Immunogenic cell death signatures from on-treatment tumor specimens predict immune checkpoint therapy response in metastatic melanoma.

Melanoma is a highly malignant form of skin cancer that typically originates from abnormal melanocytes. Despite significant advances in treating metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, a substantial number of patients do not respond to this treatment and face risks of recurrence and metastasis. This study collected data from multiple datasets, including cohorts from Riaz et al., Gide et al., MGH, and Abril-Rodriguez et al., focusing on on-treatment samples during ICB therapy. We used the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) method to calculate immunogenic cell death scores (ICDS) and employed an elastic network algorithm to construct a model predicting ICB efficacy. By analyzing 18 ICD gene signatures, we identified 9 key ICD gene signatures that effectively predict ICB treatment response for on-treatment metastatic melanoma specimens. Results showed that patients with high ICD scores had significantly higher response rates to ICB therapy compared to those with low ICD scores. ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC values for both the training and validation sets were around 0.8, indicating good predictive performance. Additionally, survival analysis revealed that patients with high ICD scores had longer progression-free survival (PFS). This study used an elastic network algorithm to identify 9 ICD gene signatures related to the immune response in metastatic melanoma. These gene features can not only predict the efficacy of ICB therapy but also provide references for clinical decision-making. The results indicate that ICD plays an important role in metastatic melanoma immunotherapy and that expressing ICD signatures can more accurately predict ICB treatment response and prognosis for on-treatment metastatic melanoma specimens, thus providing a basis for personalized treatment.

Comprehensive Literature Review on Melanoma of Unknown Primary Site Triggered by an Intriguing Case Report.

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer. While most melanomas have a discernible primary site, a small subset, approximately 3.2%, present as a metastatic disease without an identifiable primary origin, a condition known as melanoma of unknown primary (MUP). Unusual cases of primary melanoma have also been previously reported in the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts. MUP typically is found in lymph nodes, subcutaneous sites, and visceral organs, with hypotheses about its origin including spontaneous primary tumor regression and ectopic melanocytes. MUP presents unique challenges in diagnosis and treatment due to the absence of a detectable primary tumor. Understanding its genetic and molecular features, epidemiology, prognostic factors, and treatment options is crucial for optimizing patient care and outcomes in this subset of melanoma patients. We conducted an extensive literature review triggered by a case report of a patient with suspected MUP. A 51-year-old woman was transferred from another hospital where an incision was performed for a suspected superinfected hematoma of the left thigh. Since the patient showed high leukocytosis and redness and swelling of the thigh, local debridement, drainage, and excisional biopsy of the tumor mass were performed in our unit in the emergency setting, and the tumor was taken for histopathology evaluation. Intraoperatively, the mass appeared nonspecific. The permanent histopathology report established a diagnosis of melanoma, with tumor proliferation also involving lymphoid tissue, and despite broad clinical and imagistic assessments, the primary melanoma could not be identified. Clinicians must be aware of the varied clinical manifestations of malignant melanoma, especially in cases of occult melanoma where the primary site is not evident.

Strongly ROS-Correlated, Time-Dependent, and Selective Antiproliferative Effects of Synthesized Nano Vesicles on BRAF Mutant Melanoma Cells and Their Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Formulation.

Cutaneous metastatic melanoma (CMM) is the most aggressive form of skin cancer with a poor prognosis. Drug-induced secondary tumorigenesis and the emergency of drug resistance worsen an already worrying scenario, thus rendering urgent the development of new treatments not dealing with mutable cellular processes. Triphenyl phosphonium salts (TPPSs), in addiction to acting as cytoplasmic membrane disruptors, are reported to be mitochondria-targeting compounds, exerting anticancer effects mainly by damaging their membranes and causing depolarization, impairing mitochondria functions and their DNA, triggering oxidative stress (OS), and priming primarily apoptotic cell death. TPP-based bola amphiphiles are capable of self-forming nanoparticles (NPs) with enhanced biological properties, as commonly observed for nanomaterials. Already employed in several other biomedical applications, the per se selective potent antibacterial effects of a TPP bola amphiphile have only recently been demonstrated on 50 multidrug resistant (MDR) clinical superbugs, as well as its exceptional and selective anticancer properties on sensitive and MDR neuroblastoma cells. Here, aiming at finding new molecules possibly developable as new treatments for counteracting CMM, the effects of this TPP-based bola amphiphile (BPPB) have been investigated against two BRAF mutants CMM cell lines (MeOV and MeTRAV) with excellent results (even IC50 = 49 nM on MeOV after 72 h treatment). With these findings and considering the low cytotoxicity of BPPB against different mammalian non-tumoral cell lines and red blood cells (RBCs, selectivity indexes up to 299 on MeOV after 72 h treatment), the possible future development of BPPB as topical treatment for CMM lesions was presumed. With this aim, a biodegradable hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogel formulation (HA-BPPB-HG) was prepared without using any potentially toxic crosslinking agents simply by dispersing suitable amounts of the two ingredients in water and sonicating under gentle heating. HA-BPPB-HA was completely characterized, with promising outcomes such as high swelling capability, high porosity, and viscous elastic rheological behavior.

