Colorimetric detection of serum creatinine on a miniaturized platform using hue-saturation-value space analysis.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a widespread condition with considerable health and economic impacts globally. However, existing methodologies for serum creatinine assessment often involve prolonged wait times and sophisticated equipment, such as spectrometers, hindering real-time diagnosis and care. Innovative solutions like point-of-care (POC) devices are emerging to address these challenges. In this context, there is a recognized need for remote, regular, automated, and low-cost analysis of serum creatinine levels, given its role as a critical parameter for CKD diagnosis and management. This study introduces a miniaturized system with integrated heater elements designed for precise serum creatinine measurement. The system operates based on the Jaffe method and accurate serum creatinine measurement within a microreservoir chip. Smartphone-based image processing using the hue-saturation-value (HSV) color space was applied to captured images of microreservoirs. The creatinine analyses were conducted in serum with a limit of detection of ~ 0.4 mg/dL and limit of quantification of ~ 1.3 mg/dL. Smartphone-based image processing employing the HSV color space outperformed spectrometric analysis for creatinine measurement conducted in serum. This pioneering technology and smartphone-based processing offer the potential for decentralized renal function testing, which could significantly contribute to improved patient care. The miniaturized system offers a low-cost alternative ($87 per device), potentially reducing healthcare expenditures (~ $0.5 per test) associated with CKD diagnosis and management. This innovation could greatly improve access to diagnosis and monitoring of CKD, especially in regions where access to sophisticated laboratory equipment is limited.

Effect of serum creatinine difference between the Jaffe and the enzymatic method on kidney disease detection and staging.

Background: Serum creatinine (SCr), mainly determined by the Jaffe or an enzymatic method, is the central marker to assess kidney function. Deviations between these two methods may affect the diagnosis and staging of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: The results of the first parallel SCr measurement (Jaffe and enzymatic method) of adult in- and outpatients in the same serum sample at the University Hospital Essen (Essen, Germany) between 2020-2022 were retrospectively evaluated. A Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) was used to assess the difference between the Jaffe and the enzymatic SCr (eSCr) method. We used the 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for determination of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Results: A total of 41 144 parallel SCr measurements were evaluated. On average, Jaffe SCr was 0.07 mg/dl higher than eSCr (LoA -0.12; 0.25 mg/dl). In 19% of all cases there was a different CKD stage when comparing eGFR between both SCr methods, of which 98% resulted in a more severe CKD stage determined with Jaffe SCr. In 1.6% of all cases Jaffe SCr was ≥0.3 mg/dl higher than eSCr. Conclusion: The present study showed that methods of SCr measurement may affect both the diagnosis and staging of AKI and CKD. This must be taken into account when interpreting measurements of renal function in everyday clinical practice, but also when planning and comparing studies on renal diseases. One should therefore stay with one method for SCr measurement, preferably with the enzymatic method.

Comparison of Jaffe Method and Enzymatic Method at Measuring Serum Creatinine Level, Creatinine Clearance and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.

Background: Correct measuring of blood and urine creatinine level is necessary for identification and tracking of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: The aim of this study is a comparison of Jaffe and enzymatic methods for measuring creatinine in serum and in urine, in order to determine whether there are any statistical significant differences between them, and whether they are reflected on creatinine clearance calculation and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Methods: Creatinine in serum and urine was measured for the group of patients (N=60; female=34, male=26) from 24 to 69 years of age by using Jaffe's method on Dimension RxL biochemical analyzer, and enzymatic method on integrated biochemical and immunochemical analyzer Architect ci8200, and obtained levels are used for creatinine clearance calculation and eGFR. Results: The methods correlate well, both in measuring serum creatinine (r 1 = 0.990) and in measuring urine creatinine (r 2 =0.974). There are no statistically significant differences between them (p=0.57). Measuring creatinine using different methods showed no statistically significant differences in the calculated clearances (p=0.93), they significantly correlate (r=0.9722). eGFR, using the MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas, were not statistically significantly different, regardless of the used method. Conclusion: Apart from significant correlations between the used methods, the results of using the Jaffe and enzymatic methods showed no significant differences at measuring serum creatinine level, or creatinine clearance and glomerular filtration rate.

