Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury and Mortality Post Successful Cardiac Surgery in a Kashmiri Cohort: A Prospective Comparison of the RIFLE and KDIGO Criteria.

Background and objectives In critically ill patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) influences mortality and morbidity. Few studies have looked at mortality and the frequency of AKI following successful heart and thoracic operations. The current study investigates the association between AKI and mortality rates among patients undergoing post-cardiac surgery care within the Cardiology & Cardio Vascular Thoracic Surgery (CVTS) Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methodology In this prospective research, 124 patients who underwent successful cardiovascular and thoracic procedures between June 2022 and June 2023 were admitted to the CVTS ICU. To determine mortality, we contrasted the two scoring methods, Kidney Disease-Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE). Results Based on the KDIGO criteria, AKI was identified in 37.90% (n = 47) of the patients, and it was identified in 15.32% (n = 19) of the patients utilizing RIFLE. Notably, patients diagnosed with AKI using either the RIFLE criteria or KDIGO criteria exhibited considerably higher mortality rates (p< 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated the effectiveness of both scoring systems in identifying mortality (area under the ROC curve for RIFLE = 0.224 and KDIGO = 0.150). Conclusion Post-cardiac surgery, AKI escalates both mortality and morbidity rates. Despite KDIGO detecting more severe renal injury and mortality, both scoring systems exhibit comparable sensitivity and specificity in predicting death among patients undergoing various cardiovascular and thoracic procedures.

Proteinuria Assessment and Therapeutic Implementation in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients-A Clinical Audit on KDIGO ("Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes") Guidelines.

Background/Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health problem with a rising prevalence due to comorbidities like diabetes and hypertension. The aim of this research was to audit the assessment and therapeutic management of proteinuria in CKD patients at the Cantonal Hospital Baselland (KSBL) in Switzerland and determine associations between patient comorbidities, rehospitalisation, death, and the quality of therapeutic management. Methods: We analysed data from 427 adults with CKD (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2) hospitalised on the internal medicine ward in 2022. Results: The mean age was 85 years (range: 79-89), 45.9% were female, and the median eGFR was 32.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range: 25-40). Proteinuria assessment was performed in 120 (28.1%) patients (the ProtU group), and a corresponding treatment was prescribed in 59%. The ProtU group had a higher quota of patients with diabetes (44.1% vs. 33%, p = 0.048) and obesity (21.2% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.039) when compared to the group without proteinuria assessment (the Ustix group). Twelve-month survival was not significantly different between the groups (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.488-1.154; p-value = 0.191). However, survival was significantly better in patients who received an antiproteinuric treatment compared to those who did not (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.121-0.0761; p = 0.011). Conclusions: Improvements need to be made in managing CKD at the KSBL in accordance with the guidelines.

Healthcare Costs Across Diabetic Kidney Disease Stages: A Veterans Affairs Study.

Background: In the United States, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) affects about one-third of individuals with type 2 diabetes, causing significant economic burdens on the health care system and affecting patients' quality of life. Objective: The aim of the study was to quantify the burden of care in patients at different stages of DKD and to monitor shifts in healthcare costs throughout these stages. Methods: This study used data from the Veterans Affairs National database, focusing on US veterans diagnosed with DKD between January 2016 and March 2022. Aggregated all-cause health care costs per month were summarized using descriptive statistics. We used a generalized linear model to calculate the cost of DKD patent care based on the stages, dialysis phase, and kidney replacement therapy. Results: The cohort of 685,288 patients with DKD was predominantly male (96.51%), White (74.42%), and non-Hispanic (93.54%). The mean (SD) per-patient per-month costs were $1,597 ($3,178), $1,772 ($4,269), $2,857 ($13,072), $3,722 ($12,134), $5,505 ($14,639), and $6,999 ($16,901) for stages 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4 and 5 respectively. The average monthly expenditure for patients receiving long-term dialysis was $12,299. Costs peaked sharply during the first month of kidney replacement therapy at $38,359 but subsequently decreased to $6,636 after 1 year. Conclusions: The economic implications of DKD are profound, emphasizing the need for efficient early detection and disease management strategies. Preventing patients from progressing to advanced DKD stage will minimize the economic repercussions of DKD and will assist health care systems in optimizing resource allocation.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) places a substantial burden on health care systems in the United States. In part of our effort to close the knowledge gap around the disease burden, care cost analysis for the patients with DKD was performed for US veterans. Along with stage progression, overall care costs per-patient per-month drastically increases from $1,597 (stage 1) to $6,999 (stage 5). Monthly costs exceeded $10,000 once veterans started to receive long-term dialysis. The quantitative summary will help health care systems efficiently allocate resources across various disease sectors.