Immunotherapy and transarterial embolization in patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Aim: To investigate how the sequence of checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) and transarterial embolization (TAE) affects overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic melanoma.Materials & methods: This retrospective cohort study included 65 patients with metastatic melanoma who underwent both TAE and CPI between September 2011 and January 2022.Results: Significantly higher OS was seen in patients who received CPI before and after embolization (22 months, 95% CI 14-NR, p < 0.001) compared with only before embolization (4.5 months 95% CI, 14-NR). ≤3 hepatic metastasis (p < 0.01), more TAE procedures (p < 0.001) and CPI sequence (before and after embolization) (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of survival.Conclusion: Metastatic melanoma patients who underwent TAE have longer survival when CPI was sequenced both before and after embolization.

This study looked at how the order of two treatments, called checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) and transarterial embolization (TAE), affects how long people with metastatic melanoma live. Sixty-five patients who had both treatments between September 2011 and January 2022 took part in the study. Patients with fewer than three liver metastases, cancer in just one part of the liver, and who had more TAE treatments tended to live longer. Patients who got CPI both before and after TAE lived longer compared with those who only got CPI before TAE.

A Combined Proteomic and Transcriptomic Signature Is Predictive of Response to Anti-PD-1 Treatment: A Retrospective Study in Metastatic Melanoma Patients.

Resistance biomarkers are needed to identify patients with advanced melanoma obtaining a response to ICI treatment and developing resistance later. We searched a combination of molecular signatures of response to ICIs in patients with metastatic melanoma. In a retrospective study on patients with metastatic melanoma treated with an anti-PD-1 agent carried out at Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy. We integrated a whole proteome profiling of metastatic tissue with targeted transcriptomics. To assess the prognosis of patients according to groups of low and high risk, we used PFS and OS as outcomes. To identify the proteins and mRNAs gene signatures associated with the patient's response groups, the discriminant analysis for sparse data performed via partial least squares procedure was performed. Tissue samples from 22 patients were analyzed. A combined protein and gene signature associated with poorer response to ICI immunotherapy in terms of PFS and OS was identified. The PFS and OS Kaplan-Meier curves were significantly better for patients with high expression of the protein signature compared to patients with low expression of the protein signature and who were high-risk (Protein: HR = 0.023, 95% CI: 0.003-0.213; p < 0.0001. Gene: HR = 0.053, 95% CI: 0.011-0.260; p < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with low-risk gene signatures had better PFS (HR = 0 0.221, 95% CI: 0.071-0.68; p = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.186, 95% CI: 0.05-0.695; p = 0.005). The proteomic and transcriptomic combined analysis was significantly associated with the outcomes of the anti-PD-1 treatment with a better predictive value compared to a single signature. All the patients with low expression of protein and gene signatures had progression within 6 months of treatment (median PFS = 3 months, 95% CI: 2-3), with a significant difference vs. the low-risk group (median PFS = not reached; p < 0.0001), and significantly poorer survival (OS = 9 months, 95% CI: 5-9) compared to patients with high expression of protein and gene signatures (median OS = not reached; p < 0.0001). We propose a combined proteomic and transcriptomic signature, including genes involved in pro-tumorigenic pathways, thereby identifying patients with reduced probability of response to immunotherapy with ICIs for metastatic melanoma.