Perfluorooctanesulfonate Can Cause Negative Bias in Creatinine Measurement in Hemodialysis Patients Using Polysulfone Dialysis Membranes.

Serum creatinine is an important clinical marker for renal clearance. However, two conventional methods (Jaffe and enzymatic) are prone to interferences with organic compounds as compared to the standard method (isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) and can cause a significant negative bias. Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are two common perfluorochemicals (PFCs) that can easily be accumulated in humans. We aimed to verify whether this bias is the result of an accumulation of PFCs. The serum creatinine values of 124 hemodialysis patients were analyzed using the three methods. We also aimed to evaluate which biochemical parameters will influence the difference between the conventional methods and the standard method. We found that a significant underestimation occurred when using the conventional methods. Albumin is an independent factor associated with negative bias, but it loses this correlation after dialysis, likely due to the removal of protein-bound uremic toxins. PFOS can cause negative bias when using the enzymatic method. Furthermore, this linear correlation is more significant in patients who used polysulfone-based dialysis membranes, possibly due to the better clearance of other uremic toxins. The serum creatinine of uremic patients can be significantly underestimated when using conventional methods. PFCs, as well the type of dialysis membrane being used, can be influencing factors.

Interference of ketone bodies on laboratory creatinine measurement in children with DKA: a call for change in testing practices.

BACKGROUND: The presence of ketone bodies (KBs) can interfere with creatinine (Cr) measurement in both enzymatic and Jaffe methods. Since a high proportion of children hospitalized for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) develop acute kidney injury (AKI), here we investigate whether KB interferences affect the accuracy of pediatric Cr measurement. METHODS: Residual patient plasma samples were pooled to make three Cr levels (~ 50, 100, and 250 µM). KBs (acetone, acetoacetate, and ß-hydroxybutyrate) were used to spike the pooled samples. All samples were measured for Cr by two enzymatic methods (E1 and E2), two Jaffe methods (J1 and J2), and LC-MS/MS. LC-MS/MS was considered the gold standard, and the % difference in Cr concentration was calculated for each method. RESULTS: E1 and E2 were unaffected by the presence of all three KBs. J1 and J2 were unaffected by the presence of ß-hydroxybutyrate. The presence of acetone resulted in dose-dependent positive interference in both Jaffe methods, whereas the presence of acetoacetate resulted in dose-dependent positive and negative interference in J1 and J2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the enzymatic methods, the Jaffe methods were much more susceptible to interference by acetone and acetoacetate, especially at lower Cr values which are commonly seen in pediatrics. Interpretation of changes in Cr concentration between different hospitals when transferring patients can become ambiguous and true kidney function unclear if different methods are used without awareness of method-specific biases. To improve DKA patient care, we recommend standardizing all of the Cr methods to an enzymatic method. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

A Reflex Protocol for Creatinine Testing Reduces Costs and Maintains Patient Safety.

BACKGROUND: The Jaffe and enzymatic methods are the 2 most common methods for creatinine measurement. The Jaffe method is less expensive but subject to interferences. Some laboratory scientists have called for the Jaffe method to be retired. OBJECTIVE: To determine the most cost-effective and safe protocol for creatinine measurement. METHOD: We performed a retrospective database review of all outpatient creatinine measurements for 1 year, testing the risk-based reflex testing protocol we had implemented for creatinine measurement. Samples were first measured using the Jaffe method and were reflexed to the enzymatic method if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was between 55 and 65 mL per min per 1.73 m2. RESULTS: There were 104,530 creatinine measurements, of which 11,420 (10.9%) were reflexed to the enzymatic method. The Jaffe method had a positive bias of 0.08 mg per dL (-6.14 mL/min/1.73 m2 eGFR). A total of 3.4% of the paired reflexed specimens were discordant. Also, 133 (1.2%) of the Jaffe results were classified as false negatives and 3411 (29.9%) were classified as false positives. None of the false-negative results and 5 of the false-positive results were considered clinically significant. Using the reflex protocol saved approximately $40,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: The reflex protocol for creatinine measurement can reduce costs with acceptable risk.

Detection of ingested nitromethane and reliable creatinine assessment using multiple common analytical methods.