Standardizing Blood Pressure Measurement for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in the Outpatient Nephrology Office Setting: A Pilot Study.

Standardized blood pressure (BP) measurements for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are paramount in the management of hypertension. Evidence shows nursing staff adherence to best practice guidelines for BP measurement are suboptimal. A pre-/posttest pilot study implementing a six-week hybrid educational intervention for nursing staff was conducted in an outpatient nephrology office. The Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Beliefs Scale was administered to participants (n = 6) to assess individual beliefs about EBP and implementing EBP guidelines for BP measurement. One Likert-type question measured participant change in BP measurement. Improvement was noted in EBP beliefs and ability to implement EBP guidelines post-intervention. A favorable response was present for participant change in BP measurement per guidelines post-intervention. The intervention is a feasible method to improve staff adherence to EBP guidelines for BP measurement.

Practical Considerations and Implementation of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease: Who, When, and How? A Position Statement by Nephrologists.

INTRODUCTION: There remains an unmet need to reduce kidney and cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This report is therefore intended to provide real-world clinical guidance to primary care providers on sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor use in patients with CKD, focusing on practical considerations. Initially developed as glucose-lowering drugs, SGLT2 inhibitors preserve kidney function and reduce risks of cardiovascular events and mortality. Clinical benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, yet utilization in practice remains relatively low, likely due to the complexity of labeled indications (past and present) and misconceptions about SGLT2 inhibitors as a class. METHODS: A panel of 8 US-based nephrologists convened in August 2022 to develop consensus guidance for the primary care community surrounding risk assessment as well as initiation and implementation of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD. Here, we provide an adapted version of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) heatmap and a treatment-decision algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate SGLT2 inhibitors as co-first-line therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, where RAAS inhibitor dose titration need not be completed before initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor. In fact, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may facilitate up-titration or maintenance of optimal RAAS inhibitor dosing. We describe potential strategies to aid implementation of an SGLT2 inhibitor in clinical practice, including improving education and awareness among care providers and patients and dispelling misconceptions about the safety of SGLT2 inhibitors. In summary, we support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors with RAAS inhibitors as co-first-line therapy in most patients with CKD.

Cardiovascular, renal and mortality risk by the KDIGO heatmap in Japan.

Background: This study aimed to assess the prognosis of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Japan using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) heatmap. Methods: The prognoses of individuals with estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 were evaluated based on the KDIGO heatmap using an electronic medical record database in Japan. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and in-hospital death (referred to as MACE1). Additionally, ad hoc MACE2 (MI hospitalization, stroke hospitalization, HF hospitalization and in-hospital death) was examined. The secondary outcome was the renal outcome. Results: Of the 543 606 individuals included, the mean age was 61.6 ± 15.3 years, 50.1% were male and 40.9% lacked urine protein results. The risk of MACEs increased independently with both eGFR decline and increasing proteinuria from the early KDIGO stages: hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of MACE1 and MACE2, compared with G2A1 were 1.16 (1.12-1.20) and 1.17 (1.11-1.23), respectively, for G3aA1, and 1.17 (1.12-1.21) and 1.35 (1.28-1.43), respectively, for G2A2. This increased up to 2.83 (2.54-3.15) and 3.43 (3.00-3.93), respectively, for G5A3. Risks of renal outcomes also increased with CKD progression. Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the applicability of the KDIGO heatmap in assessing cardiovascular and renal risk in Japan. The risk increased from the early stages of CKD, indicating the importance of early diagnosis and intervention through appropriate testing.