Is primary breast melanoma a true pathological entity? The argument against it.

Background: Previous studies have reported cases of primary melanoma of the breast parenchyma (PMBP), but the pathogenesis of this disease remains poorly understood. We review the presentation and outcomes of reported cases and provide detailed pathological analysis of four additional cases. Furthermore, we discuss potential theories regarding the pathogenesis of this clinical presentation. Results: We identified 29 published studies (n = 95 patients) and report four new cases (n = 99). Ninety-one (92 %) patients were female, with a median age of 50 years. Previous skin melanomas were reported by 56 % of patients, with the trunk being the most common location (32.7 %) followed by the upper extremities (20 %). The most common tumor location reported (n = 73) was the right (49 %) upper outer quadrant (56 %). The median time from skin melanoma diagnosis to the presence of a breast mass was 65 months (1-192). Nodal status at presentation was reported in n = 67 (68 %) patients. Of these, positive nodal metastases were seen in 40.3 %, while distant metastatic disease at presentation was reported in 30 % of patients. Surgery was performed in 66 %, being partial mastectomy (PM) the most common procedure in 82 %. Adjuvant therapy was described in 38 patients. The reported (n = 12) median survival was 11.5 (1-70) months. Conclusion: Melanomas identified in the breast parenchyma are likely the result of nodal or hematogenous spread from previously known or unknown melanomas, and should not be considered as PMBP. Management should be multidisciplinary, including surgical excision aimed at obtaining negative margins with lymphadenectomy of clinically positive nodes and neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy.

Symptomatic aseptic sinusitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic melanoma treatment.

Immune-mediated sinusitis is poorly described and may easily go undiagnosed. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, national study focusing on symptomatic immune-mediated sinusitis in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for melanoma treatment. Twelve patients were included (50% women, median age 58 years). Overall, the paraclinical assessment, the inefficacy of antibiotic/antihistaminic treatment, the improvement of symptoms on immunosuppressants and/or after ICI discontinuation, and the presence of multiple concomitant immune-related adverse-events, suggested a noninfectious etiology. Recognizing this toxicity is imperative for limitation of diagnostic wandering and appropriate treatment. However, additional epidemiological studies are needed to assess its prevalence as a potential immune-related adverse-event, and its prognostic value in patients treated with ICIs.

Immunotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that enhances the immune system's natural ability to target cancer cells. This immune response can sometimes become overstimulated or misdirected, causing side effects, known as immune-related adverse-events (IrAEs). IrAEs involving the nasal sinuses are rarely reported and often overlooked by medical oncologists. Herein, we report a series of twelve patients presenting a symptomatic sinusitis, occurring during immunotherapy for advanced melanoma. Our study shows that sinusitis, is an often-overlooked IrAE, that can become invalidating for patients, and even impair immunotherapy continuation. Therefore, recognizing this toxicity is crucial for appropriate patient care.

Real-World Cardiotoxicity in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Encorafenib and Binimetinib.

Modern therapies targeting the BRAF gene mutation in advanced melanoma have significantly improved patient outcomes but pose cardiovascular risks. This retrospective study in Eastern Denmark (2019-2022) assessed 108 melanoma patients treated with encorafenib and binimetinib. Patients were monitored for heart function using multigated acquisition (MUGA) scans. The study defined major cardiotoxicity as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by more than 10 percentage points to below 50%, and minor cardiotoxicity as a decrease in LVEF by more than 15 points but remaining above 50%. Results showed that 19 patients (18%) developed minor cardiotoxicity and were asymptomatic, while 7 (6%) experienced major cardiotoxicity, with two requiring intervention. Notably, no significant declines in LVEF were observed after six months of treatment. The study concluded that significant cardiotoxicity occurred in 6% of cases, mostly asymptomatic and reversible, and suggests that monitoring LVEF could potentially be reduced after 6-9 months if no early signs of cardiotoxicity are detected. This provides valuable insights into the cardiac safety of these treatments in real-world settings.

Prognostic Role of Clinicopathological Characteristics and Serum Markers in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors.