AIM: Nitromethane, found in fuels used for short distance racing, model cars, and model airplanes, produces a falsely elevated serum creatinine with standard creatinine analysis via the Jaffé method. Erroneous creatinine elevation often triggers extensive testing, leads to inaccurate diagnoses, and delayed or inappropriate medical interventions. Multiple reports in the literature identify "enzymatic assays" as an alternative method to detect the true value of creatinine, but this ambiguity does not help providers translate what type of enzymatic assay testing can be done in real time to determine if there is indeed false elevation. METHODS: We report seven cases of ingested nitromethane where creatinine was determined via Beckman Coulter® analyser using the Jaffé method, Vitros® analyser, or i-Stat® point-of-care testing. Nitromethane was detected and semi-quantified using a common clinical toxic alcohol analysis method, and quantified by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: When creatinine was determined using i-Stat® point-of-care testing or a Vitros® analyser, levels were within the normal range. Comparatively, all initial creatinine levels obtained via the Jaffé method were elevated. Nitromethane concentrations ranged from 42 to 310 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These cases demonstrate reliable assessment of creatinine through other enzymatic methods using a Vitros® analyser or i-STAT®. Additionally, nitromethane is detectable and quantifiable using routine alcohols gas chromatography analysis and by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Impact of creatinine methodology on glomerular filtration rate estimation in diabetes.

AIM: To evaluate the influence of creatinine methodology on the performance of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-Epidemiology Collaboration Group-calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI-eGFR) for CKD diagnosis/staging in a large cohort of diabetic patients. METHODS: Fasting blood samples were taken from diabetic patients attending our clinic for their regular annual examination, including laboratory measurement of serum creatinine and eGFR. RESULTS: Our results indicated an overall excellent agreement in CKD staging (kappa = 0.918) between the Jaffé serum creatinine- and enzymatic serum creatinine-based CKD-EPI-eGFR, with 9% of discordant cases. As compared to the enzymatic creatinine, the majority of discordances (8%) were positive, i.e., associated with the more advanced CKD stage re-classification, whereas only 1% of cases were negatively discordant if Jaffé creatinine was used for eGFR calculation. A minor proportion of the discordant cases (3.5%) were re-classified into clinically relevant CKD stage indicating mildly to moderately decreased kidney function (< 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2). Significant acute and chronic hyperglycaemia, assessed as plasma glucose and HbA1c levels far above the recommended glycaemic goals, was associated with positively discordant cases. Due to a very low frequency, positive discordance is not likely to present a great burden for the health-care providers, while intensified medical care may actually be beneficial for the small number of discordant patients. On the other hand, a very low proportion of negatively discordant cases (1%) at the 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR level indicate a negligible possibility to miss the CKD diagnosis, which could be the most prominent clinical problem affecting patient care, considering high risk of CKD for adverse patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study indicate that compensated Jaffé creatinine procedure, in spite of the glucose-dependent bias, is not inferior to enzymatic creatinine in CKD diagnosis/staging and therefore may provide a reliable and cost-effective tool for the renal function assessment in diabetic patients.

Falsely Elevated Plasma Creatinine Due to an Immunoglobulin M Paraprotein.

The most common method for measuring plasma creatinine is based on its reaction with picric acid. However, enzymatic methods are becoming more popular due to improved specificity. We present a case of falsely elevated plasma creatinine values obtained by an enzymatic method that turned out to be due to a monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraprotein. A 63-year-old woman evaluated for lung transplantation had falsely increased plasma creatinine levels (1.54-1.71mg/dL; corresponding to estimated glomerular filtration rates of 32-36 mL/min/1.73m2) as measured by the Roche Creatinine plus enzymatic assay when compared with the picric acid-based procedure and several other enzymatic methods, which gave plasma creatinine values of 0.7 to 0.8mg/dL. Serum protein electrophoresis revealed an IgM κ light chain paraprotein. Removal of high-molecular-weight (>30kDa) proteins by ultrafiltration reduced the patient's plasma creatinine level by the Roche enzymatic method to 0.7mg/dL. Addition of the patient's immunoglobulin fraction to plasma from other patients with normal plasma creatinine levels resulted in values that were increased by 0.58 to 0.62mg/dL. Furthermore, removal of non-IgM immunoglobulins with protein G-coupled beads did not eliminate the interference from the patient's plasma. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that falsely elevated plasma creatinine values by the Roche enzymatic method can be due to an IgM paraprotein.