Effects of intraoperative different fluid therapy protocols on postoperative renal functions.

PURPOSE: Planning intraoperative fluid therapy in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery is important. It was aimed to define the difference between fluid therapy protocols for renal function, bleeding and postoperative service follow-ups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational case-controlled prospective study. Sixty patients aged 18-65 years who had undergone pancreatic surgery between December 2023- February 2023 were included in the study. Liberal (Group 1; n = 30) and targeted fluid therapies (Group 2; n = 30) were administered to the patients. Liberal fluid therapy was planned with 8-10 ml/kg/h crystalloid infusion. The targeted fluid therapy (TFT) group (Group 2; n = 30) began with a 2 ml/kg/h crystalloid infusion at the baseline. Additional fluid boluses were given in 250 ml of colloid infused over 10 min if PVI was > 13% for at least five minutes. The patients were staged using the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. The amount of bleeding during surgery was recorded for both groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in postoperative renal function. A significant difference was observed in the amount of intraoperative bleeding. The amount of bleeding was greater in patients managed with liberal fluid therapy. No significant difference was observed between the groups in the oral intake (hour), drain withdrawal (hour) mobilization (hour) and discharge (day) times and there isn't any statistically significant differance between groups in cost effectivity (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Kidney function was preserved during individualized targeted fluid therapy using non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring parameters.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Single-Center Study.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery is a well-described phenomenon, usually associated with hemodynamic changes ultimately leading to ischemic injury to the kidneys. In this study, we assessed the occurrence of AKI in a cohort of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery at a single center. Methods: Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valve repair) between the years 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively included in the study. Results: During the study, 167 patients underwent CABG, valve replacement, or both procedures. The majority were male (85.0%). Post-operative AKI was observed in 27.5% of patients, with 2.4% requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)/dialysis. The majority of AKI cases were staged as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 1. Among patients needing CRRT/dialysis, 1.8% recovered renal function within 3 months, with 0.6% experiencing 30-day mortality. In univariate analysis, factors associated with AKI included older age (P = 0.003), severe anemia (P < 0.0001), pre-operative creatinine elevation (P < 0.0001), complex surgeries (P < 0.0001), blood product transfusion (P < 0.0001), longer cross-clamp (XC) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times (P < 0.0001), and inotropes usage (P < 0.0001). Classical risk factors like diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension did not show significant differences. The majority of these factors (severe anemia, age, pre-operative creatinine, post-operative inotrope usage, and cross-clamp times) were consistently significant (P < 0.05) in logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: Post-operative AKI following cardiac surgery is frequent, with significant associations seen especially with pre-operative anemia. Future investigations focusing on the specific causes of anemia linked to AKI development are essential, considering the high prevalence of hemoglobinopathy traits in our population.