Prognostic studies can provide important information about disease biology and improve the use of biomarkers to optimize treatment decisions. METHODS: A total of 199 patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF + MEK inhibitors were included in our single-center retrospective study. We analyzed the risk of progression and death using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The predictive effect of prognostic factors on progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated in ROC analysis. RESULTS: We found that primary tumor localization, Clark level, pT category, baseline M stage and baseline serum S100B are independent and significant prognostic factors for PFS. The discriminative power of the combination of these factors was excellent for predicting 18 month PFS (AUC 0.822 [95% CI 0.727; 0.916], p < 0.001). Primary tumor localization on the extremities, Clark level V, baseline M1c stage or M1d stage, and elevated baseline serum S100B and LDH levels were independently and significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION: Baseline M stage and serum S100B appear to be independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS in melanoma patients treated with BRAF + MEK inhibitors. We newly identified significant and independent prognostic effects of primary tumor localization and Clark level on survival that warrant further investigation.

A Complete Response in a Metastatic Melanoma Patient After a Single Dose of Dual Checkpoint Inhibitors Blockade Could Be Predictable: A Case Report.

Cutaneous malignant melanoma is one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer and thus, a high mortality has been reported over decades. The prognosis for melanoma varies widely based on several factors, including the stage at which it is diagnosed, the location and thickness of the tumor, the patient's age and overall health, and specific genetic factors associated with melanoma. Therapeutic options include checkpoint inhibitors, regardless of V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B status (BRAF), and targeted therapy (anti-BRAF) in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but predicting which patients will benefit from these therapies remains challenging. Biomarkers like leukocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, platelets, and other peripheral blood biomarkers have been investigated for their potential to predict responses to ICIs. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) have emerged as potential biomarkers for predicting responses to ICIs. Elevated baseline levels of ctDNA and elevated sPD-L1 levels have been associated with worse prognosis in melanoma patients. High TMB is often associated with better responses to ICIs in melanoma. Here we present a case from our department, of a 57-year-old patient, diagnosed in 2019 with stage IV - pT4cNx cM1 (lymph nodes metastases) and suspicion of lung metastases, BRAF wild-type right hallux malignant melanoma. Due to impressive results, first-line treatment with ICIs nivolumab and ipilimumab was the preferred treatment of choice, which showed a favorable response, with regression of oncological disease after the first cycle, and achieving complete response afterward. Unfortunately, the treatment was discontinued due to severe hepatic and pancreatic toxicity, but the favorable response to immunotherapy has been maintained for four years and is ongoing. Identifying predictive biomarkers is important to achieve the best response for the patient, with minimal adverse events, especially if long-term clinical benefit can be reached.

Metastatic melanoma: an unexpected cause of acute liver failure.

Acute liver failure secondary to metastatic melanoma is exceedingly rare with the literature limited to case reports. The disease itself presents with vague symptoms making diagnosis difficult without a high clinical suspicion. Further to this, the prognosis of acute liver failure secondary to metastatic melanoma is dismal. We present the case of a 59-year-old male with a distant history of previously excised cutaneous melanoma who presented to our institution with abdominal pain and liver enzyme derangement suggestive of acute hepatitis. Due to progressive derangement in liver function and cross-sectional imaging suggestive of an infiltrative cause, a left axillary lymph node was biopsied which demonstrated metastatic melanoma. The patient subsequently deteriorated into acute liver failure and despite acute treatment of his underlying metastatic melanoma died 17 days post initial presentation. This case highlights an uncommon cause of acute liver failure as well as the poor prognosis associated with acute liver failure secondary to metastatic melanoma.

Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.

Primary Dermal Melanoma: A Rare Subtype of Melanoma and Clinical Mimicker of Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Primary dermal melanoma (PDM) is a rare variant of melanoma. We present the case of a 76-year-old female diagnosed with PDM following initial suspicion of basal cell carcinoma, prompting extensive workup to exclude metastasis. This case demonstrates the diagnostic challenges and need for rigorous evaluation in suspected PDM cases. Current literature lacks definitive diagnostic markers for PDM, and we highlight the ongoing need for research and collaborative efforts between dermatology and oncology.

Pleural Metastatic Melanoma With Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusions.