In vitro interference by acetaminophen, aspirin, and metamizole in serum measurements of glucose, urea, and creatinine.

OBJECTIVE: Here we aimed to investigate the in vitro effects of three analgesic-antipyretic drugs frequently used in clinical practice in Mexico - acetaminophen (AAP), aspirin (ASA) and metamizole (MMZ) - on serum measurements of glucose, urea, and creatinine. DESIGN AND METHODS: Each analyte was measured in a base-serum pool spiked with the drugs at subtherapeutic, therapeutic, and toxic doses. Serum glucose and urea were measured using the hexokinase/G-6PDH and urease/GLDH kinetic assays, respectively. Serum creatinine (SCr) was measured with a Jaffe procedure based on the alkaline-picrate reaction and with an enzymatic dry-chemistry system. Measurements were carried out in IL-Monarch and Vitros DT60-II analyzers, respectively. Data were analyzed by the difference-paired interference test and by ANOVA. RESULTS: By the kinetic Jaffe/Monarch procedure, we found positive interference by the drugs on the SCr measurements and by only ASA for urea measurement. For creatinine measurements, the total errors (TEs) were 22-51%, 18-105%, and 15-26% for AAP, ASA, and MMZ respectively, while for urea measurement the TE was 16-21% for ASA. A negative interference by MMZ on SCr (TE=-47%), but no-interference for AAP or ASA, were found via the enzymatic/DT60-II system. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro positive interference induced by AAP, ASA, and MMZ (via the alkaline-picrate reaction), or negative interference by MMZ (via a dry-chemistry system), on the SCr measurements highlights the importance of investigating all possible sources of variation that may alter the accuracy of the laboratory tests, in order to provide useful results for making medical decisions for optimal patient care.

Comparison between ADVIA Chemistry systems Enzymatic Creatinine_2 method and ADVIA Chemistry systems Creatinine method (kinetic Jaffe method) for determining creatinine.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was two-fold: Firstly, to compare the serum creatinine concentration measured by enzymatic method and uncompensated kinetic Jaffe method, and secondly, to compare the effects of certain interfering substances such as glucose, bilirubin, proteins, triglycerides and hemoglobin on creatinine measurement. METHODS: The determination of serum creatinine concentrations by enzymatic method and uncompensated kinetic Jaffe method was performed on ADVIA® 2400 analyzer. The interfering substances were tested by adding solutions of interference to serum pool with low (62 µmol/L), medium (221 µmol/L) and elevated (486 µmol/L) creatinine concentration. RESULTS: In the method comparison study, despite the fact that the correlation between both methods for determining serum creatinine is very good (r = 0.998, p < 0.001), the regression analysis revealed that the results are not transferable, as indicated by the slope and intercept, which are significantly different from 1 and 0, respectively. A positive bias of + 14.1% in the determination of serum creatinine by uncompensated kinetic Jaffe method was found, and when the creatinine value is lower than ∼ 180 µmol/L this difference or bis progressively increases. We found a significant positive interference due to proteins and glucose and a significant negative interference due to bilirubin by kinetic Jaffe method, and no interferences by enzymatic method were found. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the enzymatic method is the best choice for determining serum creatinine with the ADVIA® 2400 analyzer.

Multicommutated flow analysis system for determination of creatinine in physiological fluids by Jaffe method.

For the needs of photometric determination of creatinine according to Jaffe protocol a dedicated paired emitter detector diode (PEDD) detector has been developed. This PEDD device has been constructed in the compact form of flow-through cell (30 µL total volume and 7 mm optical pathlength) integrated with 505 nm LED-based emitter and 525 nm LED-based detector compatible with multicommutated flow analysis (MCFA) system. This fully mechanized MCFA system configured of microsolenoid valves and pumps is operating under microprocessor control. The developed analytical system offers determination of creatinine in the submillimolar range of concentrations with detection limit at ppm level. The throughput offered by the system operating according to multi-point fixed-time procedure for kinetic measurements is 15-40 samples per hour depending on the mode of measurements. The developed PEDD-based MCFA system has been successfully applied for the determination of creatinine in real samples of human urine as well as serum. The developed sampling unit used the system is free from effects caused by differences in sample viscosity.