Continuous Urine Output-Based Alert Identifies Cardiac Surgery-associated Acute Kidney Injury Earlier Than Serum Creatinine: A Prospective and Retrospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE(S): Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined and staged by reduced urine output (UO) and increased serum creatinine (SCr). UO is typically measured manually and documented in the electronic health record, making early and reliable detection of oliguria-based AKI and electronic data extraction challenging. The authors investigated the diagnostic performance of continuous UO, enabled by active drain line clearance-based alerts (Accuryn AKI Alert), compared with AKI stage 2 SCr criteria and their associations with length of stay, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and 30-day mortality. DESIGN: This study was a prospective and retrospective observational study. SETTING: Nine tertiary centers participated. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiac surgery patients were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 522 patients were analyzed. AKI stages 1, 2, and 3 were diagnosed in 32.18%, 30.46%, and 3.64% of patients based on UO, compared with 33.72%, 4.60%, and 3.26% of patients using SCr, respectively. Continuous UO-based alerts diagnosed stage ≥1 AKI 33.6 (IQR =15.43, 95.68) hours before stage ≥2 identified by SCr criteria. A SCr-based diagnosis of AKI stage ≥2 has been designated a Hospital Harm by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Using this criterion as a benchmark, AKI alerts had a discriminative power of 0.78. The AKI Alert for stage 1 was significantly associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and continuous renal replacement therapy, and stage ≥2 alerts were associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: AKI Alert, based on continuous UO and enabled by active drain line clearance, detected AKI stages 1 and 2 before SCr criteria. Early AKI detection allows for early kidney optimization, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Comparison of routine office blood pressure measurement versus standardized attended manually activated oscillometric office blood pressure measurement in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Context: Erroneous blood pressure measurement could lead to improper treatment and hence progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In routine clinical practice, there is poor adherence to the various steps to be followed during blood pressure measurement. Automated oscillometric BP measurement is difficult to perform in routine clinical practice due to several practical limitations. Aims: To evaluate the quality of blood pressure measurement and to compare routine office blood pressure measurement with standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with CKD attending the nephrology outpatient department (OPD) of a tertiary care referral center. Settings and Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted in patients aged more than 18 years with CKD stage 3-5ND, and previously diagnosed hypertension, in the nephrology OPD of a tertiary care referral center between July 2022 and September 2022. Methods and Material: The quality of blood pressure measurement was evaluated using a questionnaire. The study participants had their blood pressure checked by both methods-routine office blood pressure and standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure. Results: Standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure measurement yielded a significantly higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to routine office blood pressure measurement (Mean SBP: 139.53 ± 29.1 vs 132.57 ± 23.59; P < 0.001). However, the diastolic blood pressure did not differ significantly between the two methods of measurement. Conclusions: Standardized attended manually activated oscillometric BP measurement yields a higher systolic BP compared to routine office BP measurement. Further studies are required to compare the standardized attended oscillometric BP measurement used in this study with unattended automated oscillometric BP measurement and ambulatory BP measurement.

Chronic Kidney Disease Stage and Cardiovascular and Mortality Events Among Older Adults: The SPRINT Trial.

Rationale & Objective: The risk implications of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) chronic kidney disease classification in older adults are controversial. We evaluated the risk of adverse outcomes in this population across categories of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR). Study Design: Prospective cohort. Settings & Participants: In total, 2,509 participants aged ≥75 years in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Exposure: KDIGO eGFR and UACR categories. We combined KDIGO categories G1 and G2, G3b and G4, as well as A2 and A3. Outcomes: Primary SPRINT outcome (composite of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes), and all-cause death. Analytical Approach: Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Mean age was 79.8 years, and 37.4% were female. The mean eGFR was 64.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the median UACR was 13.1 mg/g. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, compared with participants with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR < 30 mg/g, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of the primary outcome among participants with eGFR 45-59 or 15-44 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR < 30 mg/g. However, those with eGFR 45-59 or 15-44 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR ≥ 30 mg/g had higher risk of the primary outcome (HR [95% CI], 1.97 [1.27-3.04] and 3.32 [2.23-4.93], respectively). The risk for all-cause death was higher for each category of abnormal eGFR and UACR, with the highest risk observed among those with eGFR 15-44 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR ≥ 30 mg/g (3.34 [2.05-5.44]). Limitations: Individuals with diabetes and urine protein >1 g/day were excluded from SPRINT. Conclusion: Among older adults SPRINT participants, low eGFR without albuminuria was associated with higher mortality but not with increased risk of cardiovascular events. Additional studies are needed to evaluate an adapted chronic kidney disease stage-based risk stratification for older adults.

Using data from participants in the SPRINT trial, we evaluated the association of chronic kidney disease stage with adverse clinical outcomes among adults older than 75 years without diabetes. We found that low level of kidney function determined by a low estimated glomerular filtration rate with moderately or severely increased urine albumin excretion was associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. However, low estimated glomerular filtration rate with normal or mildly increased urinary albumin excretion was not consistently associated with these adverse outcomes. This finding supports the need for additional studies to evaluate an age-adapted classification of chronic kidney disease to improve risk stratification among older adults.