Pleural metastatic melanoma is rare, and associated malignant pleural effusions are even rarer. We present a case of pleural metastatic melanoma with recurrent malignant pleural effusions. The initial diagnosis showed no metastatic disease, and the patient underwent resection and received a year of immunotherapy for localized disease. However, two years later, the patient presented with pleural metastatic melanoma with unresolving malignant pleural effusions requiring an indwelling pleural catheter and eventually, thoracotomy with decortication. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for pleural metastatic melanoma in the setting of recurrent pleural effusions, even though it is a rare occurrence.

Combination Atezolizumab, Cobimetinib, and Vemurafenib as a Treatment Option in BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma: Patient Selection and Perspectives.

The treatment landscape for advanced and metastatic melanoma has drastically changed in recent years, with the advent of novel therapeutic options such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies offering remarkable efficacy and significantly improved patient outcomes compared to traditional approaches. Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor activating BRAF mutations, with over 90% resulting in BRAF V600E. Tumors treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy have a high rate of developing resistance within six months. Combination therapy with MEK inhibitors helped to mitigate this treatment resistance and led to improved outcomes. Due to the up-regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 receptors in tumors treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, further studies included a third combination agent, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. This triple combination therapy may have superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile when compared with single or double agent therapy regimens.

Effective treatment of advanced and metastatic melanoma can be challenging. Newer treatment methods for patients with BRAF-mutated tumors include a combination of drugs with different complementary mechanisms. These drugs include BRAF-inhibitors, MEK-inhibitors, and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. When these three medications are used in combination, patients may have better response rates and survival outcomes, when compared to using just one or two of these medications together. Toxicity rates are higher with a triple-medication regimen, so careful patient selection is important to consider.

The Role of Surgery for Stage IV Melanoma.

Historically, stage IV melanoma carried a dismal prognosis and surgical resection was the only potential treatment offering long-term survival or palliation of symptomatic disease. With modern systemic therapies that can provide durable disease control for many patients with metastatic disease, we are actively redefining the role of surgery in metastatic melanoma. Contemporary treatment strategies can employ surgical resection in the upfront setting followed by adjuvant therapy, or used in tailored approach following systemic therapy. The combination of surgical resection and modern therapies has been associated with good long-term survival.

Corrigendum: Ex vivo modulation of intact tumor fragments with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 influences the expansion and specificity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180997.].

Tartrolon D induces immunogenic cell death in melanoma.

Tartrolon D (TRL) is produced by Teredinibacter turnerae, a symbiotic cellulose-degrading bacteria in shipworm gills. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) induction contributes to a better and longer-lasting response to anticancer treatment. Tumor cells undergoing ICD trigger activation of the immune system, as a vaccine. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate ICD induction by TRL. MAIN METHODS: Cell viability was evaluated by SRB assay. Cell stress, cell death, ICD features and antigen-presenting molecules were evaluated by flow cytometry and immunoblot. KEY FINDINGS: TRL showed antiproliferative activity on 7 tumor cell lines (L929, HCT 116, B16-F10, WM293A, SK-MEL-28, PC-3M, and MCF-7) and a non-tumor cell (HEK293A), with an inhibition concentration mean (IC50) ranging from 0.03 µM to 13 µM. Metastatic melanomas, SK-MEL-28, B16-F10, and WM293A, were more sensitive cell lines, with IC50 ranging from 0.07 to 1.2 µM. TRL induced apoptosis along with autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress and release of typical damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) of ICD such calreticulin, ERp57, and HSP70 exposure, and HMGB1 release. Additionally, melanoma B16-F10 exposed to TRL increased expression of antigen-presenting molecules MHC II and CD1d and induced activation of splenocytes of C57BL/6 mice. SIGNIFICANCE: In spite of recent advances provided by target therapy and immunotherapy, advanced metastatic melanoma is incurable for more than half of patients. ICD inducers yield better and long-lasting responses to anticancer treatment. Our findings shed light on an anticancer candidate of marine origin that induces ICD in melanoma.

The Great Impostor: A challenging case of small-cell melanoma with isolated adrenal metastasis.

Small-cell melanoma masquerading as an adrenal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The index report illustrates the deceptive cytomorphologic features of a small cell type malignant melanoma metastatic to the adrenal gland. The diagnosis was confirmed by performing immunocytochemistry on the cell block sections. The key cytomorphologic mimics and their distinctive features have also been highlighted.