment. Micro-aerobic technology, which introduces trace oxygen as an additional electron acceptor, has been demonstrated as an effective strategy for enhancing the IAHD performance. This study focus on the electronic balance calculation of the IAHD process and reveals for the first time that the IAHD process can efficient proceed with an insufficient supply of electron acceptors (nitrate) under micro-aerobic conditions. In the IAHD batch tests, the highest sulfide, nitrate, and acetate removal efficiencies and rates were obtained with an electronic deletion rate peak at 55.1%. Further sulfide oxidizing batch tests demonstrated that the electronic deletion rates were 18.7% and 38.2% under oxygen contents of 5 mL and 10 mL, respectively, in the biological sulfide oxidizing process. Illumina sequencing was used to analyze the microbial community structure in the sulfide oxidation process and indicated Thiobacillus, Thauera, Mangroviflexus, and Erysipelothrix dominated in all community compositions, in which the relative abundance of Thiobacillus increased with an increase in the electronic deletion rate. This study reveals a potential linkage between the electronic gap and the enhanced IAHD performance, which proves new insights into the simultaneous sulfur, nitrogen, and organic carbon removal process.

Interactions of functional bacteria and their contributions to the performance in integrated autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification.

Compared to autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification process, the Integrated autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification (IAHD) has wider foreground of applications in the condition where the organic carbon, nitrate and inorganic sulfur compounds usually co-exist in the actual wastewaters. As the most well-known IAHD process, the denitrifying sulfide removal (DSR) could simultaneously convert sulfide, nitrate and organic carbon into sulfur, dinitrogen gas and carbon dioxide, respectively. Thus, systematical metabolic functions and contributions of autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrifiers to the IAHD-DSR performance became an problem demanding to be promptly studied. In this work, three upflow anaerobic sludge bioreactors (UASBs) were individually started up in autotrophic (a-DSR), heterotrophic (h-DSR) and mixotrophic conditions (m-DSR). Then, the operating conditions of each bioreactor were switched to different trophic conditions with low and high sulfide concentrations in the influent (200 and 400 mg/L). The removal efficiencies of sulfide, nitrate and acetate all reached 100% in all three bioreactors throughout the operational stages. However, the sulfur transformation ratio ranged from 34.5% to 39.9% at the low sulfide concentration and from 76.8% to 86.7% at the high sulfide concentration in the mixotrophic conditions. Microbial community structure analyzed by the Illumina sequencing indicated that Thiobacillus, which are autotrophic sulfide-oxidizing, nitrate-reducing bacteria (a-soNRB), was the dominant genus (81.3%) in the a-DSR bioreactor. With respect to the mixotrophic conditions, at low sulfide concentration in the m-DSR bioreactor, Thiobacillus (a-soNRB) and Thauera, which are heterotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (hNRB), were the dominant genera, with percentages of 48.8% and 14.9%, respectively. When the sulfide concentration in the influent was doubled, the percentage of Thiobacillus decreased by approximately 9-fold (from 48.8% to 5.4%), and the total percentage of Azoarcus and Pseudomonas, which are heterotrophic sulfide-oxidizing, nitrate-reducing bacteria (h-soNRB), increased by approximately 6-fold (from 10.1% to 59.4%). Therefore, the following interactions between functional groups and their functional mechanisms in the DSR process were proposed: (1) a-soNRB (Thiobacillus) and hNRB (Thauera) worked together to maintain the performance under the low sulfide concentration; (2) h-soNRB (Azoarcus and Pseudomonas) took the place of a-soNRB and worked together with hNRB (Thauera and Allidiomarina) under the high sulfide concentration; and (3) a-soNRB (such as Thiobacillus) were possibly the key bacteria and may have contributed to the low sulfur transformation, and h-soNRB may be responsible for the high sulfur transformation in the DSR process.