Urine output is an early and strong predictor of acute kidney injury and associated mortality: a systematic literature review of 50 clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Although the present diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) involves measurement of acute increases in serum creatinine (SC) and reduced urine output (UO), measurement of UO is underutilized for diagnosis of AKI in clinical practice. The purpose of this investigation was to conduct a systematic literature review of published studies that evaluate both UO and SC in the detection of AKI to better understand incidence, healthcare resource use, and mortality in relation to these diagnostic measures and how these outcomes may vary by population subtype. METHODS: The systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Data were extracted from comparative studies focused on the diagnostic accuracy of UO and SC, relevant clinical outcomes, and resource usage. Quality and validity were assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) single technology appraisal quality checklist for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies. RESULTS: A total of 1729 publications were screened, with 50 studies eligible for inclusion. A majority of studies (76%) used the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria to classify AKI and focused on the comparison of UO alone versus SC alone, while few studies analyzed a diagnosis of AKI based on the presence of both UO and SC, or the presence of at least one of UO or SC indicators. Of the included studies, 33% analyzed patients treated for cardiovascular diseases and 30% analyzed patients treated in a general intensive care unit. The use of UO criteria was more often associated with increased incidence of AKI (36%), than was the application of SC criteria (21%), which was consistent across the subgroup analyses performed. Furthermore, the use of UO criteria was associated with an earlier diagnosis of AKI (2.4-46.0 h). Both diagnostic modalities accurately predicted risk of AKI-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that the inclusion of UO criteria provides substantial diagnostic and prognostic value to the detection of AKI.

Incidence of acute kidney injury and its associated risk factors in patients undergoing elective oesophagectomy surgeries at a tertiary care cancer institute - A pilot prospective observational study.

Background and Aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant postoperative complication. Multiple perioperative factors are implicated in the causation of AKI in the postoperative period in patients with oesophageal cancer. The study aimed to find out the incidence, causes and effects of AKI following oesophagectomy surgery. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in consecutive adult patients undergoing elective oesophagectomy at a tertiary cancer care hospital. Patients with preoperative chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl), AKI in the past and a history of renal replacement therapy were excluded. Serum creatinine values were measured on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, the day of discharge or day 15 and on the day of first follow-up or day 28, following oesophagectomy surgery. The incidence of AKI was measured using the 'Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome' (KDIGO) criteria. Results: The incidence of AKI was 14.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9%, 20.7%] (i.e., 27/183) in patients who underwent elective oesophagectomy. AKI was associated with prolonged hospital stay [median- 13 days (interquartile range {IQR} 11-21.5) versus 9 days (IQR 8-12), P < 0.001] and increased in-hospital mortality (14.8% versus 1.3%, P 0.004, odds ratio = 13.2, 95% CI 2.3, 77.3). After multivariate analysis, age, anastomotic leak and use of vasopressors in the postoperative period were independent predictors of AKI. Conclusion: The incidence of AKI was 14.7% after elective oesophagectomy. AKI was associated with prolonged hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Higher age, anastomotic leak and use of vasopressors in the postoperative period were independent predictors of AKI.

Consensus commentary and position of the Italian Society of Nephrology on KDIGO controversies conference on novel anemia therapies in chronic kidney disease.

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are new drugs developed for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This class of drugs stimulates endogenous erythropoietin production and, at the same time, improves iron absorption and mobilization of iron stores (less evident with daprodustat, vadadustat and enarodustat). Several studies have been published in the last few years showing that these agents are not inferior to standard therapy in correcting anemia associated with CKD. The efficacy of HIF-PHIs is coupled with a safety profile comparable to that of standard erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment. However, studies with HIF-PHIs were not long enough to definitively exclude the impact of new drugs on adverse events, such as cancer, death and possibly cardiovascular events, that usually occur after a long follow-up period. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recently reported the conclusions of the Controversies Conference on HIF-PHIs held in 2021. The goal of the present position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology is to better adapt the conclusions of the latest KDIGO Conference on HIF-PHIs to the Italian context by reviewing the efficacy and safety of HIF-PHIs as well as their use in subpopulations of interest as emerged from more recent publications not discussed during the KDIGO Conference.

Identification and outcomes of KDIGO-defined chronic kidney disease in 1.4 million U.S. Veterans with heart failure.

AIMS: According to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline, the definition of chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires the presence of abnormal kidney structure or function for >3 months with implications for health. CKD in patients with heart failure (HF) has not been defined using this definition, and less is known about the true health implications of CKD in these patients. The objective of the current study was to identify patients with HF who met KDIGO criteria for CKD and examine their outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 1 419 729 Veterans with HF not receiving kidney replacement therapy, 828 744 had data on ≥2 ambulatory serum creatinine >90 days apart. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 185 821) or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) >30 mg/g (n = 32 730) present twice >3 months apart. Normal kidney function (NKF) was defined as eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2, present for >3 months, without any uACR >30 mg/g (n = 365 963). Patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were categorized into four stages: 45-59 (n = 72 606), 30-44 (n = 74 812), 15-29 (n = 32 077), and <15 (n = 6326) ml/min/1.73 m2. Five-year all-cause mortality occurred in 40.4%, 57.8%, 65.6%, 73.3%, 69.7%, and 47.5% of patients with NKF, four eGFR stages, and uACR >30mg/g (albuminuria), respectively. Compared with NKF, hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for all-cause mortality associated with the four eGFR stages and albuminuria were 1.63 (1.62-1.65), 2.00 (1.98-2.02), 2.49 (2.45-2.52), 2.28 (2.21-2.35), and 1.22 (1.20-1.24), respectively. Respective age-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.13 (1.12-1.14), 1.36 (1.34-1.37), 1.87 (1.84-1.89), 2.24 (2.18-2.31) and 1.19 (1.17-1.21), and multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.11 (1.10-1.12), 1.24 (1.22-1.25), 1.46 (1.43-1.48), 1.42 (1.38-1.47), and 1.13 (1.11-1.16). Similar patterns were observed for associations with hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Data needed to define CKD using KDIGO criteria were available in six out of ten patients, and CKD could be defined in seven out of ten patients with data. HF patients with KDIGO-defined CKD had higher risks for poor outcomes, most of which was not explained by abnormal kidney structure or function. Future studies need to examine whether CKD defined using a single eGFR is characteristically and prognostically different from CKD defined using KDIGO criteria.

Impact of a Short Educational Session on Early Diagnosis and Management of Acute Kidney Injury for Different Specialties.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This questionnaire study aimed to evaluate the impact of a short educational session on the early diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury (AKI) among doctors specializing in fields other than nephrology, assessed through pre- and post-test scores. This educational study included resident doctors from various specialties for assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled different specialty resident doctors' departments and assessed them through questionnaires and assessment scores. The pre-test questionnaires were first distributed and collected after 20 minutes. This was followed by a 30-minute short educational lecture on AKI by the nephrology faculty about its early diagnosis and management as per the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Immediately post continuing medical education, the same questionnaires were distributed along with feedback forms and collected after 10 minutes. RESULTS: A total of 110 residents participated in the study. All participants showed significant improvement in the post-lecture questionnaires compared to pre-lecture scores. For medicine and allied branch residents, the pre- and post-lecture scores were significantly higher than those of the surgical and allied branch residents. The lowest score was observed in residents of orthopedics. The improvement scores of all departments also showed significant differences. The highest improvement was seen in the department of gynecology, followed by residents of the critical care unit and the department of anesthesia. The residents of those departments with high pre- and post-test scores had lower improvement scores. CONCLUSION: The study found a significant knowledge gap in different sister specialties in diagnosing and managing AKI. Short educational sessions showed significant improvement in AKI understanding by addressing the knowledge gaps.

Acute kidney injury in acute liver failure: A narrative review.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication of acute liver failure (ALF) and it worsens the already worse prognoses of ALF. ALF is an uncommon disease, with varying etiologies and varying definitions in different parts of the world. There is limited literature on the impact of AKI on the outcome of ALF with or without transplantation. The multifaceted etiology of AKI in ALF encompasses factors such as hemodynamic instability, systemic inflammation, sepsis and direct nephrotoxicity. Indications of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for AKI in ALF patients extend beyond the conventional criteria for dialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may have a role in transplant-free survival or bridge to liver transplantation (LT). LT is a life-saving option for ALF, so despite somewhat lower survival rates of LT in ALF patients with AKI, LT is not usually deferred. In this review, we will discuss the guidelines' recommended definition and classification of AKI in ALF, the impact of AKI in ALF, the pathophysiology of AKI and the role of CRRT and LT in ALF patients with AKI.

Biomarkers of acute kidney injury: From discovery to the future of clinical practice.

Purpose of this review Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex syndrome whose development is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Recent studies show that this syndrome is a common complication in critically ill and surgical patients the trajectory of which may differ. As AKI can be induced by different triggers, it is complex and therefore challenging to manage patients with AKI. This review strives to provide a brief historical perspective on AKI, elucidate recent developments in diagnosing and managing AKI, and show the current usage of novel biomarkers in both clinical routine and research. In addition, we provide a perspective on potential future developments and their impact of AKI understanding and management. Recent findings/developments Recent studies show the merits of stress and damage biomarkers, highlighting limitations of the current KDIGO definition that only uses the functional biomarkers serum creatinine and urine output. The use of novel biomarkers led to the introduction of the concept of "subclinical AKI". This new classification may allow a more distinct management of affected or at risk patients. Ongoing studies, such as BigpAK-2 and PrevProgAKI, investigate the implementation of biomarker-guided interventions in clinical practice and may demonstrate an improvement in patients' outcome. Summary The ongoing scientific efforts surrounding AKI have deepened our understanding of the syndrome prompting an expansion of existing concepts. A future integration of stress and damage biomarkers in AKI management, may lead to an individualized therapy in this area.

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Across the Spectrum of Renal Impairment in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification integrates both estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine-albumin-creatinine ratio to stratify risk more comprehensively in patients with chronic kidney disease. There are limited data assessing whether this classification system is associated with prognosis and treatment response in heart failure populations. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan across the KDIGO risk categories in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) was a global randomized controlled trial evaluating sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients were classified according to low, moderate, and high/very high KDIGO risk. Treatment responses were assessed according to baseline KDIGO risk. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure hospitalization. A renal composite outcome was defined as sustained decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate by ≥40% or end-stage kidney disease. RESULTS: Among 1,910 (23% of total) participants with available data, 42%, 32%, and 26% were classified as low, moderate, and high/very high KDIGO risk, respectively. Patients in the highest KDIGO risk categories experienced the highest rates of the primary composite outcome (7.6 per 100 person-years [95% CI: 6.5-9.0 per 100 person-years], 9.4 per 100 person-years [95% CI: 7.9-11.2 per 100 person-years], and 14.9 per 100 person-years [95% CI: 12.7-17.6 per 100 person-years]; P < 0.001). Sacubitril/valsartan had a similar safety profile and demonstrated consistent effects on the risk of both the primary outcome (PInteraction = 0.31) and the renal composite outcome (PInteraction = 0.50) across the spectrum of KDIGO risk. CONCLUSIONS: One in 4 patients with HFrEF were classified as at least high KDIGO kidney risk; these individuals faced concordantly the highest risks of CV events. Sacubitril/valsartan exhibited consistent CV and kidney protective benefits as well as safety across the spectrum of baseline kidney risk. These data further support initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF across a broad range of kidney risk. (This Study Will Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF]; NCT01035255).